On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: > > Ok, > > > > I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly. > > The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the > > vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has voted will > > receive a SECOND confirmation in the next couple of days. If the second > > confirmation is STILL wrong, please let us know. > > how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having the > suspision ?) > > if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting > for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discution, or does it > correspond to having voted for everyone except the first candidate. > > Or should it have been a ballot of -1234 or 1234- ? > > Anyway, i guess my ballot was also wrongly acounted, but i will wait for the > second confirmation now, ...
CONSPIRACY!! I demand a manual recount.. -- Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org LPSG "member" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
