On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 06:22:05PM -0400, R Garth Wood wrote: > I'll just send this directly to debian-vote(there was no reply-to). > > The reason the distinction is not clear now is that ppl want > that feature(to be easy to install debs of any license). > If you try to change that they will just circumvent > whatever measure is in place and make it just as easy, > perhaps making the distinction less clear. > > I you want to make the distinction I think there is probably a better > way. Maybe nf-<pkg_name>*.deb or something.
Is this a recommendation to vote against the proposal, a proposed amendment to the proposal, or just a comment? For the record, I would prefer to see nonfree.debian.org. That way it's clear to people using FTP and http, also. When we have our own developers say Debian's got X number of packages in it (and they count non-free) the distiction blurred to much. A different machine (or atleast a different directory tree) should help restore the balance. -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * =========================================================================
pgphQiTflDLHp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
