We're now into the campaigning period. We have 2 candidates this year:
- Andreas Tille
- Sruthi Chandran
I will make the platforms available when I have received them at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2024/platforms/
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 09/03/24 01:54, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on
Hi,
Am Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 09:24:15PM +0100 schrieb Debian Project Secretary -
Kurt Roeckx:
> The new project leader term starts on 2024-04-21. The time line
> looks like:
>
> | Period | Start | End |
> |+-+---|
> |
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on 2024-04-21. The time line
looks like:
| Period | Start
We're now into the campaigning period. We have 1 candidate this
year:
- Jonathan Carter
The platform is available at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2023/platforms/
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Kurt
On 2023/03/03 21:39, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
| Period | Start | End |
|+-+---|
| Nomination | Saturday 2023-03-04 | Friday 2023-03-10 |
I gave it consideration, and will run again this
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on 2023-04-21. The time line
looks like:
| Period | Start
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:31:38PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project
Secretary wrote:
> We're now into the campaigning period. We have 3 candidates this
> year:
> - Felix Lechner
> - Jonathan Carter
> - Hideki Yamane
>
> I will make his platforms available when I have received them at:
> https:
We're now into the campaigning period. We have 3 candidates this
year:
- Felix Lechner
- Jonathan Carter
- Hideki Yamane
I will make his platforms available when I have received them at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/platforms/
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description
Hideki Yamane 於 2022/3/11 20:22 寫道:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 00:15:02 +0100
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> | Nomination | Saturday 2022-03-05 | Friday 2022-03-11 |
Life is short, I hereby do self-nomination :)
>
oshi. +1.
Yes. Life is short. Light it up.
Best Regards,
Paul
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 12:10 AM Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 00:15:02 +0100
> Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > | Nomination | Saturday 2022-03-05 | Friday 2022-03-11 |
>
> Life is short, I hereby do self-nomin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 00:15:02 +0100
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> | Nomination | Saturday 2022-03-05 | Friday 2022-03-11 |
Life is short, I hereby do self-nomination :)
- --
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 00:15:02 +0100
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> | Nomination | Saturday 2022-03-05 | Friday 2022-03-11 |
Life is short, I hereby do self-nomination :)
- --
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmi
Hi Kurt
On 2022/03/05 01:15, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Please make sure that nominations are sent to (or cc:'d to)
debian-vote, and are cryptographically signed.
I'll be standing for another term.
-Jonathan
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Mr. Secretary,
> interested developers can nominate themselves
Please accept herewith my nomination for project leader in the 2022-2023
term. My platform is available at that web address:
https://happy.debian.net/
The web page is signed. Thank you so much!
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on 2022-04-21. The time line
looks like:
| Period | Start
On March 13, 2021 10:33:32 AM GMT+05:30, Sruthi Chandran
wrote:
>
>
>On March 7, 2021 1:09:44 AM GMT+05:30, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
>Roeckx wrote:
>...
>>The new project leader term starts on 2021-04-21. The time line
>>looks like:
>>
>>| Period | Start | End
On March 7, 2021 1:09:44 AM GMT+05:30, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx
wrote:
...
>The new project leader term starts on 2021-04-21. The time line
>looks like:
>
>| Period | Start | End |
>|+---+-|
>| Nomina
Hi Kurt
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 20:39:44 +0100
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Please make sure that nominations are sent to (or cc:'d to)
> debian-vote, and are cryptographically signed.
I hereby self-nominate for the DPL 2021 term.
-Jonathan
pgpr5E_bf053T.pgp
Description: OpenPGP
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on 2021-04-21. The time line
looks like:
| Period | Start
On 16 Mar 2020, at 19:37, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>
>> We're now into the campaigning period. We have 5 candidates this
>> year:
>> - Jonathan Carter
>> - Sruthi Chandran
>> - Brian Gupta
>
> Dear Debian Project Secretary
>
> I seem to be having difficu
Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> We're now into the campaigning period. We have 5 candidates this
> year:
> - Jonathan Carter
> - Sruthi Chandran
> - Brian Gupta
Dear Debian Project Secretary
I seem to be having difficulty counting to 5.
