On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:13:29 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:23 -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> >
> > I am confused as to what power management technology I should be using.
> > When I installed debian etch on this powerpc Apple PowerBook, apm was
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:23 -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
>
> I am confused as to what power management technology I should be using. When
> I installed debian etch on this powerpc Apple PowerBook, apm was used as
> default.
>
> Things are working great here and I have no complaints. Howeve
Sorted. it was xorg. Changed back to xfree and all works sweetly.
Really annoying untracable bug though. Still, happy that it works now.
bye.
(hope this thread of use to someone adn I'm not just emailing myself!!)
rich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Sorted. it was xorg. Changed back to xfree and all works sweetly.
Really annoying untracable bug though. Still, happy that it works now.
bye.
(hope this thread of use to someone adn I'm not just emailing myself!!)
rich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Ok, if I boot straight to console, suspend works ok. But it seems to fail when
X is running.
I thought it could be the video driver, which was "radeon". I tried "ati", no
improvements. Then I tried disabling dri, still no improvements.
So I rekon that it's not a kernel module that's causing the
I meant to send this to the laptop mailing list. Sorry!
> Hello:
>
> I'm running sarge on a gateway M305 and installed apm/apmd. But 1) the
> battery status applet still says "no battery present", 2) the laptop
> seems to be running hotter than it did before, and 3) when I try to
> suspend (as r
Lance Hoffmeyer([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I get this message every time I switch from X
> to the console. What do I need to do so that
> I don't this this message?
>
> $ apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x
> apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.e/2004-08-23
I have no way of knowin
Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are as many opinions on this list on ways to do things are there
> are options ;)
>
> However, FWIW I would recommend installing aptitude and apt-listbugs to
> maintain your sid system. It takes a while to get used to aptitude's
> interface (pa
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Whenever APM puts my computer in supend or standby mode, the monitor
> will come out of any power saving mode that is in and it will not
> suspend, standby or go off after that. What could be the cause of this?
Is this in X11 or at the console, or both? A read of 'm
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Whenever APM puts my computer in supend or standby mode, the monitor
> will come out of any power saving mode that is in and it will not
> suspend, standby or go off after that. What could be the cause of this?
Is this in X11 or at the console, or both? A read of '
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:02:39AM +, J.S.Sahambi wrote:
> I just installed the Debian unstable on a P-IV. To power off the system
> when I give it a shuddown we have to load the apm module with option
> "power_off=1". So I give the following commnad:
hm. at me loading the module itself is e
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:02:39AM +, J.S.Sahambi wrote:
> I just installed the Debian unstable on a P-IV. To power off the system
You probably want to use ACPI. Odds are, depending on the manufacturer
of your hardware, that the APM support is broken, if present at all.
E.g. my Dell Latitude
Andy Neillans wrote:
( Re-submitted - last copy did not appear - sent 18th at 2:20PM)
Hi,
I have just installed Debian R3.0 onto a newish laptop (Packard Bell iGo
6000, which is a rebranded NEC Versa M300).
If I enable APM, and cat /proc/apm I get a complete melt down - the screen
fills with wh
El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 16:04, Jason Chambers escribe:
> ACPI is the newer technology and can do more than APM. However it is still
> experimental, especially in 2.4 kernels. The Debian kernels don't
> include the later ACPI patch which can improve matters. Emma Jane Hogbin
> wr
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:55:59PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 13:51, Jason Chambers escribe:
> > "If both ACPI and Advanced Power Management (APM) support are
> >configured, whichever is loaded first shall be used."
>
> I suspected this.
El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 13:51, Jason Chambers escribe:
> "If both ACPI and Advanced Power Management (APM) support are
>configured, whichever is loaded first shall be used."
I suspected this. Which option do you think is better? I am supposing
that is ACPI, as it should be a
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:19:55PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if I can use simultaneously apmd (with APM support enabled in
> my kernel) and acpid (with ACPI support enabled in my kernel), and
> whether this is useful, or ACPI superseedes APM in any way.
