-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:21:26AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 01:18:07PM +1100, terryc wrote:
> > What is the simple procedure to install additional Tetex packages now?
> >
> > Been about 2000 sin
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 01:18:07PM +1100, terryc wrote:
> What is the simple procedure to install additional Tetex packages now?
>
> Been about 2000 since I used LaTeX a lot and I find that wrapfig is
> the way to wrap text around a figure these days, so I'd like to use it.
Bac
terryc wrote:
> What is the simple procedure to install additional Tetex packages now?
>
> Been about 2000 since I used LaTeX a lot and I find that wrapfig is
> the way to wrap text around a figure these days, so I'd like to use it.
>
> Is there any aptitude/apt-get equ
What is the simple procedure to install additional Tetex packages now?
Been about 2000 since I used LaTeX a lot and I find that wrapfig is
the way to wrap text around a figure these days, so I'd like to use it.
Is there any aptitude/apt-get equivalent and what was/is the
installation u
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 02:33:28AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/31/08 23:39, Jim McCloskey wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Thank you very much. This file is of a daunting size (7096 lines). It
>
> Send it to the band printer in the computer room?
I don't know, my Epson LQ-2080 would handle that jus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/31/08 23:39, Jim McCloskey wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thank you very much. This file is of a daunting size (7096 lines). It
Send it to the band printer in the computer room?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
We want... a Shrubbery!!
-BEGIN P
* Florian Kulzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|> > But these are details, and mostly the problem is solved, and I'm
|> > grateful for your help,
|>
|> There might be a problem with pdftex.map. Look at the output of
|>
|> kpsewhich pdftex.map
|>
|> and check if this files c
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 18:22:18 -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
[...]
> This second produced a null output. And following up on that hint,
> and with the help of /usr/share/doc/tex-common/TeX-on-Debian.txt,
> I was able to create 10local.cfg in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ with:
>
> Map pmn.map
>
> Thi
* Douglas A. Tutty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|> TeXLive is in Etch, you didn't have to go to Lenny...
Sigh ... well, thank you. This is good to know.
* Florian Kulzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|> Run the following two commands and post the output:
|> find /usr/local/share/texmf/font
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:00:13AM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
>
> Lord, so I decided to upgrade my laptop (a Lenovo T60) to
> testing/lenny so as to try out TeXLive and suddenly found myself in
> one of those linux weekends of long ago (which I've never been sure if
> I missed or not) when you're
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 00:00:13 -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
>
> Lord, so I decided to upgrade my laptop (a Lenovo T60) to
> testing/lenny
[...]
> But the problem I'm most anxious to solve at present has to do with
> the change from TeTeX to TeXLive.
>
> I have so
y wireless cards
(all of which worked beautifully before) work at all.
But the problem I'm most anxious to solve at present has to do with
the change from TeTeX to TeXLive.
I have some fonts hand-installed in /usr/local/share/texmf/fonts/
(Adobe Minion) which I use more or less constantly. All w
* Rick Dooling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080207 13:28]:
> Hi, all:
>
> I've searched the group for messages on these.
>
> I have one machine running Etch with tetex.
>
> Another newer machine where I haven't installed tetex or texlive.
>
> Anybody with rec
Rick Dooling:
>
> Anybody with recent experience moving from tetex to texlive on Etch?
I don't do much Latex anymore, but the migration should be painless. You
just may have to hunt down some packages you are using with 'apt-cache
search'es.
Texlive appears to be the
Hi, all:
I've searched the group for messages on these.
I have one machine running Etch with tetex.
Another newer machine where I haven't installed tetex or texlive.
Anybody with recent experience moving from tetex to texlive on Etch?
