On Lu, 10 nov 14, 21:49:30, songbird wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 03 nov 14, 13:56:36, Alexis wrote:
> >> zsh, however, is more helpful:
> >>
> >> $ which umask
> >> umask: shell built-in command
> >
> > Maybe a (wishlist) bug against debianutils is in order?
>
> is zsh providing a
On Lu, 10 nov 14, 21:12:10, Lee Winter wrote:
>
> Of all the options available in the NON-expert installer, the choice of
> init alternatives might not warrant a user selection option, but all of the
> _consequences_ of that selection, i.e., things that get sucked in, mandate
> that users be offer
I tried to install from
/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cddebian-testing-amd64-kde-CD-1.iso
(dd'd to a USB disk) when I ran into all these problems. Today I tried
again with the latest debian-testing-amd64-CD-1.iso, using full disk
encryption and btrfs on /. No problems at all. The machine boots a
Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:23:13 +0100
Hans écrivait :
> Hi all,
hi Hans,
> [...]
This kind of discussion made me unsubscribing to Debian lists.
If all these people code only 10 lines everytime they troll,
we can get a brand new init-system in less than a month.
>
> Happy hacking
You too.
>
> H
On Ma, 11 nov 14, 03:15:12, tor...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> "I don't want to use systemd, what are my options" inside of a debian
> communication channel makes sense to me (assuming one has been a Debian
> user in the past).
https://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#systemd
Feel free to add anythi
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:00:27AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Chris Bannister writes:
> > I read that as 'trouble unsubscribing?' then Contact
> > listmas...@lists.debian.org.
>
> I read it as 'technical trouble with this list'. You're right, though:
> now that we have listmoms the footer needs
Hi,
After a fresh reinstall of Debian "testing" today, I am unable to start
my virtual machines. I lost the configuration during the reinstall, but
have the disk images. I'm not sure if it is a bug or something wrong on
my machine. The images worked on Debian "testing" after an upgrade two
days ag
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 02:02:07 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.11.2014 um 01:58 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
>
> > Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Sorry, but that is not what I asked for. I asked for "specifics".
> >> Your answer doesn't contain any specific problem which would make me
> >> able to repro
On Mon 10 Nov 2014 at 18:11:42 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> >On Mon 10 Nov 2014 at 14:48:15 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >
> >>On 11/10/2014 2:44 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >>>Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 10.11.2014 um 19:26 schrieb Patrick Bartek:
> >Maybe, the release after
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:02:12 +0100
Jean-Marc wrote:
>
> This kind of discussion made me unsubscribing to Debian lists.
> If all these people code only 10 lines everytime they troll,
> we can get a brand new init-system in less than a month.
>
Does this code have to make sense, or can it be ju
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +, Steve Greig wrote:
> I thought I would try and build an Android app and see that you have
> to download and install some software:
> adt-bundle-linux-x86_64-20140702.zip
>
>
> Before doing this (I often find installs go wrong) I was wondering if
> it is p
Really? Wheezy? HD4600?
No kernel upgrade or anything?
On 11/10/2014 11:15 PM, Dan wrote:
*WORKS FOR ME NO PROBLEM,
I'VE BEEN RUNNING WHEEZY FOR A LITTLE MORE THAN A YEAR,
A1 SO FAR,
*
On 11/07/2014 10:05 PM, Joris Bolsens wrote:
>From my experience yes, it works on jessie without any problems
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:28:29AM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> golinux wrote:
> >
> >Yes, Refracta is pure unmodified Debian and uses the Debian repos! As
> >suggested, please join the forums and contribute expertise if possible.
> >
>
> And report back! Those of us who are still waiting and
On 2014-11-11 Man_Without_Clue wrote:
> Really? Wheezy? HD4600?
> No kernel upgrade or anything?
No, you need Jessie. In Wheezy the Vesa fallback is used.
Morten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
>On Ma, 11 nov 14, 03:15:12, tor...@riseup.net wrote:
>>
>>"I don't want to use systemd, what are my options" inside of a debian
>> communication channel makes sense to me (assuming one has been a
>> Debian user in the past).
