On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 09:07:19AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > I'm definitely fine with Kurt's revision to the title of Proposal A > given the similar change to proposal E and Ian's comments. > > > If I'm permitted to make the following change under A.1(6) (that is, > permitted to make the following change without resetting the clock) I > propose to make the following small change in proposals A, B and C: > > old: > The project issues the following statement describing our current > position on Init systems, Init system diversity, and the use of > systemd facilities. > > new: > The project issues the following statement describing our current > position on Init systems, multiple init systems, and the use of > systemd facilities. > > I considered combining init systems and multiple init systems. I have > higher confidence that I'm not changing the meaning of the sentence > without combining the clauses though so I propose the smallest possible > change.
So I did an s/Init system diversity/multiple init systems/. The text in B and C doesn't match exactly, since B and C still have "Using its power under Constitution section 4.1 (5), ". I think this fall under A.1.6. Kurt
