On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 09:29 +0200, ed mente wrote:
> > Is it possible to find out what kind of PCI/PCI-X/AGP device is
> > installed on a PC?
>
> you can start by running lspci -vv
I would run lspci too, but I always install hwinfo and also use it:
$ hwinfo --help
Usage: hwin
On 2012-11-22 11:29, ed mente wrote:
Is it possible to find out what kind of PCI/PCI-X/AGP device is
installed on a PC?
you can start by running lspci -vv
Hello,
below is a lspci -vv chunk for my extension VGA card
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GT218 [GeForce
210
> Is it possible to find out what kind of PCI/PCI-X/AGP device is
> installed on a PC?
you can start by running lspci -vv
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
Hello,
Is it possible to find out what kind of PCI/PCI-X/AGP device is
installed on a PC? (CentOS/RedHat bases boxes). In other words, if a
system has two video cards and I know for sure that one is onboard card,
how can I find out which one is it. The same applies to all
PCI/PCI-X/AGP
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:31:33 -0400, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote in
message
<4ae059fcfc262fd39f8bd71a9798a9a2.squir...@sax.esid.gecgr.co.cu>:
> Hello
>
> I use Debian Squeeze
>
>
> Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for
> Linux??
..e.g.
On 21/09/11 08:31, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote:
> Hello
>
> I use Debian Squeeze
>
>
> Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for Linux??
>
> At AMD, there is nothing of this.
AMD?
Do you mean ATI?
>
>
> I tried with 2 ATI cards and
Hello
I use Debian Squeeze
Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for Linux??
At AMD, there is nothing of this.
I tried with 2 ATI cards and I want to work the TV but I have not done
anything:
1 - R200 BB [Radeon All in Wonder 8500DV]
2 - Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x
On 19 March 2010 00:19, Cassiano Leal wrote:
> On 17 March 2010 15:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Wed,17.Mar.10, 11:27:19, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>
>>> OK, doing
>>>
>>> modprobe -r radeon
>>> modprobe radeon modeset=1
>>>
>>> using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine
On 17 March 2010 15:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed,17.Mar.10, 11:27:19, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> OK, doing
>>
>> modprobe -r radeon
>> modprobe radeon modeset=1
>>
>> using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine which actually
>> performance workplace and application s
On Wed,17.Mar.10, 11:27:19, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> OK, doing
>
> modprobe -r radeon
> modprobe radeon modeset=1
>
> using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine which actually
> performance workplace and application switching at acceptable speed.
Are you sure the mod
Hi,
Thanks for the response.
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:04 -0300, Cassiano Leal wrote:
> > (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of a version
> > mismatch.
> > [dri] radeon kernel module version is 2.0.0 but version 1.17.0 or newer is
> > needed.
> > [dri] Disabling DRI.
>
>
Hi
On 17 March 2010 07:27, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> OK, doing
>
> modprobe -r radeon
> modprobe radeon modeset=1
>
> using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine which actually
> performance workplace and application switching at acceptable speed.
>
> Now I just have 1 error
Hi Andrei,
OK, doing
modprobe -r radeon
modprobe radeon modeset=1
using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine which actually
performance workplace and application switching at acceptable speed.
Now I just have 1 error left in my XOrg.log:
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion fail
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:34 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed,17.Mar.10, 09:53:07, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> > Hi Andrei,
> >
> > Nop, not even a failure.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:45 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
> >
> > panoramix:/home/jk
On Wed,17.Mar.10, 09:53:07, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Nop, not even a failure.
>
>
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:45 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
>
> panoramix:/home/jkr# grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
> Mar 17 08:18:28 panoramix kernel: [ 12
Hi Andrei,
Nop, not even a failure.
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:45 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
panoramix:/home/jkr# grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
Mar 17 08:18:28 panoramix kernel: [ 12.304016] 3w-9xxx: scsi4: Firmware FE9X
2.08.00.006, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.05
On Wed,17.Mar.10, 09:11:31, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> 1. In several postings I saw the mentioning of the need to load
> firmware. I have installed all the firmware-linux packages, including
> the non-free which contains the relevant Radeon firmware. I see some
> firmware getting loaded (eg for m
Hi,
I am struggling with my Radeon HD 3850 / RV670 AGP ever since I have
upgraded to XOrg 7.5 which is (still) not supported by the proprietary
driver. The OSS Radeon driver is *really* slow. Switching between
workplaces or (full screen) applications sometimes take more than 30
seconds. More
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 01:20, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 31. 01. 2010 03:52:01 je Kelly Clowers napisal(a):
>>
>> AMD has published all 2d and 3d info for r100 through r700 (r800/5xxx is
>> in the pipeline):
>> http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/
>
> I stand corrected. That's like music to my ears.