>https://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#systemd
>Feel free to add
[Please don't top post]
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:24:03PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Joel Roth wrote:
> > Joel Roth wrote:
> > > Hi list,
> > >
> > > I've been upgrading my sid system. When grub goes
> > > to regenerate /boot/grub/grub.cfg, mount uses 100% CPU
> > > and causes these processes t
I get theese (totally benign) messages. How do I shut them up ? Running
jessie. I suspect something is using resources scanning and re-scanning
my drives, so the best solution would be to make that thing take a break
and leave well enough alone. Barring that, I'd like to not have that
noise bot
Le Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:47:35 +0200,
Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
> On Lu, 10 nov 14, 21:12:10, Lee Winter wrote:
> >
> > Of all the options available in the NON-expert installer, the
> > choice of init alternatives might not warrant a user selection
> > option, but all of the _consequences_ of that
Brian wrote:
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 02:02:07 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 11.11.2014 um 01:58 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
Michael Biebl wrote:
Sorry, but that is not what I asked for. I asked for "specifics".
Your answer doesn't contain any specific problem which would make me
able to reproduce
On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.11.2014 um 00:14 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
>> Ok, then explain to me the procedure for running the installer in such a
>> way that systemd is never installed, thus avoiding any potential
>> problems that might result from later uninstallation all t
Am Montag, 10. November 2014, 12:12:10 schrieb Don Armstrong:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > Exactly. I for one am getting sick and tired of being called names on
> > this list like 'hater' and 'whiner'
Sorry, Don, I did not want to afferon t someone. As I am not native English
speak
On 11/10/2014 6:32 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.11.2014 um 00:23 schrieb Patrick Bartek:
>> Optional? Yes. A lot (most) of systemd is optional. (So, I've read.)
>> But isn't a lot of that optional stuff installed by default?
> It is, yes. We decided to not split up a 10M package into 20som
On 11/10/2014 6:23 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> systemd-networkd is an entirely optional component, you don't have to
>> use it.
>> systemd-udevd is also an individual component, which btw is also used
>> under sysvinit (or upstart). You don't get really
Hans wrote:
> I just wanted to show ways, where EVERYONE might be happy
Sure. Sure. Everybody who has invested years into learning
Debian is just jumping of joy now that it is suddenly turned
into a completely different OS _and_ they have to find another
Unix _and_ learn it almost from scratch _
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:39:24PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> last time he was facing issue with rewrite module. however i have installed
> that module for sure. even i have check with apachectl command tool. though
> it is resolved for now.
> so i thought, in advance if there is any lis
Chris Bannister writes:
> I read that as 'trouble unsubscribing?' then Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org.
I wrote:
> I read it as 'technical trouble with this list'. You're right, though:
> now that we have listmoms the footer needs to be redone. File a
> wishlist bug.
Chris Bannister write
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:53:47 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> > I read it as 'technical trouble with this list'. You're right, though:
> > now that we have listmoms the footer needs to be redone. File a
> > wishlist bug.
>
> Chris Bannister writes:
> > 'listmoms'?
>
> Vernacular for moderators,
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:24:03PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> > Joel Roth wrote:
> > > Joel Roth wrote:
> > > > Hi list,
> > > >
> > > > I've been upgrading my sid system. When grub goes
> > > > to regenerate /boot/grub/grub.cfg, mount uses 100% CPU
> > > > and causes thes
Le mardi, 11 novembre 2014, 20.08:08 st a écrit :
> Hans wrote:
> > I just wanted to show ways, where EVERYONE might be happy
>
> Sure. Sure. Everybody who has invested years into learning
> Debian is just jumping of joy now that it is suddenly turned
> into a completely different OS _and_ they h
Hi all,
I'm struggling with a find problem.
I want to combine find and par2create recursively in order to get the
following done:
Foreach file with a certain suffix (e.g. avi) do par2create for that
file in its directory, so e.g.
I'm in /video
There are subfolders user1, user2 with videos video
Dear Debianists,
Should I really be on the amd64 list not this one as an amd64 user?
Regards
Michael Fothergill
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 07:33:44 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> >Placing the bar so high at "clean" for the reason given is unwarranted,
> >especially if preseeding with
> >
> >d-i base-installer/includes string sysvinit-core
> >
> >is done. Then systemd-sysv is cleanly removed du
On 11 November 2014 10:25, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2014-11-11 Man_Without_Clue wrote:
>
>> Really? Wheezy? HD4600?
