Bob McGowan wrote:
Rogelio wrote:
I'm having some weird issues with Helix (a Sid / Knoppix based
distribution). For whatever reason, I periodically get an
"input/output error" while a disk is mounted, and the only way to fix
it is to umount and then mount again via ntfs-3g.
Rogelio wrote:
I'm having some weird issues with Helix (a Sid / Knoppix based
distribution). For whatever reason, I periodically get an "input/output
error" while a disk is mounted, and the only way to fix it is to umount
and then mount again via ntfs-3g.
Here's a more d
I'm having some weird issues with Helix (a Sid / Knoppix based
distribution). For whatever reason, I periodically get an "input/output
error" while a disk is mounted, and the only way to fix it is to umount and
then mount again via ntfs-3g.
Here's a more detailed list of what
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 06:03:09PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: helix-player and RealPlayer
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Debian - The Universal Operating System
X-Spam-Checker-V
José Alburquerque wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> you mixup things.
>>
>> first, real player == helix player + real branding + two non-free
>> plugins (for mp3 and real media)
>>
>> second, you *either* install helix player *or* real player, but not
>&
Daniel Baumann wrote:
you mixup things.
first, real player == helix player + real branding + two non-free
plugins (for mp3 and real media)
second, you *either* install helix player *or* real player, but not
both. and the one does not need the other anyway.
And aren't there package
you mixup things.
first, real player == helix player + real branding + two non-free
plugins (for mp3 and real media)
second, you *either* install helix player *or* real player, but not
both. and the one does not need the other anyway.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH
Hello,
I installed helix-player in my box, but when I want to play an mp3 file
it complains that RealPlayer is not present.
Ok, I downloaded RealPlayer and ran RealPLayer10Gold.bin in /home/user1/
and now /home/user1/RealPLayer/realplay runs fine, but when I run
helix-player it deosn't
Hi,
* Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041101 20:15]:
>
> David Dorward wrote:
>
> > You are looking at Helix Player, not RealPlayer. RealPlayer is a
> > non-free derivative of Helixplayer which has extra codecs. The
> > referenced page links to RealPlaye
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:55:18 +, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[...]
>
> I get it !
>
> So, is there somewhwere a ready to install RealPlayer (10.0.1) Debian package ?
> I have just goolged, and I got nothing.
> Is it possible to build such a Package form the HelixPlayer ?
>
David Dorward wrote:
Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You probably need with the non-free (freedom) RealPlayer 10
https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/unix/
apparently the Sid package contains the newest one: 1.0.1
and "includes the mozilla plugin".
You are looking
Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You probably need with the non-free (freedom) RealPlayer 10
> > https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/unix/
> apparently the Sid package contains the newest one: 1.0.1
> and "includes the mozilla plugin".
Yo
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
thanks for the reply.
I did it !
In fact, I am afraid that there is a missunderstanding.
After the installation I tried it on one of my favorite webpage:
I got some error messages, so I would like to test helix well built
web site to be sure from where comes the er
t there is a missunderstanding.
After the installation I tried it on one of my favorite webpage:
I got some error messages, so I would like to test helix well built
web site to be sure from where comes the errors ?
IIRC Helixplayer don't have the realplayer codecs, maybe you're trying
to pl
> Does it mean that we cannot yet read `Real' stuff (as available on the CNN website) ?
>
> Jerome
>
seems true. but realplayer is there if license is not the most concerned.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
s for the reply.
> >>I did it !
> >>
> >>In fact, I am afraid that there is a missunderstanding.
> >>After the installation I tried it on one of my favorite webpage:
> >>I got some error messages, so I would like to test helix well built
> >>web
ssages, so I would like to test helix well built
web site to be sure from where comes the errors ?
IIRC Helixplayer don't have the realplayer codecs, maybe you're trying
to play some streming media...
Does it mean that we cannot yet read `Real' stuff (as available on the CNN
we
rror messages, so I would like to test helix well built
> web site to be sure from where comes the errors ?
