Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-31 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OA> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:47:41AM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> OA> Did you put that working mail cap entry into .mailcap? >> i

Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-31 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:47:41AM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> way. the weird thing is, though, that my local .mailcap didn't override > >> it. & i tried changing sensible-br

Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-30 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> way. the weird thing is, though, that my local .mailcap didn't override >> it. & i tried changing sensible-browser, which also didn't do anything. >> so i'm at a bit of a loss as to how to make

Re: sensible-browser weirdness (was Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help)

2008-07-30 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CB> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:07:28AM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >> echo'ing it seems to run & then dump out of lynx... CB> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file $(which sensible-browser) CB> /usr/bin/sensible-browser: Bourne shell script text

sensible-browser weirdness (was Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help)

2008-07-29 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:07:28AM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RJ> Works for me... > RJ> $ echo $(which sensible-browser) > RJ> /usr/bin/sensible-browser > > echo'ing it seems to run & then dump out of lynx... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fi

Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-29 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 07:26:18PM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OA> Hi, > >> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> i tried changing it, but that didn't work, so i just commented the > >> stupid thing out & boom, w

Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-28 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> OA> The real root cause fix is to get sensible-browser working. >> OA> It is simple shell script. You can see it >> OA> $ view $(which sensible-browser) >> $ view $(which sensible-browser) >> W

Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-28 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DB> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 06:13:36PM +, "i'll teach you to turn away." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: >> i tried changing it, but that didn't work, so i just commented the >> stupid thing out & boom, we're back to normal. i have no clue

Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-28 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/28/08 14:26, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OA> Hi, >>> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> i tried changing it, but that didn't work, so i just commented the >>> stupi

Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-28 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OA> Hi, >> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> i tried changing it, but that didn't work, so i just commented the >> stupid thing out & boom, we're back to normal. i have no clue what >> happened, but it's nice to be able to use l

Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-28 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 06:13:36PM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > l> but something changed, even though pine hasn't been updated in > l> forever. i can't find a setting i even accidentally hit, but now it > l> ju

Re: SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 06:13:36PM +, "i'll teach you to turn away." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > i tried changing it, but that didn't work, so i just commented the > stupid thing out & boom, we're back to normal. i have no clue what > happened, but it's nice to be able to u

SOLVED was Re: pine help

2008-07-27 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: l> but something changed, even though pine hasn't been updated in l> forever. i can't find a setting i even accidentally hit, but now it l> just says "[VIEWER command launched]", & doesn't launch anything. i l> stay in pine, unable

Re: pine help

2008-07-27 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Arvind Marathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AM> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 05:33:24PM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >> compunction:/home/crank# update-alternatives --config www-browser >> There is only 1 program which provides www-browser >> (/usr/bin/links2). Nothing to configure. AM> So

Re: pine help

2008-07-26 Thread Arvind Marathe
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 05:33:24PM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > Arvind Marathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AM> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:56 AM, i'll teach you to turn away. > >>for curiousity's sake, i renamed sensible-browser & then copied > >> lynx as /usr/bin/sensible-br

Re: pine help

2008-07-26 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Arvind Marathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AM> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:56 AM, i'll teach you to turn away. >>for curiousity's sake, i renamed sensible-browser & then copied >> lynx as /usr/bin/sensible-browser, but doing so made no difference to >> pine. AM> The script /usr/bin/sensible-br

Re: pine help

2008-07-26 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RJ> On 07/25/08 20:27, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >> i haven't, but i sorely fear change. :D RJ> A Linux user who fears change? Are you sure that's not a 3B1 on RJ> your desk? i'm pretty sure, but i'm too busy playing my green-screen g

Re: pine help

2008-07-26 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/08 20:27, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RJ> On 07/25/08 15:32, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >>> yes, i know pine is a million years old. i still love it. so >>> shh. > RJ> Since yo

Re: pine help

2008-07-25 Thread Arvind Marathe
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:56 AM, i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...snip...] >sensible-browser? i've never used or configured that... sensi* > isn't anywhere in the config, either. invoking it looks just like links2. > >for