>> No kernel upgrade or anything?
>
> No, you need Jessie. In Wheezy the Vesa fallback is used.
Intel in general works fine in Wheezy.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 07:42:33 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 11.11.2014 um 00:14 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
> >> Ok, then explain to me the procedure for running the installer in such a
> >> way that systemd is never installed, thus avoiding any potenti
Brian wrote:
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 07:42:33 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 11.11.2014 um 00:14 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
Ok, then explain to me the procedure for running the installer in such a
way that systemd is never installed, thus avoiding any poten
On 11/11/14 15:23, Michael Fothergill wrote:
Dear Debianists,
Should I really be on the amd64 list not this one as an amd64 user?
The description of the debian-amd64 list is
"Debian port to AMD64
Porting Debian to AMD x86-64 architecture."
so unless you're involved in Debian's amd64 porting
On 2014-11-11 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On 11 November 2014 10:25, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
>> On 2014-11-11 Man_Without_Clue wrote:
>>> Really? Wheezy? HD4600?
>>> No kernel upgrade or anything?
>> No, you need Jessie. In Wheezy the Vesa fallback is used.
> Intel in general works fine in Wheezy.
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> songbird wrote:
>> are you suggesting which be altered or the
>> manual page be amended to include more information
>> about what to do when which fails to report any
>> matching command?
>
> I'd rather see which(1) be more informative about built-ins.
there's a lot of
The description of the debian-amd64 list is
"Debian port to AMD64
Porting Debian to AMD x86-64 architecture."
so unless you're involved in Debian's amd64 porting effort I'd say you
probably don't have any reason to post to that list.
I remember a while back mostly 32bit users were on this list
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Blaming the Debian project for letting the Debian distribution evolve in
ways defined by its volunteers is unfair.
Blaming? Did I say a word about Stable becoming less and less
stable since about Etch? No. Did I mention that I had to get
almost all essential desktop
- Original Message -
> From: <_...@debian.org>
> Debian also was always and will always stay technically defined by those
> volunteering to make it what it is. By extension, it is explicitly not
> defined by those not putting work (but only words) into it; unmaintained
> software and code
On 11/11/2014 at 10:54 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 07:42:33 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Please be specific. What problems of of dependencies are you
>>> talking about?
>>
>> Please stop bring up irrelevant questions and address the
On 04/11/14 01:10 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 03/11/14 12:23 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
After the last upgrade (kernel 3.2.0-4-amd64 and wget), I have a
Debian/Wheezy server that isn't starting. It gets to the network then
stops.
The system isn't hung - it will still output messages to the screen
when
Can anyone confirm that http://www.emdebian.org/ is currently not
responding?
--
Tony van der Hoff| mailto:t...@vanderhoff.org
Buckinghamshire, England |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Am 11.11.2014 um 17:48 schrieb Gary Dale:
>> Update: booting using sysrescuecd, I removed the
>> /etc/rcS.d/S13networking link and rebooted into single-user mode. It
>> completed OK, so I then ran /etc/init.d/networking start, which
>> exhibited the same problems it did when run by init. However
On 11/11/2014 11:38 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> Other people subscribe to a meaning of "default" which, e.g., assumes
> only that systemd will get installed as PID 1 unless some action is
> taken to prevent it from getting so installed. That seems like an
> entirely reasonable interpretation, at lea
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:54:33 +
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Hello Tony,
>Can anyone confirm that http://www.emdebian.org/ is currently not
>responding?
At times like this, I use http://www.isup.me to see if it's "just me" or
there's a bigger problem. The site confirms (I couldn't get to it,
ei
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 11/11/2014 11:38 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
Other people subscribe to a meaning of "default" which, e.g., assumes
only that systemd will get installed as PID 1 unless some action is
taken to prevent it from getting so installed. That seems like an
entirely reasonable interpreta
On 11/11/2014 11:54 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Can anyone confirm that http://www.emdebian.org/ is currently not
responding?
Yes it's apparently down. Accessing a cached copy of the site reveals
the whole project was winding down as of July.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ.