>
You can
I have some more info regarding this most interesting problem. I know I
can be a bit verbose (I am never sure what might be important), so I
will not quote my whole original post, just a link to it in case anyone
missed it:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200307/msg03355.ht
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Daymien wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > i complete my instalation of debian linux.
> > i will use my old celeron pc at server for all pc in the house.
> > For remote control i use ssh if apm works i tray to install a x-server and
> > controll the pc over vnc but at the moment if i
Try 'insmod apm'. If the module loads then your shutdown/reboot should
work with no problems.
Good Luck!
--
Joao Pedro Clemente
jpcl @ rnl.ist.utl.pt
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Daymien wrote:
> Hi
>
> i complete my instalation of debian
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:18:00PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Thanks for your reply:
>
> since I have remove the `Batterie Charge Monitor' applet
> (Gnome2 under testing/unstable) the Linux clock is fine.
>
> Is there a link between this applet (APM) and the Linux clock ?
The APM driver disab
-- nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Saturday, 01 February 2003, 12:17 PM -0800):
> Matthew Weier OPhinney said:
> > I've got debian testing on my wife's old p-120 laptop; it works great, and
> > with the plethora of text tools I typically use, it's much more productive
> > than windows ever was o
Matthew Weier OPhinney said:
> I've got debian testing on my wife's old p-120 laptop; it works great, and
> with the plethora of text tools I typically use, it's much more productive
> than windows ever was on it.
>
> However, I've noticed some odd behaviour in relation to suspending while a
> vim
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:14:36PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 19:13, Pigeon wrote:
> > And don't forget that the power isn't REALLY turned off, and you
> > therefore have to switch it off at the wall. Or you could do what I
> > did, and take the PSU apart to wire in the do
On Tuesday 17 December 2002 17:10, Clive Standbridge wrote:
> On Mon 16 Dec 2002 18:34:27 +(+), daves debian wrote:
> > Am i right in thinking that I need apm compiled in the kernel to allow my
> > system to turn its own power off when i
> >
> > shutdown -h now ??
>
> No, it works as a mod
On Tuesday 17 December 2002 17:10, Clive Standbridge wrote:
> On Mon 16 Dec 2002 18:34:27 +(+), daves debian wrote:
> > Am i right in thinking that I need apm compiled in the kernel to allow my
> > system to turn its own power off when i
> >
> > shutdown -h now ??
>
> No, it works as a modu
Many thanks for the info
After having a read and got my apm to work by
[*] Power Management support
[ ] ACPI support
<*> Advanced Power Management BIOS support
[ ] Ignore USER SUSPEND
[ ] Enable PM at boot time
On Mon 16 Dec 2002 18:34:27 +(+), daves debian wrote:
> Am i right in thinking that I need apm compiled in the kernel to allow my
> system to turn its own power off when i
>
> shutdown -h now ??
No, it works as a module for me.
> All the documentation seesm to be about laptops and batt
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 02:06:05PM -0500, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> -- daves debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> (on Monday, 16 December 2002, 06:34 PM +):
> > Am i right in thinking that I need apm compiled in the kernel to allow my
> > system to turn its own power off when i
> >
> > s
daves debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am i right in thinking that I need apm compiled in the kernel to allow my
> system to turn its own power off when i
>
> shutdown -h now ??
>
> All the documentation seesm to be about laptops and batt saving ? I
> run a full size system.
Yes; it's funn
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 06:34:27PM +, daves debian wrote:
> Am i right in thinking that I need apm compiled in the kernel to allow my
> system to turn its own power off when i
>
> shutdown -h now ??
>
> All the documentation seesm to be about laptops and batt saving ? I run a
> full size sy
-- daves debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Monday, 16 December 2002, 06:34 PM +):
> Am i right in thinking that I need apm compiled in the kernel to allow my
> system to turn its own power off when i
>
> shutdown -h now ??
