-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First resolution `We disapprove of dunc-tank':
> -8<-
> BACKGROUND
>
> 1. Anthony Towns, the current Debian Project Leader, has suggested
> funding the Debian Release Managers' living expenses during t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First resolution `We disapprove of dunc-tank':
> -8<-
> BACKGROUND
>
> 1. Anthony Towns, the current Debian Project Leader, has suggested
> funding the Debian Release Managers' living expenses during
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Technically it's not a contradiction: DDs can vote to behave
> inappropriately. :-) Still, it's poor wording. I suggest the following
> amendment to Ian:
> Replace clause 2 of third resolution with:
> 2. The Project as a whole chooses not to expre
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Third resolution `We do not want to state an opinion':
>> -8<-
>> 1. The Developers note the existence and activities
>> of the dunc-tanc project.
>>
>> 2. We do not believe it appropriate for the Proj
Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Third resolution `We do not want to state an opinion':
>> -8<-
>> 1. The Developers note the existence and activities
>> of the dunc-tanc project.
>>
>> 2. We do not believe it appropriate for the Project as a whole to
>>
This one time, at band camp, Ian Jackson said:
>
> 6. The Project requests that the Release Managers should not accept
> any funding for their core Debian activities without the consent of
> the Project.
What makes you think that the livelihood of an individual developer is
any of you
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * The Project Leader reduces the minimum discussion period
>and the voting period to one week each;
*blink*
I didn't realise I could change the voting period. Interestingly, only the
ability to change the discussion period is lis
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * The Project Leader reduces the minimum discussion period
>and the voting period to one week each;
I strongly object.
I would like that we get a clarification over the non-free firmware for etch
vote, before you go lose yourself
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Third resolution `We do not want to state an opinion':
> -8<-
> 1. The Developers note the existence and activities
> of the dunc-tanc project.
>
> 2. We do not believe it appropriate for the Project as a whole to
> address dunc-tank in a G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hereby propose each of the three draft General Resolutions below.
(Each resolution text is between cut marks like these: -8<- ->8-).
I would like to request that:
* The Project Leader reduces the minimum discussion period
and the voting period t
10 matches
Mail list logo