On 11/11/14 16:58, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:54:33 +
> Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
> Hello Tony,
>
>> Can anyone confirm that http://www.emdebian.org/ is currently not
>> responding?
>
> At times like this, I use http://www.isup.me to see if it's "just me" or
> there's a bi
Le Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:42:33 -0500,
Tanstaafl a écrit :
> On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 11.11.2014 um 00:14 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
> >> Ok, then explain to me the procedure for running the installer in
> >> such a way that systemd is never installed, thus avoiding any
> >>
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:09:17 +0200
Jarle Aase wrote:
> tried to install from
> /cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cddebian-testing-amd64-kde-CD-1.iso
> (dd'd to a USB disk) when I ran into all these problems. Today I tried
> again with the latest debian-testing-amd64-CD-1.iso, using full disk
> en
On 11/11/2014 9:26 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Blaming the Debian project for letting the Debian distribution evolve in
> ways defined by its volunteers is unfair.
Eh? My understanding is that this systemd mess is due to a vote of the
technical committee, a vote that was in fact tied and t
On 11/11/14 17:04, Frank wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2014 11:54 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> Can anyone confirm that http://www.emdebian.org/ is currently not
>> responding?
>>
>
> Yes it's apparently down. Accessing a cached copy of the site reveals
> the whole project was winding down as of July.
On 11 November 2014 16:06, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2014-11-11 Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>> On 11 November 2014 10:25, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
>>> On 2014-11-11 Man_Without_Clue wrote:
>
Really? Wheezy? HD4600?
No kernel upgrade or anything?
>
>>> No, you need Jessie. In Wheezy the Ve
On 11/11/2014, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:00:27AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>> Chris Bannister writes:
>> > I read that as 'trouble unsubscribing?' then Contact
>> > listmas...@lists.debian.org.
>>
>> I read it as 'technical trouble with this list'. You're right, though:
On 2014-11-11 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Intel runs fine on Wheezy, though you do need a kernel upgrade in the
> form of a backported kernel for some (though not all) Intel drivers.
Of course, but if you are using backported packages, you are
not really running Wheezy anymore.
Morten
--
To UNSUB
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Le Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:42:33 -0500,
Tanstaafl a écrit :
On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 11.11.2014 um 00:14 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
Ok, then explain to me the procedure for running the installer in
such a way that systemd is never installed, thus avo
On 11/11/2014 12:07 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Le Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:42:33 -0500,
Tanstaafl a écrit :
On 11/10/2014 6:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.11.2014 um 00:14 schrieb Miles Fidelman:
>> Ok, then explain to me the procedure for running the installer in
>> such a way that syste
Le Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:58:33 -0500,
Tanstaafl a écrit :
> On 11/11/2014 9:26 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > Blaming the Debian project for letting the Debian distribution
> > evolve in ways defined by its volunteers is unfair.
>
> Eh? My understanding is that this systemd mess is due to a
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:05:35 +
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Hello Tony,
>Thanks, Brad; I'll bookmark that!
YW. It's a handy site to know about, IMO.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Gary don't need his eyes to
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 11:38:19 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 at 10:54 AM, Brian wrote:
>
> > systemd is the default init system. That means everyone gets it.
>
> No - that only means that everyone gets it by default, not necessarily
> that everyone gets it.
Everyone gets it. Not ev
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 11/11/2014 9:26 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Blaming the Debian project for letting the Debian distribution evolve in
ways defined by its volunteers is unfair.
Eh? My understanding is that this systemd mess is due to a vote of the
technical committee, a vote that was in
Brian wrote:
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 11:38:19 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
On 11/11/2014 at 10:54 AM, Brian wrote:
systemd is the default init system. That means everyone gets it.
No - that only means that everyone gets it by default, not necessarily
that everyone gets it.
Everyone gets it. Not
Le mardi, 11 novembre 2014, 12.34:10 Miles Fidelman a écrit :
> Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > There are no functional differences between an installation with
> > sysvinit-core out of the box or an install where sysvinit-core is
> > installed later, this is a fact.
>
> No, that's NOT a fact. At l
Dear Folks,
I am planning to order the components for a new PC that I will put together
myself with a bit of help from the local PC store I use for repairs etc.
