On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:35 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In his non-platform, Sam wrote
>
> If I were running as DPL, figuring out how to do a better job of
> managing delegations, respecting both the current delegates and the
> needs of the project, would be my priority for
On 2020/03/18 19:33, Sean Whitton wrote:
> In his non-platform, Sam wrote
>
> If I were running as DPL, figuring out how to do a better job of
> managing delegations, respecting both the current delegates and the
> needs of the project, would be my priority for the next year. I
>
Hello,
In his non-platform, Sam wrote
If I were running as DPL, figuring out how to do a better job of
managing delegations, respecting both the current delegates and the
needs of the project, would be my priority for the next year. I
hope that the candidates who step forward tak
Hi all,
the question of the core infrastructures is difficult and very important.
Le Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Marc Haber a écrit :
>
> Do you see the diminishing care for our Core infrastructure as a
> problem? Do you have any idea how do sensibilize our new blood for the
> fact th
Le Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:03:00AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> I find that attitude problematic. When electing a DPL we get a package
> deal. Some of each candidates ideas are liked by some/many, others
> disliked by some/many. It would be a shame to throw out good ideas
> with bad ones.
Le Mo
> (And to answer to the comment ‘you do not need to be DPL for doing this’, that
> is true, but if I make a bad score at this election, I will conclude that
> there
> are not many persons interested in what I propose anyway, and will save
> everybody's
> time by not discussing them further in th
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> (And to answer to the comment ‘you do not need to be DPL for doing this’, that
> is true, but if I make a bad score at this election, I will conclude that
> there
> are not many persons interested in what I propose anyway, and will save
>
Le Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:51:31PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
>
> So is this "let" supposed to mean "allow" or to mean "force"?
Hi Bernd,
it means, the one who wants the package is responsible for it. If upstream and
the maintainer are not interested in supporting a package on an architec
Le Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:15:47PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>
> I don't understand what "cloud computing" has to do with your idea of
> using package priorities to release differently different sub-systems
> within Debian. I'm well aware that we are currently lagging behind in
> the rac
* Charles Plessy [100327 06:17]:
> I think that the ‘RPM hell’ that you used to comment my propositions is more
> related to a situation when independant distributions are using the same
> package format, than when a distribution offers multiple repositories that
> obey
> to a policy that keeps t
Le Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:13:11PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> Does popcon not already provide a way to order packages based on
> importance? rc-alert has both options for sorting bugs by both local &
> global popcon score.
Hi Paul,
Popcon is definitely a potent indicator, but has its flaws a
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 03:17:03PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> In my experience, trivial RC bugs on not-so important packages attract
> volunteers because it is very rewarding to close RC bugs.
> So in my opinion, not all RC bugs are equal, and a better priority
> system would be useful to help
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Regarding my proposal, that is internal to Debian, I do not think that it is
> impossible. What I propose is a way for package maintainers to signal that
> their package is peripheral in the Debian system, in an opt-in manner. Debian
> is r
Hello Bernhard and everybody,
I think that the ‘RPM hell’ that you used to comment my propositions is more
related to a situation when independant distributions are using the same
package format, than when a distribution offers multiple repositories that obey
to a policy that keeps the whole syste
* Charles Plessy (ple...@debian.org) [100317 01:52]:
> I propose that we reshape the sections and priorities of our archive, so that
> it is easy to remove from Testing any RC bug that is not in a core pakcage,
> and is old and not tagged RFH.
We already do that, provided the RC bug is old enough.
Le Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:09:19AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
>
> During the last debconf, the freeze of squeeze was first announced to
> take place in December, then this decision was cancelled, and now we are
> in March.
> - How do you analyze what happened during last summer? What went wro
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hmm, you got me thinking here on why this happened, as I share your
> impression. Maybe it was because the project as a whole put more care
> into the release process after the massive pain it was to release
> Sarge, a three-year-long pain we
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:01:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Nobody can do a sponsored upload, except a DD. Nobody can do an NMU,
> except a DD. Nobody can maintain a buildd host, except a DD.