I only get as far as 3 when counting the
We're now into the campaigning period. We have 5 candidates this
year:
- Jonathan Carter
- Sruthi Chandran
- Brian Gupta
I will make the platforms available when I have received them.
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on 2020-04-21. The time line
looks like:
| Period | Start
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 07:46:19AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Chris, thank you for your service! Two terms as DPL is a serious
> contribution
> and commitment to Debian, and I greatly appreciate it!
indeed. Chris, many thanks for all your DPL work in the last two years.
IMO you were truely am
We're now into the campaigning period. We have 5 candidates this
year:
- Joerg Jaspert
- Jonathan Carter
- Sam Hartman
- Martin Michlmayr
- Simon Richter
I will make his platforms available when I have received them.
Kurt Roeckx
Debian Project Secretary
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatur
On 3/14/19 12:43 PM, Jonathan Carter wrote:
>
> On 2019/03/14 13:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Soo, lets ensure we do not have another week:
>>
>> I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
>
> I have been considering that too, and have been planning to submit my
> self-nomination as late
Joerg Jaspert writes:
> I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
Jonathan Carter writes:
> I hereby nominate myself for the 2019 DPL election.
Whether our constitution requires a second or not, I'm grateful to people
putting themselves up for the DPL role.
So, I hereby second the
On 2019-03-14 00:05:16, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Disclaimer: I was the DPL between 2013 and 2015. My recollection of that
> time might not be entirely correct, and Debian might have changed quite
> a bit since then. I must admit that I haven't followed Debian closely
> enough to know some d
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:34:02PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
I ack that this is valid.
Kurt
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:43:04PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> I hereby nominate myself for the 2019 DPL election.
I ack that this is valid.
Kurt
Hi
On 3/14/19 8:43 AM, Jonathan Carter wrote:
>
> On 2019/03/14 13:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Soo, lets ensure we do not have another week:
>>
>> I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
>
> I hereby nominate myself for the 2019 DPL election.
Thanks you both!!
Regards!
--
Daniel
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:43:04PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2019/03/14 13:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
>
> I hereby nominate myself for the 2019 DPL election.
Mwahahaha, so we managed to guilt-trip you two into stepping forward, so the
On 14/03/19 at 16:00 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > So, thinking a bit more about that, and using
> > https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.en.html as a basis, a split
> > that could maybe work is:
> Can it work without a G
On 2019/03/14 13:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Soo, lets ensure we do not have another week:
>
> I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
I have been considering that too, and have been planning to submit my
self-nomination as late as possible to give me enough chance to chicken out.
I'
On 15337 March 1977, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Since there were no candidates during the nomination period, the
nomination period has been extended by 1 week.
Soo, lets ensure we do not have another week:
I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019.
--
bye, Joerg
signature.asc
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
>
> > - it's a position where you are often alone, and lack feedback
>
> This is true in the limit, but I, and a number of other former DPLs,
> have often made ourselves available to the acting DPL to act as a
> "sounding board".
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> So, thinking a bit more about that, and using
> https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.en.html as a basis, a split
> that could maybe work is:
Can it work without a GR?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 09:36 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The second one (which requires more work on the Debian side) is to do
> our own double-accounting, track all expenses, and track how they are
> taken into account by TOs.
As far as I have seen Debian expenses, the Debian treasurers are no
Hello,
Missatge de Martin Michlmayr del dia dj., 14 de març
2019 a les 5:26:
> * Lucas Nussbaum [2019-03-14 00:05]:
> > Also, from the DPL POV, it would be very useful to have an annual
> > report on Debian finances. I don't know if this exists nowadays.
