Re: NVidia legacy 390 driver

On Sep 08, 2025, Van Snyder wrote: > On Mon, 2025-09-08 at 16:20 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > > On Sep 08, 2025, Van Snyder wrote: > > > I had been having trouble getting an antique NVidia FX 1300 to > > > work. I > > > couldn't install the 174 driver. I found a GF 630 in my basement. > > > It > > >

Re: NVidia legacy 390 driver

On Mon, 2025-09-08 at 16:20 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > On Sep 08, 2025, Van Snyder wrote: > > I had been having trouble getting an antique NVidia FX 1300 to > > work. I > > couldn't install the 174 driver. I found a GF 630 in my basement. > > It > > wants the 390 driver. > > > That's also pret

Re: NVidia legacy 390 driver

On Sep 08, 2025, Van Snyder wrote: > I had been having trouble getting an antique NVidia FX 1300 to work. I > couldn't install the 174 driver. I found a GF 630 in my basement. It > wants the 390 driver. That's also pretty old for the nVidia drivers -- which version of Debian are you using, and whi

Re: NVidia legacy 390 driver

On Mon, 2025-09-08 at 16:20 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > On Sep 08, 2025, Van Snyder wrote: > > I had been having trouble getting an antique NVidia FX 1300 to > > work. I > > couldn't install the 174 driver. I found a GF 630 in my basement. > > It > > wants the 390 driver. > > > That's also pret

Re: NVidia legacy 390 driver

On Mon, 2025-09-08 at 18:10 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > > While running NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-390.157.run: > > > > fatal error: autoconf.h: No such file or directory > > 1 | #include "autoconf.h" > > well, that's likely a missing dependency (build-essential?). root@tan:~# apt install build-essent

Re: NVidia legacy 390 driver

Hello, - Nvidia has stopped supporting your graphic card. - For Stable releases, Debian provides Nvidia proprietary drivers that are supported by Nvidia. - In order to help its users, Debian provides Nvidia proprietary drivers that Nvidia deems too old to be supported. That happens exclusivel

Re: NVidia legacy 390 driver

On Sep 08, 2025, Van Snyder wrote: > On Mon, 2025-09-08 at 18:10 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > > > While running NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-390.157.run: > > > > > > fatal error: autoconf.h: No such file or directory > > > 1 | #include "autoconf.h" > > > > well, that's likely a missing dependency (build-es

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

Response below/inline for email Felix Miata wrote: > (original email sent 15 Aug 2025 at 05:29) > > GM107GL works fine here: Excellent! Thank you for confirming this. Peace of mind. :-) -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 31.0.50 2025-04-23) on Debian 12.11

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

Response below/inline for email Brad Rogers wrote: > (original email sent 15 Aug 2025 at 08:11) > > Not if you're using nouveau. Ah, good to know. Thank you! > F*ck sustainability and f*ck the planet. Am I right? Indeed. Consumption above all else. :-( -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 31.

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 08:00:59 +0100 Eric S Fraga wrote: Hello Eric, >My graphics card is NVIDIA Corporation GM107GL [Quadro K620]. The >driver is nouveau for the moment. Do I need to worry? Not if you're using nouveau. If you were using the (closed source, proprietary) nVidia drivers, you'd h

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

Eric S Fraga composed on 2025-08-15 08:00 (UTC+0100): > Response below/inline for email Eben King wrote: >> Hmm, I hadn't considered that my video card might become unsupported. > Yeah, not something I had considered! > My graphics card is NVIDIA Corporation GM107GL [Quadro K620]. The > driver

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

Response below/inline for email Eben King wrote: > (original email sent 14 Aug 2025 at 16:33) > > Hmm, I hadn't considered that my video card might become unsupported. Yeah, not something I had considered! My graphics card is NVIDIA Corporation GM107GL [Quadro K620]. The driver is nouveau for t

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

On 8/10/25 01:21, Alex Wahl wrote: Count me in among those who used the Tesla 470 drivers and now am totally out of luck as they've been discontinued in Trixie. Nouveau is proving to be absolutely useless, both on XFCE and MATE. Can I at least compile from upstream or are we just totally an

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

On 8/10/25 04:41, Peter B wrote: "Can I at least compile from upstream..." Hi Alex, Debian source package is here https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 You could try building the Debian package from source, but, the binaries in bookworm-backports & sid hav

