e. I think it is cool that you are
running it. But very few people will have that hardware these days.
(I used to have one running under my desk.)
I suggest that you would have better luck getting help with it on the
Debian ia64 mailing list. That would be the audience who is running
on the same ar
Hi all,
I want to install the newest debian version on my Itanium zx2000 machine.
The system crashes shortly after elilo is started. I've seen some reports
about this problem but I cannot find any solution in the postings.
thanx
Eberhard
chnically accurate. AMD renamed the
architecture from x86-64 to AMD64 to brand it, much to my chagrin.
Currently, "AMD64" is the technically accurate name of the ISA. AMD
deprecated "x86-64".
Please read my post which stated why both the AMD64 and IA64 port names
must be c
ent solution to this confusion is for Debian to
> > > > rename the IA64 port to "Itanium" and rename the AMD64 port to
> > > > something like "AMDINTL64".
> > >
> > > Something wrong with 'x86_64'?
> >
> > FWIW I ne
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:47:55 -0500
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Hello Stan,
>
>>name I suggest above allows even the most challenged users to
>>understand.
>
> I disagree. the use of the letters INTL are already established,
> admittedly in oth
On 9/30/2012 6:02 AM, Wolf Halton wrote:
> How long after end-of-life of the itanium chip will Debian keep the port to
> IA64?
There's no requirement, that I am aware of, that says Debian must wait
until EOL of a processor before dropping support for it.
Anyone have a link to t
How long after end-of-life of the itanium chip will Debian keep the port to
IA64?
sorry for top-posting; that is how droid does.
Wolf Halton
http://sourcefreedom.com
Apache developer:
wolfhal...@apache.org
On Sep 30, 2012 6:40 AM, "Martin Steigerwald" wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 30. S
Am Sonntag, 30. September 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> > Having said that, I am aware that something is changing as the
> > IA64/AMD64 question is getting asked more frequently these days.
> > Whether that's because there are more adopters that are not quite as
> > co
urrent users,
not new users, "new" defined as coming from Microsoft Windows and never
having used Linux. If some Linux savvy users, such as the OP who
started this thread, can't understand the current port names, 'new'
users surely won't.
You're also missing the fact
e a bit more technically savvy that the average Joe.
Having said that, I am aware that something is changing as the
IA64/AMD64 question is getting asked more frequently these days.
Whether that's because there are more adopters that are not quite as
competent as before, I couldn't say.
--
n the
second hand market for SGI Altix 3/4K and HP RX systems, in North
America anyway. And the numbers would be extremely small. You may be
right on this one.
Itanic is included in Wheezy yes? So it will be at least a few years
before the IA64 port is dropped. Changing from IA64 to Itanium du
I suggest above allows even the most challenged users to understand.
The other problem is the existence of the name "IA64". This has as much
to do with the confusion as "AMD64" does. To fix the entire problem,
"IA64" must be eliminated so it doesn't confuse people wh
On 9/28/2012 1:52 AM, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 02:35:49 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> The only permanent solution to this confusion is for Debian to rename
>> the IA64 port to "Itanium" and rename the AMD64 port to something like
>> "A
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:35:49AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Maybe we could start some kind of petition for "Itanium" and
> "AMDINTL64". I think these tell everyone at a glance what they need to
> know when selecting a port, and would completely eliminate the confusion.
Itanium will probably
Am Freitag, 28. September 2012 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
> On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 02:52 -0400, Neal Murphy wrote:
> > On Friday, September 28, 2012 02:35:49 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > > The only permanent solution to this confusion is for Debian to
> > > rename the IA64 p
Am Freitag, 28. September 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 9/27/2012 10:07 AM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> > Tony Baldwin:
> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:33:45AM +0200, Helmut Wollmersdorfer
wrote:
> >>> I also had to find the answer for 'IA64 or AMD64?'. AFAI
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 02:52 -0400, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 02:35:49 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > The only permanent solution to this confusion is for Debian to rename
> > the IA64 port to "Itanium" and rename the AMD64 port to some
On Friday, September 28, 2012 02:35:49 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> The only permanent solution to this confusion is for Debian to rename
> the IA64 port to "Itanium" and rename the AMD64 port to something like
> "AMDINTL64".
Something wrong with 'x86_64'?
