On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:12:12PM +0100, "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote:
> Well, without looking it up that "come to a resolution" was what I
> took it to mean.[1] I think "Shit or get off the pot" is a more vulgar
> variation. ;-)
That is actually the metaphor that came to mind first. I elected to
r
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 01:34:53PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having
> > the
> > suspision ?)
(writing this last but...) The fact the the number of characters do no
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:12:12PM +0100, "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote:
> Well, without looking it up that "come to a resolution" was what I
> took it to mean.[1] I think "Shit or get off the pot" is a more vulgar
> variation. ;-)
That is actually the metaphor that came to mind first. I elected to
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 01:34:53PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having the
> > suspision ?)
(writing this last but...) The fact the the number of characters do not
ma
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having the
> suspision ?)
>
> if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting
> for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discut
Ooops - I menat to send this to the list.
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had to look the idiom on a dictionary,
> and was left wondering about what exactly Branden means. "Fish or cut
> bait" means, according to the Random House Dicti
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having the
> suspision ?)
>
> if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting
> for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discu
Ooops - I menat to send this to the list.
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had to look the idiom on a dictionary,
> and was left wondering about what exactly Branden means. "Fish or cut
> bait" means, according to the Random House Dict
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 06:37:08PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marcus> If I were nominated, I surely wouldn't make any hard
> Marcus> concrete promise about any particular issue. I would
> Marcus> always leave room to change
> "Marcelo" == Marcelo E Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcelo> Back to what Branden said:
>> * Fish or cut bait with respect to non-free, and pass any
>> constitutional amendments necessary to permit us to make that choice;
Marcelo> "Fish or cut bait" means, accordi
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting
> > for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discution, or does it
> > correspond
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> CONSPIRACY!!
> I demand a manual recount..
I'm introducing an emergency resolution to block any recounts.
--
Mike Stone
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > Ok,
> >
> > I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> > The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through th
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 06:37:08PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marcus> If I were nominated, I surely wouldn't make any hard
> Marcus> concrete promise about any particular issue. I would
> Marcus> always leave room to chang
>> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wouldn't want an elected DPL to blindly do X, because that is what
> he/she promised before the election, when new evidence comes to light
> that indicates that X is bad (eg. perhaps some new solution Y is
> suggested that removes the need for X).
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the
> vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has voted
> "Marcelo" == Marcelo E Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcelo> Back to what Branden said:
>> * Fish or cut bait with respect to non-free, and pass any
>> constitutional amendments necessary to permit us to make that choice;
Marcelo> "Fish or cut bait" means, accord
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting
> > for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discution, or does it
> > correspon
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> CONSPIRACY!!
> I demand a manual recount..
I'm introducing an emergency resolution to block any recounts.
--
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > Ok,
> >
> > I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> > The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through t
>> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wouldn't want an elected DPL to blindly do X, because that is what
> he/she promised before the election, when new evidence comes to light
> that indicates that X is bad (eg. perhaps some new solution Y is
> suggested that removes the need for X).
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the
> vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has vote
> "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> If I were nominated, I surely wouldn't make any hard
Marcus> concrete promise about any particular issue. I would
Marcus> always leave room to change my opinion upon new facts
Marcus> revealed to me in the proces
23 matches
Mail list logo