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

Alex Wahl composed on 2025-08-10 01:21 (UTC-0400): > Count me in among those who used the Tesla 470 drivers and now am totally out > of luck as they've been discontinued in Trixie. Nouveau is proving to be > absolutely useless, both on XFCE and MATE. Can I at least compile from > upstream or ar

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

"Can I at least compile from upstream..." Hi Alex, Debian source package is here https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 You could try building the Debian package from source, but, the binaries in bookworm-backports & sid have already been patched to build the

Re: Nvidia, Trixie, legacy drivers

On 10.08.2025 07:50 Uhr Alex Wahl wrote: > Can I at least compile from upstream or are we just totally and > utterly out of luck? It is proprietary, no source code for you. The binaries don't offer support for more current kernels, that is the reason it will be removed. -- kind regards Marco

Re: Nvidia packages kept back

Hi Charles, Do you mean that it should/could happen that, at a certain point, the "kept-back" packages will be upgraded by just using "apt upgrade"? Best, Livio On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 5:48 AM Charles Kroeger wrote: > This is probably related to needful dependencies not yet available, or > ava

Re: Nvidia packages kept back

This is probably related to needful dependencies not yet available, or available somewhere else. This problem is always sorted out by the passing of time. How much you want to wait is subjective to you I would think. Time is the revelator. -- C.

Re: Re: nvidia driver not loaded after install

Thanks Dan, I disabled Secure Boot and sure enough, the driver was loaded. I actually decided to make a clean install of Debian on this machine and left Secure boot disabled. I tried multiple times and was unable to get the driver to load. This is strange however because it did work before. I w

Re: nvidia driver not loaded after install

On Jan 15, 2025, Anil F Duggirala wrote: > I am trying to install the Nvidia driver on my Dell XPS 9550 fresh > Debian 12 machine. > > [ 16.905450] Loading of module with unavailable key is rejected > ... > > Can anyone please help me out. Getting Debian to work in this laptop > has been a big

Re: Nvidia fans not activating

On 08.01.2025 23:21, Eben King wrote: Hi, I have an Nvidia GTX 970 with driver 535.216 on Debian 12.9. The fans don't generally come on on the video card, and if I let it get to the mid 90s it crashes. Sometimes the driver behaves and holds the card in the mid 60s, but not always. As a workaro

Re: nvidia package 340xx

On 23/08/2024 18:51, Hans wrote: 2. Enter the line for sid into your /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free non-free-firmware [...] 5. Do NOT upgrade any other files! Do NOT aot upgrade or aptitude upgrade now although it will install many other pack

Re: nvidia package 340xx

Am Freitag, 23. August 2024, 15:55:40 CEST schrieb Richmond: > I tried something similar, but it didn't work, although... > > Hans writes: > > 1. Install module-assistant > > I didn't do this. > > > 2. Enter the line for sid into your /etc/apt/sources.list > > > > deb http://deb.debian.org/deb

Re: nvidia package 340xx

I tried something similar, but it didn't work, although... Hans writes: > > > > > 1. Install module-assistant I didn't do this. > > 2. Enter the line for sid into your /etc/apt/sources.list > > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/[1] sid main contrib non-free > non-free- firmware > > > 3. apt upd

Re: nvidia package 340xx

> I should read my own posts. I have now installed Ubuntu 22 with Kernel > 5.4 and it is working with the above Nvidia card. But I have only kicked > the can down the road to April. I wonder if it will be possible to run > Debian 12 or 11 with a 5.4 kernel and nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver? Should wo

Re: nvidia package 340xx

Richmond writes: > Hans writes: > >> Am Samstag, 20. Mai 2023, 19:15:18 CEST schrieb Richmond: >> >>> Hans writes: >> >> >>> >> >>> As far as I remember the problem in Nvidia does not support kernels >> >>> above 4. This is why my laptop is stuck on Debian 10, although I >> did >> >>> wonder if

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

David writes: > Hi, for your information, this wiki page: > https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian > has some information related to your question, I sometimes wonder if the deb-multimedia repo counts as a Frankendebian making thingy since the wiki page is ambiguous in my opinion. I sometimes

usermod video,audio (was: Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970)

On 16/08/2024 06:15, George at Clug wrote: usermod -a -G video,audio [myusername] It should not be necessary. Udev and systemd-logind "uaccess" feature grants permissions to the current active user through ACLs.

