On 4/30/19, Curt wrote:
> On 2019-04-29, Bob Bernstein wrote:
>> Thank you guys!
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:36:24PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>>
>>> This could have been communicated or handled a bit more > smoothly.
>>
>> Can I safely assume you are referring to how the organization hand
On 2019-04-29, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> Thank you guys!
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:36:24PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> This could have been communicated or handled a bit more > smoothly.
>
> Can I safely assume you are referring to how the organization handled it, and
> not my email?
>
I
Thank you guys!
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:36:24PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> This could have been communicated or handled a bit more > smoothly.
Can I safely assume you are referring to how the organization handled it, and
not my email?
All best,
--
"In our age there is no such thing a
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 15:31 -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> -snip-
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free
>
> deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free
>
> deb-src http://sec
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:31:18PM -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/InRelease Unable to find
> expected entry 'main/source/Sources' in Release file (Wrong sources.list
> entry or malformed file)
There is no more jessie-updates
On 7/15/18, deloptes wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
>
>> May we assume you tried switching repos? Because the only times I've
>> seen that, a particular repository was unreachable.
>
> no, I have not switched anything, but your answer helped me rewind the tape
> back and yes I have added one source (Si
Carl Fink wrote:
> May we assume you tried switching repos? Because the only times I've
> seen that, a particular repository was unreachable.
no, I have not switched anything, but your answer helped me rewind the tape
back and yes I have added one source (Signal) by myself and the stupid
skype pa
On 07/15/2018 06:27 AM, deloptes wrote:
Hi
on one of my machines apt-get update hangs forever.
Get:32 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 Packages [69.7
kB]
Get:33 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free Translation-en [80.6
kB]
0% [Working]
What can I do to understa
Sven Joachim writes:
> On 2018-04-14 17:24 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
>> I shut down a virtualbox sid VM, and it turned out it was running
>> "unattended upgrades". On next start, apt-get update fails:
>>
>> =
>> Get:22 http://ftp2.de.debian.org/d
On 04/14/2018 08:24 AM, Felix Natter wrote:
> apt-get update on sid: Hash Sum mismatch
That means try again later or try a different source. :)
Cheers!
--
Jimmy Johnson
Devuan Beowulf - TDE-Trinity R14.0.5 - AMD A8-7600 - EXT4 at sda8
Registered Linux User #380263
On 2018-04-14 17:24 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> I shut down a virtualbox sid VM, and it turned out it was running
> "unattended upgrades". On next start, apt-get update fails:
>
> =
> Get:22 http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian unstable/contrib amd64 Co
Op 08-02-18 om 22:27 schreef Sven Hartge:
Forest Dean Feighner wrote:
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:26:40PM -0500, Forest Dean Feighner wrote:
W: http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/stretch/updates/InRelease:
The key(s) in the
Forest Dean Feighner wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:26:40PM -0500, Forest Dean Feighner wrote:
>>> W:
>>> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/stretch/updates/InRelease:
>>> The key(s) in the keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg a
Ah, so the error is from using Synaptic rather than from the update of
libtasn1-6?
That's the only recent update I've done and I didn't realize Syaptic would
write the file.
Thanks Greg
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:26:40PM -0500, Forest Dea
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:26:40PM -0500, Forest Dean Feighner wrote:
> W:
> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/stretch/updates/InRelease:
> The key(s) in the keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg are ignored as the file is
> not readable by user '_apt' executing apt-key.
> -rw--- 1 root
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:13:43 +0200
Michael Lange wrote:
> Ok, looks like it's a bug in Jessie's apt version.