Or anybody just going with texlive having any
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:18:02 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On 10/29/07, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
> > >
> > > tetex
On 10/29/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
> >
> > tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is t
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:24:00PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
>
> tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed
>
> Command:
>
> $ sudo apt-get install docbook
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
>
> tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed
>
> Command:
>
> $ sudo apt-get install docbook-utils jadet
Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed
Command:
$ sudo apt-get install docbook-utils jadetex tetex-bin tetex-extra tetex-base
on debian oldstable (sarge)
Thanks
--
Mathieu
--
g up-to-date Etch on my desktop. I would like to upgrade to
>>> Lenny recently.
>>>
>>> I wonder the current status of tetex -> texlive transition. Is there
>>> going to be any known problem during the upgrade? Do I need to purge
>>> some related packa
rade to
>> Lenny recently.
>>
>> I wonder the current status of tetex -> texlive transition. Is there
>> going to be any known problem during the upgrade? Do I need to purge
>> some related packages in advance? Thank you.
>>
>> $ aptitude search ~i~nt
* Wei Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070909 01:14]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running up-to-date Etch on my desktop. I would like to upgrade to
> Lenny recently.
>
> I wonder the current status of tetex -> texlive transiti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am running up-to-date Etch on my desktop. I would like to upgrade to
Lenny recently.
I wonder the current status of tetex -> texlive transition. Is there
going to be any known problem during the upgrade? Do I need to purge
some rela
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Holding the various tetex packages (tetex-bin, tetex-common,
> tetex-extra, tetex-doc) "should" work -- but I wouldn't be surprised
> if they get dragged in by dependencies anyway. aptitude holds don't
> preve
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:38:52 +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> You just could take my hint for further research if it doesn’t work directly.
> (You could have come up with the idea to put everything tex-related on hold,
> for
> example.)
Thanks for the hint, as you may have already discovered from
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:44:28PM +, - Tong - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
Holding the various tetex packages (tetex-bin, tetex-common,
tetex-extra, tetex-doc) "should" work -- but I wo
Hi.
- Tong -, 25.08.2007 05:51:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:03:42 +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
>
>>> Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
>> See the manpage of aptitude and look for "hold".
>
> […]
>
> Please be *r
- Tong - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
>
> I just upgraded from Etch to Lenny, and have loads of things to fix,
> keeping tetex from upgrading to texlive will sure ease the transition for
> the moment.
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:03:42 +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
>> Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
>
> See the manpage of aptitude and look for "hold".
so what?
Actively participate in group discussion is good thing, but please be
res
Hi.
- Tong -, 25.08.2007 01:44:
> Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
See the manpage of aptitude and look for "hold".
Regards, Mathias
--
debian/rules
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:48:25 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>> Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
>>
>> I just upgraded from Etch to Lenny, and have loads of things to fix,
>> keeping tetex from upgrading to texlive will sure ease the tran
In your apt.conf file try a line like exclude texl* and see if that helps.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, - Tong - wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
I just upgraded from Etch to Lenny, and have loads of things to fix,
keeping tetex from upgrading to
Hi,
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
I just upgraded from Etch to Lenny, and have loads of things to fix,
keeping tetex from upgrading to texlive will sure ease the transition for
the moment.
thanks
--
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
http
On Thursday 16 August 2007 20:23, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I searched the mailing list for answers to the texlive vs tetex issues. The
> answers seems to be that texlive is the newer for updated distribution for
> tex and latex documents. Thus, I installed the
Hey guys,
I searched the mailing list for answers to the texlive vs tetex issues. The
answers seems to be that texlive is the newer for updated distribution for tex
and latex documents. Thus, I installed the 'texlive-latex-base' package and was
a happy camper. Latex was working fine
H.S. wrote:
>
> Same here. From all the texlive packages that are to be intall, there at
> least a few tetex package still, e.g. tetex-bin tetex-extra.
>
> These packages I would expect to be purged by aptitude automatically (by
> reporting they are no longer used) some time
David Fox wrote:
>
>
> On 06 Jul 2007 17:13:19 GMT, *Tyler Smith* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>
> If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
> switching from tetex to texlive now, which is ge
On 06 Jul 2007 17:13:19 GMT, Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless.
