Re: test sent date details

It has worked All the best Keith Bainbridge keithr...@gmail.com keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com +61 (0)447 667 468 UTC + 10:00 On 18/6/24 17:56, Keith Bainbridge wrote: All the best Keith Bainbridge keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com +61 (0)447 667 468 UTC + 10:00

Re: Test

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: [...] > Perhaps you should use debian-lists-test, > . **THANK YOU** (I know, I'm breaking my promise of bowing out of this thread, but this is just the kind of constructive behaviour I k

Re: Test

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 09:08:11PM +, Tixy wrote: > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > > This is a test of the emergency broadcast system > > Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. Folks: the OP might be a bit of a challenge to some of us (I don't

Re: Test

On Sat, 23 Dec 2023, Vít Smolík wrote: Should someone report the mail to the mailmasters as stated in here: https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html Or is it too small of an issue to even report? it's teensy. fjd -- Davis Verbum sat sapienti.

Re: Test

Vít Smolík (12023-12-23): Yeah, it is the Code of Conduct, sorry, didn't realize that. Could there be some SpamAssassin config that we could send to the list-masters, that would catch theese kinds of messages? Not without catching some legitimate questions and answers too. “Test” is a very commo

Re: Test

Vít Smolík (12023-12-23): > Yeah, it is the Code of Conduct, sorry, didn't realize that. Could there be > some SpamAssassin config that we could send to the list-masters, that would > catch theese kinds of messages? Not without catching some legitimate questions and answers too. “Test” is a very c

Re: Test

Vít Smolík (12023-12-23): I think there should be added something in the rules stating that you can't use this mailing list for testing your email client, it's pretty annoying. It is the very first rule: “Non-constructive or off-topic messages, along with other abuses, are not welcome.” And

Re: Test

Vít Smolík (12023-12-23): > I think there should be added something in the rules stating that you can't > use this mailing list for testing your email client, it's pretty annoying. It is the very first rule: “Non-constructive or off-topic messages, along with other abuses, are not welcome.” And

Re: Test

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 4:37 PM Pocket wrote: On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: This is a test of the emergency broadcast system Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. I am not spamming this list I am trying to dete

Re: Test

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 4:37 PM Pocket wrote: > > On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > >> This is a test of the emergency broadcast system > > > > Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. > > I am not spamming this list I

Re: Test

Pocket writes: > On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: >> On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: >>> This is a test of the emergency broadcast system >> Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. > > I am not spamming this list I am trying to determine if my email setu

Re: Test

On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: This is a test of the emergency broadcast system Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. I am not spamming this list I am trying to determine if my email setup is working.

Re: Test

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 4:08 PM Tixy wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > > This is a test of the emergency broadcast system > > Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. Would forwarding his message to commun...@debian.org and asking for a one m

Re: Test

On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > This is a test of the emergency broadcast system Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. -- Tixy

Re: Test ECC memory

krys...@ibse.cz wrote: > Dan Ritter wrote: > > The kernel announces readiness during boot with: > > dmesg:[ 18.331561] EDAC amd64: Node 0: DRAM ECC enabled. > > > > and then an event looks like this: > > Message from syslogd@HOSTNAME at Jan 25 15:05:51 ... > > kernel:[5964975.397283] [Hardware

Re: Test ECC memory

Dan Ritter wrote: > The kernel announces readiness during boot with: > dmesg:[ 18.331561] EDAC amd64: Node 0: DRAM ECC enabled. > > and then an event looks like this: > Message from syslogd@HOSTNAME at Jan 25 15:05:51 ... > kernel:[5964975.397283] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no > action r

Re: Test ECC memory

Anssi Saari wrote: > Dan Ritter writes: > > > We see ECC errors irregularly and infrequently on both Intel and > > AMD CPUs. > > How/where do you see those on a Debian system? I looked into this > briefly but didn't get anywhere. The kernel announces readiness during boot with: dmesg:[ 18.3

Re: Test ECC memory

krys...@ibse.cz writes: > PS: Some commercial memtests should allegedly be able to inject ECC > errors (for example the one from passmark), have anyone tried those? I've tried Passmark's memory tester (the commercial one which includes ECC error injection), but I've had no luck. My desktop has is

Re: Test ECC memory

Dan Ritter writes: > We see ECC errors irregularly and infrequently on both Intel and > AMD CPUs. How/where do you see those on a Debian system? I looked into this briefly but didn't get anywhere.

Re: Test ECC memory

Dne úterý 21. února 2023 1:20:50 CET, DdB napsal(a): > Lucky me, i just looked up my hardware (Dual CPU on server MB): > > > https://versus.com/en/amd-epyc-7282 > > Supports ECC memory Yes, but it is sad that you have to search for this information somewhere else than on vendors website. But thi

Re: Test ECC memory

Am 20.02.2023 um 23:48 schrieb krys...@ibse.cz: > I am sorry, it was little missleading - not that they can not support them, > but there is no official document that would state so. The only official > specsheet I saw that explicitely mentions ECC support is this one: > https://www.amd.com/en/p

Re: Test ECC memory

krys...@ibse.cz wrote: > Dear Debian community, > we recently started using AMD Ryzen CPUs, ASRock Rack motherboards and > Kingston unbuffered ECC DIMMs for our small bussiness servers. All the > servers are running on ZFS for which ECC memory is recommended. So I naively > tried to test it act

Re: Test ECC memory

DdB wrote: > Did you really read, that epycs cannot support ECC? > At least i can say, that my pools did not report any faults (which ofc > would be several layers above ecc) either in 3 years, which did help in > falling asleep. ;-) I am sorry, it was little missleading - not that they can not su

Re: Test ECC memory

On 2/20/23 13:12, John Hasler wrote: Tape the Americium-241 button out of a smoke detector to a RAM chip. Ooooh, that would be nasty ;o(> But it ought to do the trick. Cheers, Gene Heskett. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in

Re: Test ECC memory

Am 20.02.2023 um 18:42 schrieb krys...@ibse.cz: > Dear Debian community, > we recently started using AMD Ryzen CPUs, ASRock Rack motherboards and > Kingston unbuffered ECC DIMMs for our small bussiness servers. All the > servers are running on ZFS for which ECC memory is recommended. So I naively

Re: Test ECC memory

> Hi, thank you for the answer. Honestly it came to my mind I could make > some kind of neutrino emitter, since according to most articles it is > the main source of ECC errors, Neutrons, not neutrinos. The latter rarely interact with matter at all. A neutron source is fairly difficult to make.

Re: Test ECC memory

Tape the Americium-241 button out of a smoke detector to a RAM chip. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: test vs. [ [was: Bash script problem]

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 08:32:39AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:59:06PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 07:19:11AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > The external versions of test and [ need to exist for POSIX conformance, > > > and also so that

Re: test vs. [ [was: Bash script problem]

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:59:06PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 07:19:11AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > The external versions of test and [ need to exist for POSIX conformance, > > and also so that you can -exec them from find(1) or other similar > > programs. > > I

Re: test

On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 06:28:21PM -0400, Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside wrote: > > -- > Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside > https://www.polynamaude.com/ > > -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development > > *Mise en garde concernant la confidentialité* > > La présente communication est confidentiel

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

"Thomas Schmitt" writes: > Hi, > > Curt wrote: >> I guess I wasn't precise enough. news.gmane.org is the news server. >> gmane.linux.debian.user is this newsgroup. I am here. > > So what you post to gmane.linux.debian.user ends up on debian-user > mailing list too ? Of course, that's the way I

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, Curt wrote: > I guess I wasn't precise enough. news.gmane.org is the news server. > gmane.linux.debian.user is this newsgroup. I am here. So what you post to gmane.linux.debian.user ends up on debian-user mailing list too ? (I can distinguish a typical server name from a typical group name, b

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

"Thomas Schmitt" writes: > Curt wrote: >> I post to the group via news.gmane.org with a NNTP client. > > Can you see gmane.linux.debian.user there ? > > If yes: Are there recent messages from Rodolfo Medina ? > E.g. this one: > > From: Rodolfo Medina > Subject: Re: mplayer won't play m4a >

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

On 2019-09-03, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Curt wrote: >> I post to the group via news.gmane.org with a NNTP client. > > Can you see gmane.linux.debian.user there ? I guess I wasn't precise enough. news.gmane.org is the news server. gmane.linux.debian.user is this newsgroup. I am here. > If