>
IIRC Helixplayer don't have the realplayer codecs, maybe you're trying
to play some streming media...
Andrea
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Hello,
thanks for the reply.
I did it !
In fact, I am afraid that there is a missunderstanding.
After the installation I tried it on one of my favorite webpage:
I got some error messages, so I would like to test helix well built
web site to be sure from where comes the errors ?
Thanks,
Jerome
Nick
* Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041028 19:37]:
> Hello List,
>
> how can we test the Sid helixplayer ?
Install and run it.
sudo apt-get install helix-player
Nick.
--
Debian 3.1
Linux twofish 2.6.9-looxt93c1 i686 GNU/Linux
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello List,
how can we test the Sid helixplayer ?
Thanks,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do you have the gcc version that is specified in the file name?
On Monday 19 July 2004 13:51, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> I think I may have a corrupted download.
>
> > Tux:/home# chmod a+x hxplay*
> > Tux:/home# ./hxplay*
> > bash: ./hxplay-0.4.0.187-linux-2.2-libc6-gcc32-i586.bin: cannot
> > execute
(top posting only to keep thread..top posting bad...)
Hi guys,
I had the same problem trying to get the helix installer to run on woody.
Since woody uses an older version of GCC you need to download the legacy
version of the installer:
legacy-hxplay-0.4.0.187-linux-2.2-libc6-i386.bin. The same
I think I may have a corrupted download.
Tux:/home# chmod a+x hxplay*
Tux:/home# ./hxplay*
bash: ./hxplay-0.4.0.187-linux-2.2-libc6-gcc32-i586.bin: cannot
execute binary file
I'll try downloading again in the near future - does anyone have any
better ideas ?
Adam Bogacki,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ryan
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:26:15AM -0500, lameth wrote:
> Has anyone tried realmedia's helix producer basic yet? And if you have,
> did you have any luck getting it to actually work?
>
I have tried it to see how it had changed from the previous
Producer product... Biggest
Has anyone tried realmedia's helix producer basic yet? And if you have,
did you have any luck getting it to actually work?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a Libranet(1.82) cd and I wish to use the Helix gnome packages in it. I
noticed that it is for woody ( or what I see in the directory structure). I
tried one package to see if it will work. I tried grip and it needs libgtk... (
that's all I remember) anyway, I have this 1.2.0 whi
I seem to have screwed up my system by changing apt-lines from
helix-gnome to sid, and partially de-installing gnome. Now, whenever I
try to apt-get install anything, I get the following. Can anyone help?
aurelius:/home/ocorrain# apt-get install kppp
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building
Glyn Millington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A while back I toyed with the Helix version of Gnome - bad decision.
>Have since been weeding out the Helix packagaes that cause all kinds of
>crossed wires in normal debian upgrades.
>
>I've found that I still have the Heli
A while back I toyed with the Helix version of Gnome - bad decision.
Have since been weeding out the Helix packagaes that cause all kinds of
crossed wires in normal debian upgrades.
I've found that I still have the Helix libgtk1.2 - but a simple
dpkg --purge libgtk1.2 wants to take abo
ge. I remember when I got Helix Gnome it required woody.
>
> that's the stupid part about all this: ximian calls woody "unstable" on
> their spidermonkey server, yet it will, as it seems, only work on a
> stable (potato) system.. tsts..
>
> frank.
The n
ge. I remember when I got Helix Gnome it required woody.
>
> that's the stupid part about all this: ximian calls woody "unstable" on
> their spidermonkey server, yet it will, as it seems, only work on a
> stable (potato) system.. tsts..
Kinda makes you wonder if you know
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:12:09AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> At 12:27 AM 4/18/01 -0400, joeytsai wrote:
> Also, I noticed some other threads referred to ximian for stable; that's
> certainly a change. I remember when I got Helix Gnome it required woody.
that's the stupid
(they have ximian or helix in their version) and use
Debian's.
// joey tsai
I'm running testing (woody). What's the right move for that?
