Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:07:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:50:27AM +0900, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Charles Plessy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > >  (building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed).
> > 
> > Untrue, you just need to get your package whitelisted since non-free
> > packages may not be legal to autobuild. You need to contact aba IIRC.
> > Not sure why you don't know about this, nor where the best place to
> > store this information is, perhaps the NM templates should cover it.
Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 07:13:47AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> 
> FTR, d-d-a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Hi all,

this d-d-a message, as well as the fact that buildd.net lists different
names for the non-free buildds, and the fact that buildd.d.o does not
display the name of the buildds nor the logs for the autobuilt non-free
packages, strongly suggest that "building non-free on official
autobuilders is not allowed" is not "Untrue".

Friends, it is not the first time that threads start on such
misunderstandings, and I think that we could dramatically raise the
level of lists like as -devel by taking more time between reading an
email and answering to it.

(And since this thread is supposed to be questions for the DPL
candidates, I will add one: some time ago, a DD was sending emails on
-devel whenever the discussion was offtopic, to ask for it to be
transferred or stopped: what do you think of this initiative ?).

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to