Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:07:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:50:27AM +0900, Paul Wise a écrit : > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Charles Plessy > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > (building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed). > > > > Untrue, you just need to get your package whitelisted since non-free > > packages may not be legal to autobuild. You need to contact aba IIRC. > > Not sure why you don't know about this, nor where the best place to > > store this information is, perhaps the NM templates should cover it.
Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 07:13:47AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > FTR, d-d-a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Hi all, this d-d-a message, as well as the fact that buildd.net lists different names for the non-free buildds, and the fact that buildd.d.o does not display the name of the buildds nor the logs for the autobuilt non-free packages, strongly suggest that "building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed" is not "Untrue". Friends, it is not the first time that threads start on such misunderstandings, and I think that we could dramatically raise the level of lists like as -devel by taking more time between reading an email and answering to it. (And since this thread is supposed to be questions for the DPL candidates, I will add one: some time ago, a DD was sending emails on -devel whenever the discussion was offtopic, to ask for it to be transferred or stopped: what do you think of this initiative ?). Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]