On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:54:40PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:27:13AM +0000, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity" > > throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to > > it being subject to a plebiscite? > > Thanks for raising this issue, and yes, please! > > Something like s/init diversity/support for multiple init systems/ > seems to me to address the issue you raise, introduce more clarity, and > it sounds to me also somewhat more precise. For example: > > Choice 1: Support for multiple init systems is Important > Choice 2: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives > Choice 3: Focus on systemd for init system and other facilities > Choice 4: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress > Choice 5: Support for multiple init systems is Required
I've updated choice 1 and 5 like that. Note that the text of choice 1, 2 and 3 still mention it: "our current position on Init systems, Init system diversity, and the use of systemd facilities." Kurt
