-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:45:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> I feel I've been warned off commenting here in case I come across as a
> pontificating know-it-all who's insisting that you do everything in
> "My Way" [...]
;-)
Yes, I totally agree wit
On Wed, 18 May 2016 18:54:35 -0500
"Martin McCormick" wrote:
> Many thanks and I've learned a lot in the last few days
I'm glad that things works for you now, I didn't follow this thread from
the beginning, so I hope the original problem is now solved too.
Regards
Michael
.-.. .. ...- . .-
On Thursday 19 May 2016 04:14:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:45:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > I feel I've been warned off commenting here in case I come across as
> > a pontificating know-it-all who's insisting that you do everything
> > in "My Way" [...]
>
> ;-)
>
>
On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote:
> Yes, its the link in the sig.
Which has been unreachable all morning from here. :-( (Morning by BST=UTC+1)
Lisi
Hi all,
I need to get tcp traffic aggregation between 4 hosts connected to
same Cisco switch over 1Gbe ports (2 ports per server).
My problem is I can't get "inbound" traffic balanced over both eth0 and eth1
On all servers I'm using bond-ed interface with 2x 1Gbe slave
interfaces, want to get 2
On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:56:49 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Yes, its the link in the sig.
>
> Which has been unreachable all morning from here. :-( (Morning by
> BST=UTC+1)
>
> Lisi
Thats Lisi, I'll check that out when I wake up again. Bad night,
On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:56:49 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Yes, its the link in the sig.
> >
> > Which has been unreachable all morning from here. :-( (Morning by
> > BST=UTC+1)
> >
> > Lis
On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> > cramps, took big B-12, should kick in shortly.
Didn't know that one! (B12)
Doesn't being old _suck_?
Lisi
On Thu 19 May 2016 at 07:46:10 (+0200), deloptes wrote:
> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> > On 18/05/16 22:02, deloptes wrote:
> >> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> >>> On 17/05/16 18:02, Felix Miata wrote:
> Mounting by UUID is an optional default. Mounting life is simpler here,
> because I don
On 2016-05-18, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> *exactly* those devices tagged as "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces.
>>
>> So that should be the database you're looking for? Try, for starters
>>
>> grep auto /etc/network/interfaces
>
> auto lo eth0 eth1
>
> Its there in the complete interfaces file I just
On 19/05/16 06:46, deloptes wrote:
> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
>
>> On 18/05/16 22:02, deloptes wrote:
>>> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
>>>
On 17/05/16 18:02, Felix Miata wrote:
> Peter Hillier-Brook composed on 2016-05-17 16:41 (UTC+0100):
>
>> I recently re-formatted and re-parti
[Wed, 18 May 2016 16:59:02 -0500] Paras pradhan
wrote:
> On a Jessie host I can see nested kvm is set
>
> ---
>
> cat /sys/module/kvm_amd/parameters/nested
>
> 1
>
> --
>
> On the virtual machines I can see 'svm' but not
> seeing /sys/module/kvm_amd . When I t
Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> I'm wondered what's missing there, why inbound traffic is not coming
> over both interfaces, but one.
Then it is working correct.
You misunderstood how most bonding-modes work. Only round-robin allows
you to do what you want, but most switches don't support that.
Grüße,
On Thursday 19 May 2016 09:04:54 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:56:49 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > Yes, its the link in the sig.
> > >
> > > Which has been unreachable a
On Thursday 19 May 2016 09:30:21 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > cramps, took big B-12, should kick in shortly.
>
A 2500mg. I have a 250mg in my daily pilltainer, but overdid it a bit
yesterday, so that wasn't enough. The Metformin we take for the
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 19 May 2016 09:04:54 Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> [snip]
>> Will reply to Gene off-list as well in order to send a screenshot.
>> But no, it is still not working. Tried in Chromium and Firefox.
>>
>> Lisi
>
> For those following along, I had apache2 listening on port 630
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 19:57:00 Marc Shapiro wrote:
On 05/17/2016 09:13 PM, J Mo wrote:
lilo is ultra-ancient. I don't even know if it works with modern kernels.
Lilo definitely still works with current kernels. I started out using
lilo 17 or 18 years ago and I am still us
On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:24:38 Dan Purgert wrote:
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 May 2016 09:04:54 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> Will reply to Gene off-list as well in order to send a screenshot.
> >> But no, it is still not working. Tried in Chromium and Firefox.
> >>
> >> Lisi
I am running jessie on both virtualbox 5 host and guest. The host
networking is using eth0 interface and is fine. On the guest, I have 8
virtual interfaces on the physical eth0. When I bring up the guest, the
networking service starts, yet the network is unreachable. Then, when i
restart the n
For the record, at least in my experience now, grub nor lilo will install
from the Jessie netinst if you manually partition the drive instead of
guided and then editing the layout. Maybe guided sets up the MBR or sda1 in
such a way that you cant from part an? Idk but after guided parting then
custo
Le 19/05/2016 07:46, deloptes a écrit :
Haha, that's fair enough. It took me about 1h to reverse the setup to paper,
that I have done few years ago on one server with 12disks
Not only uuid, but crypt and lvm on top. I finally draw a map with this.
Tip : lsblk comes in handy to print the relati
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Doesn't being old _suck_?
Word dat.
--
Man is essentially a dreamer, wakened sometimes for a
moment by some peculiarly obtrusive element in the
outer world, but lapsing again quickly into the happy
somnolence of imagination.
Le 19/05/2016 00:58, Felix Miata a écrit :
Lisi Reisz composed on 2016-05-18 23:40 (UTC+0100):
Can one still use grub-legacy with modern kernels?
It's what I'm using for launching all my Debians, Fedoras, openSUSEs,
Mageias and more. Distros that no longer offer grub-legacy get installed
here
Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> alias drives="mount | grep '^/'"
Another alternative
alias drives='df -h -T -x tmpfs -x devtmpfs'
sk@d3s 02:44 PM ~
$ drives
FilesystemType Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext4 31G 6.9G 23G 24% /
J Mo:
> -->df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> udev 16441312 0 16441312 0% /dev
> tmpfs 3290364 96683280696 1% /run
> /dev/sda2114287812 44945248 63514008 42% /
> tmpfs
On Wed, May 18, 2016, at 14:57, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>
> Lilo definitely still works with current kernels. I started out using
> lilo 17 or 18 years ago and I am still using it now under Jessie and
> kernel vmlinuz-3.16.0-4-amd64.
>
I maintain a LILO web page for the benefit of Debian users her
it appears that there is a problem with guest vm adapter type. After
changing , the network worked on reboot.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:26 PM Roman Gelfand wrote:
> I am running jessie on both virtualbox 5 host and guest. The host
> networking is using eth0 interface and is fine. On the guest
27 matches
Mail list logo