-
On 9/27/2012 10:07 AM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Tony Baldwin:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:33:45AM +0200, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
>>>
>>> I also had to find the answer for 'IA64 or AMD64?'. AFAIR I used
>>> google and then I grepped /proc/cpuinfo
Stan Hoeppner:
>
> I think most people know when I swing the cluebat that I'm not trying to
> belittle the person on the receiving end, but simply forcefully driving
> home a point. If I actually intended to hurt someone's feelings I'd
> reply off list. That makes it personal. And this is exact
Am Dienstag, 25. September 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> I'm direct, often blunt, opinionated, arrogant, and sometimes abrasive.
> I admit these character "flaws" and make no apologies for
> them. That's who I am. I guess I was made to counterbalance all of
> the sugar coating and political corr
x86-64. All modern Intel
Pentiums, Core series, and Xeons are x86-64. It is called AMD64 in
Debian because AMD invented that extension to x86; Intel copied it
when it turned out to be so successful.
IA64 (Intel Architecture 64, named long before the marketing name
"Intel 64" for x86-
Tony Baldwin:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:33:45AM +0200, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
>>
>> I also had to find the answer for 'IA64 or AMD64?'. AFAIR I used
>> google and then I grepped /proc/cpuinfo for 'lm'.
>
> Isn't this just a question o
h a quad socket DL580.
>
> Why not?
>
> AFAIR it was with the release of Squeeze that I did my first 64 bit
> installation after using Debian >10 years.
>
> I also had to find the answer for 'IA64 or AMD64?'. AFAIR I used
> google and then I grepped /proc/
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:54:26PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/21/2012 4:16 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
> > On Friday, September 21, 2012 04:53:21 PM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> It's not writing style but attitude. My attitude is that people should
> >> be self reliant. Only when they search and
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:53:21PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
> > Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no gain)
> > to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want -and we can be
> > wrong or right as we don't have
>
> Am 21.09.2012 um 22:53 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>
>> On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
>>> gain)
>>> to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want -and we
>>> can be
>>> wrong or right as we don't have all
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Tóth Tibor Péter
wrote:
>>> Yes, but people don't start with a quad socket DL580.
> You're right!
> Some people starts biger than a DL580 :D
>
>
> Ezen üzenet és annak bármely csatolt anyaga bizalmas, jogi védelem alatt áll,
> a nyilvános közléstől védett. Az üzen
>> Yes, but people don't start with a quad socket DL580.
You're right!
Some people starts biger than a DL580 :D
Ezen üzenet és annak bármely csatolt anyaga bizalmas, jogi védelem alatt áll, a
nyilvános közléstől védett. Az üzenetet kizárólag a címzett, illetve az általa
meghatalmazottak használ
Am 21.09.2012 um 23:16 schrieb Neal Murphy:
If one cannot respond with civility and respect, one shouldn't
respond at all.
Attitudes like yours drive people away from OSS.
Fully ACK.
Open Source needs open communication.
Helmut Wollmersdorfer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-re
Am 21.09.2012 um 22:53 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
gain)
to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want -and we
can be
wrong or right as we don't have all the details over the t
ebian >10 years.
I also had to find the answer for 'IA64 or AMD64?'. AFAIR I used
google and then I grepped /proc/cpuinfo for 'lm'.
BTW: We have here many powerful machines out of service, because they
are not worth the time for refurbishing.
Helmut Wollmersdorfer
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 02:12:10 AM Ross Boylan wrote:
> I wish you would be more civil instead of more clever about being
> incivil.
Never mind that Miss Manners would be utterly aghast that someone would try to
claim the right to behave rudely, impolitely and/or barbarously simply becau
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 00:19 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> I think most people know when I swing the cluebat that I'm not trying
> to
> belittle the person on the receiving end, but simply forcefully
> driving
> home a point. If I actually intended to hurt someone's feelings I'd
> reply off list
e caliber
of the system being used, should have been able to easily find the
answer. It's not necessary to live and breath this stuff as I do in
order to find such answers, without resorting to a mailing list.
> The only thing you can conclude
> from his question is that he didn'
27;t think it's over 50% of
people doing this, but the number is far more than a "few".
> I agree it seems likely. But maybe Mauro made some effort?
The answer is simply too easy to find. One click from the Debian home
page (Ports/Architectures), and the first Google hit for &quo
- Original Message -
> From: Stan Hoeppner
> Go back and re-read my original reply to the OP. Then explain to the
> list what it was that I said which so compelled you to go to battle.
The problem is that you make some questionable assumptions, hold them as
absolute truth and
then pro
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:23:15 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/22/2012 7:14 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> I disagree. This list, as with most others, is not to be used as a
>>> primary technical support resource. People should be making at least
>>> a cursory effort to search for information
ding on the right side of the
page."
