On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:38:02PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> > Well I got it, but I got it twice?!
> >
> > One from "Fri Mar 23 08:21:47 2001" and one from
> > "Fri Mar 23 08:27:30 2001".
> >
> > The text in the mail is ex
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:38:02PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> > Well I got it, but I got it twice?!
> >
> > One from "Fri Mar 23 08:21:47 2001" and one from
> > "Fri Mar 23 08:27:30 2001".
> >
> > The text in the mail is e
You also have multiple copies saved in the archive. Everyone will recieve
one of these emails for each ballot they sent in.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:38:02PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> > Well I got it, but I got it twice?!
The message appears to have been sent twice. It's certainly saved twice in
the email archive.
The message IDs, dates, and such are all identical but I think this would be
the relevent part of the header:
Received: by butterfly.home.parkautomat.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4023CD
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> Well I got it, but I got it twice?!
>
> One from "Fri Mar 23 08:21:47 2001" and one from
> "Fri Mar 23 08:27:30 2001".
>
> The text in the mail is exact the same.
I hope this is not a problem. I received four new identical "Vote
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:46:49AM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:20:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:58:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > I didn't receive a second confirmation;
> >
> > Me neither, and I have not re-voted.
>
You also have multiple copies saved in the archive. Everyone will recieve
one of these emails for each ballot they sent in.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:38:02PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> > Well I got it, but I got it twice?!
The message appears to have been sent twice. It's certainly saved twice in
the email archive.
The message IDs, dates, and such are all identical but I think this would be the
relevent part of the header:
Received: by butterfly.home.parkautomat.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4023C
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Alain Schroeder wrote:
> Well I got it, but I got it twice?!
>
> One from "Fri Mar 23 08:21:47 2001" and one from
> "Fri Mar 23 08:27:30 2001".
>
> The text in the mail is exact the same.
I hope this is not a problem. I received four new identical "Vot
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:46:49AM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:20:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:58:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > I didn't receive a second confirmation;
> >
> > Me neither, and I have not re-voted.
>
Ok, thanks :) I'm on my way to test...
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:11:25PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Darren O. Benham wrote:
>
>
> > Ko... as soon as I get Jason's response...
>
> I don't actually know with exim. You should test it in your home directory
> and see
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Ko... as soon as I get Jason's response...
I don't actually know with exim. You should test it in your home directory
and see what works. a-w might do it without bouncing.
Jason
Ko... as soon as I get Jason's response...
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:41:54PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> Sorry, I pulled a long night yesterday. My schedule will
> be a lot saner next week.
>
> Anyways, looks like you've already announced it. Just go ahead.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
Ok, thanks :) I'm on my way to test...
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:11:25PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Darren O. Benham wrote:
>
>
> > Ko... as soon as I get Jason's response...
>
> I don't actually know with exim. You should test it in your home directory
> and se
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Ko... as soon as I get Jason's response...
I don't actually know with exim. You should test it in your home directory
and see what works. a-w might do it without bouncing.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Ko... as soon as I get Jason's response...
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:41:54PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> Sorry, I pulled a long night yesterday. My schedule will
> be a lot saner next week.
>
> Anyways, looks like you've already announced it. Just go ahead.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
Sorry, I pulled a long night yesterday. My schedule will
be a lot saner next week.
Anyways, looks like you've already announced it. Just go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 09:10:54PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Ok, the reprocessor is ready. I made a few changes so that
Sorry, I pulled a long night yesterday. My schedule will
be a lot saner next week.
Anyways, looks like you've already announced it. Just go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 09:10:54PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Ok, the reprocessor is ready. I made a few changes so that
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:20:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:58:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I didn't receive a second confirmation;
>
> Me neither, and I have not re-voted.
what branden said
-john
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:20:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:58:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I didn't receive a second confirmation;
>
> Me neither, and I have not re-voted.
what branden said
-john
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:58:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I didn't receive a second confirmation;
Me neither, and I have not re-voted.
--
G. Branden Robinson | "I came, I saw, she conquered." The
Debian GNU/Linux| original Latin seems to have been
[EMA
Ok, the reprocessor is ready. I made a few changes so that "errors" won't
get resent.. just valid responses... Since you are running the vote, please
announce that the reprocessing of ballots is about to start. Since the
mailbox is still chmod me.. I'll have to do the actual running of the ballo
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the
> vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has voted will
> rec
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:58:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I didn't receive a second confirmation;
Me neither, and I have not re-voted.
--
G. Branden Robinson | "I came, I saw, she conquered." The
Debian GNU/Linux| original Latin seems to have been
[EM
Ok, the reprocessor is ready. I made a few changes so that "errors" won't
get resent.. just valid responses... Since you are running the vote, please
announce that the reprocessing of ballots is about to start. Since the
mailbox is still chmod me.. I'll have to do the actual running of the ball
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the
> vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has voted will
> re
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:26:37PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > CONSPIRACY!!
> > I demand a manual recount..
>
> Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
> funny bits. Like the bumper stickers: "One Person,
> One
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:26:37PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > CONSPIRACY!!
> > I demand a manual recount..
>
> Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
> funny bits. Like the bumper stickers: "One Person,
> On
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> CONSPIRACY!!
> I demand a manual recount..
Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
funny bits. Like the bumper stickers: "One Person,
One Vote (may not apply in some states)", and "Don't Blame
Me, I voted with the M
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> CONSPIRACY!!
> I demand a manual recount..
Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
funny bits. Like the bumper stickers: "One Person,
One Vote (may not apply in some states)", and "Don't Blame
Me, I voted with the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 01:34:53PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having
> > the
> > suspision ?)
(writing this last but...) The fact the the number of characters do no
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 01:34:53PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having the
> > suspision ?)
(writing this last but...) The fact the the number of characters do not
ma
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having the
> suspision ?)
>
> if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting
> for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discut
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having the
> suspision ?)
>
> if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting
> for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discu
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting
> > for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discution, or does it
> > correspond
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> CONSPIRACY!!
> I demand a manual recount..
I'm introducing an emergency resolution to block any recounts.
--
Mike Stone
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > Ok,
> >
> > I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> > The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through th
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the
> vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has voted
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting
> > for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discution, or does it
> > correspon
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> CONSPIRACY!!
> I demand a manual recount..
I'm introducing an emergency resolution to block any recounts.
--
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > Ok,
> >
> > I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> > The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through t
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the
> vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has vote
Ok,
I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the
vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has voted will
receive a SECOND confirmation in the next couple of days. If the seco
Oh man :( Those dashes were important!!
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:33:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 06:25:19PM -0600, Acting Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > Your ballot has been received and tallied.
> >
Ok,
I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the
vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has voted will
receive a SECOND confirmation in the next couple of days. If the sec
Oh man :( Those dashes were important!!
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:33:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 06:25:19PM -0600, Acting Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > Your ballot has been received and tallied.
> > --
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 06:25:19PM -0600, Acting Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> Your ballot has been received and tallied.
> --
> Name: Anthony Towns
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Id: ajt
> Ballot: 4213
(So much for anonymo
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 06:25:19PM -0600, Acting Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> Your ballot has been received and tallied.
> --
> Name: Anthony Towns
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Id: ajt
> Ballot: 4213
(So much for anonym
48 matches
Mail list logo