Just for the record, in case anyone reads this:
I filed a bug report for apt about this issue
( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827365 ),
however it showed that a new fe
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:57:08 +0200
Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just encountered an odd problem with a repo hosted on sourceforge,
> when calling apt-get update with this repo enabled in the sources.list
> I ended with a 301 error. Apparently this happens because sourceforge
> dropped its ht
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:20:11 -0400, Ed Jabbour wrote:
> On Monday, October 12, 2015 02:34:25 AM Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:19:32 -0400
> >
> > Ed Jabbour wrote:
> > > Running Wheezy. Recently, update has been hanging on
> > > http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/upda
On 10/12/2015 01:20 PM, Ed Jabbour wrote:
Looks OK to me. I changed the backports repo from debian.net to
uchicago.edu and everything just flows. Now, if I can only find the
problem with security.debian.net, which as I understand it, has no
trustworthy mirrors
I'm not using backports, but for
On Monday, October 12, 2015 02:34:25 AM Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:19:32 -0400
>
> Ed Jabbour wrote:
> > Running Wheezy. Recently, update has been hanging on
> > http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main and
> > http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main.
Hi.
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:19:32 -0400
Ed Jabbour wrote:
> Running Wheezy. Recently, update has been hanging on
> http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main and
> http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main. The other repos
> at uchicago.edu breeze through, but the two
On 2014-11-17 17:05, i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote:
On 2014-11-17 17:02, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
On 11/17/2014 05:26 PM, i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote:
I am seeing a rather strange error. I have a wheezy VM which I am
trying to update, but I get the above error on the main source and
also
on s
On 2014-11-17 17:02, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
On 11/17/2014 05:26 PM, i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote:
I am seeing a rather strange error. I have a wheezy VM which I am
trying to update, but I get the above error on the main source and
also
on security source:
W: GPG error: http://security.de
Hi,
On 11/17/2014 05:26 PM, i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote:
> I am seeing a rather strange error. I have a wheezy VM which I am
> trying to update, but I get the above error on the main source and also
> on security source:
>
> W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release:
> Inter
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote:
>
> Running "apt-get update" on one of my machines gives:
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/Debian%20GNU_Linux%207%20%5fWheezy%5f%20-%20Official%20Snapshot%20i386%20LIVE_INSTALL%20Binary%2020140723-18:32_dis
Darac Marjal writes:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> >
> > Running "apt-get update" on one of my machines gives:
> >
> > W: Failed to fetch
> > copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/Debian%20GNU_Linux%207%20%5fWheezy%5f%20-%20Official%20Snapshot%20i386%20LIVE_INST
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:20:38PM -0700, John Conover wrote:
>
> Running "apt-get update" on one of my machines gives:
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/Debian%20GNU_Linux%207%20%5fWheezy%5f%20-%20Official%20Snapshot%20i386%20LIVE_INSTALL%20Binary%2020140723-18:32_dis
Matthias Bodenbinder:
>
> somehow my system is running an apt-get update or something similar
> during boot. Whenever I login after boot I can do a "apt-get
> dist-upgrade" directly because the package list is already up to date.
> If I am too fast with the "apt-get dist-upgrade" it even complains
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:21:09AM +0200, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somehow my system is running an apt-get update or something similar
> during boot. Whenever I login after boot I can do a "apt-get
> dist-upgrade" directly because the package list is already up to date.
> If I am too
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:21:09AM +0200, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somehow my system is running an apt-get update or something similar during
> boot. Whenever I login after boot I can do a "apt-get dist-upgrade" directly
> because the package list is already up to date. If I am too
SOLVED just now:
OK, I've simplified the test (duh), thankfully a little simpler now:
Just swapping between the two local URLs:
deb file:/public/debian/debian sid main contrib non-free
#deb http://localhost/public/debian/debian sid main contrib non-free
and this gets same problem on apt-get upda
On 08/07/14 21:31, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> Err http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates/main amd64 Packages
>> 403 Forbidden
>> ...
>> Any suggestions as to what's wrong here?
>
> Do you have any other apt config settings such as for a proxy server
> that would get in t
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Err http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates/main amd64 Packages
> 403 Forbidden
> ...
> Any suggestions as to what's wrong here?
Do you have any other apt config settings such as for a proxy server
that would get in the middle? Look in /etc/apt/apt.conf and
/etc/ap
On 08/07/14 19:04, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Does elinks http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian run on your system? or you
> see "403 forbidden?"
>
Thanks for the reply, Pol. I don't have elinks (and can't install it
using apt-get), but wget resolves fine.