Or have the module a available. Do a 'modprobe apm' as root and see
This one time, at band camp, Tom Allison said:
> I have an orinoco gold pcmcia wireless LAN card.
> works fine.
>
> But I can't suspend the notebook, or hibernate.
> If I pull the card, the apm related operations are just fine.
>
> apm -s works with the card in place.
> apm -S doesn't work in eit
Andy Saxena said:
> Hi,
> It's likely that not a lot of desktop users care to put their machine
> into suspend, but I am still hoping some of the laptop users can shed
> some light on this.
>
> I have googled around, but haven't seen anything that explains this with
> any satisfaction.
one thing
> I have just recompiled a new kernel, version 2.5.18; I use the same
> settings for APM, as it were. Problem is, now my ATX motherboard
> wouldn't completely shutdown after the shutdown command being issued. I
> hear the same clicking of the power relay during the poweroff, but the
> power light (
--- Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:50:31AM -0700, Charles
> Baker wrote:
> > Something seems to have broken my apm. My bios and
> > wmbattery show that my Dell Latitude battery is
> 100%
> > charged. However, everytime I remove the power
> cable,
> > the laptop
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:50:31AM -0700, Charles Baker wrote:
> Something seems to have broken my apm. My bios and
> wmbattery show that my Dell Latitude battery is 100%
> charged. However, everytime I remove the power cable,
> the laptop just loses power. Does anyone have a clue?
> I'm running si
<>
>
> Okay, I ran modconf and installed apm module in the
> kernel. Before wasn't apm built into most debian
> kernel images? I also did a ``cp -R
> /lib/modules/kernel-pcmcia-2.4.18-686
> /lib/modules/2.4.18-686/pcmcia'' and the pcmcia
> modules showed up in modconf. I installed
> yenta_socket,
--- Charles Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Charles,
>
> <>
>
> > > --- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > Look in /proc. There should be an apm file
> > there.
> > > > If not, linux is NOT using
> > > > apm.
>
--- Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Charles,
<>
> > --- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Look in /proc. There should be an apm file
> there.
> > > If not, linux is NOT using
> > > apm.
> >
> > Okay, no /proc/apm but what could've killed it for
> > 2.4.17 ?
Hi Charles,
* Charles Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020306 13:43]:
>
> --- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Look in /proc. There should be an apm file there.
> > If not, linux is NOT using
> > apm.
>
> Okay, no /proc/apm but what could've killed it for
> 2.4.17 ? It was working
--- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Look in /proc. There should be an apm file there.
> If not, linux is NOT using
> apm.
Okay, no /proc/apm but what could've killed it for
2.4.17 ? It was working just fine before I installed
2.4.18 .
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hacking is a "Good
Look in /proc. There should be an apm file there. If not, linux is NOT using
apm.
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 11:04:49AM -0500, Jack wrote:
| Does any body have the same problem with apm from 2.4.10?
|
| . apm does not work with any arguments passed to the kernel, like:
| "apm=on"
I noticed this when I upgraded to the Debian-packaged 2.4.x kernel.
The apm stuff is also as a
Here is my menu.lst related stuff.
color black/white
# Boot automatically after 30 secs.
timeout 15
# By default, boot the first entry.
default 0
# Fallback to the second entry.
fallback 1
# For booting Linux
title Debian GNU/Linux
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda2 idebus=66 apm=on
Here is my menu.lst related stuff...
color black/white
# Boot automatically after 30 secs.
timeout 15
# By default, boot the first entry.
default 0
# Fallback to the second entry.
fallback 1
# For booting Linux
title Debian GNU/Linux
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda2 idebus=66 apm
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:47:31PM +, andrej hocevar wrote:
> hello
> lately i've installed grub since some have mentioned it here.