Re: pine help

2008-07-25 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Aaron Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AH> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >> hi, yes, i have: >> url-viewers="/usr/bin/lynx _URL_" AH> Do the URLs have any special characters ("?", "&" from CGI and whatnot)? AH> I've noticed that alpine 1.0 (and probably pine) gives e

Re: pine help

2008-07-25 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RJ> On 07/25/08 15:32, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >> yes, i know pine is a million years old. i still love it. so >> shh. RJ> Since you like pine, have you tried alpine? i haven't, but i sorely fear change. :D lish [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pine help

2008-07-25 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Miles Fidelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: MF> i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >> hi, yes, i have: >> url-viewers="/usr/bin/lynx _URL_" MF> A couple of perhaps silly questions: MF> - does lynx still work when invoked directly? MF> - has something changed in you search path? hey, f

Re: pine help

2008-07-25 Thread Aaron Hall
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > hi, yes, i have: > > url-viewers="/usr/bin/lynx _URL_" > > that formatting is as the pine help said, but i really don't > recall ever setting that in the first place, so perhaps that's not the > issue? anyway, even set it's not

Re: pine help

2008-07-25 Thread Miles Fidelman
i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: Guillermo Mulliert Carl?n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GMCn> Hello, GMCn> |> anyhow, i'm having a strange issue. i used to be able to read GMCn> |> HTML emails by launching lynx within pine - select view, then the HTML GMCn> |> email, then yes, then *boom*

Re: pine help

2008-07-25 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/08 15:32, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > yes, i know pine is a million years old. i still love it. so > shh. Since you like pine, have you tried alpine? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In ligh

Re: pine help

2008-07-25 Thread i'll teach you to turn away.
Guillermo Mulliert Carl?n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GMCn> Hello, GMCn> |> anyhow, i'm having a strange issue. i used to be able to read GMCn> |> HTML emails by launching lynx within pine - select view, then the HTML GMCn> |> email, then yes, then *boom* i'm pushed into lynx to view the html

Re: pine help

2008-07-25 Thread Guillermo Mulliert Carlín
Hello, On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: |> yes, i know pine is a million years old. i still love it. so |> shh. |> |> anyhow, i'm having a strange issue. i used to be able to read |> HTML emails by launching lynx within pine - select view, then the HTML |> em

Re: Pine macros

2006-12-15 Thread Andrea Ganduglia
On 12/15/06, Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 15 December 2006 01:28, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > Hi. I'm working on old workstation with PINE 4.44 (I think released in > 2002), I can't upgrade software and I must work with users privileges. > In this scenario I need define m

Re: Pine macros

2006-12-15 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Friday 15 December 2006 01:28, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > Hi. I'm working on old workstation with PINE 4.44 (I think released in > 2002), I can't upgrade software and I must work with users privileges. > In this scenario I need define macros for my Pine mail client, or > better I need define a me

Re: pine

2006-08-08 Thread Alan Greenberger
On 2006-07-27, Anton Piatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) > --enigD1CC84142CB70DD9FC331E5E > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Hi, > Anyone know if "pine" is in debian? I can't fin

Re: pine

2006-08-05 Thread m
It wasn't when I looked three or four years ago, but the source is available from Washington University (www.washington.edu/pine/) and it is (or was then) really easy to compile & install. Regards, Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: pine

2006-07-27 Thread Matej Cepl
Anton Piatek wrote: > Anyone know if "pine" is in debian? I can't find it... > If you know where it is, let me know! It is not. http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-software.en.html#s-pine Matěj -- GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jab

Re: pine

2006-07-27 Thread Wulfy
Anton Piatek wrote: Hi, Anyone know if "pine" is in debian? I can't find it... If you know where it is, let me know! Anton Hi, Anton! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy pine pine: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4.64-1duo+sarge1 Version table: 4.64-1duo+sarge1 0 500 http://ftp

Re: Pine again?