Kind of. But my last dist-upgrade involved grabbing a whole slew of texlive
packa
On 2007-07-07, BartlebyScrivener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 6, 12:40 pm, Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Presumably,
>> if you just let apt handle all the upgrades you will probably find
>> that you no longer have tetex by the time Etch g
On Jul 6, 12:40 pm, Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Presumably,
> if you just let apt handle all the upgrades you will probably find
> that you no longer have tetex by the time Etch goes stable, and all
> packages have been replaced by texlive. Or something like that.
Tyler Smith wrote:
On 2007-07-06, Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070706 14:21]:
Tyler Smith wrote:
On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
switching fr
On 2007-07-06, Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070706 14:21]:
>> Tyler Smith wrote:
>> > On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > If you search the list you'll find several threa
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> * H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070706 14:21]:
>> Tyler Smith wrote:
>>> On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
>>> switching from tetex to texliv
* H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070706 14:21]:
> Tyler Smith wrote:
> > On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
> > switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless
Tyler Smith wrote:
> On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
> switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless.
>
> Tyler
Thanks for the explanation. I will probably wait a
in Latex packages in Testing these days?
tetex is old and deprecated, texlive is its successor. In the long run, all
the debian packages will be migrated to texlive from tetex. The transition
has been announced sometime back on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html . Only
On 2007-07-06, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any changes going on in Latex packages in Testing these
> days? Do I need both tetex and texlive packages? And, finally,
> what's the relation between these two kind of packages?
Tetex is not longer maintained upst
both tetex and texlive packages? And, finally, what's the relation
between these two kind of packages?
thanks,
->HS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 4, 2:40 pm, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> BartlebyScrivener wrote:
Thank you. I'm running Etch.
rd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sition under Etch. However if
you are running testing, please wait for couple more days till texlive
2007-10 descends into testing and then you can upgrade to it. If you are
running sid, I think most of the bugs that arised when transitioning from
tetex to texlive have been fixed. So mostly y
I've seen a few threads where some folks have had trouble installing
live tex.
What is the current status of this under Etch?
Is the recommended procedure to remove tetex first?
Or can they coexist?
I use Synaptic mainly.
Thanks for any help.
rd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have noticed that, by default, pdflatex is no more pdflatex:
> does your pdflatex links tp pdftex ?
>
> my two cents,
> Jerome
On Debian testing with texlive, pdflatex is a symbolic link to pdfetex.
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On 5/21/07, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed that, by default, pdflatex is no more pdflatex:
does your pdflatex links tp pdftex ?
That has been usual for some time now. The pdfetex binary changes
behaviour depending on what name it is called with.
See the TeX F
On 5/21/07, Jörg-Volker Peetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> I hope you mean the file size has increased, not the page count.
>
> The newer pdflatex embeds all (most?) fonts in the pdf file. Try
> running pdffonts on pdf files produced by different versions of
> pdflatex. I
Hello,
I have noticed that, by default, pdflatex is no more pdflatex:
does your pdflatex links tp pdftex ?
my two cents,
Jerome
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
I hope you mean the file size has increased, not the page count.
The newer pdflatex embeds all (most?) fonts in the p
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> I hope you mean the file size has increased, not the page count.
>
> The newer pdflatex embeds all (most?) fonts in the pdf file. Try
> running pdffonts on pdf files produced by different versions of
> pdflatex. I believe this is typically what you want, especially when
>
On 5/21/07, Jörg-Volker Peetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
the last upgrade in testing made me transit from tetex to texlive.
All works fine but my impression is that pdflatex now produces much
bigger (more than twice as big) pdf-file (~ 600 pages) as before with tetex.
Has any on
Dear all,
the last upgrade in testing made me transit from tetex to texlive.
All works fine but my impression is that pdflatex now produces much
bigger (more than twice as big) pdf-file (~ 600 pages) as before with tetex.
Has any one else made similar experiences?
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker
o mirror
>> that of /usr/share/texmf-texlive/. So just putting a .bst file in
>> ~/texmf and running mktexlsr (=texhash?) didn't work. It needed to be
>> in ~/texmf/bibtex/bst/.