> the only two things i had in my lilo.conf and that i want to retain were
> vga=7 and append="apm=on". let chain-load, i've found another way of
> defining the vg
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:13:40PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:53:17PM -0700, Brian McGroarty wrote:
> > Thanks, setterm sure looks like where it should be, but no good
> > so far. And unfortunately, this is a DVI display with no
> > workable off switch, so this really n
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:53:17PM -0700, Brian McGroarty wrote:
> --- Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:51:10PM -0700, Brian McGroarty
> > wrote:
> > > I'm using the stock potato 2.2.19 kernel and I've added
> > apm=on
> > > to the kernel command line.
> > >
>
--- Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:51:10PM -0700, Brian McGroarty
> wrote:
> > I'm using the stock potato 2.2.19 kernel and I've added
> apm=on
> > to the kernel command line.
> >
> > How do I enable apm console blanking? I'm not using X on
> this
> > system,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:51:10PM -0700, Brian McGroarty wrote:
> I'm using the stock potato 2.2.19 kernel and I've added apm=on
> to the kernel command line.
>
> How do I enable apm console blanking? I'm not using X on this
> system, and I'd like to power off the display after 5 minutes of
> no
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:51:10PM -0700, Brian McGroarty wrote:
| I'm using the stock potato 2.2.19 kernel and I've added apm=on
| to the kernel command line.
|
| How do I enable apm console blanking? I'm not using X on this
| system, and I'd like to power off the display after 5 minutes of
| no
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:00:18PM +0200, Fredrik Forsberg wrote:
> Hello
> What you can do is add the following line to your /etc/lilo.conf
> append="apm=on" then run /sbin/lilo
> After that it should power down when you shutdown your computer.
normal shutdown and power saving works (i compiled
Hello
What you can do is add the following line to your /etc/lilo.conf
append="apm=on" then run /sbin/lilo
After that it should power down when you shutdown your computer.
/Fredrik
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Würtele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian user list"
Sent: Tuesday, Apri
Hi,
You need to add the line append="apm=on", like this:
image=/vmlinuz
label=linux
read-only
append="apm=on"
> hallo,
>
> how can I turn on the apmd is running, I know that I've to do some
> changes in the /etc/lilo.conf, but don't know what.
>
> thanks,
> Manuel
>
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 05:21:14PM +0100, Manuel Hendel wrote:
> how can I turn on the apmd is running, I know that I've to do some
> changes in the /etc/lilo.conf, but don't know what.
Usually you should not have to make changes to lilo.conf in order to
turn on APM. Does your board support APM
What!? And here I thought I was at the height of fashion with
my brand new PS/2 mouse. (The hell is a PS/2, anyway?).
Anyway, eventually I'll figure out how to dispense with the
mouse entirely and throw it happily out the window into the
lane. Lots of good things to be found in that lane.
-chris
maybe time to switch to a USB or serial mouse :)
or find a MB that supports that ...it may be worth emailing the company
that makes the MB(provided its not a real old one) and askin them about
that ..
nate
Krzys Majewski wrote:
>
> Sadly, interrupt 12 is not listed in the power management sec
Sadly, interrupt 12 is not listed in the power management section of
the BIOS setup. It goes, perversely, something like this:
Interrupt 3 [Primary Secondary Disabled]
Interrupt 4 [Primary Secondary Disabled]
Interrupt 5 [Primary Secondary Disabled]
Interrupt 6 [Primary Secondary Disabled]
Inter
On Sunday, 17 September 2000 at 14:31, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> How can I disable the mouse interrupt for APM so that moving the mouse
> does not resume the machine? (The mouse is on my desk, there are other
> things on my desk, some of these things move occasionally, etc.)
> I tried disabling IRQ
Quick Summary: I can now stop the hdd, blank the screen, and put the
system in apm --standby mode. AFAI'mCed there's no difference between
--standby and --suspend. I'm not running apmd, though I guess I could
if I really wanted to. Tip: do a
/etc/init.d/networking stop
if apm --standby fails
Nate,
It's a pretty simple reason a person would want to fully suspend a desktop
box - using alternative power! I plan to run my entire configuration via 12Volt
batteries and a ups like inverter. if I can reduce the draw of current, I can
extend the life of my batteries. The whole reason I wa
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Nate Amsden wrote:
> curious why you'd be so interested in doing all this i could never see
> why people wanted to suspend/sleep a desktop system(a notebook i can
> see..)