2002-11-21 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Cheryl Homiak wrote: > I know i've seen threads about this on Pine before, even posted on the subject > but I'm stuck again. Pine450 is out and i'd like to use it. Debian packages for i386 (woody and sid) are available from http://www.braincells.com/open/ Information on apt

Re: Pine again?

2002-11-20 Thread Joey Hess
Travis Crump wrote: > cd /good/directory/; apt-get source pine; cd pine-; > fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us; dpkg -i ../pine*deb Or if you're using unstable: apt-get install apt-src apt-src install -i pine And to track new versions of the source as they come out: apt-src update apt-src upgra

Re: Pine again?

2002-11-20 Thread Cheryl Homiak
Looks like I'll have to wait until 4.60 is done; the present source package fetched with this command is 4.44. However, it does work. Thanks. Cheryl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pine again?

2002-11-20 Thread Travis Crump
Cheryl Homiak wrote: I know i've seen threads about this on Pine before, even posted on the subject but I'm stuck again. Pine450 is out and i'd like to use it. I've never figured out how to compile it from the source on debian and never have found a full explanation of it. I've been cheating and u

Re: pine binaries, and pico

2002-10-04 Thread Walter Tautz
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hello All > > > > At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there > > are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does > > anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does > >

Re: pine binaries

2002-10-01 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:03:37AM -0700, Stephen A. Witt wrote: > I've heard that someone was maintaining pine binaries, but I myself have > always compiled pine from the source from U.W. It is really pretty > straightforward. Debianised Pine binaries cannot be redistributed thanks to bizarre li

Re: pine binaries

2002-09-30 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello All > > At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there > are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does > anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does > one have to compile pine. > The sid ones should work without

Re: pine compilation woes

2002-09-30 Thread Claudio Bley
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 06:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 5. Based on info in http://www.braincells.com/debian/sid/pine/ made sure >that I had the following: > >libc-client-ssl2001, >libldap2, >libncurses5, >libpam0g, >libssl0.9.6 and >mime-support Just run 'apt-g

Re: pine compilation woes

2002-09-30 Thread nate
> Hello > > libc-client-ssl2001, > libldap2, > libncurses5, > libpam0g, > libssl0.9.6 and > mime-support > # osdep.c:197: x509.h: No such file or directory > # osdep.c:198: ssl.h: No such file or directory > # osdep.c:200: pem.h: No such file or directory > # osdep.c:201: buffer.h: No

Re: pine binaries

2002-09-30 Thread irvine
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:09:39PM -0500, Brooks R. Robinson wrote: > | Hello All > | > | At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there > | are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does > | anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does > | one have to compile pine. >

RE: pine binaries

2002-09-30 Thread Brooks R. Robinson
| Hello All | | At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there | are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does | anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does | one have to compile pine. | Have a look at pine-tracker (non-free). HTH, Brooks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: pine binaries

2002-09-30 Thread Stephen A. Witt
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello All > > At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there > are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does > anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does > one have to compile pine. > I've heard that someone was maint

Re: PINE, Rpm, not installed?

2002-03-10 Thread Joe
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 12:26:36PM +0200, Michel Clasquin wrote: > On Sunday 10 March 2002 04:55, Joe wrote: > > > > > Rpm isnt there either... > > > > We're *not* Red Hat. Don't insult us with that. > > > > actually though, rpm & alien both are there, in stable, testing, and > > unstable, and t

Re: PINE, Rpm, not installed?

2002-03-10 Thread Michel Clasquin
On Sunday 10 March 2002 04:55, Joe wrote: > > > Rpm isnt there either... > > We're *not* Red Hat. Don't insult us with that. > > actually though, rpm & alien both are there, in stable, testing, and > unstable, and they seem to work quite well. > > If you wanted to go to rpmfind.net for something

Re: PINE, Rpm, not installed?

