Bruce Perens wrote: > > > Any chance that 1.2 will have a recent kernel (like 2.0.23 or 2.0.24)? > > 2.0.24 has the big ping fix which I consider important, however I've > > heard some applications have problems with .24 due to a change in a > > network struct. > > It currently has 2.0.23 (although I have not released a boot disk, the > kernel package is there).
I don't get it. My mirror of ftp.debian.org, up-to-date as of last night, is a mirror of "development", which is a link to rex. Isn't the now-frozen 1.2 a snapshot of rex taken on monday? My mirror still has kernel 2.0.6: lrwxrwxrwx 1 rickm 55 Jul 23 05:30 kernel-headers-2.0.6_2.0.6-0.deb -> ../../binary-all/devel/kernel-headers-2.0.6_2.0.6-0.deb lrwxrwxrwx 1 rickm 54 Jul 23 05:30 kernel-source-2.0.6_2.0.6-0.deb -> ../../binary-all/devel/kernel-source-2.0.6_2.0.6-0.deb Where is 2.0.23, and what does it mean to say that 1.2 has it when rex doesn't? -- ...RickM... -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