>
>> DRI2/
Dne, 31. 01. 2010 03:52:01 je Kelly Clowers napisal(a):
AMD has published all 2d and 3d info for r100 through r700 (r800/5xxx
is
in the pipeline):
http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/
I stand corrected. That's like music to my ears.
DRI2/KMS is theoretically usable with 2.6.32, Mesa 7.7, XServer 1.7
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 16:00, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 30. 01. 2010 16:32:02 je Joost Kraaijeveld napisal(a):
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does the radeonhs driver support acceleration?
>
> That's a question I'm very much interested in too. I've always been under
> the impression that the radeon and radeonhd dr
Dne, 30. 01. 2010 16:32:02 je Joost Kraaijeveld napisal(a):
Hi,
Does the radeonhs driver support acceleration?
That's a question I'm very much interested in too. I've always been
under the impression that the radeon and radeonhd drivers only support
basic 2D acceleration, and only for some
Hi,
Does the radeonhs driver support acceleration? I have no performance
what so ever with the radeonhd driver with my RV670 AGP Radeon HD 3850
card.
Looking into the XOrg.0.log I see:
(WW) RADEONHD(0): [agp] AGP not available
(EE) RADEONHD(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the
oken on XPRESS 200 and 200M
I think the Xpress 1150 has the same problem. By the way, this is a PCIE
device, so no need for AGP.
May I call your attention to the ATI/AMD Radeon XPRESS 200M Linux Driver
Petition at
http://www.petitiononline.com/x200MLin/petition.html
?
If you can spare a moment, plea
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:24 +0200, csanyipal wrote:
> Hello!
>
> System: Etch, kernel 2.6.18
>
> Before I by this videocard, I want to be sure that that xorg supports
> it.
>
> Is somewhere a list of videocards supported by xorg?
>
> Any advices will be appreciated!
Sorry... I should point ou
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:24 +0200, csanyipal wrote:
> Hello!
>
> System: Etch, kernel 2.6.18
>
> Before I by this videocard, I want to be sure that that xorg supports
> it.
>
> Is somewhere a list of videocards supported by xorg?
>
> Any advices will be appreciated!
Hi Paul,
I have the Gigab
Hello!
System: Etch, kernel 2.6.18
Before I by this videocard, I want to be sure that that xorg supports
it.
Is somewhere a list of videocards supported by xorg?
Any advices will be appreciated!
--
Regards, Paul Csányi
http://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 08:42:32PM -0700, chris wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:55:50PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > Christopher Nelson writes:
> > > But the module will taint the kernel. And, if you're using unstable, the
> > > driver will require you to mess with holds of x.org and/or use a
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:55:50PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Christopher Nelson writes:
> > But the module will taint the kernel. And, if you're using unstable, the
> > driver will require you to mess with holds of x.org and/or use a
> > (further) illegal hack.
>
> What's illegal here?
Potenti
Christopher Nelson writes:
> But the module will taint the kernel. And, if you're using unstable, the
> driver will require you to mess with holds of x.org and/or use a
> (further) illegal hack.
What's illegal here?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:12:58PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> Howdy List,
>
> I'm trying to setup Debian Etch on a new Dell Inspiron 1501. X is
> working great so far, except that I cannot get DRI enabled. I can
> modprobe radeon and tell the xorg.conf to use the radeon driver, but
> glxinfo still re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy List,
I'm trying to setup Debian Etch on a new Dell Inspiron 1501. X is
working great so far, except that I cannot get DRI enabled. I can
modprobe radeon and tell the xorg.conf to use the radeon driver, but
glxinfo still reports no DRI.
Looking
rt that resolution. Search with google, for your
> display and see it if supports that resolution.
I have a Samsung SyncMaster 753DF 17" monitor and it does support
1280x1024 but the mpeg movies don't play at that resolution.