2002-03-09 Thread Joe
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:47:57PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Camilo wrote: > > > I wanted to use PINE under my potato install... found it is not > > installed? why is this? > > Licensing issues. Do this: apt-get install pine-tracker Follow it's > instructions on

Re: PINE, Rpm, not installed?

2002-03-09 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Camilo wrote: > I wanted to use PINE under my potato install... found it is not > installed? why is this? Licensing issues. Do this: apt-get install pine-tracker Follow it's instructions on how to get the newest version of pine. > Rpm isnt there either... We're *not* Red

Re: PINE, Rpm, not installed?

2002-03-09 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 07:00:20PM +0100, Jens M?ller wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Due to licensing issue, PINE is only available as source package. See > > below. > > Is it so? > > I installed it once, there was a dummy package which downloaded the > source package, bu

Re: PINE, Rpm, not installed?

2002-03-09 Thread Jens Müller
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Due to licensing issue, PINE is only available as source package. See > below. Is it so? I installed it once, there was a dummy package which downloaded the source package, built binary packages and installed them. -- Please don't CC me on replies!

Re: PINE, Rpm, not installed?

2002-03-09 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 05:32:31AM -0600, Camilo wrote: > I wanted to use PINE under my potato install... found it is not > installed? why is this? Rpm isnt there either... Due to licensing issue, PINE is only available as source package. See below. I think RPM is available in potato but it is

Re: PINE, Rpm, not installed?

2002-03-09 Thread timothy bauscher
apt-get install rpm *it should work* (==timothy==) = Hi! I wanted to use PINE under my potato install... found it is not installed? why is this? Rpm isnt there either... I guess i can use apt-get to install PINE.. but im not so sure about rpm, since it is

solved Re: pine?

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Jinks
Pine compiles for me now; things I did: # ln -s /usr/bin/gcc /usr/bin/cc install -dev portion of ncurses package add "-llber" to the compile options in the "build" script (alternatively could have adjusted it to build without LDAP support) That last I'd call a bug in the Debian source package;

Re: pine?

2002-01-06 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Michael Jinks wrote: > Further down there are more errors as a result of pine not being built. > > So, missing libraries maybe, or a version mismatch of some kind? > Now might be a good time for me to plug my unofficial binary package of pine 4.43. It's available from http://

Re: pine?

2002-01-05 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 16:28:19 -0600, Michael Jinks wrote: > /opt/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libncurses.so: mkdir: invalid version 2 (max 0) ^^^ That's not a linker from a Debian package (Debian package don't touch /opt). Try building with a $PATH that doesn't contain /opt . HTH, Ray -- People

Re: pine?

2002-01-03 Thread Michael Jinks
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:12:31PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:43:59AM -0600, Michael Jinks wrote: > > The "./debian/rules" command fails; the first error I notice is: > > > > cc -O2 -g -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o addrbook.o addrbook.c > > make[1]: cc: Com

Re: pine?

2002-01-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:43:59AM -0600, Michael Jinks wrote: > The "./debian/rules" command fails; the first error I notice is: > > cc -O2 -g -DLNX -DSYSTYPE=\"LNX\" -DMOUSE -c -o addrbook.o addrbook.c > make[1]: cc: Command not found The gcc package should install a link in /usr/bin/cc. Wh

Re: Pine compile options

2002-01-02 Thread Faheem Mitha
On 2 Jan 2002, Nick Furman wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I recently did an upgrade on a server of mine. The upgrade moved user's > mailboxes to /var/spool/mail/u/s/user. Everything is working wonderfully, > except for pine. > > I did a "apt-get source -b pine4" to download and install pine. I hav

Re: Pine only executes from Midnight Commander

2001-10-09 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, V.T.Jones wrote: > Just compiled pine 4.05. First I tried "build lnx" but it couldn't find > "crypt" so I did "build slx" with success. Why are you using pine 4.05? It's ancient. I suggest using pine 4.33. This is the version in testing/unstable and I was able to sucessfull

