Yandex contribute substantially.
https://tass.com/economy/1591543
Cheers!
On Mi, 15 dec 21, 10:33:05, David wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 03:18, Kiyanovski, Arthur wrote:
>
> > TL;DR - How do I get the Linux headers or source code for kernel
> > 3.16.0-4-amd64 Debian 8.0?
>
> The version number of a Debian kernel package is not the sam
Hi,
Kiyanovski, Arthur wrote:
> Thomas, You found 3.16.7-ckt9-3 snapshot which is very close.
Close, but no cigar.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Schmitt
>Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 7:17 PM
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Cc: Kiyanovski, Arthur
>Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] How to get linux headers or source code for debian
>8.0 kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64
>
>CAUTION:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 03:18, Kiyanovski, Arthur wrote:
> TL;DR - How do I get the Linux headers or source code for kernel
> 3.16.0-4-amd64 Debian 8.0?
The version number of a Debian kernel package is not the same
thing as the version number of the kernel that it contains.
For example
Hi,
i wrote:
> linux-headers-3.16.0-4-all-arm64_3.16.7-ckt9-3_arm64.deb
Wrong copy+paste. But there is an amd64 variant of it, too:
linux-headers-3.16.0-4-all-amd64_3.16.7-ckt9-3_amd64.deb
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
Hi,
> How do I get the Linux headers or source code for kernel
> 3.16.0-4-amd64 Debian 8.0?
Are you sure that this is the version code which you should be looking for
if interested in source ?
According to my mail archives uname -a on a Debian 8.1 says:
Linux ts6 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP
Kiyanovski, Arthur wrote:
> But it got the sources for kernel linux-3.16.84 and not 3.16.0-4
>
> Can you please help me? I need to make sure my code compiles on this
> kernel but I can't get its sources or headers ☹
you sure you are not on ubuntu
https://howtoinstall.co/en/linux-headers-3.16.0-
On 2021-12-14 17:00 UTC+0100, Kiyanovski, Arthur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR - How do I get the Linux headers or source code for kernel
> 3.16.0-4-amd64 Debian 8.0?
Hi Arthur,
I don't find this kernel version on snapshots.debian.org. I assume that
AWS uses it's own kernel
Hi,
TL;DR - How do I get the Linux headers or source code for kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64
Debian 8.0?
What I tried and failed doing:
---
I have an AWS instance with kernel:
3.16.0-4-amd64
apt-cache search doesn’t find a relevant package.
I tried updating the etc
et up Elmer
> with Trilinos. In short, a setup for some heavy duty computer
> modeling. Because of several factors, I chose to download the latest
> source code from GitHub. The CMake file (without MPI support) worked
> fine and the make file ran fine. But when I included MPI into the
>
modeling.
Because of several factors, I chose to download the latest source code
from GitHub. The CMake file (without MPI support) worked fine and the
make file ran fine. But when I included MPI into the CMake file, (see
below) the CMake still ran fine
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 8:17 AM Kent West wrote:
> Oops; when to Thomas instead of list; sorry. (Gmail, ugh!)
>
"went", not 'when". (Kent's typing skills, ugh!)
-- Forwarded message -
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:23 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> It depends on where you plan to
orporated into Debian, which can
then be released without having to add those previous Debian-specific
patches.
So, in theory, If I "apt source PACKAGE" or "git clone PACKAGE", I'll get
the same base source code, except that as part of the "apt source PACKAGE"
route,
Oops, went to Stefan instead of list; sorry. (Google Mail is so ... broken,
in some ways.)
-- Forwarded message -
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:50 PM Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> > When I use "apt source sl" (from sid, into its own directory) and compare
> > that tree (?) with what I
Hi,
Disclaimer: I am not a Debian member and only prepare the Debian packages
of my own upstream project. So i'm just one or two steps ahead of you.
Kent West wrote:
> Should I consider the Debian download as the official source, of the Git
> version?
s/of/or/ ?
It depends on where you plan to
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:49:15PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > When I use "apt source sl" (from sid, into its own directory) and compare
> > that tree (?) with what I get if I download via what that suggests (git
> > clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sl.git) (into its own directory), I
> >
> When I use "apt source sl" (from sid, into its own directory) and compare
> that tree (?) with what I get if I download via what that suggests (git
> clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sl.git) (into its own directory), I
> notice that the Makefile in the Debian version is slightly
> more compl
Hi!