It was pointed out to me on IRC that yes, there are sponsored NMUs, and
that it therefore is 'stran
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:56:56PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hmm, you got me thinking here on why this happened, as I share your
> impression. Maybe it was because the project as a whole put more care
> into the release process after the massive pain it was to release
> Sarge, a three-year-long p
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:56:58PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dijo [Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:45:33AM +0100]:
> > The numbers are easy. The amount of Debian Developers has been
> > approximately steady at about 1000 for the past ten years. Over that
> > same time, the amount of packa
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:56:56PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dijo [Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:57:13AM +0100]:
> > In my opinion, the best release we ever had (that I was a part of, at
> > least) was the Etch release process; shortly after Sarge had been
> > released, the release mana
* Charles Plessy [100317 01:52]:
> I propose that we reshape the sections and priorities of our archive, so that
> it is easy to remove from Testing any RC bug that is not in a core pakcage,
> and is old and not tagged RFH.
How is that different from the current procedure?
> In parallel, I propo
Stefano Zacchiroli dijo [Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:59:39PM +0100]:
> FWIW, the total number of DDs is not a particularly good indicator of
> the work force we have in Debian. Until recently, with the introduction
> of (periodic) WAT runs, the number of DDs was just meant to go up and
> up, given that
Wouter Verhelst dijo [Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:45:33AM +0100]:
> The numbers are easy. The amount of Debian Developers has been
> approximately steady at about 1000 for the past ten years. Over that
> same time, the amount of packages in our distribution has been steadily
> increasing. By definition
Wouter Verhelst dijo [Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:57:13AM +0100]:
> In my opinion, the best release we ever had (that I was a part of, at
> least) was the Etch release process; shortly after Sarge had been
> released, the release managers had started to regularly update the
> project as a whole on wher
Le Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:44:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> Releasing is regularly the hardest thing that Debian does, not just
> technically but also socially. Apart from the standard issues of setting
> deadlines, RC bug counts being high, and similar difficult technical
> issues, the
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:59:39PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:14:18PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > > the number of DDs has not been going up for quite a while now.
> > If it hasn't declined very much, that'd be a good thing already.
>
> FWIW, the total number o
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:14:18PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > the number of DDs has not been going up for quite a while now.
> If it hasn't declined very much, that'd be a good thing already.
FWIW, the total number of DDs is not a particularly good indicator of
the work force we have in Debian
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:35:51PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:45:33AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Given the above, I believe the most important task ahead of us is making
> > Debian more attractive for users and prospective contributors; that is
> > what I
On Tue, 16.03.2010 at 01:45:33 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> increasing. By definition, that means the ratio of Debian Developers per
> package has been doing down, and thus also that the core infrastructure
> has less contributors. Having more packages does not necessarily mean
> that only fri
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:45:33AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Given the above, I believe the most important task ahead of us is making
> Debian more attractive for users and prospective contributors; that is
> what I intend to work on.
How do you intend to work on this?
Greetings
Marc
Reading Wouter's post in this thread just now I realize I made a fairly
stupid mistake when writing my mail.
Frans Pop wrote:
> This seems to be what the RT has been focussing on after Sarge. [...]
s/Sarge/Etch/
> During the Sarge release these two sides were in balance. After that, for
> Sarge
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> This is for all candidates.
>
> In the last years I have seen a really disturbing development in
> Debian: New developers are very interested in bringing new packages
> into Debian, but care for our core infrastructure (dpkg, apt) has a
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:09:19AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 14/03/10 at 14:44 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > This is for all candidates.
> >
> > Releasing is regularly the hardest thing that Debian does, not just
> > technically but also socially. Apart from the standard issues of settin
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:44:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This is for all candidates.
>
> Releasing is regularly the hardest thing that Debian does, not just
> technically but also socially. Apart from the standard issues of setting
> deadlines, RC bug counts being high, and similar difficu
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:04:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Marc Haber (15/03/2010):
> > Maybe we failed to provide such a "two-liner", which in fact is,
> > unfortunately, much more complicated than one might think naively.
> > Additionally, example code for policy-rc.d is (almost?) nonexi
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:04:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Marc Haber (15/03/2010):
> > Maybe we failed to provide such a "two-liner", which in fact is,
> > unfortunately, much more complicated than one might think naively.