>> W: Failed to fetch
>> http://ftp.uk.debian.org/deb
Does elinks http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian run on your system? or you
see "403 forbidden?"
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/wheezy-updates/non-free/binary-amd64/Packages
403 Forbidden
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old
ones used i
On Du, 06 iul 14, 23:30:28, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Of course now with SSDs that standard thinking needs to be thought out
> > > again. I haven't seen any benchmark data for full SSDs. I imagine
> > > that it will have much flatter performance curves
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Of course now with SSDs that standard thinking needs to be thought out
> > again. I haven't seen any benchmark data for full SSDs. I imagine
> > that it will have much flatter performance curves up to very full on
> > an SSD. It would super awesome i
On Vi, 20 iun 14, 18:54:45, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> Of course now with SSDs that standard thinking needs to be thought out
> again. I haven't seen any benchmark data for full SSDs. I imagine
> that it will have much flatter performance curves up to very full on
> an SSD. It would super awesome if
B a écrit :
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>> What do you mean when you say "these blocks won't be free ..."
>> without defragmenting? Please explain. If you have references to
>> share that explained the details that would be great.
>
> Just think about this:
> * HD original = 1000
> * HD -5%.
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:24:32 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> What do you mean when you say "these blocks won't be free ..."
> without defragmenting? Please explain. If you have references to
> share that explained the details that would be great.
Just think about this:
* HD original = 1000
* HD -5%.
B wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > completely out of disk space. For that the reasonable amount of
> > disk space reserved is an absolute value that a system might need
> > on that partitions. That part really shouldn't be a percentage of
> > the disk but should be a finite reserved amount.
>
debian-user:
I filed an issue report on GitHub:
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/pkg-zfs/issues/116
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/49269
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:54:45 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> completely out of disk space. For that the reasonable amount of
> disk space reserved is an absolute value that a system might need
> on that partitions. That part really shouldn't be a percentage of
> the disk but should be a finite reserv
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> If you are interested in retrieving some disk space on this
> partition, I would suggest to reduce the percentage of diskspace
> which may only be allocated by privileged processes. It is normally
> 5% of the diskspace of a partition. In your case this makes ca. 1.8
> GB.
Chris Bannister wrote, on 06/16/2014 00:27:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:04:14PM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
...
>> For the "ext" family of file systems this can be done on the running system.
>
> The suspense is killing me. Is it a secret?
>
Of course it's not, we're dealing with FOSS ;-)
T
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:04:14PM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> If you are interested in retrieving some disk space on this partition, I would
> suggest to reduce the percentage of diskspace which may only be allocated by
> privileged processes. It is normally 5% of the diskspace of a partiti
If you are interested in retrieving some disk space on this partition, I would
suggest to reduce the percentage of diskspace which may only be allocated by
privileged processes. It is normally 5% of the diskspace of a partition. In
your case this makes ca. 1.8 GB. To me this seems more than ever n
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 08:22:55PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2,4K Feb 16 11:33 apt-file
> drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14K Jun 15 19:21 archives
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 39M Jun 15 19:25 pkgcache.bin
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 39M Jun 15 19:25 srcpkgcache.bin
Ahh!, that
On 2014-06-15 19:59 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Does this seem necessary?
>
> root@tal:~# apt-get clean
> root@tal:~# df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% /
> root@tal:~# apt-get update
> [...]
> root@tal:~# df -h
> Filesystem Si
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:59:20AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does this seem necessary?
>
> root@tal:~# apt-get clean
> root@tal:~# df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% /
> [...]
> root@tal:~# apt-get update
> Hit http://ftp
Am Montag, 16. Juni 2014, 05:59:20 schrieb Chris Bannister:
> Hi,
Hi Chris,
> Does this seem necessary?
>
> root@tal:~# apt-get clean
> root@tal:~# df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% /
> [...]
> root@tal:~# apt-get update
> Hit http:/
Hey, I did!
It works all nice now!
Thanks,
Tamer
Am 28.03.2014 04:25, schrieb Scott Ferguson:
> On 28/03/14 13:51, Tamer Higazi wrote:
>> Hi people!