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

On 2019-09-03 at 07:28, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2019-09-03 at 07:15, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >> Regrettably the newsgroup archive version is still not reachable for me >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/558396 >> It would really be interesting to see whether Rodolfo's failed a

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, Curt wrote: > I post to the group via news.gmane.org with a NNTP client. Can you see gmane.linux.debian.user there ? If yes: Are there recent messages from Rodolfo Medina ? E.g. this one: From: Rodolfo Medina Subject: Re: mplayer won't play m4a Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 13:15:24 +

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, i wrote: > > Due to no interest in the original topic, i only have the file '90' > > but not a direct mailing list copy of the mail. The Wanderer wrote: > If you'd like, I could send one as an attachment, much as Rodolfo did Not needed. Your report about lack of newsgroup headers matches wha

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

On 2019-09-03, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > --- > And a curious question towards Curt : > Your mails have the same > Old-Return-Path: > as in the message copy which Rodolfo gave me as the one to which he tries > to reply and fail

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

On 2019-09-03 at 07:15, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > >> I actually have two copies of that message: the one originally >> received by me, and the one later provided by Rodolfo as an >> attachment (with the filename '90'), which latter is the one he's >> been trying to reply to. > > Due to no in

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, > I actually have two copies of that message: the one originally received > by me, and the one later provided by Rodolfo as an attachment (with the > filename '90'), which latter is the one he's been trying to reply to. Due to no interest in the original topic, i only have the file '90' but n

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

On 2019-09-03 at 05:40, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > a more elaborate theory: > > https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/GnusTutorial > shows that Gnus+Emacs works on e-mail and newsgroups alike. > > If Rodolfo's Gnus got Andrei's message from a newsgroup rather than via > mail, then it might hav

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, a more elaborate theory: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/GnusTutorial shows that Gnus+Emacs works on e-mail and newsgroups alike. If Rodolfo's Gnus got Andrei's message from a newsgroup rather than via mail, then it might have directed the reply to that newsgroup. I got the Cc: via mail, b

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, i wrote: > > One header is missing: To: ... Rodolfo Medina wrote: > So what would your theory be...? That Gnus tried to send the message to Newsgroup gmane.linux.debian.user ? That the Debian mailing list server does not accept messages without To:, Cc:, or Bcc: to a debian-list ? I had a

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

"Thomas Schmitt" writes: > I have a new theory. > > One header is missing: > > To: ... Right... Whereas all my previous messages on this list do have that header... So what would your theory be...? Thanks, Rodolfo

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, The Wanderer wrote: > >> Here's an attempt to reply to the message which Rodolfo Medina has > >> reported having trouble replying to. Has anyone else tried to reply > >> to this message, prior to this? I wrote > > I did, creating the sub-thread &

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

t;> Here's an attempt to reply to the message which Rodolfo Medina has >> reported having trouble replying to. Has anyone else tried to reply to >> this message, prior to this? > > I did, creating the sub-thread "Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a". > Same

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

On 2019-09-02 at 13:00, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > The Wanderer wrote: >> Here's an attempt to reply to the message which Rodolfo Medina has >> reported having trouble replying to. Has anyone else tried to reply >> to this message, prior to this? > &

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, so the In-Reply-To theory took a blow. I'm out of ideas. Have a nice day :) Thomas

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, i make a test with a synthetic In-Reply-To: header like Rodolfo's. A test mail to myself went through. So it is not everywhere bad. Now i am really curious ... Have a nice day :) Thomas

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

eported having trouble replying to. Has anyone else tried to reply to > this message, prior to this? I did, creating the sub-thread "Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a". Same as with your attempt: no problems. And Rodolfo can reply to our follow-up mails in the thread. It

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

On 2019-09-02 at 11:33, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > i wrote: >>> I don't have the mail by Andrei POPESCU in my mailbox, > > The Wanderer wrote: >> I do. It has: > In-Reply-To: <87h8664rvb.fsf@lenovo> >> If you want the full message, I can probably pass it along as an >> attachment. > >

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

The Wanderer writes: > On 2019-09-02 at 11:21, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > >> "Thomas Schmitt" writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Rodolfo Medina wrote: ...And I'm replying now to the above message from Thomas... >>> >>> This one has no In-Reply-To header. >>> >>> I don't have the mail by Andrei POPESC