> > Additionally, example code for policy-rc.d is (almost?) nonexi
Marc Haber (15/03/2010):
> Maybe we failed to provide such a "two-liner", which in fact is,
> unfortunately, much more complicated than one might think naively.
> Additionally, example code for policy-rc.d is (almost?) nonexistent.
Maybe running reportbug would be more efficient than talking abou
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:45:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote:
> > - The concept of "all services are immediately started after
> > configuration" and "deleting all stop/start links will cause the
> > package's defaults to be re-established on the next package update"
> >
[ Please: can people that follow-up with different questions change the
subject accordingly? I believe it would make easier to read the
question archive afterwords. ]
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:09:19AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During the last debconf, the freeze of squeeze was first anno
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:44:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Releasing is regularly the hardest thing that Debian does, not just
> technically but also socially.
To some extent, I believe it is normal. Releases are our main
"products", they define our purpose. The people which are putting their
Marc Haber wrote:
> - dpkg still uses normal console prompting for dpkg-conffile
> handling, while debconf has been mandatory for regular packages for
> years now.
Dpkg has more active development now than it has for much of the
past fifteen years. And they've even talked some about impl
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Do you see the diminishing care for our Core infrastructure as a
> problem? Do you have any idea how do sensibilize our new blood for the
> fact that "new packages" doesn't help Debian if our Core stuff is
> diminishing? I know that this
Hi Frans,
Let me first start by stating that I'm sadly concerned about the tone
of your mail.
Nobody claims that the release process has been done perfectly, there
have been mistakes, but we are all human and we can all make mistakes.
It's alright to point those mistakes out so that people can c
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I think that most of the frustration comes from the fact that the
> release team is lacking manpower. The job of the release team is very
> stressful and very rarely do the RM and RA feel that their work is
> appreciated.
I disagree. I think the main problem is that t
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marc Haber wrote:
> Do you see the diminishing care for our Core infrastructure as a
> problem? Do you have any idea how do sensibilize our new blood for the
> fact that "new packages" doesn't help Debian if our Core stuff is
> diminishing? I know that this is not
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> During the last debconf, the freeze of squeeze was first announced to
> take place in December, then this decision was cancelled, and now we are
> in March.
> - How do you analyze what happened during last summer? What went wrong?
What wen
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Releasing is regularly the hardest thing that Debian does, not just
> technically but also socially. Apart from the standard issues of setting
> deadlines, RC bug counts being high, and similar difficult technical
> issues, the process seems
Le lundi 15 mars 2010 à 12:54 +0100, Marc Haber a écrit :
> Agreed. Any more additions by others?
Core packages: glibc, kernel, X.org, Mozilla, KDE, GNOME…
These are the packages everything else is built upon, yet people are
more interested in adding yet another implementation of existing
functio
Hi!
Marc Haber schrieb:
>> - Debian Installer development
>> - Porting: several ports are struggling
>> - Documentation maintenance:
>> - website
>> - Release Notes
>> - various other guides
> Agreed. Any more additions by others?
ftp-team and more or less everything PR related.
Best re
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:52:44PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> IMO it's worth adding to that:
> - Debian Installer development
> - Porting: several ports are struggling
> - Documentation maintenance:
> - website
> - Release Notes
> - various other guides
Agreed. Any more additions by othe
Marc Haber wrote:
> In the last years I have seen a really disturbing development in
> Debian: New developers are very interested in bringing new packages
> into Debian, but care for our core infrastructure (dpkg, apt) has a
> little bit diminished.
Good question and quite true.
IMO it's worth ad
This is for all candidates.
In the last years I have seen a really disturbing development in
Debian: New developers are very interested in bringing new packages
into Debian, but care for our core infrastructure (dpkg, apt) has a
little bit diminished. I am not saying that noone seems to care, but
On 14/03/10 at 14:44 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This is for all candidates.
>
> Releasing is regularly the hardest thing that Debian does, not just
> technically but also socially. Apart from the standard issues of setting
> deadlines, RC bug counts being high, and similar difficult technical
>
This is for all candidates.
