https://askubuntu.com/questions/863150/pcie-bus-error-severity-corrected-type-physical-layer-id-00e5receiver-id
Anders Andersson 于2020年8月28日周五 下午4:12写道：
> > stan clay 于2020年8月26日周三 上午10:26写道：
> >> Yesterday, I upgraded unstable from stable and installed a new kernel,
> but
Hi,
i got an error about nvme yesterday when trying to rebase my first patch
from kernel 4.19 to 5.9-rc2.
[1.099627] nvme nvme0: failed to set APST feature (-10)
Gave up waiting for root filesystem device
The good news is that the very recent kernel version next-20200827
works for me. Kernel
> stan clay 于2020年8月26日周三 上午10:26写道：
>> Yesterday, I upgraded unstable from stable and installed a new kernel, but I
>> couldn't get into the system with the new kernel. I got an error
By unstable you mean sid? What is the new kernel version? I saw that
debian experimental
error and found some similar errors
and solutions, such as in the grub.cfg Riga PCI = ***, etc., but it
doesn't work here. I found that their error reporting devices are
different from mine
stan clay 于2020年8月26日周三 上午10:26写道：
> Yesterday, I upgraded unstable from stable and installed a n
Yesterday, I upgraded unstable from stable and installed a new kernel, but
I couldn't get into the system with the new kernel. I got an error
[ 26.367633] nvme :01:00.0: AER: PCIe Bus Error:
severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Transmitter ID)
[ 26.367633] nvme :01:00.0
On Thu, May 9, 2019, 03:47 songbird wrote:
> Tixy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:49 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > [...]
> >> And, BTW, when will Unstable ever get into the 5.x.x kernel series?
> >
> > Not until after Buster is released I assume.
>
> i've been running newer kernels from th
Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:49 -0400, Default User wrote:
> [...]
>> And, BTW, when will Unstable ever get into the 5.x.x kernel series?
>
> Not until after Buster is released I assume.
i've been running newer kernels from the experimental
suite. working ok for me.
songbird
On Wed, May 8, 2019, 13:23 Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2019 11:49:18 -0400
> Default User wrote:
>
> > So, since
> > linux-image-4.19.0-5-amd64 - Linux 4.19 for 64-bit PCs
> > (signed)
> > seems to be available, why did updating not update the kernel from
> > linux-
On Wed, 8 May 2019 11:49:18 -0400
Default User wrote:
> So, since
> linux-image-4.19.0-5-amd64 - Linux 4.19 for 64-bit PCs
> (signed)
> seems to be available, why did updating not update the kernel from
> linux-image-4.19.0-4-amd64 to linux-image-4.19.0-5-amd64?
Because linux-im
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:21 PM Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:49 -0400, Default User wrote:
> [...]
> > And, BTW, when will Unstable ever get into the 5.x.x kernel series?
>
> Not until after Buster is released I assume.
>
> --
> Tixy
>
>
: (
On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:49 -0400, Default User wrote:
[...]
> And, BTW, when will Unstable ever get into the 5.x.x kernel series?
Not until after Buster is released I assume.
--
Tixy
exim4-base (4.92-7) ...
Setting up exim4-daemon-light (4.92-7) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.8.5-2) ...
Processing triggers for systemd (241-3) ...
Current status: 0 (+0) broken, 0 (-4) upgradable, 59005 (+0) new.
Okay . . . So is there a new kernel?
I did: uname -a
Result:
Linux [user
Have you tried adding pti=off to the kernel boot line? This is supposed
to turn off the spectre/meltdown "fix".
Henning Follmann writes:
>Hello,
>I have a strange issue with the newest kernel
>4.9.0-5-amd64 on this 2011 Macbook Pro.
>As far as I can see it has to do with the power management of
You might try some kernel parameters.
"ignore_loglevel[KNL]
Ignore loglevel setting - this will print /all/
kernel messages to the console. Useful for debugging.
We also add it as printk module parameter, so users
could change it dynamically,
Hello,
I have a strange issue with the newest kernel
4.9.0-5-amd64 on this 2011 Macbook Pro.
As far as I can see it has to do with the power management of this laptop.
Whenever the laptop is on power supply the boot process stops hard after
I enter the passphrase for the encrypted lvm. There is one
On 2014-12-30, Hans wrote:
>
> The problem is, that we do still not know, what the real reason is for the
> malfunction.