Re: pine for Debian

2001-09-15 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Faheem Mitha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010915 19:03]: > > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Joe Koenig wrote: > > > Trying to install pine on Potato. > > Downloaded the official sources. cd pine-3.96M. dpkg-buildpackage. > > dpkg --install pine-tech-notes_3.96M-5.0_all.deb > > > > -- snip ---

Re: pine for Debian

2001-09-15 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Faheem Mitha wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Joe Koenig wrote: > > > Trying to install pine on Potato. > Then refresh and do (as root!) > > apt-get source -b pine > > By the way, I tried this just now, and I'm getting some bizarre permission > problems I've never se

Re: pine for Debian

2001-09-15 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Joe Koenig wrote: > Trying to install pine on Potato. > Downloaded the official sources. cd pine-3.96M. dpkg-buildpackage. > dpkg --install pine-tech-notes_3.96M-5.0_all.deb > > -- snip -- > Preparing to replace pi

Re: PINE

2001-07-18 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 09:28:42PM -0400, dude wrote: > > I know PINE is not what debian users use, > but i recently convinced my girlfriend to > let me install debian on her windows computer. > Her only gripe with using it is > that there are no debs of Pine. There are unofficial (and perfectly

Re: PINE

2001-07-18 Thread florentin ionescu
like "#include " Hope that helped, Florentin. From: Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: User zos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Subject: Re: PINE Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 02:22:10 -0600 (MDT) On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, User zos wrote: > Compiling

Re: PINE

2001-07-18 Thread John Galt
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Calvin Chong wrote: >on 7/18/01 11:42 AM, Jeff Maxson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, dude wrote: >> >>> >>> I know PINE is not what debian users use, >>> but i recently convinced my girlfriend to >>> let me install debian on her windows computer. >>> Her

Re: PINE

2001-07-18 Thread John Galt
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Ari Pollak wrote: >On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 07:23:58PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I haven't used pine in ages. Switched to mutt not long ago, and haven't >> looked back.. But, there was a 'mana' package, which appears to be a >> fork from pine. Worked about as well when

Re: PINE

2001-07-18 Thread John Galt
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, dude wrote: > >I know PINE is not what debian users use, >but i recently convinced my girlfriend to >let me install debian on her windows computer. >Her only gripe with using it is >that there are no debs of Pine. > >She has tried building it from source >downloaded from washi

Re: PINE

2001-07-18 Thread Bruce Sass
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, User zos wrote: > Compiling Pine on a debian system doesn't work out of the box in my > experiance. There are .debs of Pine 4.22 last time I checked, but its been > a while. I have compiled Pine on a few debian boxen and if you are > interested in making a compile from source

Re: PINE

2001-07-18 Thread User zos
Compiling Pine on a debian system doesn't work out of the box in my experiance. There are .debs of Pine 4.22 last time I checked, but its been a while. I have compiled Pine on a few debian boxen and if you are interested in making a compile from source work (the better option vs. a debianized sourc

Re: PINE

2001-07-17 Thread Calvin Chong
on 7/18/01 11:42 AM, Jeff Maxson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, dude wrote: > >> >> I know PINE is not what debian users use, >> but i recently convinced my girlfriend to >> let me install debian on her windows computer. >> Her only gripe with using it is >> that there are no

Re: PINE

2001-07-17 Thread Jeff Maxson
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, dude wrote: > > I know PINE is not what debian users use, > but i recently convinced my girlfriend to > let me install debian on her windows computer. > Her only gripe with using it is > that there are no debs of Pine. > > She has tried building it from source > downloaded fro

Re: PINE

2001-07-17 Thread Ari Pollak
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 07:23:58PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I haven't used pine in ages. Switched to mutt not long ago, and haven't > looked back.. But, there was a 'mana' package, which appears to be a > fork from pine. Worked about as well when I tried it, but I haven't heard > a thing a

