Tanstaafl wrote:
On 11/11/2014 9:26 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <[email protected]> wrote:
Blaming the Debian project for letting the Debian distribution evolve in
ways defined by its volunteers is unfair.
Eh? My understanding is that this systemd mess is due to a vote of the
technical committee, a vote that was in fact tied and the chair had to
cast the tie-breaker.
Hardly waht I would call an 'evolution defined by its volunteers'...
Not to mention looking more and more like "evolution toward a
monoculture, as defined by Lennart Poettering" (with a stated intent to
direct the evolution of all distros and the kernel), with all others
becoming less and less relevant.
Miles Fidelman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