>
He might want to look in the log for errors, if that detail hasn't
already been mentioned (/var/log/Xorg.0.log).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
Am Dienstag, 30. Dezember 2014, 10:40:55 schrieben Sie:
> It has the black screen after boot when try load the desktop login screen -
> so this is the 2. - from which you mentioned.
>
> I have got two NVIDIA 8600GT - in SLI - with two screens plugged in one of
> the cards - as you could see in my
Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2014, 18:19:52 schrieb Gábor Hársfalvi:
> Hi all,
>
> I did all what the Hans and the wiki-site suggested - Installed dkms, and
> the header file too - and it updated the initramfs too.
>
> But after restarting I still get the black screen :(
>
> If I booted to the previo
On 12/29/2014 06:19 PM, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I did all what the Hans and the wiki-site suggested - Installed dkms,
> and the header file too - and it updated the initramfs too.
>
> But after restarting I still get the black screen :(
>
> If I booted to the previous working - kernel
Hi all,
I did all what the Hans and the wiki-site suggested - Installed dkms, and
the header file too - and it updated the initramfs too.
But after restarting I still get the black screen :(
If I booted to the previous working - kernel 2.6 version - with grub it
succesfully load my xorg.conf.
P
On 2014-12-29, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I succesfully updated my Squeeze's Kernel version from 2.6 to 3.2, but
> after restarting the system its all after booting the black screen...
>
You need to update your nvidia driver as Hans has suggested.
Here's a helpful wiki that could ligh
Hi Gabor,
you might need to build new kernel modules for nvidia cards.
The easiest way is to install nvidia-kernel-dkms and module-assistant.
The command m-a gives you a nice ncurses gui, where you can easily prepare
your system. It will then download and install all needed packages.
After
river "nvidia"
VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
BoardName "GeForce 8600 GT"
BusID "PCI:5:0:0"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Device0"
Monitor"Monitor0"
DefaultDepth24
Option "TwinView" "1"
Option "TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder" "CRT-0"
Option "metamodes" "CRT-0: 1920x1080 +1440+0, CRT-1:
nvidia-auto-select +0+0"
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
EndSubSection
EndSection
Please help with use this configurations with my new kernel!
LNXSYBUS:00/
PNP0C0C:00/input/input3
But I think you're right. The problem may still be related to udev.
What I suspect is the problem is that my lilo.conf was not configured to
boot the very latest kernel -- it booted one of the 2.26.x kernels
instead of the 3.0.x kernels, but the udev was
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:05:29PM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I was fortunate in that I hadn't put any data into that database system
> yet. The 40,000,000 value for shm is higher than the 34 million and
That 4000 was just some arbitrary value I threw in, I don't know
what it should be.
I was fortunate in that I hadn't put any data into that database system
yet. The 40,000,000 value for shm is higher than the 34 million and
change value that postgresql was using before and that would explain why
this failure happened. However, it will be a good idea to fix the
postgresql 9.1
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 04:49:32AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> The transition from postgresql 8.4 to postgresql 9.1 almost worked over
> here except for a little matter of the linux kernel's shm value. This
> broke when I was involved with pg_upgradecluster and afterwards 9.1
> wouldn't start
The transition from postgresql 8.4 to postgresql 9.1 almost worked over
here except for a little matter of the linux kernel's shm value. This
broke when I was involved with pg_upgradecluster and afterwards 9.1
wouldn't start. End result, all of postgresql has been removed from this
machine.
Sthu Deus wrote:
> apt-cache search linux-image
> ...
> Is there a more elegant way?
In addition to the ways suggested by others there is also a program to
query the database and provide other useful information.
apt-show-versions | grep linux-image
Mine shows:
linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/sque
On Sb, 17 dec 11, 01:28:59, Sthu Deus wrote:
>
> How do I find out if there is a new version of linux kernel package is
> available? - I mean, having 3.1 installed, to know that 3.2 is
> available?
Beside Camaleón's suggestion, aptitude keeps track of "new"[1] packages.
You can show the list wit
On 12/16/2011 02:20 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sat 17 Dec 2011 at 01:28:59 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
How do I find out if there is a new version of linux kernel package is
available? - I mean, having 3.1 installed, to know that 3.2 is
available?