I'm trying to dip my toe in the waters of editing the source code of Debian
packages, and I've started with the simplest, most innocuous program I
could think of - sl (the ASCII train that goes by on the screen when you
mistype "ls" as "sl).
When I use "apt sour
Hi Brian,
>
> URI, please.
>
sorry, there is no URL to download it at the moment (my site is down).
I attached the files to the message I sent to mentors.
> Becuase, up until now, nobody has packaged and submitted it.
Hmm, so kali-linux is not debian, I understand. But as it is in kali, it is
On Wed 27 Jul 2016 at 18:47:34 +0200, Hans wrote:
> package is made and upoaded to mentors.debian.org. Thanks for all the help so
> far. It is my first self-made package.
URI, please.
> Meanwhile I heard, there is already a sakis3g-package in kali-linux, so
> someone was faster than me. Howev
Hi folks,
package is made and upoaded to mentors.debian.org. Thanks for all the help so
far. It is my first self-made package.
Meanwhile I heard, there is already a sakis3g-package in kali-linux, so
someone was faster than me. However, I am wondering, why it is not in debian.
Whatever, the kal
On Wed 27 Jul 2016 at 09:39:04 +0200, Hans wrote:
> I want to create a debian package with my own additions (added an icon
> and a button for the kde-menu, changed groups and user rights).
>
> But there is a problem:
>
> The file is just a script. I read in the dokus, and all told, they
> want t
On 2016-07-27 11:29 +0200, Hans wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> great, your foo-file helped me a lot, the package is almost finished.
> I can build it now. YES!
>
> However, the installed package is still root:root, but should be root:dig.
> I suppose, this can be preset? Or do I have to edit the packages
Have you tried xenity yet?
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Hans wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 03:39:04
From: Hans
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: How to create package without source code
Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 07:39:25 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hi folks,
I
On 07/27/2016 10:49 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-07-27 10:14 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>
>> Here is the manual describing how to build binary packages:
>>
>> http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/
>
> This is over ten years old and only for hardcore
Hi Sven,
great, your foo-file helped me a lot, the package is almost finished.
I can build it now. YES!
However, the installed package is still root:root, but should be root:dig.
I suppose, this can be preset? Or do I have to edit the packages manually
after the build?
>
> I have attached a
Hi,
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Thomas also said:
> "After investing due effort to find answers myself, i post packaging
> questions to
> debian-ment...@lists.debian.org
> Is it not worth considering that advice?
We seem still in the 'due effort' stage.
Sven's skeleton package would be my best bet to
Hi Lisi,
>
> Is it not worth considering that advice? You might get better answers.
>
of course. And if I am stuck, I will do that. However, Sven Joachim sent me a
foo.file, which helped me a lot.
At the moment I am testing and reading the manuals of dh_install.
I already made the structure
Hi,
Hans wrote:
> this doesn't help me at all. All manuals I read assume, I have a programm in
> source code. But I repeat: it is just a shell script!
This assumption includes the possibility of zero source code, which
needs no further preparation.
A Makefile would be a way to int
On Wednesday 27 July 2016 09:36:13 Hans wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> this doesn't help me at all. All manuals I read assume, I have a programm
> in source code. But I repeat: it is just a shell script!
>
> Of course, each user can download it, put it below /usr/bin/, set manual
On 2016-07-27 10:14 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Here is the manual describing how to build binary packages:
>
> http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/
This is over ten years old and only for hardcore users. Creating a
source package (even if it's just a
On 27/07/2016 09:24, Hans wrote:
However, I did not quit understand. Can I add several files instead of a single
one? And will it preserve rights, as I set?
Yes, both these are possible - have a look at the Wiki for more examples
https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/wiki
On 2016-07-27 09:39 +0200, Hans wrote:
> I want to create a debian package with my own additions (added an icon and a
> button for the kde-menu, changed groups and user rights).
>
> But there is a problem:
>
> The file is just a script. I read in the dokus, and all told, they want to
> compile s
Hi Thomas,
this doesn't help me at all. All manuals I read assume, I have a programm in
source code. But I repeat: it is just a shell script!
Of course, each user can download it, put it below /usr/bin/, set manually
owners to root:dig, and off he goes.
But I want a debian package, to ma
On 07/27/2016 09:39 AM, Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I want to create a debian package with my own additions (added an icon and a
> button for the kde-menu, changed groups and user rights).
>
> But there is a problem:
>
> The file is just a script. I read in the dokus, and all told, they want t
Hi Tom,
sounds good at a first view.
> It's sort of cheating, and wouldn't allow you to upload to the Debian
> archive, but for personal/internal use something like FPM might work.
> See https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/wiki/PackageSimpleFiles for an
> example.
However, I did not quit under
Hi,
> I read in the dokus,
Did you already read
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/first.en.html
especially
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/first.en.html#simplemake
?
It should be possible to make a Makefile that makes nothing.
E.g.:
(echo "all:" ; echo $'\t'"ec
On 27/07/2016 08:39, Hans wrote:
The file is just a script. I read in the dokus, and all told, they want to
compile somehow.
I imagine, to pack all the files with the correct user rights into a folder,
then pack it into maybe *.tgz and then change it somehow into a *.deb.
Maybe there is a more
Hi folks,
I want to create a debian package with my own additions (added an icon and a
button for the kde-menu, changed groups and user rights).
But there is a problem:
The file is just a script. I read in the dokus, and all told, they want to
compile somehow.
I imagine, to pack all the file
Bob wrote:
atar wrote:
I've downloaded from bluez.org the source of the 5.7 package but
Any reason not to use the Debian packaged version already in Debian?
when I ran ./configure on it, it emitted an error message at the
bottom of all the messages saying:
"checking for GLIB... no
configu
atar wrote:
> I've downloaded from bluez.org the source of the 5.7 package but
Any reason not to use the Debian packaged version already in Debian?
> when I ran ./configure on it, it emitted an error message at the
> bottom of all the messages saying:
>
> "checking for GLIB... no
> configure: er
Hi there!!
My machine is running Debian Wheezy from the live-boot Debian project
which is installed on my USB stick.
I've downloaded from bluez.org the source of the 5.7 package but when I
ran ./configure on it, it emitted an error message at the bottom of all
the messages saying:
"chec
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:57 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 03:29:45PM +0800, Edmond Halley wrote:
> > I would like to get apt source code via VCS(git,bzr,svn...). I do not
> > find the repository of apt. [...]
>
> Your first stop
Hello,
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 03:29:45PM +0800, Edmond Halley wrote:
> I would like to get apt source code via VCS(git,bzr,svn...). I do not
> find the repository of apt. [...]
> Is there a repot of apt?
Your first stop for checking something like this would be
http://packages.qa.d
Hi,
I would like to get apt source code via VCS(git,bzr,svn...). I do not
find the repository of apt.
I have cloned aptitude
repository(git://git.debian.org/aptitude/aptitude.git) and am reading
the code. I find it refers to apt class. I would like to look into apt
code.
Is there a repot of apt
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:07:53PM -0400, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
> I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
> tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
> add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
> are built against i
On 2010-06-28 21:32 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
> > (for me -O3 is stable... I didn't had any problem with it)
>
> Depends on the program, I think. In general, -O3 produces bigger
> binaries (than -O2) that may or may not run faster. Mozilla
2010/6/28 Sven Joachim :
> On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
>
>> I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
>> tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
>> add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
>> a
On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
> I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
> tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
> add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
> are built against i386 architectu
I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
are built against i386 architecture, and for me it is waste of my CPU
capabilities;
for examp
shampavman wrote:
surreal wrote:
I have got source code of a program in *.tar.gz format.
I want to create a debian binary package which includes
documentation, binary executable, manual etc.
Any place where I can get some help?
Please help...
--
Harshad Joshi
Hi,
This is how you do it
surreal wrote:
I have got source code of a program in *.tar.gz format.
I want to create a debian binary package which includes documentation,
binary executable, manual etc.
Any place where I can get some help?
Please help...
--
Harshad Joshi
Hi,
This is how you do it...
For assumption
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 08:22, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:48:51 +0500
> surreal wrote:
>
>> I have got source code of a program in *.tar.gz format.
>>
>> I want to create a debian binary package which includes documentation,
See package checkinstall a
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:48:51 +0500
surreal wrote:
> I have got source code of a program in *.tar.gz format.
>
> I want to create a debian binary package which includes documentation,
> binary executable, manual etc.
>
> Any place where I can get some help?
http://www.debian.o
I have got source code of a program in *.tar.gz format.