Also, I noticed some other threads referred to ximian for stable; that's
certainly a change. I remember when I got Helix Gnome it required woody.
> Since I've been running "sid" and Ximian's Gnome packages, until I did
> an "apt-get dist-upgrade" yesterday, I saw no problems. Then, I ran into
> a similar problem as the original poster -- there was a debian package
> newer than the ximian one and it caused a brief headache.
>
> Why exactly s
> If you are running unstable (sid), you should not be running
> Ximian's Gnome. Purge their packages (they have ximian or
> helix in their version) and use Debian's.
Since I've been running "sid" and Ximian's Gnome packages, until I did
an "apt-ge
ked, and then I went back to dist-upgrade and continued.
I have two more potato systems to upgrade. I think I'll try purging helix
stuff first as suggested.
...RickM...
:: Ross Boylan ::
> Is this a bug with anything, or just an inevitable result of trying to put
> unlike things (ximian and debian) together?
If you are running unstable (sid), you should not be running Ximian's Gnome.
Purge their packages (they have ximian or helix in their versi
I have a similar problem, but slightly different packages:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgnomesupport0: Depends: gnome-libs-data (>= 1.2.13-4) but 1.2.11-ximian.1
is installed
libgnomeui32: Depends: gnome-libs-data (>= 1.2.13-4) but 1.2.11-ximian.1 is
installed
> dpkg --purge gnome-control-center gnome-panel
>
> then do the rest of the ximian/helix purging as described earlier.
>
> also make sure your sources.list do NOT contain ximian or helix
> sources and run apt-get update.
Thanks for your help, that did the trick.
I think I&
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> this may only affect the woody dpkg but setting COLLUMS (that looks
> spelled wrong) will adjust this.
Very nice! I had no idea. Thanks.
Oh, it's COLUMNS. :)
> i think apt has a --force-downgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dave]$ apt-get --force-downgra
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 05:20:16PM -0700, David Steinberg wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> > dpkg -l | grep ximian
> >
> > dpkg -l | grep helix
> >
>
> Minor point: you might want to make that "grep ximi" instead of
> "
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> dpkg -l | grep ximian
>
> dpkg -l | grep helix
>
Minor point: you might want to make that "grep ximi" instead of
"grep ximian", given that helix/ximian version numbers tend to be quite
long, and "dpkg -l"
dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or
> specify a solution).
dpkg --purge gnome-control-center gnome-panel
then do the rest of the ximian/helix purging as described earlier.
also make sure your sources.list do NOT contain ximian or helix
sources and run apt
On (15/04/01 14:45), Ethan Benson wrote:
> purge every gnome package. removing task-* packages does not remove
> anything.
>
> dpkg -l | grep ximian
>
> dpkg -l | grep helix
>
>
> then try a apt-get install task-gnome with your sources.list NOT
> including ximi
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 11:36:52PM +0100, simon wrote:
> I cannot apt-get -f install out of it as that fails with the same
> error. I thought I would remove helix completely and then reinstall
> gnome, but apt is telling me I do not have task-helix-gnome
> installed. I'm at a bi
I'm new to Linux and even newer to Debian.
I am running woody, and today (15th) I did an apt-get upgrade that's
messed up Gnome. I was running Helix Gnome, although I did plan to
remove it and go back to plain Gnome...whatever the update did today
it seems to have replaced parts of H
rces.list (that's what I did).
Is the original poster aware that the name has been changed from
"helix" to "ximian"?
Change "helixgnome.com" to ximian.com in your apt sources list and it
should work.
--
Andrew
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Stan Brown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>But I'd highly recommend against using the Helix packages. I've found
>>that they have conflicts with other packages on a recurring basis.
I have installed them on three comput
On Wed Feb 28 21:49:39 2001 Greg Gilbert wrote...
>
>The following line works:
>deb http://spidermonkey.ximian.com/distributions/debian unstable main
>
>But I'd highly recommend against using the Helix packages. I've
>found that they have conflicts with other pa
David Steinberg wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Greg Gilbert wrote:
>
> > But I'd highly recommend against using the Helix packages. I've
> > found that they have conflicts with other packages on a recurring
> > basis.
