On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:59:28PM +0200, Thomas Amm wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 16:46 -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
>
> > If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark
> > [...]
> > Regards
> >
>
> Conrats! You have just made it into everybody's kill file.
A somewhat friendl
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 16:46 -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
> If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark
> [...]
> Regards
>
Conrats! You have just made it into everybody's kill file.
On Lu, 06 sep 21, 16:46:24, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
>
>
> Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu:
> > Curt writes:
> >> I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird
> >> to compose your email as plain text
> > Or even as "normal" HTML.
>
> If it is trivial to me setting my mail
On 7/09/21 5:25 am, John Hasler wrote:
Curt writes:
I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird
to compose your email as plain text
Curt didn't write that; I did. Please be careful with your attributions.
I'm intrigued to know how this mistake happened, however. Were you
per
On Tuesday, September 07, 2021 12:27:32 PM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can you add Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org to your
> > whitelist? Or isn't it possible to use Resent-From?
>
> Thanks, I'll have to look into that -- that would be something I have to do
> for / at google and I
One or two days after i tried to subscribe using the site, I received a
warning from this list saying that several messages were bounced by
Yahoo. It also said that if more bounces happen, i may be unsubscribed.
So, the subscribing messages i tried to make did not even arrived to my
spam folder - i
Thanks for the reply, some responses interspersed below:
On Tuesday, September 07, 2021 11:07:36 AM David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 07 Sep 2021 at 08:49:19 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > -- I don't remember that message very well).
>
> Probably like:
>
> "In the last seven days we've seen
On Tue 07 Sep 2021 at 08:49:19 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I occasionally seem to lose other messages (I get the message from the debian-
> user lists about about some (small number of) messages beeing undeliverable
> in the last day or so (can't remember the term used, and maybe there
' it.
I don't see how that works. Once you've upgraded by one version,
downgrading it again is a non-trivial operation. But I found it
difficult to follow precisely the steps you took.
> A more detailed story is in the thread i pointed in my first message here:
>
> https:/
I asked and then answered my own question -- google decided the messages from
Dedeco were spam, with this message when I open one (in google mail):
This message seems dangerous
Similar messages were used to steal people's personal information. Avoid
clicking links, downloading attachments, or
Em 07/09/2021 03:28, Andrew M.A. Cater escreveu:
> It has been repeated a few times in different
> places that you can't jump a release straightforwardly, so it has to
> be 9 -> 10 -> 11.
>
Yes. People in the forum also told me this. But the problem was
something else.
> Having remade all th
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:20:26AM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
> My issue happened (this is my conclusion) because my Debian 9 was not
> updated when I followed the steps to change sources.list to those of
> Debian 10. This is something that should be added in Debian
> documentation, in my opinion.
by not rebooting the computer after
> each 'apt upgrade' for the next version. So, i ended up with a computer
> with packages and sources.list of Debian 11, but it was not quite that.
> So, i remade all steps. And my first steps were to restore my Debian 9
> sources.list,
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:58 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:46:21PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
> > If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark
> > background i need, and to make it ignore the (usually default)
> > background of color of all HTML messages,
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:47 PM Dedeco Balaco
wrote:
>
>
> Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu:
>
> Curt writes:
>
> I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird
> to compose your email as plain text
>
> Or even as "normal" HTML.
>
> If it is trivial to me setting my mail man
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:46:21PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
> If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark
> background i need, and to make it ignore the (usually default)
> background of color of all HTML messages, why the people in Debian User
> list cannot do it? I will not
On 06/09/2021 21:50, Dan Ritter wrote:
Here is reality:
Nobody here is obligated to help you. At all.
If we do, it's out of the goodness of our hearts.
If we don't, it could be:
because we don't know the answer
or
because you are being rude
This is a place where people send questions in plain
Dedeco Balaco wrote:
>
> Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu:
> > Curt writes:
> >> I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird
> >> to compose your email as plain text
> >
> > Or even as "normal" HTML.
> >
>
> If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the d
Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu:
> Curt writes:
>> I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird
>> to compose your email as plain text
>
> Or even as "normal" HTML.