I want to create a debian binary package which includes documentation,
binary executable, manual etc.
Any place where I can get some help?
Please help...
--
Harshad Joshi
I recently installed the alsa source code into my lenny desktop.
Linux debian 2.6.26-2-686-bigmem #1 SMP Wed Aug 19 06:34:05 UTC 2009
i686 GNU/Linux
Now the boot process hangs at cupsd. Also, when I am able to get into
GDM and login after using single-user mode, I get a "failed to
initi
I installed blender by apt-get install blender and it worked very
well, but after I built a new blender from its source code, the
fine-work one is broken, and the built one also doesn't work, here is
the error message:
-
minjue:~/workspace/Blender/Blender-svn/bl
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Amit Uttamchandani
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Just wondering how you guys go about studying code? Do you read every
> single source file and then make notes? Or is there a tool that goes
> about and draws out relationship
Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Just wondering how you guys go about studying code? Do you read every
> single source file and then make notes? Or is there a tool that goes
> about and draws out relationships between source code files?
>
> I ask this beca
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:48:02 -0500
"Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/16 Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > 4. doc++ - Documentation system that generates LaTeX/html. Latest
> > upload was on dec 2002.
>
> Doxygen could also work here. It's more recent, and
2008/7/16 Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 4. doc++ - Documentation system that generates LaTeX/html. Latest
> upload was on dec 2002.
Doxygen could also work here. It's more recent, and it does more
languages than just C or C++. I frequently use it to document my own
code, and for undo
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:45:54 +0100
"Sam Kuper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/16 Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Just wondering how you guys go about studying code?
> >
>
> My guess is: different people use different techniques, some more
> formal than others. I'm looking forw
2008/7/16 Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just wondering how you guys go about studying code?
>
My guess is: different people use different techniques, some more formal
than others. I'm looking forward with interest to replies from more
experienced coders, though.
However, note that as
Hey everyone,
Just wondering how you guys go about studying code? Do you read every
single source file and then make notes? Or is there a tool that goes
about and draws out relationships between source code files?
I ask this because I am looking into adding a feature/fix to pcmanfm
but it looks
On 21/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > The motor code is rather messy. I was thinking of cleaning it up in
> > general. Are people using it? If anyone is actually interested in
> > using it, it might be worthwhile to maintain it.
>
> I haven'
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used
nano, but it isn't enough. I need more "real" IDE like functionalities
eg constant view of current row number, file browser and selection,
cutting, pasting and copying functions. I al
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 21/04/2008, Joost Witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 21/04/2008, Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Lars Bjerregaard wrote:
> > Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> >> On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL
On 21/04/2008, Joost Witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/04/2008, Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Lars Bjerregaard wrote:
> > > Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > >> On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On 21/04/2008, Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Lars Bjerregaard wrote:
> > Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> >> On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I installed motor in my AMD64 Etch system and after I execute it I g
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Lars Bjerregaard wrote:
> Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>> On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I installed motor in my AMD64 Etch system and after I execute it I get
>>> "Segmentation fault"... :-/
>>
>> Whoa, etch? You got that
y simple and often
> overlooked feature is being able to view source code in two columns, which
> is something I've never seen in graphical IDEs - for this reason I always
> make my code fit into 80 cols and have 4 character tabs. Ctags and Cscope
> are supported natively so jumpin
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:14:08PM +1000, Owen Townend wrote:
> Hey,
> Try vim, once you get your head around the way it works it is an immensely
> powerful editor. There are many 'cheat sheet' type reference sheets
> available if you google a bit which, when stuck to a nearby wall, help out
> as
, and
any compiler and debugger can easily be used by the program. When
compiling from within xwpe, errors in the source code can be jumped to
and swiftly corrected. Variables and the stack can be easily displayed.
Setting and unsetting breakpoints can be done directly within the
source code
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I installed motor in my AMD64 Etch system and after I execute it I get
"Segmentation fault"... :-/
Whoa, etch? You got that on etch? How the hell did such an RC bug get
into etch? First time I hear about
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:19:34 +0300
Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Goodenough wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> >> Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
> >>> I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have
Tero M�ntyvaara wrote:
I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used
nano, but it isn't enough. I need more "real" IDE like functionalities
eg constant view of current row number, file browser and selection,
cutting, pasting and copying functions.