>>
>> when I run apt-get update, I always receive a bunch of error messages,
>> as well if I want to install something through aptitude, debian i
On 28/03/14 13:51, Tamer Higazi wrote:
> Hi people!
>
> when I run apt-get update, I always receive a bunch of error messages,
> as well if I want to install something through aptitude, debian isn't
> capable to install packages, because those are not on the server.
>
> And ideas what I might of
Steven G. Johnson wrote:
> Jochen Spieker wrote:
> >Very strange. Did you try changing to another mirror, just to see if
> >that helps? Did you set a proxy in /etc/apt/apt.conf{,.d}?
>
> That was the problem: we had previously been using the approx proxy
> server, and there was an Acquire::http::p
Jochen Spieker wrote:
Very strange. Did you try changing to another mirror, just to see if
that helps? Did you set a proxy in /etc/apt/apt.conf{,.d}?
That was the problem: we had previously been using the approx proxy
server, and there was an Acquire::http::proxy set in
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d.
Steven G. Johnson:
>
> I am not behind a firewall. The only uncommented line in my
> /etc/apt/sources.list is:
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free
>
> Running "apt-get update" yields the "Connection failed" errors
> listed below. I've also run "apt-get upd
On 10/10/13 3:54 PM, Danilo Sampaio wrote:
> sometimes, the commands below works for me:
>
> sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf
> sudo apt-get clean
> sudo apt-get update
Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to help.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
sometimes, the commands below works for me:
sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get update
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
> A few days ago I did an "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade" on our
> amd64 Debian system to update it to wheezy.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 10:47:03 +0200, Dirk Hombrecher wrote:
> since yesterday I can't do apt-get update, either aptitude update
>
> following excerpt of messages in German
>
> Fehl http://debian.netcologne.de wheezy Release.gpg
> Verbindung fehlgeschlagen
> Fehl http://ftp.de.debian.org wheezy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
On 08/26/2012 10:47 AM, Dirk Hombrecher wrote:
> Hi folks, since yesterday I can't do apt-get update, either
> aptitude update
>
> following excerpt of messages in German
>
> Fehl http://debian.netcologne.de wheezy Release.gpg
> Verbindung fehlg
On 07/10/2012 06:46 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
So the problem is apparently in the building of the initrd and its
detection of ‘necessary’ modules
That sounds plausible. Unfortunately, I don't have knowledge of of
initramfs system. Looking at it's /etc tree and a few man pages, I
might be ab
Hello David,
David Christensen wrote:
> The warning "target sda2_crypt uses a key file, skipped" doesn't make
> sense -- /dev/sda2 does not use a key file:
>
> 2012-07-10 17:18:38 root@i72600s ~
> # cat /etc/crypttab
> sda2_crypt UUID=c020df80-6439-4e9e-a70e-0ff303d61180 none,discard luks
> s1f
On 07/09/2012 08:40 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Thanks for the reply. :-)
David Christensen wrote:
Loading Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 ...
Loading initial ramdisk ...
Loading, please wait...
Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems:
- Boot args (cat /proc/
Hello David,
David Christensen wrote:
> Loading Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 ...
> Loading initial ramdisk ...
> Loading, please wait...
> Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems:
> - Boot args (cat /proc/cmdline)
> - Check rootdelay= (did the system wait
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 07:30:42 -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> I have an Intel DQ67SW motherboard with Intel i7-2600S processor and
> have installed debian-6.0.5-amd64 and the 3.2 kernel from backports.