For the present I do it by
apt-cache search linux-image
; apt-get -V dist-upgrade" is what I use to run in
wheezy.
> PS apt-cache policy linux-image-exact_version shows only updates for the
> version - and not a new kernel version s 3.2 vs. 3.1
Anyway, AFAICS the latest available kernel in Debian is 3.1 (testing/sid)
and 3.2 (for experimen
On Sat 17 Dec 2011 at 01:28:59 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> How do I find out if there is a new version of linux kernel package is
> available? - I mean, having 3.1 installed, to know that 3.2 is
> available?
>
> For the present I do it by
>
> apt-cache search linux-image
>
> and then look for wha
?
PS apt-cache policy linux-image-exact_version shows only updates for
the version - and not a new kernel version s 3.2 vs. 3.1
Thanks for Your time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On 12/04/2011 08:14 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Only try this if your keyboard is a usb keyboard. If you do it with a
ps/2 keyboard you'll probably have to buy a new motherboard after the
people with those trucks that have lots of water visit you and put your
computer out. pull the usb keyboard co
+0100, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> >
> >> On 23/11/2011 17:05, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>> But the story doesn't end there. It gets worse.
> >>>
> >>> This morning I upgraded again. Now I have a brand-new kernel
> >&g
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:23:09 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:13:49 +0100, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
>
>> On 23/11/2011 17:05, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>>>
>>> But the story doesn't end there. It gets worse.
>>>
>>> This mor
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:57:59 +0100, debianuser.thegrue wrote:
(...)
>> I would try first to remove (not in the sense of "eliminating" but
>> "bypass") the firewall to discard the problem is generating from there.
>
> Yes, this would be sane. But the company won't switch it off and I don't
> thi
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:59:40 +0100
+debianuser+thegrue+733a2fc4c3.debianuser.thegrue#spamgourmet@spamgourmet.com
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > We have a few linux machines behind a firewall. When we start a
> > download on the "newer" machines (kernel 2.6.32-5), the download
> > starts fast (~3M/s),
Hello,
> We have a few linux machines behind a firewall. When we start a
> download on the "newer" machines (kernel 2.6.32-5), the download
> starts fast (~3M/s), then quickly gets slower after about 10 or 20
> seconds and soon stalls completely or proceeds at ~3 Byte/s or
> something like that.
Hello Camaleón,
> > we have a strange problem here at our company:
> >
> > We have a few linux machines behind a firewall.
>
> What kind of firewall? Iptables rules or some kind of commercial
> appliance?
It's a commercial appliance: Sonicwall NSA3500.
> Computers with older kernels are r
Hello Alex,
> > We have a few linux machines behind a firewall. When we start a
> > download on the "newer" machines (kernel 2.6.32-5), the download
> > starts fast (~3M/s), then quickly gets slower after about 10 or 20
> > seconds and soon stalls completely or proceeds at ~3 Byte/s or
> > somethi
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:50:45 +0100, debianuser.thegrue wrote:
> we have a strange problem here at our company:
>
> We have a few linux machines behind a firewall.
What kind of firewall? Iptables rules or some kind of commercial
appliance?
> When we start a download on the "newer" machines (ke
On 11/24/2011 02:50 PM, debianuser.theg...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have a strange problem here at our company:
>
> We have a few linux machines behind a firewall. When we start a
> download on the "newer" machines (kernel 2.6.32-5), the download starts
> fast (~3M/s), then quickly ge
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:13:49 +0100, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> On 23/11/2011 17:05, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> Yesterday I updated my wheezy system and when I restarted my machine
>> this morning all my xfce windows had lost their frames. There as no
>> longer a close button or a top border I could use
As Einstein said, things should be
>> as simple as possible but no simpler.
>>
>> But the story doesn't end there. It gets worse.
>>
>> This morning I upgraded again. Now I have a brand-new kernel
>> (3.1.something). Booting with it gives me a login screen w
ediately.
I hope xfce isn't going the way of gnome and becoming unusable. I'm all
in favour of simplicity, but... As Einstein said, things should be as
simple as possible but no simpler.
But the story doesn't end there. It gets worse.
This morning I upgraded again. Now I have
here. It gets worse.