Re: PINE

2001-07-17 Thread Simon Law
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, dude wrote: > > I know PINE is not what debian users use, > but i recently convinced my girlfriend to > let me install debian on her windows computer. > Her only gripe with using it is > that there are no debs of Pine. > > She has tried building it from source > downloaded f

Re: PINE

2001-07-17 Thread idalton
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 09:28:42PM -0400, dude wrote: > > I know PINE is not what debian users use, > but i recently convinced my girlfriend to > let me install debian on her windows computer. > Her only gripe with using it is > that there are no debs of Pine. > > She has tried building it from s

Re: PINE

2001-07-17 Thread David Purton
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, dude wrote: > > I know PINE is not what debian users use, > but i recently convinced my girlfriend to > let me install debian on her windows computer. > Her only gripe with using it is > that there are no debs of Pine. > > She has tried building it from source > downloaded f

Re: pine and Maildir

2001-07-11 Thread Brandon M. Browning
> >1. can pine use Maildir format, with a site config change > >(/etc/pine.conf)? __abandoning__ pine is not possible immediately. > > The Debian package of Pine has maildir support builtin. > > >2. since IMP works with imap, just changing the imap server to use > >Maildir instead of Mailbox wil

Re: pine and Maildir

2001-07-11 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Olimpio de Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've a box with exim, qpopper and imapd for email services. > Users can read email through pine, IMP/Horde, or pop3. > I would like the change over to Maildir format, using lower >footprint serv

Re: pine and Maildir

2001-07-11 Thread Vineet Kumar
http://www.google.com/search?q=pine+maildir+patch should return you some useful information. I know there is a patch for pine, but it may be for an older version. Is downgrading also an immediate impossibility? As for the second question, I've not used IMP, but your guess sounds correct: if it in

Re: pine and trn interaction

2001-07-09 Thread Colin Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anyone know how to set trn up so that when a post is made to >a newsgroup, a copy of the mail is stored in the sent-mail pine folder? Try 'export AUTHORCOPY=$HOME/mail/sent-mail' (or wherever it is) in your shell initialization files. There's documentation of

Re: Pine

2001-06-18 Thread USM Bish
The file where the configuration of file is written is at .pinerc in your home directory ... It is easiest to set up things through the pine Setup options ... In case you want to set it by hand just edit the lines in that file. The relevant lines from my .pinerc which gives [EMAIL PROTECTED] i

Re: Pine

2001-06-17 Thread John Galt
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Nick Furman wrote: >What file in the pine directory sets the domain after the "@" sign. > >Example: nfurman@"domain.com" "S"etup, "C"onfig, "user-domain" >Thanks! > >Best Regards, > >Nicholas K. Furman >Systems & Network Administrator >J-Link Computer & Internet Services >15

Re: pine

2001-01-21 Thread Christopher W. Aiken
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Benjamin Pharr wrote: ->I'm having a bit of a problem getting pine to compile on Debian. I ->installed the src and the diffs package and then followed the instructions ->in the README. It compiles for several minutes and then starts giving errors. -> ->os.c:1122 ->invalid o

Re: Pine installation sequence

2000-10-29 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:14:43PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > >I believe that is not allowed by the license. > > I understood that the University of Washington had told the developer in > question that they didn't mind this specific use. Of cours

Re: Pine installation sequence

2000-10-27 Thread Colin Watson
Frederik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: >> Just go to http://members.mint.net/frodo/pine/ and get the binary >> packages. You won't need to deal with building from source. These are >> unofficial packages, but they're made by an official Debian developer

Re: Pine installation sequence

2000-10-27 Thread Frederik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > Just go to http://members.mint.net/frodo/pine/ and get the binary > packages. You won't need to deal with building from source. These are > unofficial packages, but they're made by an official Debian d

Re: Pine installation sequence

2000-10-27 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just go to http://members.mint.net/frodo/pine/ and get the binary packages. You won't need to deal with building from source. These are unofficial packages, but they're made by an official Debian developer and are high quality. noah On Fri, Oct 27,

