> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes:
Kurt> So I did an s/Init system diversity/multiple init
Kurt> systems/. The text in B and C doesn't match exactly, since B
Kurt> and C still have "Using its power under Constitution section
Kurt> 4.1 (5), ".
It is intentional that the text in
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 09:07:19AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I'm definitely fine with Kurt's revision to the title of Proposal A
> given the similar change to proposal E and Ian's comments.
>
>
> If I'm permitted to make the following change under A.1(6) (that is,
> permitted to make the fol
[2019-11-27 16:19] Ian Jackson
> I am not the proposer of any of the options that use the word
> "diversity". I have addressed this message to (amongst others)
> Dmitry, who is the proponent of the relevant Member-proposed option.
>
> I do not feel I can predict with confidence what Dmitry's vi
Ian Jackson dijo [Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:19:25PM +]:
> Chris Lamb writes ("Please drop/replace the use of the term "diversity""):
> Enrico writes:
> > Something like s/init diversity/support for multiple init systems/
>
> I support this proposal.
Thank
I'm definitely fine with Kurt's revision to the title of Proposal A
given the similar change to proposal E and Ian's comments.
If I'm permitted to make the following change under A.1(6) (that is,
permitted to make the following change without resetting the clock) I
propose to make the following
Micha Lenk writes ("Re: Please drop/replace the use of the term "diversity""):
> I support avoiding the term diversity in the context of this GR for
> the already mentioned good reasons. However, I would consider
> "alternative init systems" a better phrase
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: Please drop/replace the use of the term
"diversity""):
> I agree. I have been uncomfortable with this in the context of "init
> diversity" efforts, but I didn't raise it in the past because I couldn't
> articulate clea
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 07:15:17PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I've updated choice 1 and 5 like that.
thank you.
> Note that the text of choice 1, 2 and 3 still mention it:
> "our current position on Init systems, Init system diversity, and the use of
> systemd facilities."
how about replacing t
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:54:40PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:27:13AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
> > throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
> > it being subject to a plebi
Hi all,
I support avoiding the term diversity in the context of this GR for the already
mentioned good reasons. However, I would consider "alternative init systems" a
better phrase than "multiple init systems" in this context (if that matters
from a non-native speaker).
Regards,
Micha
Am 27.
Am Mi., 27. Nov. 2019 um 15:54 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie :
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 11:27:13 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
> > throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
> > it being subject to a plebiscite
Chris Lamb writes ("Please drop/replace the use of the term "diversity""):
> May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
> throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
> it being subject to a plebiscite?
On November 27, 2019 2:54:04 PM UTC, Simon McVittie wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 11:27:13 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
>> throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
>> it being subject to a plebiscite?
>
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 11:27:13 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
> throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
> it being subject to a plebiscite?
Thank you for raising this, Chris.
I agree. I have been uncomforta
la...@debian.org wrote:
>May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
>throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
>it being subject to a plebiscite?
I fully agree.
Also, it is not acceptable for a small minority to frame the whole
debate in the terms
> "Enrico" == Enrico Zini writes:
Enrico> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:27:13AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
>> throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution
>> prior to it being subject to a plebiscite
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:54:40PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
> > throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
> > it being subject to a plebiscite?
> Thanks for raising this issue, and yes, please!
>
> Som
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:27:13AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
> throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
> it being subject to a plebiscite?
Thanks for raising this issue, and yes, please!
Something like
Dear -vote,
> […]
May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
it being subject to a plebiscite?
To be clear, I am neither quibbling with the dictionary definition nor
the applicability of this word in a tec
19 matches
Mail list logo