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On 8/15/24 13:47, Hans wrote: Hi Ebon, you said, it is flashing? Or do you have a blamk screen? It's all black, but the backlight flashes. I'll see if making the fixmonitors script correct works. I wrote that script and it uses xrandr to reset the monitors to the way they should be. Now thei

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 15:46, George at Clug wrote: > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. > > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ? Hi, for your information, this wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian has

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Friday, 16-08-2024 at 03:30 Hans wrote: > > What Steam games do you have working under Nvidia? I have watched people on > > YouTube play some interesting and modern games using Nvidia + Linux and > > with ray-tracing, but they have to do a lot of customisation from what I > > could tell. From my

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Friday, 16-08-2024 at 03:57 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 00:48:20 +1000, George at Clug wrote: > > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. > > > > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ? > > No. Back

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

Le 15/08/2024 à 19:17, e...@gmx.us a écrit : [...] > Aug 15 12:57:24 cerberus lightdm[1085]: Error getting user list from > org.freedesktop.Accounts: > GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name > org.freedesktop.Accounts was not provided by any .service files [...] didier@hp-

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

> > You don't get security updates for backport kernels, so I'd strongly > oppose it if you're running an exposed server. But for a desktop system > in a normal kind of setup (behind a firewall, or on a private network) > it should be within reasonable expectations of security. Huh, this is an

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 00:48:20 +1000, George at Clug wrote: > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. > > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ? No. Backports are reasonably safe. Installing one doesn't break all your dep

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

Hi Ebon, you said, it is flashing? Or do you have a blamk screen? This can happen, when the resolutionb of the monitor is out of sync. You can try to create an /etc/xorg.conf file, where you can set the resolution. Xorg.conf is not needed any more, as the monitor is telling the resolution and

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

> What Steam games do you have working under Nvidia? I have watched people on > YouTube play some interesting and modern games using Nvidia + Linux and > with ray-tracing, but they have to do a lot of customisation from what I > could tell. From my experience basic distribution installations do not

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On 8/15/24 12:54, e...@gmx.us wrote: On 8/15/24 05:05, Hans wrote: If it is now starting well, you are good and can move your loginmanagers back. After reboot, it should automatically starting the -Server witrh a login greeter. OK, I'll try that. I haven't changed anything but we'll see wh

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

I am currently running in X with the GTX. Only two of three monitors are connected. The right one currently has a VGA cable which doesn't work with this card. In the console, the left (sideways, DVI) worked but the center (HDMI) didn't until "startx". How can I fix that, or is the DVI one the

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On 8/15/24 05:05, Hans wrote: Hi Ebon, I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a charme. No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and everything elese is working great. FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. Proba

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > Hi Ebon, > > I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a > charme. > > No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and > everything elese is > working great. What Steam games do you have wo

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

Hi Ebon, I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a charme. No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and everything elese is working great. FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. If your card i

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

Ebon, I have used GTX 970 and GTX 960 video cards for several years.  I have used them with Bookworm since Bookworm was released, using the Bookworm packaged Nvidia proprietary drivers. As long as the GTX 970 is not faulty, you should have an excellent experience with the GTX 970, ... unless yo

Avoid APT::Default-Release (was: Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size)

On 04/08/2024 06:24, Van Snyder wrote: Then, to avoid sucking anything more from unstable, I added /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/my-default containing APT::Default-Release "stable"; It prevents installing security updates

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On Sat, 2024-08-03 at 23:49 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2024-08-01 12:12:31 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > Should I switch to the proprietary nvidia driver on these > > > machines? > > > > Without NVidia's graphics accelerator, u

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-02 14:55:31 +0200, Franco Martelli wrote: > Sorry but have you read that bug report (#1076561)? Some users has posted > solutions to make smaller the initrd file: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076561#10 > and > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 12:12:31 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Should I switch to the proprietary nvidia driver on these machines? > > Without NVidia's graphics accelerator, using software rendering with > nouveau is painfully slow. Sometimes even t

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 01/08/24 at 17:46, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69879473 2024-07-19 02:11:58 initrd.img-6.7.12-amd64 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 112644015 2024-08-01 13:01:40 initrd.img-6.9

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. > And the initrd size is reasonable: … >

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 11:32:10 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 17:18 (UTC+0200): > > > On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> the bug fix should trim initrd size considerably before > >> too long. > > > What do you mean? > > After package containing b

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 17:18 (UTC+0200): > On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> the bug fix should trim initrd size considerably before >> too long. > What do you mean? After package containing bug fix is installed, newly generated initrds will be considerably sma

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): > > > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > > > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > > proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-3

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. > And the initrd size is reasonable: > -rw-

Re: Nvidia chipsets and Debian 12 [WAS Re: Why is Firefox crashing so much lately?]

