On Lu, 10 nov 14, 21:12:10, Lee Winter wrote: > > Of all the options available in the NON-expert installer, the choice of > init alternatives might not warrant a user selection option, but all of the > _consequences_ of that selection, i.e., things that get sucked in, mandate > that users be offered a choice.
The systemd *package* would 'suck in' following packages (assuming
installation of Recommends, which is the default):
$ apt-cache show systemd=215-5+b1 | egrep '(Depends|Recommends)' | sed -e
's/\(: \|, \)/&\n\t/g'
Depends:
libacl1 (>= 2.2.51-8),
libaudit1 (>= 1:2.2.1),
libblkid1 (>= 2.19.1),
libcap2 (>= 1:2.10),
libcryptsetup4 (>= 2:1.4.3),
libkmod2 (>= 5~),
libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1),
libselinux1 (>= 2.1.9),
libsystemd0 (= 215-5+b1),
util-linux (>= 2.19.1-2),
initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-53.2),
sysv-rc,
udev,
acl,
adduser,
libcap2-bin
Pre-Depends:
libc6 (>= 2.17),
libgcrypt20 (>= 1.6.1),
liblzma5 (>= 5.1.1alpha+20120614),
libselinux1 (>= 1.32)
Recommends:
libpam-systemd,
dbus
Looks quite reasonable to me, or am I misunderstanding your comment
about systemd "sucking in" other stuff?
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
