In <102841.80521...@web35202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, Stephen Liu wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>Debian 5.0 minimal
>No desktop
>
>What option shall be up to run either "apt-get install" or "aptitude
>install" installing X packages collectively. Thanks.
I'
Hi folks,
Debian 5.0 minimal
No desktop
What option shall be up to run either "apt-get install" or "aptitude
install" installing X packages collectively. Thanks.
Further more;
# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny main
deb-src http
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 18:27, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Ok, I'm confused.
>
> I want to upgrade to X 4.3.0. I don't run xdm, so I don't think I need
> "x-window-system".
>
> Just by following links on the pacakges.debian.org site, I see this
> dependecny tree:
>
> x-window-system
> x-win
Ok, I'm confused.
I want to upgrade to X 4.3.0. I don't run xdm, so I don't think I need
"x-window-system".
Just by following links on the pacakges.debian.org site, I see this
dependecny tree:
x-window-system
x-window-system-core
xserver-xfree86
xserver-c
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 09:31:21PM +0100, Sebastian D.B. Krause wrote:
> On 3468 September 1993, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
> > Does anyone have or know where to get some 1.5.x mutt packages that will
> > work on woody?
>
> http://people.debian.org/~nobse/debian/woody/backported/mutt/
>
> Or in y
On 3468 September 1993, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
> Does anyone have or know where to get some 1.5.x mutt packages that will
> work on woody?
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/debian/woody/backported/mutt/
Or in your sources.list:
deb http://people.debian.org/~nobse/debian/woody/backported/ ./
Does anyone have or know where to get some 1.5.x mutt packages that will
work on woody?
TIA.
--
:wq!
Matthew Daubenspeck
http://www.oddprocess.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s have had success with removal and
reinstallation, but I keep ending up with lots of missing files.
Is this a problem with the X packages, or do sid packages require reiserfs
or something like that that could be completely fouling up my package
installs?
Rikki Hall
>> I'm trying to install a bunch of X packages (wmaker,
>> xemacs, games, xmms, etc). But it won't let me
>> without installing X. Is their a good way to install
>> these packages through dselect? I don't want X
>> because I'm using X4.0.2
1)
Hey,
I'm trying to install a bunch of X packages
(wmaker, xemacs, games, xmms, etc). But it won't let me without installing
X. Is their a good way to install these packages through dselect? I
don't want X because I'm using X4.0.2
Thanks,
Cameron matheson
Hi,
I tried apt-getting Licq 0.75.x a couple days ago and it wouldn't run.
I'm pretty sure I've heard of people here having similar experiences.
Does anyone know if it has been fixed yet? The Debian unstable
tree has 0.75.2 while 0.75.3 is out.
--
Bart Szyszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ:4982727
Gig
Hello.
I've been looking around for Debian packages of a recent version of
INND, but I could only find the old 1.7 version. Even Potato has
INND 1.7. :(
Is it possible to find an INND 2.x package for Debian?
On Fri, Feb 19, 1999 at 06:42:45PM +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> I have upgraded my hamm to slink, but I am a bit confused.
>
> First, I thought the packages have been renamed to the following:
> xfntbase->xfonts-base
> xfnt75 ->xfonts-75dpi
> xfnt100
On 19-Feb-99 Shao Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> I have upgraded my hamm to slink, but I am a bit confused.
>
> First, I thought the packages have been renamed to the following:
> xfntbase->xfonts-base
> xfnt75 ->xfonts-75dpi
> xfnt100 ->xfonts-100dpi
>
Hi,
I have upgraded my hamm to slink, but I am a bit confused.
First, I thought the packages have been renamed to the following:
xfntbase->xfonts-base
xfnt75 ->xfonts-75dpi
xfnt100 ->xfonts-100dpi
xfntscl ->xfonts-scalable
xfntbi
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:31:35PM -0600, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
> hi
>
> why -10 insists on having tons of stuff installed i really
> don't use?
>
> like xfs, or rstart(d), or twm (is there any person alive who
> uses twm?), or xmh, or xterm, or...
It doesn't. Read the extended description of
On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 11:19:07AM -0800, Paul Nathan Puri wrote:
> > I recently upgraded to potato.
> >
> > Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be?
>
> This is (probably) a known bug in -9. Upgrade to -10.
>
> > What are the minimum
On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 11:19:07AM -0800, Paul Nathan Puri wrote:
> I recently upgraded to potato.
>
> Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be?
This is (probably) a known bug in -9. Upgrade to -10.
> What are the minimum packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
x
In a message dated 2/8/99 1:13:54 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'd like to know the answer to the question: "What is a minimal set
> of packages necessary to run X?"
>
I'd say (for hamm) xbase, xserver-svga (or other depending on your card),
xserver-vga16, and xfnts7
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Paul Nathan Puri <"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"@office.law-counsellor.com>
> writes:
> >[...] What are the
> > minimum packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
[snipped: useful answer by Daniel to the Potato X problem]
I'd like to know the ans
Paul Nathan Puri <"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"@office.law-counsellor.com> writes:
> I recently upgraded to potato.