>
>
> I ran "apt-get update" and "apt-get upgrade" yesterday. Since then, the
> system fails
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> That is incorrect and the source of your problems. Remove those
> lines. Add these lines:
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main
That fixed it! Thanks for th
On Friday 06 April 2012 18:42:51 MPR wrote:
> Last year I started getting errors when running apt-get update. The
> errors look like this:
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile/dists/squeeze/volatile/main/sour
>ce/Sources.gz 404 Not Found [IP: 130.89.148.13 80]
>
> W:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, MPR wrote:
>
> Last year I started getting errors when running apt-get update. The
> errors look like this:
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile/dists/squeeze/volatile/main/source/Sources.gz
> 404 Not Found [IP: 130.89.148.13 80]
>
>
MPR wrote:
> Last year I started getting errors when running apt-get update. The
> errors look like this:
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile/dists/squeeze/volatile/main/source/Sources.gz
> 404 Not Found [IP: 130.89.148.13 80]
Right. The Lenny volatile repositor
On Vi, 06 apr 12, 10:42:51, MPR wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how to fix this? I had not made any changes to the
> server to cause this and have just been living with it.
Volatile has been replaced with squeeze-updates
http://www.debian.org/volatile/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announc
On 08/10/2011 22:36, Christian Körner wrote:
On 08/10/11 20:12, Johan Scheepers wrote:
Good day,
Kindly please what does this means. Never got this before..
apt-get update
Hit http://debian.mirror.ac.za squeeze Release
Hit http://debian.mirror.ac.za squeeze-updates Release
E: Release file
On 08/10/11 20:12, Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Kindly please what does this means. Never got this before..
>
> apt-get update
>
> Hit http://debian.mirror.ac.za squeeze Release
> Hit http://debian.mirror.ac.za squeeze-updates Release
> E: Release file expired, ignoring
> http://debian
Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Kindly please what does this means. Never got this before..
>
> apt-get update
>
> Hit http://debian.mirror.ac.za squeeze Release
> Hit http://debian.mirror.ac.za squeeze-updates Release
> E: Release file expired, ignoring
> http://debian.mirror.ac.za/debia
On Tue 17 May 2011 at 14:28:07 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> AFAIK apt calls dpkg to do the actual package installation, but other
> then that they are quite disconnected. I see no reason for apt to touch
> /var/lib/dpkg/available or /var/lib/dpkg/updates.
It indeed has no reason but dpkg does
On Ma, 17 mai 11, 18:41:01, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2011-05-17 14:28:07 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > AFAIK apt calls dpkg to do the actual package installation, but other
> > then that they are quite disconnected. I see no reason for apt to touch
> > /var/lib/dpkg/available or /var/lib/dp
On 2011-05-17 14:28:07 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> AFAIK apt calls dpkg to do the actual package installation, but other
> then that they are quite disconnected. I see no reason for apt to touch
> /var/lib/dpkg/available or /var/lib/dpkg/updates.
OK.
> What exactly are you trying to achieve?
On Ma, 17 mai 11, 11:34:05, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I had to clear the /var/lib/dpkg/available file (it is now empty).
> I've done:
>
> $ sudo apt-get update
[...]
> So, nothing has been downloaded and the /var/lib/dpkg/available file
> is still empty. Nothing in the /var/lib/dpkg/updates dire
On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Thomas H. George wrote:
> just ran apt-get update with the following result:
>
> ...
>
> E: Method rred has died unexpectedly!
> E: Sub-process rred received a segmentation fault.
> dragon:~# exit
>
> Script done on Wed 04 Nov 2009 08:53:24 AM EST
>
> I am using
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:58:07 -0500
"Thomas H. George" wrote:
> just ran apt-get update with the following result:
i) read today's postings to the list
ii) google the error
iii) use the BTS
Celejar
--
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net
>From the manpage:
-f, --fix-broken
-f is poitnless for apt-get update, it's only usefull for apt-get install
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sunday 26 October 2008, L.V.Gandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'apt-get update error':
>*deb http://live.debian.net/debian/ etch main
>*to */etc/apt/sources.list.
Based on what I saw that http://live.debian.net/debian , they are not using
the pooled layout with distribution subdirectories
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:42:34AM -0700, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have 2 (of out many) machines that will not do a apt-get update
> properly (since the 4.0 upgrade a couple days ago). These 2 machine are
> old but have working just fine. The message I get on both of
[debian-boot is not the right list for this.. debian-user is]
Dave Rave wrote:
> when running apt-get update, and its reading the files, it says
>
> "file rred" instead of "file read"
>
> Its been that way for a while now. maybe whoever updated the updater
> didn't speaka d'englishe.
rred is a
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Anton Piatek wrote:
> Unfortunately unison is designed such that both client and server
> versions must match, so as my servers are etch I need the etch version
> on my laptop.