>
> Really? I've been
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Greg Gilbert wrote:
> But I'd highly recommend against using the Helix packages. I've
> found that they have conflicts with other packages on a recurring
> basis.
Really? I've been using Helix/Ximian on Debian (first potato then
woody) for a cou
The following line works:
deb http://spidermonkey.ximian.com/distributions/debian unstable main
But I'd highly recommend against using the Helix packages. I've
found that they have conflicts with other packages on a recurring
basis.
Greg
* Martin Marconcini ([EMAIL PROTECT
Hi, what is the correct path to get Helix-Gnome in
sources.list and the apt-get command I should exec?
I've been trying some stuff but couldnt make it
work!
I wish to get the latest Helix version
(Xivian?)
Regards,
Martin.
> "Moritz" == Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Moritz> Do you have xmms configured to use the esd output plugin?
Moritz> (I've no idea about the other programs...)
I would have thought this was the default. Oh, wait, no, its trying to
use the OSS plugin. Thanks for your sugg
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have not been able to get sound support working under Helix Gnome
> for several weeks now.
>
> esdplay works fine, but no Gnome programs work (xmms and Gnome Control
> Centre for instance).
Do you have xmms configured to use the esd
Hello,
I have not been able to get sound support working under Helix Gnome
for several weeks now.
esdplay works fine, but no Gnome programs work (xmms and Gnome Control
Centre for instance).
(xmms works if I kill esd first).
Any ideas?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I ve update helix(gnome-core 1.2.4) for debian 2.2r0 and gmix can´t find
/dev/mixer and it said that it there is no /dev/dsp. The problem is that
the ALSA driver worked fine before.
does any one know what`s can going on? perhaps has the update changed
modules.conf ?
any idea is welcome
Hi,
I dl the Ximian Gimp 1.2 and in the suggested list were tw debs that
were not there. Though the rest were and Gimp 1.2 started up witout a
fuss. Where could I find these? First place I checked was potato...
libz1
libxpm4
Doing an apt-get -d install I get xpm4g is the newest version and zlib1
Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> [ using Debian (woody/potato) with 2.4.0 kernel and Xfree86 4.0.2 ]
>
> I've recently move to the Gnome/Ximian (used to be Helix) environment.
>
> Over at the gnome/ximian sites i've read about an auto-updater (seemed much
> like windowsu
[ using Debian
(woody/potato) with 2.4.0 kernel and Xfree86 4.0.2 ]
I've recently move
to the Gnome/Ximian (used to be Helix) environment.Over at the
gnome/ximian sites i've read about an auto-updater (seemed much like
windowsupdate) for Ximian, i ran the shell command
the ximi
When I try to run gnomecc it crashes out of X and returns me to my KDM prompt.
Is Gnome currently broken under Woody?
==
Steve Cooper
(working for somebody else in Redmond, WA)
>
> Subject: Re: Helix gnome control center freezes
> Date: Wed, 3
> > Well, for some stupid reason, I decided to give the
> > Gnome packages from Helix a try. After re-starting
> > X-Windows, I noticed that my Eterms don't have
> > scrollbars and scroll-arrows. My first assumption
> > is that it's related to Helix
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Well, for some stupid reason, I decided to give the Gnome packages from Helix
> a try. After re-starting X-Windows, I noticed that my Eterms don't have
> scrollbars and scroll-arrows. My first assumption is that it's related to
&
window just freezes and doesn't show
> any contents of menus. I know Helix gnome is not a part of official Debian
> dist but since it happened after the upgrade, I was wandering ther's any
> conflict between Helix Gnome and new Debian.
>
> Has anyone had the same problem?
And Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> gave word to the following thoughts:
> I can't provide a solution but I've had the same problem. Try running
> the control center using strace. You'll probably see that it tries to
> find all kind of librep/rep-gtk related things. You need to fiddle
> aro
Seung-woo Nam wrote:
> Since I upgraded my Debian system from 2.2_rev0 to 2.2_rev2, all the
> Sawfish menus in Gnome control center wouldn't work (appearance,
> focus behaviour, etc.). When I click on any of those the window just
> freezes and doesn't show any contents of men
Salve Seung-woo Nam,
> Has anyone had the same problem?
me too :-(
--
Paolo Pedaletti, Como, ITALYa www.fastflow.it/~paolop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 4755831
Hi everyone:
Since I upgraded my Debian system from 2.2_rev0 to
2.2_rev2, all the Sawfish menus in Gnome control center wouldn't work
(appearance, focus behaviour, etc.). When I click on any of those the window
just freezes and doesn't show any contents of menus. I know Helix gnom
David B. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>To quote Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
># Well, for some stupid reason, I decided to give the Gnome packages
># from Helix a try. After re-starting X-Windows, I noticed that my Eterms
># don't have scrollbars and scrol
To quote Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# Well, for some stupid reason, I decided to give the Gnome packages
from Helix a try. After re-starting X-Windows, I noticed that my Eterms
don't have scrollbars and scroll-arrows. My first assumption is that
it's related to Helix&
Well, for some stupid reason, I decided to give the Gnome packages from Helix a
try. After re-starting X-Windows, I noticed that my Eterms don't have
scrollbars and scroll-arrows. My first assumption is that it's related to
Helix's version of the various imlib packages. Now
t; If I understand you right, it is probably best to do completely without a
> display manager and instead use an ".xsession" file in my home directory
> from which I start the corresponding session. What script do I have to
> execute for starting Helix Gnome?
>
The way
corresponding session. What script do I have to
> execute for starting Helix Gnome?
I think it's gnome-session. Try KDM, to add a session you just go as root to
the appropriate dialog in kcontrol [System > Login manager > Sessions tab].
The session name is the name of the bash command y
> If I understand you right, it is probably best to do completely without a
> display manager and instead use an ".xsession" file in my home directory
> from which I start the corresponding session. What script do I have to
> execute for starting Helix Gnome?
No, not at all.
g in.
If I understand you right, it is probably best to do completely without a
display manager and instead use an ".xsession" file in my home directory
from which I start the corresponding session. What script do I have to
execute for starting Helix Gnome?
Thanks!
Greetings,
Holger
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:15:27PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
>
> How can I switch between KDE and Helix-Gnome when both are installed on
> the system? Unfortunately, I can not install gdm and kdm at the same time,
> so I'm not sure what to do. One solution might be to do witho
Hello!
How can I switch between KDE and Helix-Gnome when both are installed on
the system? Unfortunately, I can not install gdm and kdm at the same time,
so I'm not sure what to do. One solution might be to do without an X
display manager entirely, but then I'm not sure whether I can
In attempting to compile the 'gimp-print' plugin for use as a
printer driver it appears that the 'helix' version of gimp that i
installed is preventing me from installing some needed dev-libs.
Has anyone removed 'helix' pkg-versions (task-helix-co
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> packages? Are they as stable? Is there any strange behavior? Do they
> contain as many programs as are available in the Helix packages? What are
> the pros and cons of each?
I switched over to a clean woody only system some days ago. I
fact that librep9 wasn't installed with the
rest of Helix. After I installed it, all the problems ceased. I would
consider it an installation bug, since I actually used http://go-gnome.com to
install it, using the full install option.
-Rob
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> For some reason, the gnome control center doesn't want me to configure any
> sawfish aspects. When I click on any of the sawfish configuration options,
> the
> left pane displays nothing, and eventually, the entire app freezes and has to
> be killed.
>
>
I had this problem as well, you need to install the rep packages from helixcode
manually for some reason they don't install with task-helix-gnome.