This morning I upgraded again. Now I have a brand-new kernel
(3.1.something). Booting with it gives me a login screen with only a
space for my user name (as in the old, old days) but does not respond to
keyboard input not mouse activity. I can't log in.
I rebooted
I am running Lenny and have a Logitech webcam which uses the gspca
driver modules.
Running the standard (for Lenny) 2.6.26 kernel, I added
gspca-modules-2.6.26-2-686 and all is well. Camera is detected as v4l,
and cheese works, even producing video with synchronised audio.
Because later kern
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 05:44 +0100, Dom wrote:
> On 21/06/11 18:52, Camaleón wrote:
[...]
>
> Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
> meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you said.
>
> I then rebooted and... it works fine.
>
Not quite... i
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:51:49 +0100, Dom wrote:
> On 22/06/11 12:21, Camaleón wrote:
>> It decided to install the PAE kernel instead the 486 (non-PAE). Why? As
>> I hadn't installed a "linux-image-2.6-686-pae" previously I'd expected
>> a non-PAE update, and given that "-686" was not available, "-
ld kernel and no way to
> automatically install a newer one until you manually choose one of the
> linux-image-486 or linux-image-686-pae packages?
>
> Neither of these options seems to be very good.
No indeed, but I would add a third option:
- is smart enough to ask the user what
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:16:10 +0100, Dom wrote:
> On 22/06/11 12:10, Camaleón wrote:
>> Now seriously, how can be that?
>>
>> I know there were a set of Pentium M processors models that had enabled
>> PAE/NX but if that's the case, cpuinfo should expose both flags ("pae"
>> and "nx"), which is not
On 2011-06-22 13:21 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:06:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> But just out of curiosity, what's the raw logic behind the routine that
>>> decided to install a PAE kernel instead another one? Why the installer
>>> took such option? :-?
>>
>> I
On 22/06/11 12:21, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:06:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
(...)
But just out of curiosity, what's the raw logic behind the routine that
decided to install a PAE kernel instead another one? Why the installer
took such option? :-?
It didn't.
Well, it did.
Th
On 22/06/11 12:10, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Dom writes:
Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you
said.
I then rebooted and... it works fine.
It ha
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:21:48 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>>
>>> Dom writes:
>>>
Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel instal
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:06:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
(...)
>> But just out of curiosity, what's the raw logic behind the routine that
>> decided to install a PAE kernel instead another one? Why the installer
>> took such option? :-?
>
> It didn't.
Well, it did.
The following NEW packages
Camaleón writes:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>
>> Dom writes:
>>
>>> Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
>>> meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you
>>> said.
>>>
>>> I then rebooted and... it works fine.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Dom writes:
>
>> Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
>> meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you
>> said.
>>
>> I then rebooted and... it works fine.
>
> It happened to me too!
Dom writes:
> Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
> meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you
> said.
>
> I then rebooted and... it works fine.
It happened to me too!
--
Alberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de
cpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 tm pbe up bts est tm2
No "pae" flag, as you can see.
So in the end you need to manually remove the pae kernel and install the
486, as Gilbert suggested.
I think I'll leave it there for now and upgrade manually when a new
kernel revision is released.
On 2011-06-21 20:37 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:13:06 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2011-06-21 19:52 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> Well, if you agree with the update, the pae kernel installs despite it
>>> warns about it will not work (and when you boot with it, it fails
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:05:04 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 01:52 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> So in the end you need to manually remove the pae kernel and install
>> the 486, as Gilbert suggested.
>>
>> I still think this should have been automagically done by the upgrade.
>> Why proce
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:13:06 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-06-21 19:52 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Well, if you agree with the update, the pae kernel installs despite it
>> warns about it will not work (and when you boot with it, it fails as
>> expected). You can still boot with the old ke
On 2011-06-21 19:52 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> Well, if you agree with the update, the pae kernel installs despite it
> warns about it will not work (and when you boot with it, it fails as
> expected). You can still boot with the old kernel (good job!).
>
> So in the end you need to manually remov
On 06/21/2011 01:52 PM, Camaleón wrote:
Well, if you agree with the update, the pae kernel installs despite it
warns about it will not work (and when you boot with it, it fails as
expected). You can still boot with the old kernel (good job!).