Install unison2.13.16 on your laptop. The unison mantainer generally
maintains versions of unison i
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 14:44:51 +0100, Anton Piatek wrote:
> 2008/6/21 Florian Kulzer :
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 13:04:54 +0100, Anton Piatek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Does anyone know why apt-get crashes when updating?
> >>
> >> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Sources
> >> Hit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2008/6/21 Florian Kulzer :
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 13:04:54 +0100, Anton Piatek wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Does anyone know why apt-get crashes when updating?
>>
>> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Sources
>> Hit http://security.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anton Piatek wrote:
> Does anyone know why apt-get crashes when updating?
> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Sources
> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Sources
> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/n
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 13:04:54 +0100, Anton Piatek wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anyone know why apt-get crashes when updating?
>
> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Sources
> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Sources
> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,
Anton Piatek schrieb:
> Does anyone know why apt-get crashes when updating?
>
> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Sources
> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Sources
> Hit http://security.debian.org lenny
On Fri February 29 2008 16:36:17 Tim Channon wrote:
> Package netselect is broken for a large class of users, 6+ year old
> fatal bug misclassified as wishlist
> I guess someone thought that pass through firewall was a major code
> change, hence wishlist, is apparently not that at all.
>
> netselec
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Alle Meije Wink:
Err ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org stable Release.gpg
Could not connect data socket, connection timed out
The mirror is either temporarily broken or down for good, Just use
another one, there's nothing else you can do.
I confirm it has been unreliable recentl
Alle Meije Wink:
>
> Err ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org stable Release.gpg
> Could not connect data socket, connection timed out
The mirror is either temporarily broken or down for good, Just use
another one, there's nothing else you can do.
J.
--
I frequently find myself at the top of the stairs wi
Hi,
> One reply suggested the following:
> gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 6070D3A1
> gpg --export --armor 6070D3A1 | apt-key add -
>
> Another reply suggested:
> gpg --recv-key A70DAF536070D3A1
> gpg --export A70DAF536070D3A1|apt-key add -
>
> When I run the first line of either pa
The original message in this thread referred to this URL:
http://ftp.debian.org.
I'm having the same problem but the URL is security.debian.org.
One reply suggested the following:
gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 6070D3A1
gpg --export --armor 6070D3A1 | apt-key add -
Another rep
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:13:50AM +1200, alan bonard wrote:
> Hi, when using 'apt-get update' I keep getting
>
> >Reading package lists... Done
> >W: GPG error: http://www.mclean.net.nz stable Release: The following
> >signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
> >available: NO
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 08:49 -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> Failed to fetch ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/Release.gpg Data
> socket timed out [IP: 128.101.240.212 21]
> Reading package lists... Done
> W: Conflicting distribution: http://security.debian.org stable/updates
> Release
> (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Hyslop escribió:
> Hi, all
>
> The more I learn, the less I know :-)
>
> I've seen several people on this list recommending that we run 'apt-get
> update' and 'apt-get upgrade' on a regular basis. What are your thoughts
> on setting up a cron job
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:32:54 -0500
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Hyslop wrote:
> > I've seen several people on this list recommending that we run 'apt-get
> > update' and 'apt-get upgrade' on a regular basis. What are your thoughts
> > on setting up a cron job to do it automatically,
Kent West wrote:
Jim Hyslop wrote:
Kent West wrote:
[...]
In short, there's too much that can go wrong if you don't pay
attention,
so I personally would not go the route of automation. Others may
disagree.
I was wondering if there would be any issues like that. Can you
elaborate a litt
Jim Hyslop wrote:
Kent West wrote:
[...]
In short, there's too much that can go wrong if you don't pay attention,
so I personally would not go the route of automation. Others may disagree.
I was wondering if there would be any issues like that. Can you
elaborate a little on the kinds of
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