Releasing is regularly the hardest thing that Debian does, not just
technically but also socially. Apart from the standard issues of setting
deadlines, RC bug counts being high, and similar difficult technical
issues, the process seems to eat volunteers. There's usual
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:47:49PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>Le Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:04:59PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>>
>> I can also see that you have your own menu/desktop topic there too
>> that I expect you'll want to raise. What are your plans for that?
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.d
Le Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:04:59PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>
> I can also see that you have your own menu/desktop topic there too
> that I expect you'll want to raise. What are your plans for that?
>
> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DiscussionsAfterLenny
Hi Steve,
First I plan to produce a
Hi Charles,
Apologies for the delay in responding: I've been ill (as *always*
seems to happen around the DPL election period) and then had a funeral
to attend today. I hope next week is better...!
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:13:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>Our Consitution suggests a strong
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear Steve, Luk and Stefano,
Hi Charles
> thank you very much for the time and efforts you are proposing to dedicate to
> the Project !
>
> Our Consitution suggests a stronger leadership of the DPL the discussions:
>
> 9. Lead discussions amongst Developers.
>
> Th
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:13:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> thank you very much for the time and efforts you are proposing to
> dedicate to the Project !
Hi Charles, thanks for your question.
> Our Consitution suggests a stronger leadership of the DPL the
> discussions:
> Given how heated
Dear Steve, Luk and Stefano,
thank you very much for the time and efforts you are proposing to dedicate to
the Project !
Our Consitution suggests a stronger leadership of the DPL the discussions:
9. Lead discussions amongst Developers.
The Project Leader should attempt to participate in d
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
> infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
> As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
> july.
> (http://people.debian.org/~igloo/popcon-graphs/index.
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:21:23PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
>>> If you were elected DPL for the next term, what would you do about this
>>> GR and when? How would you ensure that the declassification ca
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> (And since this thread is supposed to be questions for the DPL
> candidates, I will add one: some time ago, a DD was sending emails on
> -devel whenever the discussion was offtopic, to ask for it to be
> transferred or stopped: what do you think of this
Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:07:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:50:27AM +0900, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Charles Plessy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > (building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed).
> >
> > Un
On 13/03/2008, Paul Wise wrote:
> Untrue, you just need to get your package whitelisted since non-free
> packages may not be legal to autobuild. You need to contact aba IIRC.
> Not sure why you don't know about this, nor where the best place to
> store this information is, perhaps the NM templates
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:21:23PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
>> If you were elected DPL for the next term, what would you do about this
>> GR and when? How would you ensure that the declassification can happen
>> in a timely manner and fulfil
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:20:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>Hi,
Hi Charles,
>Although I am not yet a DD, as it can happen anytime before or after the
>elections, I would like to ask a question to the candidates.
>
>Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
>that it
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed).
Untrue, you just need to get your package whitelisted since non-free
packages may not be legal to autobuild. You need to contact aba IIRC.
Not sure why you d
Hi Moritz, hi Marc.
I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
july.
(http://people.debian.org/~igloo/popcon-graphs/index.php?package
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> If you were elected DPL for the next term, what would you do about this
> GR and when? How would you ensure that the declassification can happen
> in a timely manner and fulfil all the requirements? What would your
> declassification team look lik
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
> that it should adapt to its new size, and if yes, how can you help this
> process as a DPL.
Debian has steadily grown in the past few years, at least in respect to
the number of pack
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Although I am not yet a DD, as it can happen anytime before or after the
> elections, I would like to ask a question to the candidates.
>
> Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
> that it should adapt to its new size, and if yes, how can you he
Dear candidates,
At the end of 2005, the Debian Project passed a General Resolution [0]
to declassify posts made to the debian-private mailing list. The GR
specified that posts that are at least three years old will be
considered for publishing. It also specified that the DPL will appoint a
team t
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:20:35AM +, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Can we imagine a more componentised Debian distribution, in which it
> would be the common responsability of the packagers and the service
> managers to opt in or opt out the use of each services by Debian
> packages (or preferably g
Hi,
Although I am not yet a DD, as it can happen anytime before or after the
elections, I would like to ask a question to the candidates.
Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
that it should adapt to its new size, and if yes, how can you help this
process as a DPL.
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, your arbitrary dislike of Google is well-enough known
> already; it has no place in this forum.
Apparently it's not well-enough known that it's not arbitrary, but
actually based on their irritating bugs and misbehaviour!
Also, maybe some d
MJ Ray wrote:
> Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about
>> SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there
>> outcome? Which projects where successful and which failed?
I also mentored a I18N related proj
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> but after that, I didn't find another search result until he mentioned
> the 2007 marketing campaign. Is this the sort of "fire and forget"
> reporting that we would expect if Steve McIntyre were elected DPL?
>
> How would other candidates avoid dropping top
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>
>that sounds to me like you wanted to continue with "but you cant
>do that???as they are all volunteers and you cant push them" or so.
>could you elaborate? were you in the position to push people to
>do something in debian, and ho
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:22:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> "The Google Summer of Code[0] is over, and final reports have been
> submitted. Most of our students worked well right up to (and in some
> cases beyond) the end of the summer, and hopefully we'll see some
> useful results from their p
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070316 14:35]:
> > > How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this?
> >
> > The only way you can do that is by actively asking people to produce a
> > report when they said they'
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070316 14:35]:
> > > How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this?
> >
> > The only way you can do that is by actively asking people to produce a
> > report when they said they'd do so.
>
> that so
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:22:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > [...] Is this the sort of "fire and forget"
> > reporting that we would expect if Steve McIntyre were elected DPL?
> [...]
> If writing the full report wasn't Steve's responsability, then it's n
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070316 14:35]:
> > How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this?
>
> The only way you can do that is by actively asking people to produce a
> report when they said they'd do so.
that sounds to me like you wanted to continue with "but you cant
d
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:22:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about
> > SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there
> > outcome? Which projects where successful and which
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> So, just to be sure I've understood your reply: if you-as-DPL (or one of
> your delegates) tells us that we can expect something, that would't mean
> anything if the task depends on someone else? You'd feel that you need
> not check whether we get it, or give a
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> > How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this? [cc'd to
> > -vote for these questions, please drop -project or -vote on replies]
>
> This is not really up to the DPL. That would be useless micro-management.
[
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
>> How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this? [cc'd to
>> -vote for these questions, please drop -project or -vote on replies]
>
> This is not really up to the DPL. That would be useless micro-management.
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this? [cc'd to
> -vote for these questions, please drop -project or -vote on replies]
This is not really up to the DPL. That would be useless micro-management.
Last year was our first participation and it ha
* MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2007-03-16 9:22 +]:
> Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about
> > SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there
> > outcome? Which projects where successful and w
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about
> SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there
> outcome? Which projects where successful and which failed?
Excellent questions!
Steve McIntyre wrote in "Bits fr
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> How important are unofficial archives[1] for you? What whould you do to
> support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
> integrate them into official Debian structure?
As a general rule, I find unofficial archives importa
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:50:22PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this question is for all candidates:
>
> How important are unofficial archives[1] for you?
They are important, as they allow people to do stuff with their Debian
installation that isn't necessarily possible with Debian
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:50:22PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>Hi,
hi Martin,
>this question is for all candidates:
>
>How important are unofficial archives[1] for you? What whould you do to
>support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
>integrate them into official D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> How important are unofficial archives for you? What whould you do to
> support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
> integrate them into official Debian structure?
If we would follow along the line of my distribution trunk pr
Hi,
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> How important are unofficial archives[1] for you? What whould you do to
> support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
> integrate them into official Debian structure?
All unofficial archives serve a purpose, but they are
Hi,
this question is for all candidates:
How important are unofficial archives[1] for you? What whould you do to
support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
integrate them into official Debian structure?
Martin
[1] http://www.debian-unofficial.org/
http://www.backpo
[redirecting to -devel where this belongs]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:11:59PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > --
> > > Question to the release and archive people: Is there such a
> > > requirement? Will such architectures inde
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> There is no way at the moment to see any progress of the issues in public.
> Now my question:
> 1.) Do you think it would be a good idea to handle debian-admin more
> openly?
> 2.) Would you encourage debian-admin to do so?
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