> Does your motherboard support an AGP slot, some inter
>Rishi
> But I'm unable to play mpeg videos in 1280x1027 resolution.
>So therefore I wanted to know if I buy this video card: Pine, 128 MB
>NVIDIA AGP Card, FX model, that it would work on my Debian Sarge
>system - meaning get high resolution and play mpeg videos?
You real
re to get some help.
http://www.winischhofer.at/sisforum/viewtopic.php?t=175
However, I'm assuming that it may not be possible.
So therefore I wanted to know if I buy this video card: Pine, 128 MB
NVIDIA AGP Card, FX model, that it would work on my Debian Sarge
system - meaning get high reso
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:03:35PM +0100, Alex Polite wrote:
> This is slightly off topic, more a general linux question.
>
> I'm building a new desktop for office work, and I'm thinking of
> running dual screens. Both screens will have DVI inputs. What's
> simple
This is slightly off topic, more a general linux question.
I'm building a new desktop for office work, and I'm thinking of
running dual screens. Both screens will have DVI inputs. What's
simplest to configure.
1) 1 AGP + 1 PCI card
2) 1 AGP card with dual DVI output
Any recomme
mpiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 0.1.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a
(II) Module scanpci: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 0.1.0
(II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a
(--) PCI: (0:18:0) BrookTree 848 rev 18, Mem
2005. július 25. 18:55,
Andras Lorincz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-> user ,:
> Hi,
>
> I can see in /var/log/XFree86.log.0 this line:
>
> (II) NVIDIA(0): Detected AGP rate: 8X
>
> I just want to know if this means that agp 8x is really enabled or it
> just detects that th
Hi,
I can see in /var/log/XFree86.log.0 this line:
(II) NVIDIA(0): Detected AGP rate: 8X
I just want to know if this means that agp 8x is really enabled or it
just detects that the video card can work at 8x and I need somehow o
enable it?
On Thursday 05 May 2005 02:42, Mohammad Halawah wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> Probelm:
> 1)during booting I experience 3min. pause while loading the module "i830"
> 2)after system is up, The xserver/kernel crashes (I am not sure which of
> them)
>
>
> I had read in dmesg the following :
> ##
Hello ,
Probelm:
1)during booting I experience 3min. pause while loading the module "i830"
2)after system is up, The xserver/kernel crashes (I am not sure which of them)
I had read in dmesg the following :
###
[drm:i830_probe] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart mod
Hello,
I'm running on my HP nc6000 (with an external hp L1925 TFT-Monitor) Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r3, XFree86 4.3.0, the prorpietary ATI Radeon Linux driver, and as display manager GDM; XFree is configured to use 1280x1024 24bpp externally, and 1024x768 24bpp internally.
After booting the system GD
have an ATI
> >>>Radeon 9600, so I installed the driver radeon as suggested in the
> >>>HOWTO. When I run
> >>>dpkg-reconfigure --priority=low xserver-xfree86
> >>>
> >>>I'm asked of the PCI bus ID. Now my videocard is on AGP, so
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 12:09 pm, Michael Spang wrote:
> Heh, true. It is important to note that many of the questions are
> "optional." It might be helpful if this was made more clear to users.
Not even Windows points out something that obvious, though...
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
igure --priority=low xserver-xfree86
I'm asked of the PCI bus ID. Now my videocard is on AGP, so what
should I do?
Leave it alone, I've yet to come across a video card that setting the
PCI ID actually helped.
Except if you run Ruby multi-seat Linux and use IsolateDevice= ;-)
H
Heh, true.
erver-xfree86
I'm asked of the PCI bus ID. Now my videocard is on AGP, so what
should I do?
Leave it alone, I've yet to come across a video card that setting the
PCI ID actually helped.
Except if you run Ruby multi-seat Linux and use IsolateDevice= ;-)
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
iority=low xserver-xfree86
>
> I'm asked of the PCI bus ID. Now my videocard is on AGP, so what
> should I do?
Leave it alone, I've yet to come across a video card that setting the
PCI ID actually helped.