On 2024-07-18 13:51, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:41:50AM -0700, Van Snyder wrote: On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 07:55 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: HOW did you upgrade? Did you go via 11? Fresh install on reformatted boot and root partitions. OK I can't do that with my o

Re: Nvidia chipsets and Debian 12

Andrew M.A. Cater composed on 2024-07-18 17:51 (UTC): > So just use Nouveau already on a ~15 year old laptop. FTR, technically not a good recommendation. Nouveau has multiple meanings. Employing each individual meaning generally is suboptimal, as it includes the "reverse-engineered, experimental"

Re: NVIDIA drivers issue: Bug that keeps presenting on kernel 6.1.0-21

Daniel Rodriguez writes: > The solution of the post to this issue is to update the kernel from > 6.1.0-13 -> 6.1.0.18; however, my kernel is a later version: > 6.1.0-21-amd64, so I am stuck for solving this issue. Do you have any > idea about what may be happening and/or how to solve it? I wonde

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Hans: Thanks for the note. It seems that nouveau is a bit more stable in Debian 12.5 than it had been in Debian 10.1. At least I hope it is. So far, it hasn't crashed. MfG, Van On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 10:11 +0200, Hans wrote: > No, the NV6800M needs 340xx driver, not 390xx as I prior posted. Howev

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

> In real life no one wants to care of it! Nvidia not, because this > costs money and the developers not, because this is Nvidia and > proprietrary (what is not quite correct, because the kernel-module, > which is the part, that can not be build, is open-source). Since you say it's "open source

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

No, the NV6800M needs 340xx driver, not 390xx as I prior posted. However, I have a GF-119 in my Lenovo T520, where nvidia-detect says, it needs 340xx. But, although I got 340xx compiled for the kernel, it did not start. I then build 390xx, which worked like a charm. This happened on my notebook

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 01:13 +0200, Toni Mas Soler wrote: > El Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:56:23 -0700Van Snyder < > van.sny...@sbcglobal.net> va escriure el següent: > > On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > > > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you > > > need340.xx, but this

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

El Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:56:23 -0700 Van Snyder va escriure el següent: > On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you need > > 340.xx, but this is not always true. My card (with th eolder > > kernel) was running 390.xx, although th es

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On 08/06/2024 03:29, Van Snyder wrote: Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in Debian 12? I am not aware of current state of affairs. Several years ago it was possible to rebuild the .deb package (that uses DKMS) with additional patches to make the code compatible

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you need 340.xx, but > this is not always true. My card (with th eolder kernel) was running 390.xx, > although th esystem told me, I have to use 340.xx. 390.xx was running like a > charm, 340.x

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Am Freitag, 7. Juni 2024, 22:29:30 CEST schrieb Van Snyder: Hi! Sadly to tell, that I treid hard to get 340.xx running in Bookworm. The problem is: You can not get it build with the actual kernel sources. I checked and the developers missed some dependencies, the NVidia driver needs at build tim

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

On 03/01/24 at 19:28, Thomas Anderson wrote: Thanks a lot, Macro! it worked. Sorry for delay, I got side tracked with "my day" =) On 03/01/2024 12:03, Marco Moock wrote: Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: Here is the output. Wow, a lot. All those lines with ii at the beg

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

On 3/1/24 18:36, Thomas Anderson wrote: I will upgrade Debian to 12 within the next month or so...but before I do, want to clean up my current system. I am running Debian 12 with the nvidia driver. It's mostly OK but I recently had to reboot as the Xorg process had taken around 70% of my 3

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Thanks a lot, Macro! it worked. Sorry for delay, I got side tracked with "my day" =) On 03/01/2024 12:03, Marco Moock wrote: Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: Here is the output. Wow, a lot. All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt rem

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

> dpkg-reconfigure nvidia-kernel-dkms > Hi all, I am using a NVidia card, which is using the Tesla-driver version (525.147.XX) and used the 470.XXX version before. Both could not be installed by using the above package. But it got installed using package module-assistant. Suggestion, how to

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Marco Moock writes: > Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > >> Here is the output. Wow, a lot. > > All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. > > apt remove *nvidia* -s > > Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only > simulates).

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > Here is the output. Wow, a lot. All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt remove *nvidia* -s Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only simulates).

