Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Technically it's not a contradiction: DDs can vote to behave > inappropriately. :-) Still, it's poor wording. I suggest the following > amendment to Ian:
> Replace clause 2 of third resolution with: > 2. The Project as a whole chooses not to express any further opinion on > dunc-tank at this time. This constitutes neither approval nor > disapproval. That's not strong enough. I'm hoping that this isn't seconded at all, but if we have to vote on it, I'd prefer an option that explicitly rejects resolution by GR. Otherwise, I'd probably vote the entire thing below more discussion. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