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ursine.dyndns.org/
pgpsiht62xasL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
>
> I'm asked of the PCI bus ID. Now my videocard is on AGP, so what should I do?
the AGP bus has PCI ID 01
--
I am incapable of conceiving infinity, and yet I do not accept finity
(Simone de Beauvoir)
( ( ( i ) ) ) http://indymedia.org (
Hello everyone,
I'm in trouble in the installation of the x-server. I have an ATI Radeon 9600,
so I installed the driver radeon as suggested in the HOWTO. When I run
dpkg-reconfigure --priority=low xserver-xfree86
I'm asked of the PCI bus ID. Now my videocard is on AGP, so what s
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:03:03 -0400
"Scott V. McGuire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:37:52PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> ... elision ...
> > Excellent! Thanks, Andrea.
> >
> > I was googling and found some threads indicating I would need to
> > disable the vesafb framebuffer,
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:37:52PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
... elision ...
> Excellent! Thanks, Andrea.
>
> I was googling and found some threads indicating I would need to disable
> the vesafb framebuffer, but evidently not, as it's now working. Glxgears
> is now showing 2600fps, and tuxracer is ge
gt; On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:52:14 +0200
> > > Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm running the latest updates in Sarge, with a 2.6.7-1-k7
> >
> > > Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > I'm running the latest updates in Sarge, with a 2.6.7-1-k7
> > > > kernel. I've modprobed agpgart and nvidia_agp, which according
> > > > to the logs recognize the agp bridge on the mo
Sarge, with a 2.6.7-1-k7 kernel.
> > > I've modprobed agpgart and nvidia_agp, which according to the logs
> > > recognize the agp bridge on the motherboard.
> >
> > You also have to load a radeon module *after* the agpgart
> > module. Here's What I use in m
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:52:14 +0200
Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm running the latest updates in Sarge, with a 2.6.7-1-k7 kernel.
> > I've modprobed agpgart and nvidia_agp, which according to the
Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm running the latest updates in Sarge, with a 2.6.7-1-k7 kernel. I've
> modprobed agpgart and nvidia_agp, which according to the logs recognize
> the agp bridge on the motherboard.
You also have to load a radeon module *after* t
Hello list,
I've managed to get a Radeon 9200SE working on one computer, but it uses
agp 4x. On another computer I've got a plain Radeon 9200 that appears to
be agp 8x only installed in a motherboard with the Nvidia Nforce2
chipset (which supports agp 8x). However, I can't seem to
ad it explicitly. Now I've
got intel-agp in my /etc/modules file (this will load the agpgart
module automatically too). Now, if you really want to get graphics
hardware acceleration that's not enough either, you also have to load
the module for your graphics chip (radeon in my case;
Correct. It is an Intel chipset and I have "CONFIG_AGP_INTEL"
configured as a module.
Adam Aube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> However, the OP is using i810, which is an Intel chipset, so the correct
> options in that case is the Intel i8xx support (CONFIG_AGP_INTEL) rather
> than CONFIG_
csj wrote:
>> I've recently upgraded from 2.4.25 to 2.6.4 via a source from
>> kernel.org. I'm having the somewhat common problem with my x
>> server. The message is:
>>
>> "Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory.) AGP
>> GART
On 5. April 2004 at 9:30AM -0700,
Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've recently upgraded from 2.4.25 to 2.6.4 via a source from
> kernel.org. I'm having the somewhat common problem with my x
> server. The message is:
>
> "Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No suc
I've recently upgraded from 2.4.25 to 2.6.4 via a source from
kernel.org. I'm
having the somewhat common problem with my x server. The message is:
"Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory.)
AGP GART is not available..."
After 10 kenel recompiles and countless s
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Werner Mahr wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2004 14:57 schrieb Peter Samek:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:23:51PM +0100, Bjorn Johansson wrote:
> > > If I try AGP ="8" in /etc/XF86Config-4 it says that the mode is invalid.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 26. März 2004 06:02 schrieb Marc Wilson:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:23:51PM +0100, Bjorn Johansson wrote:
> > If I try AGP ="8" in /etc/XF86Config-4 it says that the mode is invalid.
> > Is it really true that
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:23:51PM +0100, Bjorn Johansson wrote:
> If I try AGP ="8" in /etc/XF86Config-4 it says that the mode is invalid. Is
> it really true that no higher than AGP 4X is supported, not even in the
> latest Xfree86 4.4?
I suppose everyone gets to guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2004 14:57 schrieb Peter Samek:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:23:51PM +0100, Bjorn Johansson wrote:
> > If I try AGP ="8" in /etc/XF86Config-4 it says that the mode is invalid.
> > Is it really true that
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:23:51PM +0100, Bjorn Johansson wrote:
>
> If I try AGP ="8" in /etc/XF86Config-4 it says that the mode is invalid. Is
> it really true that no higher than AGP 4X is supported, not even in the
> latest Xfree86 4.4?
The problem is probably in the
If I try AGP ="8" in /etc/XF86Config-4 it says that the mode is invalid. Is
it really true that no higher than AGP 4X is supported, not even in the
latest Xfree86 4.4?
Björn Johansson
(not a member of the list)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Hello!
I'm using the latest Xfree86 4.4 here and it seems like it doesn't support
higher than AGP 4. If I try AGP 8 I get an error message saying it's invalid.
Is this the fault of Xfree86 or is it my kernel which doesn't support AGP 8?
I have a 2.6.2 kernel in my sys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 2. März 2004 02:58 schrieb Maxime BrouBrou:
> Hi,
>
> I got a Geforce FX 5200 128 mo...and i want to know if Debian will accept
> it...and if not...what can i do?
>
> Thanks you for reply!
I have exact the same Card, using driver 5336 wit
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 20:58, Maxime BrouBrou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a Geforce FX 5200 128 mo...and i want to know if Debian will accept
> it...and if not...what can i do?
Using the EXACT same Card. I use Debian Exclusively. I am using v5336
nvidia drivers for X. I have AGP Status,
Hi,
I got a Geforce FX 5200 128 mo...and i want to know if Debian will accept
it...and if not...what can i do?
Thanks you for reply!
Maxime B.
From Quebec Canada
boring of window!
_
MSN Messenger : discutez en direct avec vos amis
I haven't patched it so I will try ! Thank you !
original message:
Re: debian unstable / 2.6.2 kernel / ATI Radeon 9200 + fglrx (proprietary) / probably
AGP problem ? / Colin Keefe / Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:11:51 -0600
|
http://www.rage3d.com/board/forumdisplay.
* Jakub Ondrusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-24 13:30 +0100]:
> (I only see this in the log, the screen turns black (still in text mode)
> and stays that way until I change to another virtual console. When
> I switch back, I only see the connection reset by peer message.
>
> any help ?
Did you
PAGE_SIZE: 0x1000
(II) fglrx(0): [drm] register handle = 0xdfef
(II) fglrx(0): [agp] Mode=0x1f000a1b bridge: 0x1106/0x3189
(II) fglrx(0): [agp] AGP v1/2 disable mask 0x
(II) fglrx(0): [agp] AGP v3 disable mask 0x
(II) fglrx(0): [agp] enabling AGP with mode=0x1f000b1a
(I only s
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:40:13 +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm not doing a great job. I did a netinstall from
> debian-installer (12-01-04, FWIW, and it *rocks*!), but can't seem to
> get X to come up at all.
My usual approaches in such cases:
1. (as proposed by another pos
creens
> found". He's got a NVidia FX mumble in there.
>
> If I could get the damn thing to work with even the vesa driver, I'd
> know where to start - but I can't. I've got mdetect, read-edid and
> discover installed (all before apt-get installing xserver
w that some nvidia cards will work with the nv driver that comes
with Xfree86. However you won't get any acceleration out of it. Some
of the newer cards won't even work with that and will require the
nvidia drivers. I'm not sure if there are any nvidia cards out there
that won
g to work with even the vesa driver, I'd
know where to start - but I can't. I've got mdetect, read-edid and
discover installed (all before apt-get installing xserver-xfree86), but
this doesn't seem to help.
So -
o any AGP gotchas I should look out for? I've only instal
Have you tried Knoppix or something like that to see if that works graphically? If
so, you can take the X config stuff from there
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, January 18, 2004 11:34 am
Subject: Xfree setup: does AGP require an
sa driver, I'd
know where to start - but I can't. I've got mdetect, read-edid and
discover installed (all before apt-get installing xserver-xfree86), but
this doesn't seem to help.