Jamil
> For some reason, the gnome control center doesn't want me to configure any
> sawfish aspects. When I click on an
For some reason, the gnome control center doesn't want me to configure any
sawfish aspects. When I click on any of the sawfish configuration options, the
left pane displays nothing, and eventually, the entire app freezes and has to
be killed.
Another thing I noticed is that the control center oft
About a month ago when installing a new system, I tried installing the
Gnome that comes with Woody (I've been using Helix Gnome on other
systems). I saw some strange behavior, but perhaps it was because I didn't
have a lot of suggested packages installed at the time. And, although a
tri
This doesn't work because helix is in the version number, not the package
name (except for about 3 packages). The matching seems only to match the
package name.
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> apt-get takes regular expressions, so a 'apt-get --purge remove "helix
apt-get takes regular expressions, so a 'apt-get --purge remove "helix*"'
should nuke everything that has the string 'helix' in its name.
Note that apt-get does a substring match with the package name,
so 'helix*' will be matched no matter where in the n
I'm interested in following the Woody releases of GNOME instead of Helix Code's.
Problem is, how do I remove ALL the Helix Code packages. Seeing they all have
"helix" in their package name, a simple script should easily do this. Too bad
I'm not that familiar with dpk
Hi,
I use hlix gnome on potato. After today's apt-get upgrade to
sawfish_0.34-helix1, sawfish draws a window frame for my gnome panels
(menu panel and edge panel).
I also can't unhide the edge panel anymore. Tried to tell sawfish to use
"Frame-Type: None" for the menu panel, but then the panel
You don't need to.
On approximately Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:35:22AM -0500, Marcelo Chiapparini
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Should I deinstall Gnome in order to install Helix Gnome in a Debian 2.2
> machine?
> Thanks in advance
> Marcelo
> _
> Marcelo C
Hi!
Should I deinstall Gnome in order to install Helix Gnome in a Debian 2.2
machine?
Thanks in advance
Marcelo
_
Marcelo Chiapparini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sometime this morning, Helix made new packages available. I´ll bet
it all works OK now, so ignore my earlier post.
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 09:55:07PM -0500, Joel Dinel wrote:
> I can't seem to install Helix Gnome on my woody box.
>
> dimmu:~# apt-get install task-helix-gnome
>
Since the problem is a conflict between Helix and Debian versions
of some libraries, perhaps you can temporarily comment out the Debian
lines in your sources.list, do an apt-get update and then try
apt-get install task-helix-gnome. Don´t forget to fix your
sources.list afterwards or you won´t
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Martin Waller wrote:
> I have a friend here who abandoned potato 'cos he couldn't get gnome helix
> running under potato.
>
> Can it be done (without resorting to woody)?
> How?
Works fine for me. I just put this in my apt-sources:
deb http://s
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Joel Dinel wrote:
> I can't seem to install Helix Gnome on my woody box.
Thats an interesting apt quirk, just list all the packages at once:
auric{jgg}~/apt2/build/bin#./apt-get install task-helix-gnome task-helix-core
sawfish-gnome rep-gtk-gnome libgdk-pixbu
> So I apt-get install task-helix-core. I get the same message, but wirh
> sawfish-gnome. I install sawfush-gnome, now I get this same message about
> rep-gtk-gnome. This goes on and on through more packages until :
>
> dimmu:~# apt-get install libgdk-pixbuf2
> Reading Pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joel Dinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ dependancy problem elided ]
> Has anybody else encountered this? Is there woody boxes out there
> running Helix?!
I see this also, but I've already got a working install of Helix
Gnome, so it
I can't seem to install Helix Gnome on my woody box.
dimmu:~# apt-get install task-helix-gnome
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the uns
Hi Johann,
Quoth Johann Spies,
> Excuse my ignorance, but after reading lynx's man page, I still do not
> understand what is actually happening in a command like this or let me
> put it this way: I do not understand how it can help to install
> helix-gnome or why it has to be r
Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I installed helix gnome in this way, and have since put the helix
> stuff in my sources file and have been getting updates from them, is
> there something else I should do to right it? I've noticed that
> task-helix-gnome is alw
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