>
> Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be? What are the
> minimum packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
It would probably be because the X maintainer l
I recently upgraded to potato.
Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be? What are the minimum
packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
Thanks,
NatePuri
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI:
I just upgraged to the rev 3.3.2.2-3 X11 packages and the mouse movement
sluggishness and jerkiness seems to have gone away, and it seems that the
random "button pressing" behavior has disappeared.
I'm guessing this is what affected me, although I'm using xserver-s3,
not the SVGA server (fro
> On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, someone wrote:
>
> What brand and model of mouse are you using?
>
Its a Dexxa three-button serial mouse, the relevant XF86Config lines are:
Section "Pointer"
Protocol"Microsoft"
Device "/dev/mouse"
--ken
__
Ken
Quoting George Bonser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It works both ways, last time I looked Debian had no entry for dtterm
> either and this is rather a bummer since all commercial Unix that I am
> aware of ship with CDE now.
It's in there now. ncurses-term-1.9.9g-8.8. I'd have to say that debian
(and fr
*-George Bonser (20 Jul)
| On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Ken Lauffenburger wrote:
| >
| >
| > Also, on a related note, what is the purpose of changing the TERM variable
| > to "xterm-debian" ? I'm planning on changing it back on
On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, George Bonser wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Ken Lauffenburger wrote:
>
> >
> > Any suggestions or clues would be quite appreciated.
> >
>
> What brand and model of mouse are you using?
>
> >
> >
Hello,
I just recently updated the X11 packages on my Hamm system from rev 3.3.2.1-1
to 3.3.2.2-1 and then to 3.3.2.2-2. Ever since, simple X-Y mouse movements
cause the window manager to act as if the mouse buttons are being randomly
pressed. This of course causes all sorts of annoying things
In message <"5mupn2.0.MF5.WECUp"@debian>, "Dale Miller" writes:
> I had some questions about the Xwindows packages. Are they based
> on the stable 3.2 release? Has the public patch that is mentioned
> on www.xfree86.org been applied? I am asking because I have just
> bought an ATI 3D Expression +
On 13 May 1997, Dale Miller wrote:
> I had some questions about the Xwindows packages. Are they based
> on the stable 3.2 release? Has the public patch that is mentioned
> on www.xfree86.org been applied? I am asking because I have just
> bought an ATI 3D Expression + PC2TV card and am having tro
I had some questions about the Xwindows packages. Are they based
on the stable 3.2 release? Has the public patch that is mentioned
on www.xfree86.org been applied? I am asking because I have just
bought an ATI 3D Expression + PC2TV card and am having trouble
getting it to work with the Mach64 X se
I can't be sure that 2.0.24 was the cause, but maelstrom won't
run right now because it claims that it cannot allocate 'X shared
memory' or some such thing. Lately, I upgraded many things including
libc5 and 2.0.6 -> 2.0.24 before I noticed this. Anyway, when
I can spare a few hours of modem time
On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> It currently has 2.0.23 (although I have not released a boot disk, the
> kernel package is there).
>
> I'd like to hear more about what breaks with 2.0.24 .
>
How about hearing what has been fixed in 2.0.24? ;-) There was a bug
introduced via a bugfix for
On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> I'd like to hear more about what breaks with 2.0.24 .
Some people have reported that X is slower in 2.0.24. Linus is looking
into the cause.
Gerry
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-
Bruce Perens wrote:
>
> > Any chance that 1.2 will have a recent kernel (like 2.0.23 or 2.0.24)?
> > 2.0.24 has the big ping fix which I consider important, however I've
> > heard some applications have problems with .24 due to a change in a
> > network struct.
>
> It currently has 2.0.23 (althou
In your email to me, Bruce Perens, you wrote:
>
> > Any chance that 1.2 will have a recent kernel (like 2.0.23 or 2.0.24)?
> > 2.0.24 has the big ping fix which I consider important, however I've
> > heard some applications have problems with .24 due to a change in a
> > network struct.
>
> It
> Any chance that 1.2 will have a recent kernel (like 2.0.23 or 2.0.24)?
> 2.0.24 has the big ping fix which I consider important, however I've
> heard some applications have problems with .24 due to a change in a
> network struct.
It currently has 2.0.23 (although I have not released a boot di
On Mon, 4 Nov 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> The code-freeze for 1.2 happens today.
Any chance that 1.2 will have a recent kernel (like 2.0.23 or 2.0.24)?
2.0.24 has the big ping fix which I consider important, however I've
heard some applications have problems with .24 due to a change in a
netwo
The person who is building X is expecting to upload them within the
next two weeks - he says sooner, I'm being conservative. The hold-up is
due to our packaging system going through some changes that require
editing of installation scripts. The X source builds 27 binary packages,
no surprise that s
39 matches
Mail list logo