Yeah I get this question a lot. To me it's really obvious
though: I live in a small apartment and the no
curious why you'd be so interested in doing all this i could never see
why people wanted to suspend/sleep a desktop system(a notebook i can
see..)
as far as the power supply fan is concerned, i had a 486 a while back
that did this. it had a temperature senstive fan, if the temp was above
XX the fa
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 07:32:51AM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> > "apm: set display: Unable to enter requested state"
> >
> > But APM is activated in the BIOS and the kernel recognizes it while
> > booting:
>
> Turn apm *off* in the bios. Linux apm will handle it alone, and
> better usually than
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 03:15:52PM +0200, Philipp Schulte wrote:
>
> I recently exchanged my MSI-6167 board with a new MSI-K7pro. Since
> then I seem to have a problem with the Power Management.
>
> I chose "Enable console blanking using APM" in the kernel setup
> (2.2.17pre20) and with the old b
Once upon a time, I heard Moore, Paul say
> Hi,
> I have a PC with APM support at home. I've installed Debian (Potato) onto it
> and built my own kernel with APM support compiled in (I needed to build my
> own to add the APM real mode calls option, as the default kernel crashes on
> a poweroff cal
my monitor shots off (led in front stays on, but no scan lines
show up even at maximum brightness) in console mode after
a few minuntes. xwindows ain't even running.
before running into debian i'd tried freebsd, and their
default install had a neat set of screensavers in console
mode that switched
uot;.
Or at least that's what I understand from briefly looking at "man xset"
and the result of "xset".
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Shand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 1:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Jay Kell
, 2000 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jay Kelly; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: APM Disable
> According to the only package I found on Debian's site concerning APM
> (apmd): The Debian default kernel does *not* contain APM support,
> because it causes problems on some compu
> According to the only package I found on Debian's site concerning APM
> (apmd): The Debian default kernel does *not* contain APM support,
> because it causes problems on some computers.
as of a few kernels ago in potato (at least a few months ago but i can't
remember when) apm support *is* enab
Jay Kelly wrote:
> Hello Guys,
> After a few minutes my monitors shut due to APM. Where do I shutoff APM? I
> checked the bios and didnt see anything dor the monitor.
> Any sugestion would be great
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
According to the only pack
Hoi Jay!
Jay> After a few minutes my monitors shut due to APM. Where do I
Jay> shutoff APM? I checked the bios and didnt see anything dor the
Jay> monitor. Any sugestion would be great
How about setting your monitor's turn off time? Under X xset, under
console setterm can do the job for y
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 09:37:37AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I don't remember exactly, and browsing through the kernel documentation, I
> > found that the apm=power-off should only apply to smp mobo's
>
>
> And here I thought APM was disabled completely on SMP kernels with more
> than o
David Kanter wrote:
>
> I compiled a new kernel last night with APM support. When I boot up, I get
> the message about APM BIOS. However, it doesn't work all that well.
>
On my Hamm system, I had a hell of a time just getting my monitor to
shut down let alone suspend the system or put it on st
>
> Why does the CPU wake up by itself, or so it seems? Could something be going
> on in the background that wakes it up?
>
As a test, try disabling X screensaver. What may be happening is that
xscreensaver is performing some task, which wakes up the CPU.
APM functions based on time and idlene
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 09:42:01AM -0500, David Kanter wrote:
> I compiled a new kernel last night with APM support. When I boot up, I get
> the message about APM BIOS. However, it doesn't work all that well.