There's nothing in the OP's post that indicates he doesn't know what
kind of hardware he has (x86 vs. Itanium). He even identifies the
processor in the original post as "Xeon." When it's pointed out to
him that IA64 is
On Fri 21 Sep 2012 at 19:42:03 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/21/2012 7:05 PM, T Elcor wrote:
> >
> > If someone deems a question "stupid" and below his level of
> > expertise one can always ignore the question, as there is no
> > obligation for anyone to answer any questions on this list. Pe
Am Freitag, 21. September 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 9/21/2012 4:16 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
> > On Friday, September 21, 2012 04:53:21 PM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> It's not writing style but attitude. My attitude is that people
> >> should be self reliant. Only when they search and can't fin
Am Freitag, 21. September 2012 schrieb Neal Murphy:
> On Friday, September 21, 2012 04:53:21 PM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > It's not writing style but attitude. My attitude is that people
> > should be self reliant. Only when they search and can't find an
> > answer should they ask on a mailing list
Am Freitag, 21. September 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> > Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
> > gain) to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want
> > -and we can be wrong or right as we don't have all the deta
On 9/23/2012 3:20 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> While one could hope you're wanting this off the list because you've
> finally realized how much you've embarrassed yourself, I know that,
> sadly, that isn't true.
The only thing in this thread that has embarrassed me is the hypocrisy
of those, i
Stan,
Calling people names is no way to encourage them to use free software.
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/bb13d31f-28c7-47b1-b34c-3c121e74f.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/22/2012 7:14 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:53:21 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>>
Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
gain) to say this
On 9/22/2012 7:14 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:53:21 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
>>> gain) to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want -and
>>> we ca
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:53:21 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
>> gain) to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want -and
>> we can be wrong or right as we don't have all the d
On 22/09/12 21:18, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The clue bat is "uncivilized" by design. If you're going to hit someone
in the gut to get their full attention, and make sure what you're
telling them sticks, wrapping the blunt instrument in a big pillow of
cotton candy defeats the purpose, doesn't it,
On 9/22/2012 2:45 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> I agree that the OP's question was ... perhaps unenlightened.
> However, I don't respond like a jerk to such questions. While
> answering the question simply and clearly isn't beneath you,
> undignifying yourself by responding in such an unciviliz
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:38:54 -0500
"Christofer C. Bell" wrote:
Hello Christofer,
>* Use common sense all the time.
The trouble with that is, the use of the word "common". IME, the sense
it talks of is anything *but* common. :-(
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious
On 9/22/2012 2:38 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> Stan violates these two points of the CoC:
>
> * The mailing lists exist to foster the development and use of Debian.
> Non-constructive or off-topic messages, along with other abuses, are
> not welcome.
> * Try not to flame; it is not polite.
I
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/21/2012 7:05 PM, T Elcor wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>
>>
You are either:
1. Horribly lazy
2. Incompetent
>>
>>> Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no gain)
>>> to say this o
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> T Elcor writes:
>
>> - Original Message -
>>
>> From: Stan Hoeppner
>>
>>> This list, as with most others, is not to be used as a
>>> primary technical support resource. People should be making at least a
>>> cursory effort to searc
T Elcor writes:
> - Original Message -
>
> From: Stan Hoeppner
>
>> This list, as with most others, is not to be used as a
>> primary technical support resource. People should be making at least a
>> cursory effort to search for information before asking here.
>
> Please see the Code of
On 9/21/2012 7:17 PM, T Elcor wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> From: Stan Hoeppner
>
>> This list, as with most others, is not to be used as a
>> primary technical support resource. People should be making at least a
>> cursory effort to search for information before asking here.
>
>
On 9/21/2012 7:05 PM, T Elcor wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
>
>>> You are either:
>>>
>>> 1. Horribly lazy
>>> 2. Incompetent
>
>> Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no gain)
>> to say this on the list
>
> I agree. I find this list to be very helpful bu
- Original Message -
From: Stan Hoeppner
> This list, as with most others, is not to be used as a
> primary technical support resource. People should be making at least a
> cursory effort to search for information before asking here.
Please see the Code of Conduct (
http://www.debian.
- Original Message -
>> You are either:
>>
>> 1. Horribly lazy
>> 2. Incompetent
> Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no gain)
> to say this on the list
I agree. I find this list to be very helpful but lately there seems to have
been a lot of unnecessar
On 9/21/12 3:06 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
If one cannot respond with civility and respect, one shouldn't
respond at all.
How would that help OSS?