> It doesn't. I wanted to do something
On 14/03/19 at 00:05 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> What could work is a group of people that are elected together, agree
> beforehand on how to share the various areas of responsibility, and
> synchronize very frequently to align their views. But it's probably hard
> to be efficient in the typical
On 14/03/19 at 00:01 -0700, Jose Miguel Parrella wrote:
> lucas wrote:
> > What could work is a group of people that are elected together, agree
> > beforehand on how to share the various areas of responsibility, and
> > synchronize very frequently to align their views. But it's probably hard
> > t
On 13/03/19 at 21:04 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> How much of the DPL's financial role can be delegated?
> I understand that for example absent instructions otherwise the DPL is
> our expendature approval point for SPI (and presumably the other trusted
> organizations).
>
> Would the governing proc
On 14/03/19 at 12:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:05 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Also, from the DPL POV, it would be very useful to have an annual
> > report on Debian finances. I don't know if this exists nowadays.
>
> Some of the TOs have annual reports, the SPI one in
lucas wrote:
> What could work is a group of people that are elected together, agree
> beforehand on how to share the various areas of responsibility, and
> synchronize very frequently to align their views. But it's probably hard
> to be efficient in the typical Debian setup, and to determine a spl
* Lucas Nussbaum [2019-03-14 00:05]:
> Also, from the DPL POV, it would be very useful to have an annual
> report on Debian finances. I don't know if this exists nowadays.
It doesn't. I wanted to do something like that a few years ago but it
wasn't possible because we couldn't get the needed dat
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:05 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Responsibility #4: "Debian Monthly News"
>
> Over time, the DPL somehow has grown the responsibility of distributing
> news that are sometimes very loosely related to the DPL role. That's
> probably a
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:05 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Also, from the DPL POV, it would be very useful to have an annual
> report on Debian finances. I don't know if this exists nowadays.
Some of the TOs have annual reports, the SPI one includes some details
of Debian & DebConf money at SPI, inc
Sam Hartman writes:
> How much of the DPL's financial role can be delegated?
Unclear.
> Would the governing procedures/bilaws/whatever of our trusted
> organizations permit a DPL to delegate some or all of this?
I think so.
However, I suspect this would not feel like a significant reduction i
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> - it's a position where you are often alone, and lack feedback
This is true in the limit, but I, and a number of other former DPLs,
have often made ourselves available to the acting DPL to act as a
"sounding board". In fact, I think I've personally provided advice and
g
How much of the DPL's financial role can be delegated?
I understand that for example absent instructions otherwise the DPL is
our expendature approval point for SPI (and presumably the other trusted
organizations).
Would the governing procedures/bilaws/whatever of our trusted
organizations permit
Hi,
Disclaimer: I was the DPL between 2013 and 2015. My recollection of that
time might not be entirely correct, and Debian might have changed quite
a bit since then. I must admit that I haven't followed Debian closely
enough to know some details!
(And I hope that other former DPLs will post thei
On 2019-03-13 15:13:33, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> (Dropping Chris from CC: as he is subscribed to -vote)
>
> On 2019-03-12 16:55, Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana wrote:
> >
> > Mehdi, would you like to run again?
> > I saw you run in 2017 and you have experience as DPL.
> >
>
> I am really not sure
(Dropping Chris from CC: as he is subscribed to -vote)
On 2019-03-12 16:55, Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana wrote:
Mehdi, would you like to run again?
I saw you run in 2017 and you have experience as DPL.
I am really not sure what people are expecting from the DPL. My past
experience showed m
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> Not to pile on, but i wonder whether Lamby's diligence, and his clear
> documentation of the workload (via Bits from the DPL at least) hasn't
> scared off some prospective candidates, who might now be realizing that
> they don't have the bandwidth to handle all of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2019/03/12 18:22, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> +1. Thank you so much for everything you've done for Debian over the past
>> two years!
>
> Not to pile on, but i wonder whether Lamby's diligence, and his clear
> documentation of the workload (v
On Tue 2019-03-12 08:45:46 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bdale Garbee writes:
>
>> Chris, thank you for your service! Two terms as DPL is a serious
>> contribution and commitment to Debian, and I greatly appreciate it!
