On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Third resolution `We do not want to state an opinion':
>  -8<-
>   1. The Developers note the existence and activities
>      of the dunc-tanc project.
> 
>   2. We do not believe it appropriate for the Project as a whole to
>      address dunc-tank in a General Resolution.
>  ->8-

 So, if this resolution wins the vote, it will contradict itself since
 we will have had a GR on Dunc yet we find it not appropriate to
 have one?

-- 
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to