On Thu, 26 May 2011 18:01:11 +1000, M-L wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 00:55:57 + (UTC) "Juan R. de Silva"
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Camaleón, you were the only one to reply. And this puzzles me
>> BTW. I doubt people do not use clamav in Debian. Is there anything
>> wrong with my posting. I'm new
On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:53:59 -0500, Ron Johnson
wrote:
> > safer (admittedly, if I were to deactivate the root account and set
> > up some sort of sudo thingy, as seems more common now, I might be
> > safer --
>
> So, you log into your GUI as root?
No. I always log in as regular user. I use
On 05/26/2011 02:02 PM, Brian wrote:
[snip]
Broadly I agree with your sentiments. Now all that remains is to
convince the other 100,000,000+ who run everything as root to adopt the
same atitude. Antivirus software is for after the event. Failure has
already taken place.
Obligatory xkcd refere
On Thu 26 May 2011 at 13:04:38 -0400, Mark Grieveson wrote:
Apologies for picking this out and snipping your very useful technical
response but . . . .
> Others here have argued that it's not necessary to worry about viruses
> and stuff when using Linux, but I still like to do it to feel a bit
>
On 05/26/2011 12:04 PM, Mark Grieveson wrote:
[snip]
Others here have argued that it's not necessary to worry about viruses
and stuff when using Linux, but I still like to do it to feel a bit
safer (admittedly, if I were to deactivate the root account and set up
some sort of sudo thingy, as seem
> > The posting was fine. I use clamav in Squeeze, but I have not had
> > the same problems that you cited. It works fine for me; hence, I
> > did not respond since I had no feedback to give.
>
> Thanks for the comment Mark.
You're welcome. One problem I did have with clamav was when it was
On Thu, 26 May 2011 00:55:57 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 11:08:36 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> You can try to manually download the "bytecode.cvd" and then restart
>> the clamd daemon.
>
> I've not tried it since, first, I have no idea would to do with the damn
> thing afte
On Thu, 26 May 2011 00:55:57 + (UTC)
"Juan R. de Silva" wrote:
> Thanks Camaleón, you were the only one to reply. And this puzzles me
> BTW. I doubt people do not use clamav in Debian. Is there anything
> wrong with my posting. I'm new to Debian community and willing to
> learn. :-)
Not cert
On 26/05/11 10:55, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> So, it looks to me like Squeeze clamav package has a bug. It either does
> not configure clamav upon installation properly or simply missing some
> file/s in package.
Or you are the only one to encounter this problem. The total lack of
people with
On 05/26/2011 12:28 AM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011 22:11:52 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/25/2011 07:55 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote: [snip]
Thanks Camaleón, you were the only one to reply. And this puzzles me
BTW. I doubt people do not use clamav in Debian. Is there anything
On 05/25/2011 11:44 PM, Mark Grieveson wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011 22:11:52 -0500, Ron Johnson
wrote:
The main (only valid?) purpose of clamav is for mail server computers
in Windows offices.
I've found it useful for removing unwanted and/or broken applications
(--detect-pua --detect-broken)
On Wed, 25 May 2011 23:13:39 -0400, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> The posting was fine. I use clamav in Squeeze, but I have not had the
> same problems that you cited. It works fine for me; hence, I did not
> respond since I had no feedback to give.
Thanks for the comment Mark.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, 25 May 2011 22:11:52 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 07:55 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote: [snip]
>>
>> Thanks Camaleón, you were the only one to reply. And this puzzles me
>> BTW. I doubt people do not use clamav in Debian. Is there anything
>> wrong with my posting. I'm new to Debi
On Wed, 25 May 2011 22:11:52 -0500, Ron Johnson
wrote:
>
> The main (only valid?) purpose of clamav is for mail server computers
> in Windows offices.
I've found it useful for removing unwanted and/or broken applications
(--detect-pua --detect-broken) as well as viruses and spam. I had some
er
> So, it looks to me like Squeeze clamav package has a bug. It either
> does not configure clamav upon installation properly or simply
> missing some file/s in package.
>
> Thanks Camaleón, you were the only one to reply. And this puzzles me
> BTW. I doubt people do not use clamav in Debian. Is t
On 05/25/2011 07:55 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
[snip]
Thanks Camaleón, you were the only one to reply. And this puzzles me BTW.
I doubt people do not use clamav in Debian. Is there anything wrong with
my posting. I'm new to Debian community and willing to learn. :-)
The main (only valid?) pu
On Wed, 25 May 2011 11:08:36 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 22:42:57 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>
>> I installed clamav on Sqeeze 64b bit seemingly without problems but
>> then every time I run freshclam I have the following:
>>
>> username@desktop:~$ sudo freshclam
>> [sudo] p
On Tue, 24 May 2011 22:42:57 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> I installed clamav on Sqeeze 64b bit seemingly without problems but then
> every time I run freshclam I have the following:
>
> username@desktop:~$ sudo freshclam
> [sudo] password for username:
> ClamAV update process started at Tue M
On Tue, 24 May 2011 22:42:57 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> I installed clamav on Sqeeze 64b bit seemingly without problems but then
> every time I run freshclam I have the following:
>
> username@desktop:~$ sudo freshclam
> [sudo] password for username:
> ClamAV update process started at Tue M
I installed clamav on Sqeeze 64b bit seemingly without problems but then
every time I run freshclam I have the following:
username@desktop:~$ sudo freshclam
[sudo] password for username:
ClamAV update process started at Tue May 24 15:36:11 201
main.cvd is up to date (version: 53, sigs: 846214, f
20 matches
Mail list logo