I wasn't aware I had an obligation to help OSS in order to use it. The
list exists to help people use the software, and not primarily to help
the so
self-fulfilling prophecy, one can aim at Godwin's law ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348265101.1187.2.camel@localhost.localdomain
On 09/21/2012 05:16 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
On Friday, September 21, 2012 04:53:21 PM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
It's not writing style but attitude. My attitude is that people should
be self reliant. Only when they search and can't find an answer should
they ask on a mailing list. Especially in thi
On 9/21/2012 4:16 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Friday, September 21, 2012 04:53:21 PM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> It's not writing style but attitude. My attitude is that people should
>> be self reliant. Only when they search and can't find an answer should
>> they ask on a mailing list. Especially
On Friday, September 21, 2012 04:53:21 PM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> It's not writing style but attitude. My attitude is that people should
> be self reliant. Only when they search and can't find an answer should
> they ask on a mailing list. Especially in this case, when the answer is
> so damn eas
On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no gain)
> to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want -and we can be
> wrong or right as we don't have all the details over the table- but it's
> rather discourteous to tell
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:04:50 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/20/2012 2:44 AM, Mauro wrote:
>> Hello.
>> I have a HP proliant DL580 G5 server with 4 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330
>> @ 2.40GHz processors.
>> What architecture port I've to install, IA64 or AMD64? T
On 20 September 2012 23:04, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You are either:
>
> 1. Horribly lazy
> 2. Incompetent
Ok, thank you for answer, have a good day ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 23:43 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> It draws about 400-500 watts continuously at idle, up to 900 at load.
> 99.999% of people will not tolerate this on the home electric bill.
99.9991% of the people don't have knowledge about this, their motto is
"more is better".
--
To UN
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 19:43 -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> That he's at that stage now doesn't mean he's an idiot.
Even if somebody should be an idiot, I wonder about the intolerance.
Isn't it wanted that everybody should use FLOSS?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 9/20/2012 8:43 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Why do you assume he's doing it for work? If he said something about
> being an experienced sysadmin, I missed it. This could easily be a box
> he bought as the n'th owner or from ebay or something.
The noise level of a DL580 is 52 dBA. 99.999% of pe
Stan Hoeppner writes:
> On 9/20/2012 4:40 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
>> On 21/09/12 09:04, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> You are either:
>>>
>>> 1. Horribly lazy
>>> 2. Incompetent
>>>
>>
>> Or having a bad day, or been dropped in the deep end by the employer, or
>> any one of a number of things
On 9/20/2012 4:40 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
> On 21/09/12 09:04, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> You are either:
>>
>> 1. Horribly lazy
>> 2. Incompetent
>>
>
> Or having a bad day, or been dropped in the deep end by the employer, or
> any one of a number of things we don't know about.
>
> Suggestin
On 21/09/12 09:04, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You are either:
>
> 1. Horribly lazy
> 2. Incompetent
>
Or having a bad day, or been dropped in the deep end by the employer, or
any one of a number of things we don't know about.
Suggesting google or debian.org or whatever is fine, but this is way
o
On 9/20/2012 2:44 AM, Mauro wrote:
> Hello.
> I have a HP proliant DL580 G5 server with 4 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330
> @ 2.40GHz processors.
> What architecture port I've to install, IA64 or AMD64?
> Thank you.
This may be a bit harsh, but it's the glaring truth: your
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:44:35 +0200, Mauro wrote:
> I have a HP proliant DL580 G5 server with 4 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330
> @ 2.40GHz processors.
> What architecture port I've to install, IA64 or AMD64? Thank you.
The available architectures are detailed and explain
On 20 September 2012 09:53, Markus Schönhaber
wrote:
> 20.09.2012 09:44, Mauro:
>
>> I have a HP proliant DL580 G5 server with 4 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330
>> @ 2.40GHz processors.
>> What architecture port I've to install, IA64 or AMD64?
>
> AMD64.
> IA64
20.09.2012 09:44, Mauro:
> I have a HP proliant DL580 G5 server with 4 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330
> @ 2.40GHz processors.
> What architecture port I've to install, IA64 or AMD64?
AMD64.
IA64 is for Itanium processors. You'd know if you had one.
--
Regards
mks
--
To UN
Hello.
I have a HP proliant DL580 G5 server with 4 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330
@ 2.40GHz processors.
What architecture port I've to install, IA64 or AMD64?
Thank you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On 5/17/2012 8:59 AM, Bill Mclain wrote:
> Actually I meant ia64, but I got it working. Thanks for all the help!
