haw a particular message id:
>
> # exim4 -Mt
>
> that should be enough to get you going.
Thanks for the syntax.
Well, after running the 'Mt' command on the message-ids in my mailq, I'm
told their not frozen. So, I attempted to retry delivery on most of the
list, but it d
gt;>>
>>> It seems strange that Exim4 would break, if the network to the SMARTHOST
>>> is down. One would assume that it would carry on as usual once the
>>> connection was restored.
>>
>> another thought:
>>
>> dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config
One would assume that it would carry on as usual once the
>> connection was restored.
>
> another thought:
>
> dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config
Clive:
Yeah I don't really want to resort to that -- If one has to do such a
draconian measure then I would think this is a bug in Exim
On 28/09/2006 celejar wrote:
> I believe that '-qf' won't resend frozen messages; did you try '-qff'
> ?
Yes. It appears that this will not over-ride the retry time, as per below.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R=smarthost T=remote_smtp_
> smarthost defer (-53): retry time not reached
On (28/09/06 10:59), Stephen Allen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:34:14AM -0400 or thereabouts, celejar wrote:
> > On 9/28/06, Stephen Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >Right. May have to.
> > >
> > >Thanks Clive.
> >
> > Have you tried 'exim -qff' ?
>
> Hello Celejar:
>
> Yes, actual
ng had gone out to my SMARTHOST, (before I noticed the DSL was
>> down) is now in my Exim4 mailq.
>>
>> I've been grokking the man page, but so far I haven't found a way, to
>> force/tell Exim to send these messages along their merry way.
>
> try exim4 -qff.
On 9/28/06, Stephen Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:34:14AM -0400 or thereabouts, celejar wrote:
> On 9/28/06, Stephen Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Right. May have to.
> >
> >Thanks Clive.
>
> Have you tried 'exim -qff' ?
Hello Celejar:
Yes, actually tried '-
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:34:14AM -0400 or thereabouts, celejar wrote:
> On 9/28/06, Stephen Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Right. May have to.
> >
> >Thanks Clive.
>
> Have you tried 'exim -qff' ?
Hello Celejar:
Yes, actually tried '-qf' prior as well -- No change in the 'q'.
It seems st
Have you tried
exim -M ...
?
What does the command "mailq" print out?
--
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
noticed the DSL was
> down) is now in my Exim4 mailq.
>
> I've been grokking the man page, but so far I haven't found a way, to
> force/tell Exim to send these messages along their merry way.
try exim4 -qff.
That will force exim to run its queue and ignore retry times and
On 9/28/06, Stephen Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clive Menzies wrote:
>Stephen Allen wrote:
> Greetings:
Hello Clive:
[...]
>> Any ideas, on how to get these delivered ?
>
> Thanks.> Have you tried restarting exim4?
Yup. First thing I tried.
Here is what the 'q' looks like (with e-mail a
Clive Menzies wrote:
>Stephen Allen wrote:
> Greetings:
Hello Clive:
[...]
>> Any ideas, on how to get these delivered ?
>
> Thanks.> Have you tried restarting exim4?
Yup. First thing I tried.
Here is what the 'q' looks like (with e-mail addresses removed);
26h 1.0K 1GSYPt-0002lq-0Z
ARTHOST, (before I noticed the DSL was
> down) is now in my Exim4 mailq.
>
> I've been grokking the man page, but so far I haven't found a way, to
> force/tell Exim to send these messages along their merry way.
>
> I assumed that these messages would eventually go out
Greetings:
Yesterday for a 20 hr period, my Bell Canada telephone service was down,
hence my DSL connection followed.
Since I have come back online, I've noticed that the e-mail I was
assuming had gone out to my SMARTHOST, (before I noticed the DSL was
down) is now in my Exim4 mailq.
I&#x
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:29:54AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:09:39PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:25:08PM +0200 or thereabouts, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:17:55PM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
> > I have several messages stuck in my mailq. I've been reading the Exim3 manpages,
> > and under the mailq page, I co
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:17:55PM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
> I have several messages stuck in my mailq. I've been reading the Exim3 manpages,
> and under the mailq page, I couldn't find any mention of forcing them to be
> delivered -- I had problems off and on to-day with m
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:09:39PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I have several messages stuck in my mailq. I've been reading the Exim3
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:09:39PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have several messages stuck in my mailq. I've been reading the Exim3
> > manpages, and under the mailq page, I couldn't find any
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have several messages stuck in my mailq. I've been reading the Exim3
> manpages, and under the mailq page, I couldn't find any mention of
> forcing them to be delivered -- I had problems off and on to-day with my
> IS
Seems to be my day with little issues...
I have several messages stuck in my mailq. I've been reading the Exim3 manpages,
and under the mailq page, I couldn't find any mention of forcing them to be
delivered -- I had problems off and on to-day with my ISP. Now that the
connection is a l
h ya jijo
put mailq as an app that jijo can run in the sudo.conf
file
( ie.. check into sudo )
have fun
alvin
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:39:03PM +0530, Jijo Jose A wrote:
> > hi all
> > i still used exim as MTA. how c
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:39:03PM +0530, Jijo Jose A wrote:
> hi all
> i still used exim as MTA. how can i run 'mailq ' without as root . In the
> normal user it seems to 'exim: permission denied' will occured.
You can add the user to the group "mail" bu
hi all
i still used exim as MTA. how can i run 'mailq ' without as root . In the
normal user it seems to 'exim: permission denied' will occured.
TIA
-jijojose
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 11:02:34PM +1000, Davor Balder wrote:
> No, it's not a security risk... for the reasons you mentioned... just
> edit permissions in usual manner...
There is no need to alter permissions to change this behaviour. Setting
queue_list_requires_admin to false in /etc/exim.conf
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 07:29:50AM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> mailq is linked to exim, so the mailq command is just a shortcut to do a
> queue check. Is it a security risk to permit normal users to check the mailq,
> because if I try it as a non-r
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 07:29:50AM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> mailq is linked to exim, so the mailq command is just a shortcut to do a
> queue check. Is it a security risk to permit normal users to check the mailq,
> because if I try it as a non-r
Greetings.
mailq is linked to exim, so the mailq command is just a shortcut to do a
queue check. Is it a security risk to permit normal users to check the mailq,
because if I try it as a non-root user, I get "permission denied".
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Souli
28 matches
Mail list logo