[Yo
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
> I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used
> nano, but it isn't enough. I need more "real" IDE like functionalities
> eg constant view of current row number, file browser and selection,
> cutting, pasting and copying
On 16/04/2008, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It just occurred to me: is AMD64 fully supported in Etch? (Or am I
> thinking Sarge?)
Yes, it is. etch was the first Debian distribution to support x86_64.
I guess there were a few kinks in that support.
- Jordi G. H.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/08 15:33, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 16/04/2008, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I installed motor in my AMD64 Etch system and after I execute it I
On 16/04/2008, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I installed motor in my AMD64 Etch system and after I execute it I get
> > "Segmentation fault"... :-/
>
> Whoa, etch? You got that on etch? How the hell did such an
On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed motor in my AMD64 Etch system and after I execute it I get
> "Segmentation fault"... :-/
Whoa, etch? You got that on etch? How the hell did such an RC bug get
into etch? First time I hear about it.
- Jordi G. H.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/08 11:09, Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
[snip]
>
> I installed motor in my AMD64 Etch system and after I execute it I get
> "Segmentation fault"... :-/
Did you file a bug?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
We want... a Shrubbery!!
-BEGI
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 15/04/2008, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's a darned shame that there are no IDEs similar to the one in
Turbo Pascal.
How about motor? (apt-cache show motor).
I still prefer myself to use Emacs. With stuff like ede to automatise
the building of
On 15/04/2008, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a darned shame that there are no IDEs similar to the one in
> Turbo Pascal.
How about motor? (apt-cache show motor).
I still prefer myself to use Emacs. With stuff like ede to automatise
the building of Makefiles, it's a full-fledged I
On 16/04/2008, Dave Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian has a package for damn near anything!
>
> dt
Yup, your right...
#apt-cache show kitchensync
:-)
Adrian
--
24x7x365 != 24x7x52 Stupid or bad maths?
hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to
ping, it works complet
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 03:53:38PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> It's a darned shame that there are no IDEs similar to the one in
> Turbo Pascal.
$ apt-cache show xwpe
[...]
Description: Programming environment and editor for console and X11
Xwpe is an integrated programming and debugging environmen
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 06:19:34PM +0300, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Eclipse is used in graphical user environment only. I wished to find a
> shell program. :-)
In that case, shouldn't you be using "ed"? (just kidding!!)
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
:
> Hi Tero,
> Vim is great for this but has a steep learning curve. Vim is also tuned for
> touch typists, which eventually pushed me into learning touch typing, which
> is great, especially for night time coding. One really simple and often
> overlooked feature is being able to vi
n.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used nano,
> but it isn't enough. I need more "real" IDE like functionalities eg constant
> view of current row number, file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/15/08 15:35, Lesley Binks wrote:
> On 15/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used nano,
>> but it isn't enough. I need more "re
On 15/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used nano,
> but it isn't enough. I need more "real" IDE like functionalities eg constant
> view of current row number, file browser and s
Hi Tero,
Vim is great for this but has a steep learning curve. Vim is also tuned for
touch typists, which eventually pushed me into learning touch typing, which
is great, especially for night time coding. One really simple and often
overlooked feature is being able to view source code in two
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:00:27 +0300
Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used
> nano, but it isn't enough. I need more "real" IDE like
> functionalities eg constant view of current row number
David Goodenough wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
>> > I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used
>> > nano, but it isn't enough. I need more "real" IDE like functional
David Goodenough wrote:
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used
nano, but it isn't enough. I need more "real" IDE like functionalities
eg constant view of current row numbe
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:50:55 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You will not find any "real" IDEs in Linux. However, vim/gvim can do
what you describe. Emacs (another powerful editor) is also capable of
doing what you describe.
If it's an
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:07:10 +0100
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it's an IDE you're after, check out Eclipse[0]. It rocks. 'Nuff
> Said. :oP
Sorry, missed the bit about needing a shell. :o(
If you're using a command line, as raju says use VIM or Emacs. If you
can i
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
> > I am looking for shell program for source code edition. I have used
> > nano, but it isn't enough. I need more "real" IDE like functionalities
> > eg constant view of current ro
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:50:55 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You will not find any "real" IDEs in Linux. However, vim/gvim can do
> what you describe. Emacs (another powerful editor) is also capable of
> doing what you describe.
If it's an IDE you're after, check out Ecli
1 - 100 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