Into which/whose Itanium server did you install this Best Buy NIC?
Seems strange to install such an el cheapo NIC into an $8-$10K (minimum)
server.
--
Stan
> Bill McLain
>
get it to install either. Thanks and any info I did
>> not provide just let me know and I will get it to you.
>
> First, I'd guess you really didn't mean "IA64" but "AMD64". As for the
> Best Buy house brand NIC, post lscpi output for the device. The name on
just let me know and I will get it to you.
First, I'd guess you really didn't mean "IA64" but "AMD64". As for the
Best Buy house brand NIC, post lscpi output for the device. The name on
the card is irrelevant. What matters is what ethernet ASIC it has.
Linux drives ar
All,
Can anyone assist me with getting drivers and installing a Dynex DX-PCIGB
network card? I also have a USB Netgear Wireless n300 adapter as an alternative
but I cannot get it to install either. Thanks and any info I did not provide
just let me know and I will get it to you.
Bill
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:15:30 -0700, Ryan J Nicholson wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> build-essential :
> Depends: libc6.1-dev but it is not going to be installed or libc-dev
This says that you have to manually install "libc-dev" first.
> Depends: g++ (>= 4:4.4.3) but
I installed ia64 Squeeze 6.0.4 from DVD to an HP Integrity rx1620. I
enabled mirrors during the install - ftp.us.debian.org.
After installation, I updated against ftp.us.debian.org. I attempted to
install build-essential and was blocked:
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that
:48 PM, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi, everyone
>> >>>
>> >>> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
>> >>> My old PC (Pentium-D core) is using i386 package.
>> >>>
>>
everyone
> >>>
> >>> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
> >>> My old PC (Pentium-D core) is using i386 package.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>
On 24 May 2011 23:26, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Mihira Fernando
> wrote:
>> On 05/24/2011 08:48 PM, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, everyone
>>>
>>> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i3
On Mon, 30 May 2011 19:57:39 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:21:37 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
> > Mihira Fernando wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit
> >> player, I've found that
On Mon, 30 May 2011 16:38:19 -0400
Doug wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 03:21 PM, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
> > Mihira Fernando wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit player,
> >> I've found that the 32bit one plays without
On Mon, 30 May 2011 16:09:20 -0400, George Standish wrote:
> Shouldn't the subject be "AMD64 and i386"?
Well, yes, but now should be retitle to "YAFD" (Yet Another Flash
Discussion"... done! :-)
> On 30/05/11 03:57 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:21:37 -0400, Celejar wrote:
(...
Why don't get miro? ;-)
On 05/30/11 at 04:38pm, Doug wrote:
> Using pclos; installed youtube-dl (which you refer to) and youtube-download.
> Both are scripts. I searched the youtube-dl for "clive" and found nothing,
> nor did I find usage, altho it might be there--this is a very large script.
> The youtube-download (perh
On 05/30/2011 03:21 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
Mihira Fernando wrote:
...
Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit player,
I've found that the 32bit one plays without any hiccups that the 64bit
one seems to have (No need to have flash is evil
Shouldn't the subject be "AMD64 and i386"?
On 30/05/11 03:57 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:21:37 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
Mihira Fernando wrote:
Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit
player, I've found that the 32bit on
On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:21:37 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
> Mihira Fernando wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit
>> player, I've found that the 32bit one plays without any hiccups that
>> the 64bit one seems to have (
On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
Mihira Fernando wrote:
...
> Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit player,
> I've found that the 32bit one plays without any hiccups that the 64bit
> one seems to have (No need to have flash is evil debates here. Some of
> us wants
Jeroen van Aart (jer...@mompl.net on 2011-05-24 13:39 -0700):
> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > amd64 is possible. Since from amd64 you can still run x86 code ...
> > but not the other way around. Is there a drawback when installing
> > an amd64 kernel ?
>
> 32 bits is likely to play more video codec
On Wed, 25 May 2011 06:58:42 +0530, Mihira Fernando wrote:
>> with all the people and resources they have their software should be
>> 99.99∞% "bug-free">:-)
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
> then, following that logic, windows should be a perfect OS ... :P
Well, although I don't like to give gratuitous c
with all the people and resources they have their software
should be 99.99∞% "bug-free">:-)
Greetings,
then, following that logic, windows should be a perfect OS ... :P
Mihira.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
> with the capacity of lscpu i obtain :
Hi,
Try;
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
Regards,
Burhan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTimGoyOKxc0TDrLXY8sewFi1s
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo