[Sorry if this is a duplicate - I'm resending it, my original reply
seems to have been eaten by net ghosts.]
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:48, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> Question: dselect wants to install something to give me Java VM to go
> with jikes (e.g., kaffe, jdk1.1). Should I just override th
Aaron Maxwell muttered:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:48, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> > Question: dselect wants to install something to give me Java VM to go
> > with jikes (e.g., kaffe, jdk1.1). Should I just override this and
> > install jikes by itself? Is there a graceful way to tell dselect that
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:48, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> Question: dselect wants to install something to give me Java VM to go
> with jikes (e.g., kaffe, jdk1.1). Should I just override this and
> install jikes by itself? Is there a graceful way to tell dselect that
> Java VM is already installed?
Craig: Yes, I knew you meant the 'Q' key. My favorite thing about
dselect is that I haven't had to learn how to use dpkg :-)
dman: Yes, I understand jikes is just a compiler, but I'll try it with
your recommendation. I've noticed that javac is kind of s l o w.
Thanks! Paul
--
Paul Mackinney
[EM
Craig Dickson wrote:
> You can try forcing your selections with the X key, but I find this
> often doesn't work.
Uh, that's the Q key. Oops.
Craig
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 09:48:46AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
| dman muttered:
| > On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:49:49AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
| >
| > | I use 'javac' to compile .java to .class, 'java' to run .class files.
| > | I've heard that gcj is only 1.0 compatible. Any know of a jdk1
Paul Mackinney wrote:
> Question: dselect wants to install something to give me Java VM to go
> with jikes (e.g., kaffe, jdk1.1). Should I just override this and
> install jikes by itself? Is there a graceful way to tell dselect that
> Java VM is already installed?
You can try forcing your selec
dman muttered:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:49:49AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
>
> | I've heard that the Sun and Blackdown are identical for jdk1.3, I've
> | installed both and on the surface they appeared identical. By inspecting
> | one of the Blackdown mirror sites, I was able to successfully
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:49:49AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
| I've heard that the Sun and Blackdown are identical for jdk1.3, I've
| installed both and on the surface they appeared identical. By inspecting
| one of the Blackdown mirror sites, I was able to successfully configure
| my sources.l
Pascal THIVENT muttered:
> Hi,
>
> the blackdown JDK is available as debian package on
> http://www.blackdown.org.
> Just choose download and select your ftp mirror...
>
> You could choose to install the IBM developer kit for Java on
> http://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/dklx130/dklx130-p.
> You just
s jdk 1.1.x. I don't see
| >> 1.3.x anywhere.
| >>
| >> What am I doing wrong?
|
| rio> apt-get install j2re1.3
|
|
| That's the runtime environment. I was looking for the develpment
| environment (JDK).
'j2sdk1.3' is the name of the
> "rio" == rio Brito writes:
rio> On Aug 12 2001, Bob Koss wrote:
>> I added the above to sources.list, did a apt-get update, but
>> when I apt-cache search, all I see is jdk 1.1.x. I don't see
>> 1.3.x anywhere.
>>
>> What am I doing wrong?
rio>apt-get
On Aug 12 2001, Bob Koss wrote:
> I added the above to sources.list, did a apt-get update, but when I
> apt-cache search, all I see is jdk 1.1.x. I don't see 1.3.x
> anywhere.
>
> What am I doing wrong?
apt-get install j2re1.3
Hope this helps, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> "Andreas" == Andreas Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> personally I'm using blackdown jdk version 1.3.1 . It is
>> supplied as a debian package. I added this to my sources.list :
>> deb ftp://ftp.oleane.net/pub/java-linux/debian potato non-free
I added the above to sources
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 03:02:45PM +0200, Kalle Hasselström wrote:
| On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:21:35PM +0200, Olivier Bourgeois wrote:
| > Le Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:12:25 +0200
| > Kalle Hasselström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ecrit :
| >
| > > What packages supply jdk 1.3? Are
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:21:35PM +0200, Olivier Bourgeois wrote:
> Le Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:12:25 +0200
> Kalle Hasselström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ecrit :
>
> > What packages supply jdk 1.3? Are there any packages at all of sun's
> > jdk, or is it not free enoug
free).
The IBM JDK IS available in tarball format
HTH
-Message d'origine-
De: Kalle Hasselström
A: debian-user mailing list
Date: 10/08/01 12:12
Objet: jdk 1.3
What packages supply jdk 1.3? Are there any packages at all of sun's
jdk, or is it not free enough?
--
BOFH excuse
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Olivier Bourgeois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. August 2001 12:22
An: Kalle Hasselström
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: jdk 1.3
>Hi,
>personally I'm using blackdown jdk version 1.3.1 . It is supplied a
Le Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:12:25 +0200
Kalle Hasselström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ecrit :
> What packages supply jdk 1.3? Are there any packages at all of sun's
> jdk, or is it not free enough?
>
Hi,
personally I'm using blackdown jdk version 1.3.1 . It is supplied as a
deb
What packages supply jdk 1.3? Are there any packages at all of sun's
jdk, or is it not free enough?
--
BOFH excuse #38:
secretary plugged hairdryer into UPS
--
Kalle Hasselström, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgptGkVKGaiY9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
20 matches
Mail list logo