On 21/04/2008, Joost Witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/04/2008, Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Lars Bjerregaard wrote: > > > Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > > >> On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> I installed motor in my AMD64 Etch system and after I execute it I > get > > >>> "Segmentation fault"... :-/ > > >> > > >> Whoa, etch? You got that on etch? How the hell did such an RC bug get > > >> into etch? First time I hear about it. > > > > > > I also get a 'Segmentation fault' on a 64-bit system. > > > Me too, it needs (at least) the following patch:
Ah, nice patch. I did a stack trace, but I didn't see that. Good catch. I was looking at the signed/unsigned comparisons that gcc threw as warnings, but turns out that was a total red herring. The motor code is rather messy. I was thinking of cleaning it up in general. Are people using it? If anyone is actually interested in using it, it might be worthwhile to maintain it. - Jordi G. H.
