On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:05:04 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: > On 06/21/2011 01:52 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> So in the end you need to manually remove the pae kernel and install >> the 486, as Gilbert suggested. >> >> I still think this should have been automagically done by the upgrade. >> Why proceed with installing something that will not work and even set >> it as the default boot option>:-P >> >> > They're just doing that to see if we're paying attention! X-) > I had always assumed that the little sub-notebook's processor would have > supported PAE. If aptitude had taken upon itself just to switch me from > 686 to 486, I probably would have thought that was odd, too. At least > the package manager did tell me exactly what I needed to do. That's a > good thing for a dummy like me. > > 8-) Yes, I agree. The package manager warned us and the most important, IMO, it is configured _by default_ to keep the old kernel. This can sound irrelevant but this option is no the default in many other distributions that are usually well-known as more "user-friendly". Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.06.21.18.55...@gmail.com