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, i wrote: > > I don't have the mail by Andrei POPESCU in my mailbox, The Wanderer wrote: > I do. It has: > >>> In-Reply-To: <87h8664rvb.fsf@lenovo> Well, it is not about the In-Reply-To: header itself. Most of our mails here have one, with just a message id string in <>-brackets. But somethi

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

On 2019-09-02 at 11:21, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > "Thomas Schmitt" writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Rodolfo Medina wrote: >>> ...And I'm replying now to the above message from Thomas... >> >> This one has no In-Reply-To header. >> >> I don't have the mail by Andrei POPESCU in my mailbox, to which you >> tri

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

"Thomas Schmitt" writes: > Hi, > > Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> ...And I'm replying now to the above message from Thomas... > > This one has no In-Reply-To header. > > I don't have the mail by Andrei POPESCU in my mailbox, to which you > tried to reply with that header line. > https://lists.debian.

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

On 2019-09-02 at 11:14, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> ...And I'm replying now to the above message from Thomas... > > This one has no In-Reply-To header. > > I don't have the mail by Andrei POPESCU in my mailbox, to which you > tried to reply with that header line. >

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

Hi, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > ...And I'm replying now to the above message from Thomas... This one has no In-Reply-To header. I don't have the mail by Andrei POPESCU in my mailbox, to which you tried to reply with that header line. https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2019/08/msg01294.html A ma

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

> In my recent mail to that thread i announced to reply to > Message-Id: 87h8664rvb.fsf@lenovo rather than 87blwe4rd8.fsf@lenovo. > The latter is the id of the previous mail in the thread. > > This one should show up as follow-up to > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2019/08/msg

Re: test

"Thomas Schmitt" writes: > Hi, > > Rodolfo Medina wrote (twice ?): >> Done. Let's see... Yes, twice, sorry, a sort of non-delivered-messages fear... ;-) > I received the direct mail > > Subject: Re: mplayer won't play m4a > Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 13:15:24 + > Message-ID: <87r24yx2

Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a

4rvb.fsf@lenovo rather than 87blwe4rd8.fsf@lenovo. The latter is the id of the previous mail in the thread. This one should show up as follow-up to https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2019/08/msg01171.html with subject Re: test, Was: mplayer won't play m4a Have a nice day :) Thomas

Re: test

Hi, Rodolfo Medina wrote (twice ?): > Done. Let's see... I received the direct mail Subject: Re: mplayer won't play m4a Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 13:15:24 + Message-ID: <87r24yx2j7.fsf@lenovo> References: <87h8664rvb.fsf@lenovo> <20190826190505.zldub4tzker6am7d@localhost>

Re: test

"Thomas Schmitt" writes: > Hi, > > Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> Yes, that's the strange thing: I've been added a reply to that thread, many >> times, but it was not delivered to the list neithere is being delivered nor >> it will even now... > > And in the next mail: >> Sorry, `I've been adding' >

Re: test

On 2019-09-02 at 09:23, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > The Wanderer writes: > >> On 2019-09-02 at 09:07, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >>> Try again. >>> Add Cc: to scdbac...@gmx.net and to yourself. >>> Then let's see what shows up where. >> >> This seems worth trying, but... >> >>> (Did you get both copies

Re: test

The Wanderer writes: > On 2019-09-02 at 09:07, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Rodolfo Medina wrote: >>> Yes, that's the strange thing: I've been added a reply to that thread, many >>> times, but it was not delivered to the list neithere is being delivered nor >>> it will even now... >> >>

Re: test

"Thomas Schmitt" writes: > Hi, > > Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> Yes, that's the strange thing: I've been added a reply to that thread, many >> times, but it was not delivered to the list neithere is being delivered nor >> it will even now... > > And in the next mail: >> Sorry, `I've been adding' > >

Re: test

On 2019-09-02 at 09:07, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> Yes, that's the strange thing: I've been added a reply to that thread, many >> times, but it was not delivered to the list neithere is being delivered nor >> it will even now... > > And in the next mail: >> Sorry, `

Re: test

Hi, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > Yes, that's the strange thing: I've been added a reply to that thread, many > times, but it was not delivered to the list neithere is being delivered nor > it will even now... And in the next mail: > Sorry, `I've been adding' Try again. Add Cc: to scdbac...@gmx.net an

Re: test

Rodolfo Medina writes: > "Thomas Schmitt" writes: > >> Rodolfo Medina wrote: >>> > I've been sending many times a message to the present group but it >>> > doesn't seem to have been delivered... >> >> Gene Heskett wrote: >>> your name has not previously been received here. >> >> The list archive

Re: test

"Thomas Schmitt" writes: > Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> > I've been sending many times a message to the present group but it >> > doesn't seem to have been delivered... > > Gene Heskett wrote: >> your name has not previously been received here. > > The list archive has > > "mplayer won't play m4a"

Re: test

Hi, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > > I've been sending many times a message to the present group but it > > doesn't seem to have been delivered... Gene Heskett wrote: > your name has not previously been received here. The list archive has "mplayer won't play m4a" Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:26:00 +0

Re: test

On Monday 02 September 2019 07:20:23 Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been sending many times a message to the present group but it > doesn't seem to have been delivered... > > Rodolfo I have a broken crystal ball, so no clue what you have sent before, but your name has not previously been received

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

On Saturday 01 April 2017 21:23:21 Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > On 4/1/17, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:33:08PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > >> In all this talk of Debian being the universal operating system, and > >> helping > >> newbies ... > > > > I'm not sure tho

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

On 4/1/17, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:33:08PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: >> >> In all this talk of Debian being the universal operating system, and >> helping >> newbies ... > > I'm not sure those two concepts are related. My understanding of Debian > being the un

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

On Saturday 01 April 2017 18:59:48 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:33:08PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > In all this talk of Debian being the universal operating system, and > > helping newbies ... > > I'm not sure those two concepts are related. My understanding of De

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:33:08PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > In all this talk of Debian being the universal operating system, and helping > newbies ... I'm not sure those two concepts are related. My understanding of Debian being the universal operating system is that it can run on as many ha

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

Lisi Reisz wrote: >On Wednesday 22 March 2017 17:26:56 Richard Owlett wrote: >> >> I had a "Live 8.6 MATE" DVD next to me. >> I had a minor glitch and a possibly significant problem. >> The minor glitch was when launching the installer it needed a password. >> Having seen that problem reported befo

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

On Wednesday 22 March 2017 17:26:56 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 03/22/2017 10:33 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 March 2017 14:53:24 Richard Owlett wrote: > >> On 03/22/2017 09:28 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 22 March 2017 14:05:28 Richard Owlett wrote: > The results of th

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

On 03/22/2017 10:33 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 22 March 2017 14:53:24 Richard Owlett wrote: On 03/22/2017 09:28 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 22 March 2017 14:05:28 Richard Owlett wrote: The results of the 6 installs I intended to run: [the only variable being which DE related box

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

On Wednesday 22 March 2017 14:53:24 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 03/22/2017 09:28 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 March 2017 14:05:28 Richard Owlett wrote: > >> The results of the 6 installs I intended to run: > >> [the only variable being which DE related boxes checked] > >> [space used re

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

On 03/22/2017 09:28 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 22 March 2017 14:05:28 Richard Owlett wrote: The results of the 6 installs I intended to run: [the only variable being which DE related boxes checked] [space used reported by gparted] 1. None CLI installed taking ~.92 GB 2. Only

Re: [TEST RUNS] Re: installer defaults for desktops (was Re: Suggested edit)

On Wednesday 22 March 2017 14:05:28 Richard Owlett wrote: > The results of the 6 installs I intended to run: > [the only variable being which DE related boxes checked] > [space used reported by gparted] >    1. None >       CLI installed taking ~.92 GB >    2. Only top entry checked (asking for uns

Re: Test version of the system.

On 23 April 2016 at 18:01, amd amd wrote: > > At this point in time , none of the test version does not work, weekly, > and daily sid broken after the installation will not start. The last > working test sid was released 14.3.2016 . > ​This is a bit delphic Please can you tell us what cpu a

Re: Test version of the system.

On 23/04/16 01:01 PM, amd amd wrote: At this point in time , none of the test version does not work, weekly, and daily sid broken after the installation will not start. The last working test sid was released 14.3.2016 . Sid is unstable. Testing is currently Stretch. Stretch works somewhat,

Re: Test - Don't reply

On 04/18/2016 05:15 PM, Gary Roach wrote: Testing

Re: Test Post (Ignore)

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 16 September 2015 22:16:11 Patrick Wiseman wrote: > > It won't, until someone replies to it on the debian user list. > > That's a "feature" of gmail. > > It depends on what he uses as his SMTP server and email client. As far as I remember the

Re: Test Post (Ignore)

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > It won't, until someone replies to it on the debian user list. That's > a "feature" of gmail. > But until a couple years ago, all my original posts for years got mirrored, then overnight it stopped. Literally. One day, mirrored; next day, not. And

Re: Test Post (Ignore)

On Wednesday 16 September 2015 22:16:11 Patrick Wiseman wrote: > It won't, until someone replies to it on the debian user list. That's > a "feature" of gmail. It depends on what he uses as his SMTP server and email client. > > Patrick > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > >

Re: Test Post (Ignore)

It won't, until someone replies to it on the debian user list. That's a "feature" of gmail. Patrick On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > Just a test to see if this email gets mirrored back to me. > > B >

Re: test if fan is working

Ok, well, I have tested that the fan is working, because Ive heard it working now, and the temps appear to be in a good range, my BIOS did not show me anything in regards to fans though, thanks, On Sun, May 24, 2015, at 10:22 PM, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: > On Sat, 23 May 2015 13:01:54 -0700 > Ani

Re: test if fan is working

On Sat, 23 May 2015 13:01:54 -0700 Anil Duggirala wrote: > hello, > How can I test if my fan is working in Debian?, thanks, > > you might want to try booting into the bios (F2 or DEL or something on boot). often the bios will have an rpm reading on any fans present. Brian -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: test if fan is working

On Sun, 24 May 2015 12:09:44 +0200 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > Just because it doesn't find the fan or reports 0 rpm doesn't > necessarily mean the fan isn't running. Or it may mean that an older fan does not have a RPM sensor... Cheers, Ron. -- He that breaks a thing to find ou

Re: test if fan is working

On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 16:59 -0700, Anil Duggirala wrote: > Ive installed the xsensors package as well, it only shows me 2 > temperature readings, temp1 and core 0, cant see any rpm (Im running > lxde). Is there a way for me to manually turn the fan on? > thanks, You could try installing and config

Re: test if fan is working

Ive installed the xsensors package as well, it only shows me 2 temperature readings, temp1 and core 0, cant see any rpm (Im running lxde). Is there a way for me to manually turn the fan on? thanks, On Sat, May 23, 2015, at 01:16 PM, Haines Brown wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:01:54PM -0700, A

Re: test if fan is working

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:01:54PM -0700, Anil Duggirala wrote: > hello, > How can I test if my fan is working in Debian?, thanks, I've installed the xsensors package. It continually reports the RPM of three fans. Would this do? Haines Brown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@list

Re: test VMs

Bonno Bloksma wrote: > I was thinking I could run something which Debian Install runs too > but then later realized that probably depends on files like ssh keys > not being present yet and only creating new keys when that is the > case. There isn't anything that runs later that does this in the de

RE: test VMs

Hi Bob, >> I want to setup a few test VMs on my VMware servers. > > Fun! > >> Can I simply clone a basic machine? A machine with no desktop, just an >> "empty" server. > > Yes. I do that all of the time. Depending upon what VM system you are using > there may > be a script to clone the VM and

Re: test VMs

Bonno Bloksma wrote: > I want to setup a few test VMs on my VMware servers. Fun! > Can I simply clone a basic machine? A machine with no desktop, just > an "empty" server. Yes. I do that all of the time. Depending upon what VM system you are using there may be a script to clone the VM and auto

Re: test VMs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2015 04:18 PM, Bonno Bloksma wrote: > Hi, > > I want to setup a few test VMs on my VMware servers. > Can I simply clone a basic machine? A machine with no desktop, just an "empty" server. Yes. > > Is there a script which I can use to simply

Re: test message

Hello. On Nov 12, 2014 2:55 PM, "Joel Roth" wrote: > greetings > > -- > Joel Roth > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141112195507.GA3134

Re: Test

On 2014-03-08, Bill Wood wrote: > On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 00:11 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: >. . . >> That's not moderation (it would also be impossible to do with open >> lists), it's just oversight ;) > > I hope oversight works better here than in other all-to-familiar > contexts. A genuine

  1   2   3   4   >