>
> I run Window Maker, and after the selected dead time (as set in my BIOS), the
> CP
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, John Pearson wrote:
> > > > while rebooting to get into DOS. There is win95 installed on the same
> > > > hd and I'm using 'loadlin'. (It was impossible to get lilo working
> > > > with this machine.) With win95 the power goes off automaticly, when I
> > > > stop
> > > > the o
On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 11:03:24PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 09:35:26PM -0500, Rob Mahurin wrote:
> > Hmmm, this thread died without answering the question I was lurking to
> > listen for. I have apmd up and running but can't figure out how to
> > make it go to sleep
On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 09:35:26PM -0500, Rob Mahurin wrote:
> Hmmm, this thread died without answering the question I was lurking to
> listen for. I have apmd up and running but can't figure out how to
> make it go to sleep on a schedule. Winblows had (has, presumably) a
> place where you could
I read the docu on APM. Seems like it is useful for laptop and may not
be for desktop? Suppose I can turn the system into standby mode, how
can I turn the hard drive spin down?
The question boils down to: how can save maximum energy when the
computer is idling? I mainly use the computer after work
Bradley Fehr wrote:
>
> I just installed debian 2 on a laptop and I have
> the apm -s command working to suspend the
> system but,
>
> 1. I want apm -s to work for users other than root.
> Currently it says
> apm: Operation not permitted
> Any ideas?
Use sudo or super as wrapper around it. I us
The following is taken from debian install instructions
4.7. Advanced Power Management
If your motherboard provides Advanced Power Management (APM),
configure it so that power management is controlled by APM.
Disable the doze, standby, suspend, nap
I'm experiencing the same. On my machine, suspend mode usually
triggers a lockup after some while. Moreover, crontabs won't run and
the system clock runs slow (well, not the system clock in BIOS
but the Linux one); I also use the vgetty for faxing and that didn't
work anymore either.
So, I chos
On 04 Sep 1998 00:45:58 +1000, Robert Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Remo Badii) writes:
>
>> I cannot remember having seen any suggestion to include APM support in
>> the kernel during the (successful) installation of Debian 2.0 from the
>> CDs using dselect. Do I really ha
On Mon, Aug 31, 1998 at 08:32:58AM +0200, Remo Badii wrote:
> I cannot remember having seen any suggestion to include APM support in
> the kernel during the (successful) installation of Debian 2.0 from the
> CDs using dselect. Do I really have to load the source file(s) from an
> FTP site and comp
On Mon, Aug 31, 1998 at 08:32:58AM +0200, Remo Badii wrote:
> I cannot remember having seen any suggestion to include APM support in
> the kernel during the (successful) installation of Debian 2.0 from the
> CDs using dselect. Do I really have to load the source file(s) from an
> FTP site and compi
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Jonas Bofjall wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 1998, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
>
> > Use the hdparm package, which can instruct your drive to spin itself
> > down at a specified timeout (if the drive supports it).
>
> This is not what I want. That way the disks spin down too often.
>
On Wed, 11 Mar 1998, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
> Use the hdparm package, which can instruct your drive to spin itself
> down at a specified timeout (if the drive supports it).
This is not what I want. That way the disks spin down too often.
What I was looking for is a way to spin them down when un
Use the hdparm package, which can instruct your drive to spin itself down at a
specified timeout (if the drive supports it).
Jonas Bofjall wrote:
> I would like my IDE disks (I'd very much appciate a general solution too
> which can be used on SCSI systems) to spin down when unmounted. Mounting
>
On Fri, Mar 06, 1998 at 12:26:29AM +0100, Jonas Bofjall wrote:
> I would like my IDE disks (I'd very much appciate a general solution too
> which can be used on SCSI systems) to spin down when unmounted. Mounting
> them would cause them to spin up again. Is this possible and how?
Well, I don't thi
From: Casper Boden-Cummins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> apm_bios: set display standby: Unrecognised device ID
Set APM to _not_ blank the display. Use "setterm -powersave on" instead.
Put it in an rc script.
Apparently APM screen blanking doesn't work nearly as well as VESA screen
blanking. I don't know i
92 matches
Mail list logo