>
> +1. Thank you so much for everything you've done for Debian over the past
Hi,
On 3/12/19 6:26 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Dear Developers,
>
> Whilst it would have been clear to any serious potential candidate
> already, for the sake of clarity I will not be looking to extend my
> term in this year's DPL elections.
Thank you. I believe it was import you clarify that.
Meh
Bdale Garbee writes:
> Chris, thank you for your service! Two terms as DPL is a serious
> contribution and commitment to Debian, and I greatly appreciate it!
+1. Thank you so much for everything you've done for Debian over the past
two years!
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <
Chris, thank you for your service! Two terms as DPL is a serious contribution
and commitment to Debian, and I greatly appreciate it!
Bdale
On March 12, 2019 3:26:26 AM MDT, Chris Lamb wrote:
>Dear Developers,
>
>> Since there were no candidates during the nomination period, the
>> nomination p
Dear Developers,
> Since there were no candidates during the nomination period, the
> nomination period has been extended by 1 week.
Whilst it would have been clear to any serious potential candidate
already, for the sake of clarity I will not be looking to extend my
term in this year's DPL elect
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:47:52AM +0100, Daniel wrote:
> On 10/03/2019 11:37, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:20:03AM +0100, Daniel wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2019 04:44, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >>> This is an obviously untrue signature.
> >> Why do you want to taint the election
On 15337 March 1977, Zlatan Todorić wrote:
So, funny, maybe we will live to our long history of community
fostering (which is the thing I most enjoy from Debian, besides that
we produce kickass OS) and be leaderless as we in all nature of
project actually are.
While the idea of going leaderles
/usr/bin/dpl \
--mode supervised-learning \
--training-input debian-de...@lists.debian.org \
--training-input debian-proj...@lists.debian.org \
--training-input debian-vote@lists.debian.org \
--authorized-peers /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg \
--authorized-peers /usr/share/keyr
Hi all,
On 10.03.19 18:48, Zlatan Todorić wrote:
maybe we will live to our long history of community fostering (which is
the thing I most enjoy from Debian, besides that we produce kickass OS)
and be leaderless as we in all nature of project actually are.
If this ("leaderless as we in all nat
(sorry for top posting)
So, funny, maybe we will live to our long history of community fostering (which
is the thing I most enjoy from Debian, besides that we produce kickass OS) and
be leaderless as we in all nature of project actually are.
Doesn't sound too bad to me,
Z
;)
On March 10, 201
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15337 March 1977, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> > In fairness, I'd recommend that the nominations period be extended for
> > some explicit time. I think that we want to have a known window for new
> > nominations rather than say startin
Hi,
Since there were no candidates during the nomination period, the
nomination period has been extended by 1 week.
The new time line looks like:
| Period | Start | End |
|+---+-|
| Nomination | Sunday 2019-03-03 | S
On 15337 March 1977, Sam Hartman wrote:
In fairness, I'd recommend that the nominations period be extended for
some explicit time. I think that we want to have a known window for new
nominations rather than say starting the campaigning as soon as someone
nominates themselves.
§5.2.4 to the re
We seem to have reached the end of the nominations period with no Debian
developers stepping forward to nominate themselves. As has been
discussed, the nomination in
is not
valid because the person nominating themselves is not a developer.
In fairness, I'd recommend that the nominations period b
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:20:03AM +0100, Daniel wrote:
>
>
>On 10/03/2019 04:44, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>>
>> This is an obviously untrue signature.
>
>Why do you want to taint the elections with more bullying, insulting and
>disrespectful comments?
He's telling the truth, nothing more.
Daniel
On 10/03/2019 04:44, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> This is an obviously untrue signature.
>
Why do you want to taint the elections with more bullying, insulting and
disrespectful comments?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:56:00AM +0100, Daniel wrote:
> On 03/03/2019 01:17, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Please make sure that nominations are sent to (or cc:'d to)
> > debian-vote, and are cryptographically signed.
> A lot of people contacted me encouraging me to run for
On 03/03/2019 01:17, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Please make sure that nominations are sent to (or cc:'d to)
> debian-vote, and are cryptographically signed.
>
A lot of people contacted me encouraging me to run for DPL as a way to
help Debian out of the current cultural and
[-- The following data is signed --]
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on 2019-04-17. The time line
look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> [..]
I hereby nominate myself for the 2018 Debian Project Leader
election.
Regards,
- --
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on 2018-04-17. The time line
looks like:
| Period | Start
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 02:29:17PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > I hereby nominate myself for the forthcoming DPL election.
>
> Trying again; something, somewhere mangled my signature.
The signature was fine in both cases.
Kurt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris Lamb wrote:
> I hereby nominate myself for the forthcoming DPL election.
Trying again; something, somewhere mangled my signature.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwv5L0nHBObhsUz5GHpU+J9QxHlgFAljECZoACgkQHpU+J9Qx
Hlg1ZA//ZZJKNd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> [...]
I hereby nominate myself for the forthcoming DPL election.
Regards,
- --
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Mai
Hi,
I hereby nominate myself as a candidate for the 2017 DPL election.
--
Mehdi Dogguy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on Friday the 17th of April,
2017. The time line looks like:
| Period
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 739cd7a3-8473-486c-8cbe-f54835b4b3b6
> [1 ] Choice 1: Mehdi Dogguy
> [2 ] Choice 2: None Of The Above
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
Il est sage de nous réconcilier av
Hi,
This is the last call for votes for the 2016 DPL election. There
are about 30 hour left to vote at the time of this writing.
Voting period starts 2016-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2016-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian
Sorry for top posting - but wrong year? (and thus wrong selection of
candidates ;) )
On 04/10/2016 12:48 AM, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
This is the 2nd call for votes for the DPL election.
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be
Hi,
This is the second call for votes, now with a correct ballot.
Voting period starts 2016-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2016-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at http://www.debian.o
Hi,
This is the 2nd call for votes for the DPL election.
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at http://www.debian.
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx writes:
> This is the 2nd call for votes for the DPL election.
> Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
> Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This appears to have been a replay of the 2nd ballot for last year's
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2016.
Voting period starts 2016-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2016-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at
Hi,
I hereby nominate myself as a candidate for the 2016 DPL election.
--
Mehdi Dogguy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:53:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 05/03/16 at 23:33 +0100, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
> > leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
> > post becomes
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 11:33:33PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
Roeckx wrote:
> The new project leader term starts on Friday the 17th of April,
> 2016. The time line looks like:
>
> | Period | Start| End|
> |+-
On 05/03/16 at 23:33 +0100, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
> leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
> post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
Hi,
We might have a s
Hi,
According to the constitution (5.2. Appointment), project
leader elections should begin "six weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately."
The new project leader term starts on Friday the 17th of April,
2016. The time line looks like:
| Period
Hi,
The voting period for the Debian Project Leader election 2015 is
almost over. You still have about 25 hours from the time of this
writing.
The timeline is:
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This vote is b
Hi,
This is the 2nd call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2015. The timeline is:
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may
On Friday 03 April 2015 04:37 AM, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PLEASE READ!!!
>
> Just to make sure that everybody understand. In the original
> ballot there was an error where there were 2 "Choise 1" lines,
> both for Mehdi Dogguy and Gergely Nagy. If you used that bal
Hi,
PLEASE READ!!!
Just to make sure that everybody understand. In the original
ballot there was an error where there were 2 "Choise 1" lines,
both for Mehdi Dogguy and Gergely Nagy. If you used that ballot,
your vote for Gergely Nagy ended up as being the vote for Mehdi
Dogguy and Gergely Nagy
[ ] Choice 1: Mehdi Dogguy
[ ] Choice 1: Gergely Nagy
Heads up: do NOT use this broken ballot.
Apparently devotee isn't (or at least wasn't yesterday) smart enough to
notice this brokenness and reject the vote; instead, it counts your vote
incorrectly.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> > There are 4 choices in the form, which you may rank with numbers between
> > 1 and 4. In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1.
> > P
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