At first I had thought to buy an FX 8350 motherboard plus fan and some RAM
and a power supply e.g. Corsair Builder Series CXM 750W Modul
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 12:00:23 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 11:38 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> > Other people subscribe to a meaning of "default" which, e.g., assumes
> > only that systemd will get installed as PID 1 unless some action is
> > taken to prevent it from getting so installed.
On 11/11/2014 12:07 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> There are no functional differences between an installation with
> sysvinit-core out of the box or an install where sysvinit-core is
> installed later, this is a fact.
Irrelevant.
> Allowing the user to choose this at install time from the inte
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Rob Owens wrote:
> This type of comment says to me that my contributions to Debian are
> useless if they are not in the form of code.
https://contributors.debian.org/ is everyone who we know has contributed
to Debian in one of the ways that we currently measure. [Granted, it's
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, John Hasler wrote:
> Vernacular for moderators, making sure that we play nice.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Bret Busby wrote:
> Women who hit you with a list of things to do ("Clean up your
> room!...Mow The lawns!Wash the dishes") instead of hitting you
> over the head with a hoc
While I like the dhelp script idea, I think man is a pure UX issue -
man should generally DWIM because if I type "man foo", I don't want to
jump through hoops. There times (looking at libraries and system calls
and the like) that knowing the system helps. However, with >20 (IDR
how many - a bunch)
Le 11/11/2014 18:59, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Rob Owens wrote:
>> This type of comment says to me that my contributions to Debian are
>> useless if they are not in the form of code.
> https://contributors.debian.org/ is everyone who we know has contributed
> to Debian in one o
>apt-cache search android | less
>returns some interesting results?
That was useful to know how to search the APT cache.
I am thinking of starting a new thread as I am completely unable to
find any of the files and folders I created when I downloaded and
installed the adt-bundle. I definitely
Don Armstrong writes:
> Sexism like this is inappropriate in Debian. Please stop.
Ok. List-parental-units.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 12:58:25 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> >Everyone gets it. Not everyone boots with it. Not everyone who boots
> >first time with it gets to use it on subsequent boots.
>
> That is DEFINITELY a definition of "default" that is subject to very
> differing opinion
On 2014-11-11 18:18 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 11/11/14 17:04, Frank wrote:
>>
>> On 11/11/2014 11:54 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>> Can anyone confirm that http://www.emdebian.org/ is currently not
>>> responding?
>>>
>>
>> Yes it's apparently down. Accessing a cached copy of the
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 12:36:14 -0500, Marty wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 12:07 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >
> >There are no functional differences between an installation with
> >sysvinit-core out of the box or an install where sysvinit-core is
> >installed later, this is a fact.
> >
> >Allowing th
On 11/11/14 11:59 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Am 11.11.2014 um 17:48 schrieb Gary Dale:
Update: booting using sysrescuecd, I removed the
/etc/rcS.d/S13networking link and rebooted into single-user mode. It
completed OK, so I then ran /etc/init.d/networking start, which
exhibited the same problem
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 13:14:00 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 12:07 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > There are no functional differences between an installation with
> > sysvinit-core out of the box or an install where sysvinit-core is
> > installed later, this is a fact.
>
> Irrelevan
On 11/11/14 01:09 PM, Michael Fothergill wrote:
Dear Folks,
I am planning to order the components for a new PC that I will put
together myself with a bit of help from the local PC store I use for
repairs etc.
At first I had thought to buy an FX 8350 motherboard plus fan and some
RAM and a p
On 12/11/2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, John Hasler wrote:
>> Vernacular for moderators, making sure that we play nice.
>
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Bret Busby wrote:
>> Women who hit you with a list of things to do ("Clean up your
>> room!...Mow The lawns!Wash the dishes") inst
On 11-11-2014 21:16, Brian wrote:
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 12:36:14 -0500, Marty wrote:
On 11/11/2014 12:07 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
>There are no functional differences between an installation with
>sysvinit-core out of the box or an install where sysvinit-core is
>installed later, this is
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 11/11/2014 18:59, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> > When I (or someone else) asks people to "show us the code", it's
> > really just shorthand for "someone needs to do this work, and it
> > currently isn't important enough for me to do it."