So -
o any AGP gotchas I should look out for? I've only installed on a PCI
system b
e v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
> agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 201M
> agpgart: Detected SiS 630 chipset
> agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe000
>
> and this is an excerpt from "lspci -v" (full output is attached in
> case you want to read it):
>
&
ssage:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 201M
agpgart: Detected SiS 630 chipset
agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe000
and this is an excerpt from "lspci -v" (full output is attached in case
you want to read it):
00:0f.0
s
message:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 201M
agpgart: Detected SiS 630 chipset
agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe000
and this is an excerpt from "lspci -v" (full output is attached in case
you want to read it):
00:0f.
Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
Hi all,
may I request your help?
I've recently bought a Radeon 7000 graphics card for my home PC running
Debian testing. (XFree86 version is 4.2.1.1.)
Despite having tried several suggestions (I've specified the "radeon"
driver in place of "ati" in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4, loa
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
>
> while glxgears reports an awful 80 FPS.
> I guess that these lines from /var/log/XFree86.0.log identify the
> problem:
>
> (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available
> (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] failed to remove DRM signal handler
>
>
lxgears reports an awful 80 FPS.
I guess that these lines from /var/log/XFree86.0.log identify the
problem:
(EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available
(EE) RADEON(0): [drm] failed to remove DRM signal handler
I tried loading the "agpgart" kernel module, but to no effect.
The full /var/log/
I have chatted with people at AMD about the AGP bug and they contend
that it is fixed in the in 2.4.20 kernel. Is this true in the debian
2.4.20 kernel sources package? My machine still hangs randomly, and
when it does, XFree86 is running at ~98% cpu.
Art Edwards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
pport it back in april
i've since convreted out most of the old fireGL and have them using
$1,000 nvidia quadro 9x000 series controllers .. they seem to be happy
3D modeling their molecules complete w/ 3d goggles
> > agp gart stuff is tricky to get working ... fun or annoying stuff
>
are that to the level of
support that nVidia provides.
> agp gart stuff is tricky to get working ... fun or annoying stuff
If your chipset is supported, it's not tricky at all. Otherwise, it
depends - how much of a kernel hacker are you? ;-)
--
Best Regards, | Hi! I'm a .signature
nfig and hardware and installed
apps and your "support level needed" to get it working
- ie .. read lots of docs
( ati or nvidia websites usually has up-2-date drivers n stuff )
agp gart stuff is tricky to get working ... fun or annoying stuff
c ya
alvin
--
> > I need to enable agp gart for my radeon 128 mb ati card, according
> > to the instructions in the xfree site.
>
> I pity you. Any cash left to buy nVidia?
You are scaring me. Is the support so bad for this card? I got it because some said
earlier in the list that at
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:40:10 +0200, Antonio Rodr wrote:
> I need to enable agp gart for my radeon 128 mb ati card, according to
> the instructions in the xfree site.
I pity you. Any cash left to buy nVidia?
> However, I can't find the place in the compilation of my image. I am
It's under Character Devices in my menuconfig session.
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 16:35, Antonio Rodr wrote:
> I need to enable agp gart for my radeon 128 mb ati card, according to the
> instructions in the xfree site. However, I can't find the place in the compilation
> of my
I need to enable agp gart for my radeon 128 mb ati card, according to the instructions
in the xfree site. However, I can't find the place in the compilation of my image.
I am using kernel-package and kernel-source from testing, in the "make menuconfig"
step.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 17:04, Egor Tur wrote:
> Hi folk.
> I have motheboard on via chipset (Via Apollo Pro 133Z).
> And I have AGP video card.
> My kernel is 2.4.20. I compile it with support agp, but I cacnnot use agp -
> this is from dmesg command:
> Linux agpgart interf
Hi folk.
I have motheboard on via chipset (Via Apollo Pro 133Z).
And I have AGP video card.
My kernel is 2.4.20. I compile it with support agp, but I cacnnot use agp -
this is from dmesg command:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 06:51, eric lin wrote:
> Dear Linuxer:
>
> did any one know sis305 agp is what chipset in xfree86 4?
Try the drivers for the sis300 series from Thomas Winischhofer
located at: www.winischhofer.net/linuxsis630.shtml
You need to patch your kernel and overwrite
eric lin said:
> Dear Linuxer:
>
> did any one know sis305 agp is what chipset in xfree86 4?
http://www.xfree86.org/4.1.0/Status30.html#30
the 300 is supported, but it says there are some problems with it,
the 305 is probably considered similar enough to the 300 to run
with that drive
1 - 100 of 365 matches
Mail list logo