So in the end you need to manually remove the pae ker
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:48 +0100, Dom wrote:
> On 21/06/11 17:33, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:16:02 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
(...)
>>> Aptitude was nice to me.
>>
>> Yep, I also think so. But I wondered how "apt-get dist-upgrade" would
>> handle this sitution. I bet that it
On 21/06/11 17:33, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:16:02 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
On 06/21/2011 10:59 AM, Camaleón wrote:
But now the day has come and I've got two questions:
1. Will the PAE kernel work on this VM? I guess no.
2. Shouldn't the dist-upgrade routine had to automat
y question 1 and somehow the question 2, thanks.
> For the heck of it, I went ahead and installed it anyway, but the new
> kernel was listed as not configured. I decided to be a good boy, install
> the 486 kernel, and remove the new (unconfigured PAE version) and old
> 686 kerne
the kernel upgrade a shot. As expected, I
got a message from aptitude about the kernel not being supported by the
processor on this system. The message suggested installing the 486
kernel and removing the newly obsoleted 686 kernel.
For the heck of it, I went ahead and installed it anyway, but the n
Hello,
On my testing VM machine, I'm currently running:
root@debian:~# uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.38-2-686 #1 SMP Sun May 8 14:49:45 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
Today, I've just run a dist-upgrade and see this:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-image-2.6.39-2-686-pae (2.6.39-2)
; "do_initrd = no", and it's nice to finally understand why that didn't
> work either.
I think you meant kernel-img.conf, not make-kpkg.conf.
But in all honesty, I have not actually tested the scenario you
just described. I'm pretty sure it's true for Squeez
d option on the make-kpkg command, yet one was still
created. I mistakenly then tried to change the make-kpkg.conf to
"do_initrd = no", and it's nice to finally understand why that didn't
work either.
Anywho, I'll be going through it in more detail tonight or tomorrow
whe
Several months ago I asked those on this list to give me their opinion
of a web page that I wrote on building a custom kernel for Debian:
http://www.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm
Responses were generally favorable, but among the calls for improvement
were the following:
(1) instructions
Jen Craigson wrote:
> I still cannot normally operate any USB printer connected to my system
> after I upgraded to stable Lenny with the stock 2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel.
>
> It's clear now after more testing that this problem described below is
> not ehci_hcd specific as I can get the "module reload"
t; > In my /etc/modules I have the following comment and
> > module:
> >
> > # Allow USB printer to be powered up after boot.
> > usblp
> >
> > I'm afraid I don't know how or where I found that out.
> I
> > think it's
> > been there si
Edmond Halley writes:
> I installed debian lenny 5.0.3. The kernel is 2.6.26, I want a newer kernel
> image >2.6.28. Can I just "apt-get install" a new kernel? I can't find new
> kernel in the repository by apt-cache search "kernel-image" or search in
> a
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:56:46AM +0800, Edmond Halley wrote:
>Hi, all
>
>I installed debian lenny 5.0.3. The kernel is 2.6.26, I want a newer
>kernel image >2.6.28. Can I just "apt-get install" a new kernel? I can't
>find new kernel in the repos
Hi, all
I installed debian lenny 5.0.3. The kernel is 2.6.26, I want a newer kernel
image >2.6.28. Can I just "apt-get install" a new kernel? I can't find new
kernel in the repository by apt-cache search "kernel-image" or search in
aptitude.
If there is not pre
On Fri, Aug 28 2009, Celejar wrote:
> Assuming that you're building kernel packages with kernel-package, you
> may be being hit by this:
>
> "The image postinst no longer runs the initramfs creation commands.
> Instead, there are example scripts provided that will perform the task.
> These script
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:07:45 +0800
Niu Kun wrote:
> bdebreil 写道:
...
> > Now, with Lenny, I haven't so far been able to go any further in
> > recompiling usable kernels. 2.6.30.4 did compile without errors, but
> > then I found that I had no 'mkinitrd' on my new system. How am I to
> > generate
bdebreil 写道:
Hi to Everyone,
With my old SARGE system, as stated here last week, I was unable to boot
newly compiled kernels, most likely because of the faulty initrd.img
that I got using 'mkinitrd'. For this reason, I decided to install
Lenny.