>
If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark
background i need, and to make it ig
Curt writes:
> I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird
> to compose your email as plain text
Or even as "normal" HTML.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 06/09/2021 01:01, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
No. I do not want to edit emails with the traditional "black over white"
area. And I have seen that the colors I send can be ignored. And
Thunderbird also sends a pure text message together with the HTML
messages I prefer to use.
Thank you
I will feel
On 2021-09-06, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
>> manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. W: GPG
>> error: http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease: The
>> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
>> not available: NO_PUBKEY 648ACFD622F3D138 NO
On 6/09/21 1:20 pm, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
3. Tried to do 'apt update' as root, but it does not work. GPG signature
error.
21:18:54 [ 0] root@compo: /etc/apt # apt-mark hold firefox-esr
firefox-esr-l10n-pt-br thunderbird thunderbird-l10n-pt-br firefox-esr
set on hold. firefox-esr-l10n-pt-br set o
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 09:01:22PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
[...]
> I did not receive the Greg answer. The only 3 messages I have in my
> folder now are the 2 you sent, and the one I receive for my message:
Here's the start of the thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/09/thread
Em 05-09-2021 19:10, piorunz escreveu:
> On 05/09/2021 05:27, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
>
>> What should i do to solve this?
> You reposted your question two hours later, so I repost the solution and
> CC you as well.
I am sorry it was reposted. I had trouble subscribing to the list, using
the site,
On 05/09/2021 05:27, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
What should i do to solve this?
You reposted your question two hours later, so I repost the solution and
CC you as well.
1. Start by reading the error message. If you can't understand it, then
paste it here. As Greg Wooledge already said.
2. Disable
tion, i did not find this explanation. It says it can be done,
> but it does not explain how to do it.
>
> So, i opened the following thread. Do not read it now, there are more
> things i will say here, first.
>
> https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/upgradi
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 11:04:49PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
> So, i should to 2 upgrades: one to Debian 10, and one more to Debian 11.
> Fine. And for each one, the steps are:
> But after my first edition to sources.list, apt update fails. I have
> tried apt-get update to, but it also fails for
On Thu 27 Aug 2020 at 19:44:56 (-0500), R. Ramesh wrote:
> I finally decided to move from debian 7 to 10. As a first step I
> wanted to upgrade to debian 8 (jesse)
>
> I changed all ftp.us.debian.org part in /etc/apt/sources.list to
> archive.debian.org and tried aptitude update and got the follow
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:43:35PM -0500, R. Ramesh wrote:
> My only wish is apt is updated to say something about the fact
> that this is unsupported and users are on their own, but still
> provide the download/install without we having to manually
> intervene.
I think¹ that there are
The expired keys do complicate life but my understanding of the
rationale is that the limited key lifetime serves as a sort of
contract regarding the integrity of the files. Once a release has
been archived it does not fall under that promise from the project
any more and so the expired keys serve
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:23:33PM -0500, R. Ramesh wrote:
> I did think about fresh install, but every method has its drawback. There
> are subtle changes that I could not get right in the past, so I chose
> upgrade path.
Last year I did do a squeeze to stretch upgrade by upgrading to eac
That said, Wheezy is *way* too far away from Buster! For example,
"Update in Place" is likely to fail, because of SystemD changes.
(Heck, I had trouble updating Stretch to Buster in Place, but some of
that was User Error).
I did think about fresh install, but every method has its drawback
On 2/9/20 3:56 am, Kenneth Parker wrote:
My Recommendation, if it isn't too late, is to Install Buster in a
separate Partition, and then copy /home files as desired. Reclaim the
Wheezy Partition when you are sure that you don't need it anymore.