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Here is the output. Wow, a lot. Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-===

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Am 03.01.2024 um 11:36:03 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > Key information: > I am aware that there are two different installation paths for the > nvidia driver, either through the repos or from nvidia downloads. > I think I did the later, but I have misplaced, lost, and cannot > download the drive

Re: Nvidia 390 driver no longer available for Bookworm; nouveau constantly freezes. Solutions?

On 17.08.2023 20:48, Luiz Romário Santana Rios wrote: Hello, all, (Please cc me when replying, I'm not subscribed to the mailing list) I have (according do lspci) a NVIDIA Corporation GK208B [GeForce GT 710] (rev a1) graphics card. The correct proprietary driver for this card seems to be the

Re: Nvidia graphics driver naming convention

Nicolas Marie writes: > My question is about the package naming: is the > nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 specifically built for Tesla > graphics, and the fact that I can use it for my consumer Nvidia GPU is > a positive "side effect"? The description of package nvidia-tesla-470-driver seems

Re: Nvidia graphics driver naming convention

On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 09:48:34AM +0200, Nicolas Marie wrote: > Hello. > > I've got three workstations using different Nvidia GPU. I upgraded them from > Debian 11.6 to Debian 12: > > * The first one is a Geforce GT520 (Fermi) so I used the package >*nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx* an

Re: Nvidia GT 710 and Secure Boot

Mick Ab composed on 2023-07-02 17:36 (UTC+0100): > I understand that some people have experienced problems with booting a > motherboard with Secure Boot enabled in the BIOS such that they get a blank > screen, can't enter the BIOS and possibly can't boot at all. > This problem seems to be due to

Re: nvidia package 340xx

Richmond writes: > Ubuntu 20.04 supports kernel 5.4 until 2025. So I might try that after > debian 10 expires. > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/ReleaseNotes#Linux_Kernel Off topic but they actually increased that to 2030 recently, at least on x86-64. I thought I could benefit from it with

Re: nvidia package 340xx

Hi Richmond, I found this from https://packages.debian.org/sid/nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver[1] "Building the kernel module has been tested up to Linux 6.2." Ok, building does not really mean, it is working, only it is buildable. The other information I mentioned ("it segfaults with qt-libs") I c

Re: nvidia package 340xx

Hans writes: > Am Samstag, 20. Mai 2023, 19:15:18 CEST schrieb Richmond: > >> Hans writes: > > >> > >> As far as I remember the problem in Nvidia does not support kernels > >> above 4. This is why my laptop is stuck on Debian 10, although I > did > >> wonder if Debian 11 can run with kernel 4. >

Re: nvidia package 340xx

Am Samstag, 20. Mai 2023, 19:15:18 CEST schrieb Richmond: > Hans writes: > > As far as I remember the problem in Nvidia does not support kernels > above 4. This is why my laptop is stuck on Debian 10, although I did > wonder if Debian 11 can run with kernel 4. > > (Nouveaux is no good to me).

Re: nvidia package 340xx

"Marlin S. Petre" writes: > On 5/20/23 1:15 PM, Richmond wrote: >> As far as I remember the problem in Nvidia does not support kernels >> above 4. This is why my laptop is stuck on Debian 10, although I did >> wonder if Debian 11 can run with kernel 4. >> >> (Nouveaux is no good to me). >> > I am

Re: nvidia package 340xx

On 5/20/23 1:15 PM, Richmond wrote: As far as I remember the problem in Nvidia does not support kernels above 4. This is why my laptop is stuck on Debian 10, although I did wonder if Debian 11 can run with kernel 4. (Nouveaux is no good to me). I am using the "nvidia-tesla-450-driver" on Debia

Re: nvidia package 340xx

On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 06:15:18PM +0100, Richmond wrote: > As far as I remember the problem in Nvidia does not support kernels > above 4. This is why my laptop is stuck on Debian 10, although I did > wonder if Debian 11 can run with kernel 4. It should, so long as you don't care about the newer k

Re: nvidia package 340xx

On 5/20/23 1:15 PM, Richmond wrote: As far as I remember the problem in Nvidia does not support kernels above 4. This is why my laptop is stuck on Debian 10, although I did wonder if Debian 11 can run with kernel 4. (Nouveaux is no good to me). I am using the "nvidia-tesla-450-driver" on Debia

Re: nvidia package 340xx

Hans writes: > Dear debian team, > > I just discovered the "nividia-legacy-340xx"-packages in debian sid. > > However, as they were in buster, but NOT in bullseye, NOR in bookworm, > I wonder, if there is a chance, they will transfer from testing to > bookworm some day. > > I tested them on bookw

Re: nvidia package wrong documentation?