Now, with Lenny, I haven't so far been able to go
Hi to Everyone,
With my old SARGE system, as stated here last week, I was unable to boot
newly compiled kernels, most likely because of the faulty initrd.img
that I got using 'mkinitrd'. For this reason, I decided to install
Lenny.
Now, with Lenny, I haven't so far been able to go any further in
2008/11/27 boss ganesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i pasted the config file of 18th kernel to kernel source of 26 & I ran "make
> oldconfig" , eventhough it is querying for the new options present in that
> source for that i didnt know what to do.. i simply gave enter to that
> options.
> Simply pres
i pasted the config file of 18th kernel to kernel source of 26 & I ran "make
oldconfig" , eventhough it is querying for the new options present in that
source for that i didnt know what to do.. i simply gave enter to that
options.
Simply pressing enter will enable the options if not shall I cont
boss ganesh wrote:
> I have pasted the config file of 2.6.18 (already compiled working kernel
> config file) to kernel source of version 2.6.26 , after that also it is
> asking queries without compiling it when i ran the command "make" ..
>
> why is it happening like that?
The command you want
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:59:26AM +0530, boss ganesh wrote:
> I have pasted the config file of 2.6.18 (already compiled working kernel
> config file) to kernel source of version 2.6.26 , after that also it is
> asking queries without compiling it when i ran the command "make" ..
>
> why is it h
uot;make menuconfig" and hope for the best.
> This checks your .config file and asks you questions to new options
> available in the new kernel source.
Yes, many hundreds of them, literally.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> why is it happening like that?
Did you run "make oldconfig"?
This checks your .config file and asks you questions to new options
available in the new kernel source.
Be sure to read the file called README, it's in bold for a reason.
There is also "make help"
Adrian
I have pasted the config file of 2.6.18 (already compiled working kernel
config file) to kernel source of version 2.6.26 , after that also it is
asking queries without compiling it when i ran the command "make" ..
why is it happening like that?
--
bossganesh
BOSSTeam
CDAC
I believe I need the ath9k driver. However, I now have my new
2.6.27-rc9 kernel working flawlessly and my wireless card is up and
working. Thanks for all the help guys! I'm still going to look into
building my own kernel; good knowledge to have.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Matthew Lane:
>
> I'm new to debian, just switched over from ubuntu. I heard news of the
> new 2.6.27 kernel coming out, and has atheros driver support. My laptop
> has an atheros card I haven't gotten to work yet, and I'd like to get
> the new kernel to
doing that, I just am curious where I can get a package
> (.deb?) to install the 2.6.27 kernel image, and where it would be
> located to add to my grub boot menu.
Normally the new kernel should appear in your Grub menu automatically,
as "update-grub" is run by the linux-image* postinst
+0200, Matthew Lane wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to debian, just switched over from ubuntu. I heard news of
the new 2.6.27 kernel coming out, and has atheros driver support. My
laptop has an atheros card I haven't gotten to work yet, and I'd like
to get the new kernel to get that car
o work yet, and I'd like to get
> the new kernel to get that card working. My kernel is 2.6.18, running
> the latest distro of debian. I understand I can compile my own kernel
> if I wish to, but I never have. I'm also aware kernel.org has daily
> image builds, but I don't
On 2008-10-12 18:45 +0200, Matthew Lane wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm new to debian, just switched over from ubuntu. I heard news of
> the new 2.6.27 kernel coming out, and has atheros driver support. My
> laptop has an atheros card I haven't gotten to work yet, and
Matthew Lane wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm new to debian, just switched over from ubuntu. I heard news of
> the new 2.6.27 kernel coming out, and has atheros driver support. My
> laptop has an atheros card I haven't gotten to work yet, and I'd like
> to get the ne
Hello all,
I'm new to debian, just switched over from ubuntu. I heard news of the
new 2.6.27 kernel coming out, and has atheros driver support. My laptop
has an atheros card I haven't gotten to work yet, and I'd like to get
the new kernel to get that card working. My k
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:46:52 -0400 Michael Habashy wrote:
> i just tried the new dvd 4.0r4a dvd -- I thought the new kernel would
> be there..instead i got the 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1
>
> can someone tell me how to get the new kernel or modify the dvd to
> install the ne
1 - 100 of 747 matches
Mail list logo