+1
FWIW I'd recommend this course for most ma
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 12:17 PM R. Ramesh wrote:
> My attempts to upgrade to Jesse (8) did not work at all and all the
> information on the net seem old and not current that Buster is out and
> jesse is already archived. Anyway, after looking around, I made ddrescue
> copy of the current install di
My attempts to upgrade to Jesse (8) did not work at all and all the
information on the net seem old and not current that Buster is out and
jesse is already archived. Anyway, after looking around, I made ddrescue
copy of the current install disk (only 64GB, so easy) first and then
directly upgra
I finally decided to move from debian 7 to 10. As a first step I wanted
to upgrade to debian 8 (jesse)
I changed all ftp.us.debian.org part in /etc/apt/sources.list to
archive.debian.org and tried aptitude update and got the following error
W: GPG error: http://archive.debian.org wheezy Release
On 9/14/2015 2:33 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
I know. It took me a while to work out what he actually wanted with all the
drama. ;-) People who come from Ubuntu don't understand about point
releases. Since I don't know Ubuntu, I don't know what it is that they are
thinking of.
Lisi
I do run Ub
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 14 September 2015 05:00:01 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Sunday 13 September 2015 16:13:19 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> > > > > I just want to make sure ag
Quoting Himanshu Shekhar (irm2015...@iiita.ac.in):
> I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one version of Debian
> to other without losing data or without formatiing the partition, simply as
> Ubuntu does.
The more times you ask, the more different answers you will receive.
At s
On Monday 14 September 2015 14:01:48 Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:12:42AM +0300, Jarle Aase wrote:
> > On 09/13/2015 10:57 AM, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> > > I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one
> > > version of Debian to other without losing data or wi
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:12:42AM +0300, Jarle Aase wrote:
> On 09/13/2015 10:57 AM, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> > I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one
> > version of Debian to other without losing data or without
> > formatiing the partition, simply as Ubuntu does. An earlie
On Monday 14 September 2015 05:00:01 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 September 2015 16:13:19 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> > > > I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one
> > > > version
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 13 September 2015 16:13:19 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> > > I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one
> > > version of Debian to other without losing data or without
> > > formatiing t
On Sunday 13 September 2015 16:13:19 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> > I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one version
> > of Debian to other without losing data or without formatiing the
> > partition, simply as Ubuntu does.
> > An earlie
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one version
> of Debian to other without losing data or without formatiing the
> partition, simply as Ubuntu does.
> An earlier mail in this mailing list stated to reboot from iso image
> and in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:23:29AM +0200, pasc...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
[...]
> Same (almost) for me:
>
> $ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade
>
> $ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
>
>
> (I don't remember if I even needed to reboot)
Reboot
On Thursday 10 September 2015 09:17:48 Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> i have debian jessie 8.1 on my laptop and wish to upgrade it to 8.2 without
> messing with the much configuration i have done and without losing any of
> the packages installed.
> please don't give any suggestion or method you are not
On Sunday 13 September 2015 08:57:49 Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one version of
> Debian to other without losing data or without formatiing the partition,
> simply as Ubuntu does.
We don't know Ubuntu. Don't expect us to give you instructions
On 2015-09-13 10:12, Jarle Aase wrote:
On 09/13/2015 10:57 AM, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one
version of Debian to other without losing data or without
formatiing the partition, simply as Ubuntu does. An earlier mail in
this mailing list stat
Hi,
Le 13/09/2015 09:57, Himanshu Shekhar a écrit :
> I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one version
> of Debian to other without losing data or without formatiing the
> partition, simply as Ubuntu does.
I think you're looking for this :
https://www.debian.org/releases/stab
On 09/13/2015 10:57 AM, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one
> version of Debian to other without losing data or without
> formatiing the partition, simply as Ubuntu does. An earlier mail in
> this mailing list stated to reboot from iso image and in
I just want to make sure again. How can one upgrade from one version of
Debian to other without losing data or without formatiing the partition,
simply as Ubuntu does.
An earlier mail in this mailing list stated to reboot from iso image and
install in the same old traditional way.
This Facebook pos
Joris Schoolmeesters wrote:
> Thanks for all replies.
>
>
> Didn't know about about snapshot.debian.org
> Looks like the best way to go in this situation.
much easier than another method (get specific package
version numbers and force upgrades to those versions).
songbird
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Updating between point releases is the same as any other update:
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
Regards,
/peter
Am 10.09.2015 um 10:17 schrieb Himanshu Shekhar:
> i have debian jessie 8.1 on my laptop and wish to upgrade it to
> 8.2 without m
i have debian jessie 8.1 on my laptop and wish to upgrade it to 8.2 without
messing with the much configuration i have done and without losing any of
the packages installed.
please don't give any suggestion or method you are not confident of.
--
Himanshu Shekhar
IIIT-Allahabad
IRM2015006
Thanks for all replies.
Didn't know about about snapshot.debian.org
Looks like the best way to go in this situation.
2015-09-09 14:15 GMT+02:00 songbird :
> Joris Schoolmeesters wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With Debian 7.9 out in the wild, apt-get will upgrade you
>> automatically to 7.9 on Debian
Joris Schoolmeesters wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With Debian 7.9 out in the wild, apt-get will upgrade you
> automatically to 7.9 on Debian 7.
>
> Is there a way to upgrade from 7.7 to 7.8 ?
the easiest way is probably by looking up the
release date and then using:
snapshot.debian.org
songbird
On 9/9/15, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 08:38:43AM +0200, Joris Schoolmeesters wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to upgrade from 7.7 to 7.8 ?
>
> The FAQ should cover it: there isn't a great deal of difference between
> point upgrades
> - they roll up security fixes about once a qu
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 08:38:43AM +0200, Joris Schoolmeesters wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With Debian 7.9 out in the wild, apt-get will upgrade you
> automatically to 7.9 on Debian 7.
>
> Is there a way to upgrade from 7.7 to 7.8 ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Joris
You could install packages from 7.8 me
Hi all,
With Debian 7.9 out in the wild, apt-get will upgrade you
automatically to 7.9 on Debian 7.
Is there a way to upgrade from 7.7 to 7.8 ?
Thanks in advance,
Joris
Thanks for spotting of the error in the sources.list. It error message was
confusing me.
I did run apt-get dist-upgrade after apt-get update.
The process ground to a halt with a problem over dependency error over
'default-jre'
After googling the new error I had to run:
apt-get -o APT::Immediate
And what about
#apt-get dist-upgrade
or
#aptitude safe-upgrade
?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/d6a6eea37c974ce57bcb30a25ff2ff2a.squir...@www.sud-oue
On 11/26/2012 09:08 PM, Tim Long wrote:
Hi all,
I have an installation of debian stable I am trying to upgrade to testing.
I have updated sources.list to testing/wheezy but when I do apt-get
upgrade I get the following error:
=
W: Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.au.debian.org/pub/debian/dists/tes
Hi all,
I have an installation of debian stable I am trying to upgrade to testing.
I have updated sources.list to testing/wheezy but when I do apt-get upgrade
I get the following error:
=
W: Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.au.debian.org/pub/debian/dists/testing/Release Unable to
find expected entr
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 18:10 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Kun Niu wrote:
> > Somewhere on debian.org are pages on how to upgrade from Woody to Etch. So,
> > I'd read them first and try it.
>
> What about sarge? IIRC, it was woody -> sarge -> etch -> lenny.
>
> You'd have to find a sarge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kun Niu wrote:
> Somewhere on debian.org are pages on how to upgrade from Woody to Etch. So,
> I'd read them first and try it.
What about sarge? IIRC, it was woody -> sarge -> etch -> lenny.
You'd have to find a sarge archive to upgrade to, though.
> > Yes. That's what I want. Would that be too dangerous?
> > We've encountered the boot failure problem.
> > But the system works fine when switching back to the old 2.4 kernel.
> >
>
> I don't think that Debian ever supports skipping major releases, and also I
> think that before moving to Etch
That would be really appreciated.
Have you got that email?
2009/8/5 Siggy Brentrup
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:05 +0800, Kun Niu wrote:
> > Just wish me good luck then.
> > Or I'll have to go thousands of miles to check my system.
> > That'll be really awesome for me.
> > And a live cd will be
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:05 +0800, Kun Niu wrote:
> Just wish me good luck then.
> Or I'll have to go thousands of miles to check my system.
> That'll be really awesome for me.
> And a live cd will be a really good idea.
> Thank you for your kind reply.
>
> On 2009-08-04 22:41, Kun Niu wrote:
>
Just wish me good luck then.
Or I'll have to go thousands of miles to check my system.
That'll be really awesome for me.
And a live cd will be a really good idea.
Thank you for your kind reply.
On 2009-08-04 22:41, Kun Niu wrote:
[snip]
> We've encountered the problem upgrading the kernel to 2.6
On 2009-08-04 22:21, Kun Niu wrote:
Dear all,
My debian system was installed on Sep. 2005.
Now, we've decided to upgrade my present system via apt-get to the latest
stable debian branch.
Our kenel is 2.4.21.
What a *boring* system. But... boring can be good!
We've encountered the problem upg
Dear all,
My debian system was installed on Sep. 2005.
Now, we've decided to upgrade my present system via apt-get to the latest
stable debian branch.
Our kenel is 2.4.21.
We've encountered the problem upgrading the kernel to 2.6.8.
It seems that apt-get fail to execute the update-initramfs and the
2008/1/9, Jostein Elvaker Haande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Alex Teclo wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I have noticed that, on 2008-01-05, the Linux version of Second Life
> > stopped working on my Debian lenny x86 machine.
> > This was a few minutes after I did aptitude upgrade, so I suspect it
> > might be s
Alex Teclo wrote:
[snip]
I have noticed that, on 2008-01-05, the Linux version of Second Life
stopped working on my Debian lenny x86 machine.
This was a few minutes after I did aptitude upgrade, so I suspect it
might be some due to the installation of a new version of some package.
This is Se
Hello,
I have noticed that, on 2008-01-05, the Linux version of Second Life stopped
working on my Debian lenny x86 machine.
This was a few minutes after I did aptitude upgrade, so I suspect it might
be some due to the installation of a new version of some package.
Let's do grep "status installed
Hello list.
Here some hints related to VMWare I found after upgrading a debian box to Xorg7
in a
hosted system.
If you download a package xserver-xorg-video-all it will install for you all
video
drivers. Actually you just need the package xserver-xorg-video-vmware and you
can
remove all other
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:27:16PM -0400, Yu,Glen [Ontario] wrote:
> What I'm wondering now is if we upgrade to the 2.6.8-3-686-smp kernel via
> apt would it have any ill effects (i.e. it can't detect any hard disks
> again)?
If you're willing to sacrifice your uptime, you can install the kerne
Hello everyone,
In the very beginning, our intention was to install Debian 3.1 Sarge with the
2.6.8 kernel (via 'linux26' at install prompt) on our Dell PowerEdge 2800
server, but at the step in the installation process where it was suppose to
partition the hard disks, it gave an error citing n
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:02:04PM +0200, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:12:28AM -0700, nuno romano wrote:
> > I have a background with several Linux
> > distributions,and when I want to upgrade
> > one package,I download the source package
> > (or binary,if compatible) through
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:12:28AM -0700, nuno romano wrote:
> I have a background with several Linux
> distributions,and when I want to upgrade
> one package,I download the source package
> (or binary,if compatible) through a web
> browser html/ftp interface in a mirror.
> I see all packages liste
I have a background with several Linux
distributions,and when I want to upgrade
one package,I download the source package
(or binary,if compatible) through a web
browser html/ftp interface in a mirror.
I see all packages listed and I pick what
I want.Now,I have Debian and when I want
to download i
Hello
J P (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> when do i install the new 446mb of updates?...during
> the main Debian installation of the 7cd's during
> apt?or afterwards in root#.if so, is the
> command
The answer is: whenever you want.
To upgrade your system, make sure you have entries for
cr wrote:
is a fault between the street and the incoming junction box in my house,
which is only apparent when powered up?
Amazing what I learn on deb-user!
cr
This is what the original tech. meant.
In most installations, the public utility stops at the street, and you
are responsibl
On Sun, 09 May 2004 00:37, John Hasler wrote:
> cr writes:
> > And it persists even when I disconnect all the house wiring and hook my
> > phone / modem direct to the incoming line.
>
> That pretty well proves that it's in their system.
>
> > For me, the clincher was when the phone company tech cam
cr writes:
> And it persists even when I disconnect all the house wiring and hook my
> phone / modem direct to the incoming line.
That pretty well proves that it's in their system.
> For me, the clincher was when the phone company tech came to check, went
> out to the junction box in the street,
On Sat, 08 May 2004 16:24, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> Yea, verily, I say unto you that on this date (Sat, 8 May 2004 14:10:52
> +1200) cr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did appear within my Magick Viewing Screen
>
> and, being somewhat pleasantly supplicatory, did polemicize thusly:
> > Yes, sitting behind a 56k
On Sat, 08 May 2004 16:49, Silvan wrote:
> On Friday 07 May 2004 11:06 pm, cr wrote:
> > > year or two. Grabbing new stuff by modem just takes patience. It
> > > helps if you don't pay for your connectivity by the hour too.
> >
> > Ah. I do (or rather, I have a fixed number of hours prer month
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Sat,
08 May 2004 15:06:26 +1200, cr wrote:
> Rather more significantly, I only have one telephone line - so when my
> computer's on line, phone ain't working.
Same here. The Potato (stable) to Woody (testing) dist-upgrade took me
around 40 hours. I, too, as a
On Saturday 08 May 2004 02:23 am, cr wrote:
> For me, the clincher was when the phone company tech came to check, went
> out to the junction box in the street, disconnected the line from the
> exchange - crackle stopped - and reconnected it - crackle restarted.And
> then the tech told me it mu
On Sat, 08 May 2004 16:24, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> Yea, verily, I say unto you that on this date (Sat, 8 May 2004 14:10:52
> +1200) cr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did appear within my Magick Viewing Screen
>
> and, being somewhat pleasantly supplicatory, did polemicize thusly:
> > Yes, sitting behind a 56k
On Sat, 08 May 2004 16:49, Silvan wrote:
> On Friday 07 May 2004 11:06 pm, cr wrote:
> > > year or two. Grabbing new stuff by modem just takes patience. It
> > > helps if you don't pay for your connectivity by the hour too.
> >
> > Ah. I do (or rather, I have a fixed number of hours prer month
On Friday 07 May 2004 11:06 pm, cr wrote:
> > year or two. Grabbing new stuff by modem just takes patience. It helps
> > if you don't pay for your connectivity by the hour too.
> Ah. I do (or rather, I have a fixed number of hours prer month on
> dial-up).
Gack. Well, I suppose your origina
Yea, verily, I say unto you that on this date (Sat, 8 May 2004 14:10:52
+1200) cr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did appear within my Magick Viewing Screen
and, being somewhat pleasantly supplicatory, did polemicize thusly:
> Yes, sitting behind a 56k modem (or a 28k which is what I'm stuck with
> when line
cr writes:
> I have a fixed number of hours prer month on dial-up
That's a problem.
> Rather more significantly, I only have one telephone line - so when my
> computer's on line, phone ain't working.
Same here.
> And* I can never guarantee the line won't drop for some reason, so
> leaving the t
On Sat, 08 May 2004 14:30, Silvan wrote:
> On Friday 07 May 2004 10:21 pm, John Hasler wrote:
> > cr writes:
> > > Yes, sitting behind a 56k modem (or a 28k which is what I'm stuck with
> > > when line noise sets in!), a major upgrade of several packages is
> > > really only practical off CD's.
> >
On Friday 07 May 2004 10:21 pm, John Hasler wrote:
> cr writes:
> > Yes, sitting behind a 56k modem (or a 28k which is what I'm stuck with
> > when line noise sets in!), a major upgrade of several packages is really
> > only practical off CD's.
>
> I don't find that to be the case.
Me neither. W
cr writes:
> Yes, sitting behind a 56k modem (or a 28k which is what I'm stuck with
> when line noise sets in!), a major upgrade of several packages is really
> only practical off CD's.
I don't find that to be the case.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Fri, 07 May 2004 20:22, mags wrote:
> Are there packages from Testing and Unstable on the Debian CD's (3.02
> etc)? or just Stable.
> I'm interested in installing Debian, but many packages in stable seem a
> little out of date, and an upgrade with a 56k modem looks as though it
> would take fore
On Friday 07 May 2004 12:22 am, mags wrote:
> Are there packages from Testing and Unstable on the Debian CD's (3.02
> etc)? or just Stable.
> I'm interested in installing Debian, but many packages in stable seem
> a little out of date, and an upgrade with a 56k modem looks as though
> it would take
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