Re: Pine

2000-10-13 Thread Bob Nielsen
Check the source file. There are pine (ver 3.96) and pine4 (ver 4.21) sources in addition to pine4-src and pine4-diffs. The pine4-src and pine4-diffs packages were created (iirc) before apt had the ability to download source and automatically create a package this way. From the description of pi

Re: Pine

2000-10-13 Thread Robert Varga
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Christian Pernegger wrote: > > What's wrong with > > $ apt-get -b source pine > Would it not want to get pine4-tar.gz, pine4-4.21-xdiff.gz and pine4-4.21-?.dsc ergo the source files themselves from the source archive? It is not that way with pine. The sources are

Re: Pine

2000-10-12 Thread Christian Pernegger
What's wrong with $ apt-get -b source pine That also builds pine/pico/pilot and some docs as debs... On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 07:09:59PM +0200, Robert Varga wrote: > > You need to install the pine4-diffs package as well. It contains the > patches and the dsc file, as well as the debian-package

Re Pine

2000-10-12 Thread Eileen Orbell
Thank you to everyone who replied to my Pine problems. It works now. having always been a RH user I am slowly getting the hang of debian.. Thanks Eileen Orbell Software & Internet Applications Capitol College mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't Fear the Penguin.

Re: Pine

2000-10-12 Thread S.J. Black
Hi, Eileen - Unpack the source w/ : dpkg-source -x pine4_4.21-1.dsc (make sure you have dpkg-dev installed for this.) Then cd into pine_4.21, where you run : debian/rules binary cd back to /usr/src/pine4 Then run: dpkg -i pine_4.21-1_i386.deb This should do the trick. Hope it helps... alp

Re: Pine

2000-10-12 Thread Robert Varga
You need to install the pine4-diffs package as well. It contains the patches and the dsc file, as well as the debian-package configuration files. You also will need libc-client4.7 and libc-client4.7-dev, and libncurses5-dev packages. After you have installed both, switch into /usr/src/pine4. Issu

Re: Pine

2000-10-12 Thread Ray Percival
I have not looked in the recent past but have they cleared up the buffer overflow problems with Pine? If not you might be better off with something else. To try and answer the question have you tried apt-get install pine ? Should work like a charm. -- Original Message ---

Re: Pine and exim

2000-10-09 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:55:52AM -0700, Jatin Golani wrote: > mail system of Linux. I have exim on my Debian system > and use Pine > to access my POP3 mail account at my ISP. Now Pine is > supposed to be a MUA and exim a MTAso > theoretically ex

Re: pine in debian

2000-10-04 Thread Bruce Sass
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Christopher W. Aiken wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, Parrish M Myers wrote: > -|Does anyone rember why pine isn't included in the debian install (only > -|the sources are)... I looked at the license and it doesn't seem that > -|restrictive? > > I'm a Debian n

Re: pine in debian

2000-10-04 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Parrish M Myers wrote: > Does anyone rember why pine isn't included in the debian install (only > the sources are)... I looked at the license and it doesn't seem that > restrictive? The pine license doesn't allow distribution of *modified* b

Re: pine in debian

2000-10-04 Thread Christopher W. Aiken
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, Parrish M Myers wrote: -|Hi, -| -|Does anyone rember why pine isn't included in the debian install (only -|the sources are)... I looked at the license and it doesn't seem that -|restrictive? -| -|Parrish Myers -| I'm a Debian newbee and wondered the same t

Re: pine (again!)

2000-09-29 Thread Daniel Lesage
Thanks to Joel Dinel for pointing me to this address: http://www.linuxnewbie.org/ubb/Forum12/HTML/96.html Turns out I did not have libncurses5-dev installed, only libncurses5. Now I'm wondering why apt did not warn me of the missing dependance... Dan.

Re: pine (again!)

2000-09-29 Thread steph
Yup...either look for /usr/src/pine4 or /usr/src/pine...there's a wonderful README that actually tells each gory little step of the process. Works very well Alpha

  1   2   3   4   >