>>
>
> I had to do that also for tetex
>
I probably had tetex improperly se
unning mktexlsr (=texhash?) didn't work. It needed to be
> in ~/texmf/bibtex/bst/.
>
I had to do that also for tetex
> Anyways, the rest works out fine.
>
> Tyler
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o rerun texhash after the update
Thanks for your responses, everybody. I carefully purged all
the TeTeX files, then installed TeXLive, and tested it out
on a couple of documents (on the way I noticed that a couple
of packages I use *all the time* (apacite and apa.cls) which
I'd previously had
On 2007-05-07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files
>> (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls files) into the right directories
>
> If you have non-standard files you should put them
* Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070507 13:49]:
> ... its time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since
> it actually updates, but I've also heard tell that people experience
> big problems when moving over from TeTeX instead of just installing
> TeXLive on
XeTeX to run to some more work, but that is irrelevant to the question
since tetex doesn't have XeTeX (good utf and truetype font support)
> (another thread on this list in the last month or two has the details
> of that). Doing an apt{get,itude} purge of the tetex stuff before
> i
XeTeX to run to some more work, but that is irrelevant to the question
since tetex doesn't have XeTeX (good utf and truetype font support)
> (another thread on this list in the last month or two has the details
> of that). Doing an apt{get,itude} purge of the tetex stuff before
> i
the last month or two has the details
of that). Doing an apt{get,itude} purge of the tetex stuff before
installing texlive is probably a good idea.
> Also, (very importantly) does AUCTeX work with TeXLive?
>
Once I got texlive installed I had no problems with Auctex.
HTH,
Tyler
--
To UNS
;ve
>> > had to remove some TeX component or other because it now
>> > won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means it's
>> > time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since
>> > it actually updates, but I've also heard te
nally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've
> > > had to remove some TeX component or other because it now
> > > won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means it's
> > > time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since
> > > it actually
On 5/7/07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400
Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've
> had to remove some TeX component or other because it now
> won't depend o
On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400
Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've
> had to remove some TeX component or other because it now
> won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that me
Hey all,
So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've
had to remove some TeX component or other because it now
won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means it's
time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since
it actually updates, but I've
* KS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070425 15:42]:
>
> While the installation of texlive went fine with my Sid box, it did take
> quite a lot of space doing that upgrade. It ended up using more than
> 500MB in my /usr partition. Did anyone notice that?
In my installation of etch, /usr/share/texmf-texlive o
Russell L. Harris wrote:
>> Johannes Wiedersich escribió:
>>> Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install
>>> texlive'?
>
> Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you
> must purge all the teTeX conf
ll of this then
you should not install tex-live, I mean, because tetex no longer exists...
Regards,
Jose Luis.
- --
ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talug.org.ve
http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es
San Cr
Upgrade will eat a half gig. Maybe all this text-live language modules should
be installable to a different partition or burnable to an offline CD or DVD.
Why? How often will they be used? Nice to have them available but too much
disk space for some of us.
Shoud I file a "wish-list"?
--
To U
On 2007-04-15, Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Johannes Wiedersich escribió:
>>> Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install
>>> texlive'?
>
> Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears tha
> Johannes Wiedersich escribió:
>> Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install
>> texlive'?
Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you
must purge all the teTeX configuration files before installing
TeXLive.
I fail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Wiedersich escribió:
> I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to
> TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a
> happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just won
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivan Glushkov escribió:
> So, any idea what can be wrong?
Yes, tetex does not longer exists. Try tex live ;-)
Regards,
Jose Luis.
- --
ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jens Kubieziel wrote:
> 2007/4/12, Ivan Glushkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> updmap-sys failed. Output has been stored in:
>> /tmp/tetex.updmap.SzH23920
>
> What is the output of:
> ls /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/dvip
2007/4/12, Ivan Glushkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
updmap-sys failed. Output has been stored in:
/tmp/tetex.updmap.SzH23920
What is the output of:
ls /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/
dpkg -S dvips35.map
kpsewhich --format=map dvips35.map
kpsewhich --show-path=map
grep TEXFO
there:
10:58 / $ find . | grep article.cls
./usr/local/matlab7/sys/tex/latex/base/article.cls
./usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/article.cls
./usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/extsizes/extarticle.cls
11:01 / $
I do not know what triggered this behavior.I tried to uninstall and then
install again th
> < 2007 to unstable.
>
> Doesn't concern etch. Having both available on etch, when should *I*
> upgrade?
if you would have read on, you would have found in the following sentence:
<------
With this version, teTe
* Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070411 12:42]:
> I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to
> TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch.
I have been using teTeX under Etch to generate a variety of
complicated documents, t
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:49 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Thilo Six wrote:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html
>
> From there, I get:
> < the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live
> < 2007 to unstable.
>
>
Thilo Six wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html
From there, I get:
< the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live
< 2007 to unstable.
Doesn't concern etch. Having both available on etch, when should *I*
upgrade?
On 4/11/07, Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to
TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a
happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when
is the b
Johannes Wiedersich wrote the following on 11.04.2007 19:37:
> I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to
> TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a
> happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when
I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to
TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a
happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when
is the best time to migrate: now, later or should I wait for an
auto
Hi Micha:
Please try pdfetex &latex file.tex
It seems to work for me, though -output-format latex does not work.
Then perhaps try latex &latex file.tex
Please also have a look at /etc/texmf/fmt.d and see whether you have the
proper .cnf files.
Sebastian Canagaratna
Department of Chemistry
Ohio
> I tried to produce dvi output from a tex file I have and latex just
> > > > refuses to do it. I tried:
> > > > latex -output-format=dvi .tex
> > > > And it's as if the option is not there, I just get a pdf file again.
> > > > How do I force la
gt; refuses to do it. I tried:
> > > latex -output-format=dvi .tex
> > > And it's as if the option is not there, I just get a pdf file again.
> > > How do I force latex to produce a dvi file?
> > > This is with debian unstable and the tetex packages, not texliv
]:
> > > I tried to produce dvi output from a tex file I have and latex just
> > > refuses to do it. I tried:
> > > latex -output-format=dvi .tex
> > > And it's as if the option is not there, I just get a pdf file again.
> > > How do I force latex
t
> > refuses to do it. I tried:
> > latex -output-format=dvi .tex
> > And it's as if the option is not there, I just get a pdf file again.
> > How do I force latex to produce a dvi file?
> > This is with debian unstable and the tetex packages, not texlive
>
> By
atex to produce a dvi file?
> This is with debian unstable and the tetex packages, not texlive
By default, the command
$ latex filename.tex
produces a dvi file, in both TeTeX and TeXLive. I an unaware of the
"output-format" option; why are you using it?
RLH
--
To UNSUBSCR
I tried to produce dvi output from a tex file I have and latex just refuses to
do it. I tried:
latex -output-format=dvi .tex
And it's as if the option is not there, I just get a pdf file again.
How do I force latex to produce a dvi file?
This is with debian unstable and the tetex packages
Russell L. Harris schrieb am 24.11.2006 23:59:
[...]
> So now my task is to figure out how to install version 49 or 50 of
> minitoc.sty in texlive.
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=instpackages or try
the MikTeX tools:
http://dojo.miktex.org/blogs/christian_schenk/articles/mpmuni
e and I could not compile some of my older
> Tetex documents and some of the things I was used to just did not
> work. Unfortunately I can't remember the details now. At that time
> I just removed Texlive and went back to Tetex - and everything
> worked as usual.
I made a fresh in
ion and for more information on the options which are
> available to me?
As far as I know, tetex will still be in Debian throughout Etch's
lifecycle. That means there is no urgent need for you to switch. In the
long run, switching to texlive is probably a good idea. I did that a few
months
1 - 100 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