On 2023-03-22 10:50:30 +0100, Hans wrote: > What I believe is, that the documentation from NVidia might be wrong > and Nvidia told wrong, to say 390xx is for NVS4200. I don't know for your case, but there are inconsistencies in the Nvidia pages. For instance, for Quadro K610M, the 470.161.03 page

Re: nvidia package wrong documentation?

On Wed 22 Mar 2023 at 10:50:30 (+0100), Hans wrote: > > I am running a Lenovo T520 with two graphic cards on board: Intel an Nvidia. > > As you see here it is an GF119M [Quadro NVS 4200M] (rev a1) > > --- snip --- > lspci | grep VGA > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Gen

Re: nvidia-driver gets a code 1

On vrijdag 10 maart 2023 08:00:36 (+01:00), Charles Kroeger wrote: > deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main non-free non-free-firmware > > not > > deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free > non-free-firmware > > ? > Of course, you can also add 'contrib' se

Re: nvidia-driver gets a code 1

deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main non-free non-free-firmware not deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware ? -- CK

Re: nvidia-driver gets a code 1

Ah so a typo. A small thing causing big problems. Once that was corrected the necessary files from firmware were included in an apt update and eventually the full-upgrade without nvidia-kernel-dkms being held back. Everything resolved after that. Thanks -- CK

Re: nvidia-driver gets a code 1

On donderdag 09 maart 2023 23:59:03 (+01:00), Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 04:18:21PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote: > > W: Failed to fetch https://deb/debian.org/debian/dists/bookworm/InRelease > > Could not resolve 'deb' > > You have a typo. deb/debian.org should be deb.d

Re: nvidia-driver gets a code 1

On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 04:18:21PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote: > W: Failed to fetch https://deb/debian.org/debian/dists/bookworm/InRelease > Could not resolve 'deb' You have a typo. deb/debian.org should be deb.debian.org

Re: nvidia-driver gets a code 1

Anssi, thanks for your reply. When Andreas Beckmann added this URL to his apt disclosure: https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#non-free-split He does give a useful example of how the entry should look in /etc/apt/sources/list like this: deb https:

Re: nvidia-driver gets a code 1

Charles Kroeger writes: > Where is this nvidia-open-kernel-525.89.02 ? Seems like it's lost to history. Bookworm non-free has nvidia-open-kernel-525.85.12. So maybe you just need to run apt update to have up to date package lists and then run apt upgrade? > There was an advisory by Andreas Bec

Re: Nvidia-legacy-470xx-driver

Le Sat, 29 Oct 2022 12:52:40 -0400, Jeremy Hendricks a écrit : > Thank you. It appears there is an issue with Linux 6.x. However, its > been fixed in SID per: > https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//non-free/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470_470.14

Re: Nvidia-legacy-470xx-driver

Thank you. It appears there is an issue with Linux 6.x. However, its been fixed in SID per: https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//non-free/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470_470.141.03-3_changelog I imagine it will make it to Bookworm within a few da

Re: Nvidia-legacy-470xx-driver

Le Sat, 29 Oct 2022 11:31:57 -0400, Jeremy Hendricks a écrit : > Hello! Since Debian testing/bookworm has moved to the nvidia 510 > driver, does anyone know if there will be a > nvidia-legacy-470xx-driver? If you need the 470 series you can install the "nvidia-tesla-470-driver" package.

Re: Nvidia + Plasma + Keyboard

On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:12:23AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Marco composed on 2022-08-04 06:51 (UTC): > > > Thu, 04 Aug 2022 06:37:31 + Hans composed: > > >> Did I miss telling it? On T520 it is GF119 (NVS4200) and in the > >> Aspire it is GF-86M, both need *-340xx-* legacy drivers. > >

Re: Nvidia + Plasma + Keyboard

Marco composed on 2022-08-04 06:51 (UTC): > Thu, 04 Aug 2022 06:37:31 + Hans composed: >> Did I miss telling it? On T520 it is GF119 (NVS4200) and in the >> Aspire it is GF-86M, both need *-340xx-* legacy drivers. > For this generation of cards, nouveau works fine. I am running it with a >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >