Gene Heskett wrote on 06/05/16 21:52:
> On Sunday 05 June 2016 13:03:09 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> I just let it do it all, and will "wait for the other shoe to drop"
>>> One thing that seems missing in these procedures is when a bunch of
>>> libs have been purged, is a run of ldconfig
On Sunday 05 June 2016 13:03:09 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>
>
> > I just let it do it all, and will "wait for the other shoe to drop"
> > One thing that seems missing in these procedures is when a bunch of
> > libs have been purged, is a run of ldconfig to clean up things.
>
> No, when purging a d
> I just let it do it all, and will "wait for the other shoe to drop"
> One thing that seems missing in these procedures is when a bunch of libs
> have been purged, is a run of ldconfig to clean up things.
>
No, when purging a debian package, dpkg triggers actions like ldconfig as
prescribed by
On Sunday 05 June 2016 10:24:13 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Gene Heskett wrote on 06/05/16 03:11:
> > On Saturday 04 June 2016 17:49:02 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> >> Gene Heskett wrote on 06/04/16 23:02:
> >>> On Saturday 04 June 2016 16:12:30 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> I'm glad it worked for
Gene Heskett wrote on 06/05/16 03:11:
> On Saturday 04 June 2016 17:49:02 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>
>> Gene Heskett wrote on 06/04/16 23:02:
>>> On Saturday 04 June 2016 16:12:30 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
I'm glad it worked for you.
Now I'm just curious what
aptitude search '
On Sunday 05 June 2016 03:18:38 David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 04 Jun 2016 at 21:11:23 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 June 2016 17:49:02 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> > > aptitude search '~g'
> >
> > And that returns an equally lengthy list, all prefaced with an 'id'. No
> > clue wha
On Sat 04 Jun 2016 at 21:11:23 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 04 June 2016 17:49:02 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> > aptitude search '~g'
>
> And that returns an equally lengthy list, all prefaced with an 'id'. No
> clue what that means as I don't believe I have the reference manual.
On Saturday 04 June 2016 17:55:41 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 04 June 2016 19:06:01 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Thank you for the link Lisi, I believe it was helpful in showing me
> > that at my age, I am finally in over my head,
>
> Many years ago now I had that salutary lesson - at a MUCH younge
On Saturday 04 June 2016 17:49:02 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Gene Heskett wrote on 06/04/16 23:02:
> > On Saturday 04 June 2016 16:12:30 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> >> I'm glad it worked for you.
> >> Now I'm just curious what
> >>
> >> aptitude search '~c'
> >>
> >> spits out now.
> >>
> >> Rega
On Saturday 04 June 2016 19:06:01 Gene Heskett wrote:
> Thank you for the link Lisi, I believe it was helpful in showing me that
> at my age, I am finally in over my head,
Many years ago now I had that salutary lesson - at a MUCH younger age. My six
year old son was musically gifted. There is a
Gene Heskett wrote on 06/04/16 23:02:
> On Saturday 04 June 2016 16:12:30 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>
>> I'm glad it worked for you.
>> Now I'm just curious what
>>
>> aptitude search '~c'
>>
>> spits out now.
>>
>> Regards,
>> jvp.
>
> A rather lengthy list I'll paste, wordwrap off again:
>
>
On Saturday 04 June 2016 16:12:30 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> I'm glad it worked for you.
> Now I'm just curious what
>
> aptitude search '~c'
>
> spits out now.
>
> Regards,
> jvp.
A rather lengthy list I'll paste, wordwrap off again:
root@coyote:/var/lib/dpkg# aptitude search ~c
c brasero
I'm glad it worked for you.
Now I'm just curious what
aptitude search '~c'
spits out now.
Regards,
jvp.
On Saturday 04 June 2016 12:05:01 This wrote:
> Gene Heskett wrote on 06/04/16 16:45:
> > On Saturday 04 June 2016 05:53:17 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> >> The aptitude on your system is an older version (on sid it is
> >> 0.8.1),
> >
> > Yes, this is wheezy. 6.8.2 here.
> >
> >> maybe it hasn't the
On Saturday 04 June 2016 11:11:32 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 04 June 2016 15:45:17 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 June 2016 05:53:17 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> > > The aptitude on your system is an older version (on sid it is
> > > 0.8.1),
> >
> > Yes, this is wheezy. 6.8.2 here.
>
>
Gene Heskett wrote on 06/04/16 16:45:
> On Saturday 04 June 2016 05:53:17 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>
>> The aptitude on your system is an older version (on sid it is 0.8.1),
>
> Yes, this is wheezy. 6.8.2 here.
>
>> maybe it hasn't the full architecture support.
>> The dpkg output is reliable, I
On Saturday 04 June 2016 11:11:32 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 04 June 2016 15:45:17 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 June 2016 05:53:17 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> > > The aptitude on your system is an older version (on sid it is
> > > 0.8.1),
> >
> > Yes, this is wheezy. 6.8.2 here.
>
>
On Saturday 04 June 2016 15:45:17 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 04 June 2016 05:53:17 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> > The aptitude on your system is an older version (on sid it is 0.8.1),
>
> Yes, this is wheezy. 6.8.2 here.
Which, according to " is also Y2K-compliant,
non-fattening, naturally
On Saturday 04 June 2016 05:53:17 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> The aptitude on your system is an older version (on sid it is 0.8.1),
Yes, this is wheezy. 6.8.2 here.
> maybe it hasn't the full architecture support.
> The dpkg output is reliable, I think. Since in the output of the dpkg
> command a
The aptitude on your system is an older version (on sid it is 0.8.1), maybe it
hasn't the full architecture support.
The dpkg output is reliable, I think. Since in the output of the dpkg command
all amd64 packages have an "ii" at the beginning of the line, it shows that all
your amd64 packages are
On Friday 03 June 2016 20:06:57 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Some more explanations: these tilde-on-letter combinations are search
> patterns for aptitude. "~c" stands for packages already removed but
> not purged, there are some config files left on the system. See also
> "--purge --pending" in the
Some more explanations: these tilde-on-letter combinations are search patterns
for aptitude. "~c" stands for packages already removed but not purged, there are
some config files left on the system. See also "--purge --pending" in the man
page of dpkg.
So this does no harm if you don't intend to rei
On Friday 03 June 2016 14:15:17 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> aptitude purge '~i~ramd64
Returns:
root@coyote:/var/lib/dpkg# aptitude purge '~i~ramd64'
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of arch
On Friday 03 June 2016 14:09:21 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gene Heskett wrote on 06/03/16 13:14:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > I re-added the amd64 architecture to the architecture's in
> > dpkg/synaptic, but the package -> force-version remains stubbornly
> > ghosted, so I cannot fix any bro
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 06/03/16 20:09:
> Hi,
>
> Gene Heskett wrote on 06/03/16 13:14:
>> Greetings all;
>>
>> I re-added the amd64 architecture to the architecture's in dpkg/synaptic,
>> but the package -> force-version remains stubbornly ghosted, so I cannot
>> fix any broken patckages tha
Hi,
Gene Heskett wrote on 06/03/16 13:14:
> Greetings all;
>
> I re-added the amd64 architecture to the architecture's in dpkg/synaptic,
> but the package -> force-version remains stubbornly ghosted, so I cannot
> fix any broken patckages that are preventing the install of any updates.
>
> So
Greetings all;
I re-added the amd64 architecture to the architecture's in dpkg/synaptic,
but the package -> force-version remains stubbornly ghosted, so I cannot
fix any broken patckages that are preventing the install of any updates.
So I try to have dpkg remove the amd64 aarchitecture, but no
27 matches
Mail list logo