>
> Asking to prov
>
>
>> For business desktop use, I prefer onboard graphics for reliability.
> Also, most add-in cards require fans for cooling which gives you another
> point of failure while adding to the noise. Power requirements are higher
> when you want the graphics performance of the faster graphics cards.
>
On 11/11/14 19:12, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-11-11 18:18 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/14 17:04, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/11/2014 11:54 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Can anyone confirm that http://www.emdebian.org/ is currently not
responding?
>>>
>>> Yes it's
Le 11/11/2014 20:21, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Erwan David wrote:
>> Le 11/11/2014 18:59, Don Armstrong a écrit :
>>> When I (or someone else) asks people to "show us the code", it's
>>> really just shorthand for "someone needs to do this work, and it
>>> currently isn't import
On 11 November 2014 17:30, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2014-11-11 Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>> Intel runs fine on Wheezy, though you do need a kernel upgrade in the
>> form of a backported kernel for some (though not all) Intel drivers.
>
> Of course, but if you are using backported packages, you are
I received an answer on the intel-gfx mailing list:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-November/055165.html
As instructed, I enabled SNA acceleration in my custom xorg.conf and
installed the intel driver from experimental. ZaphodHeads now works on
my new desktop just as I want.
Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote:
On 11-11-2014 21:16, Brian wrote:
On Tue 11 Nov 2014 at 12:36:14 -0500, Marty wrote:
On 11/11/2014 12:07 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
>There are no functional differences between an installation with
>sysvinit-core out of the box or an install where sysvinit-
Erwan David wrote:
Le 11/11/2014 18:59, Don Armstrong a écrit :
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Rob Owens wrote:
This type of comment says to me that my contributions to Debian are
useless if they are not in the form of code.
https://contributors.debian.org/ is everyone who we know has contributed
to Deb
- Original Message -
> From: "Rob Owens"
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: <_...@debian.org>
>
> > Debian also was always and will always stay technically defined by those
> > volunteering to make it what it is. By extension, it is explicitly not
> > defined by those not putting
> Secondly do you guys have any advice on more security of WP. i have heard
> that word press is kind of week in security. maybe i am wrong but i have
> heard that.
I've had no problems in several years of hosting WP.
I do recommend NOT using the Debian package for WordPress. For security and
On Ma, 11 nov 14, 12:34:10, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >There are no functional differences between an installation with
> >sysvinit-core out of the box or an install where sysvinit-core is
> >installed later, this is a fact.
>
> No, that's NOT a fact. At least it's not a
On Ma, 11 nov 14, 11:58:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 9:26 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > Blaming the Debian project for letting the Debian distribution evolve in
> > ways defined by its volunteers is unfair.
>
> Eh? My understanding is that this systemd mess is due to a vote of the
-Original Message-
From: Bret Busby [mailto:bret.bu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:28 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Joey Hess is out?
On 11/11/2014, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:00:27AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>> Chris Banni
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014,Don Armstrong mailto:don%40debian.org>>
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 11/11/2014 18:59, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> > When I (or someone else) asks people to "show us the code", it's
> > really just shorthand for "someone needs to do this work, and it
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry about late reply, got a bit busy with other things.
On 11/07/2014 11:43 PM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'd try adding some memory (or swapspace) to this VM to satisfy
> mremap's wish to remap to exactly 8G virtual memory.
>
> Reco
Tried this, set
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 11 nov 14, 12:34:10, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
There are no functional differences between an installation with
sysvinit-core out of the box or an install where sysvinit-core is
installed later, this is a fact.
No, that's NOT a fact. At least
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:00:03 +0100
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
wrote:
> Martin Manns:
> > After switching to systemd, [...] password entry on startup looks
> > weird because some weird red moving stars are shown instead of a
> > prompt.
>
> The official name for the "weird red moving stars" is "
> You seem to have overlooked Darac Marjal's response.
I have not. I've just took a pause to do some additional reading and to
experiment a little.
I've tried 'tune2fs -m 1.0 /dev/sdXY' (found in Arch docs for Ext4).
The result was quite interesting. Both Nautilus and "df" showed the used
spac
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
