On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 07:33:11AM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Why not run explicitly:
>
> env LC_ALL=C gpg [whatever]
Good idea, I think I'll do so. Thank you!
--
Regards,
Alexander Batischev
1024D/69093C81
F870 A381 B5F5 D2A1 1B35 4D63 A1A7 1C77 6909 3C81
signature.asc
Description: Di
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:04:32PM +0300, Alexander Batischev wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 04:11:20PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> > (...)
> >
> > You can launch Mutt in debug mode (mutt -d 3), so it logs any message to
> > "~/.muttdebug0".
>
> That's the first thing one should think about if so
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 09:25:31AM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> Hey, I just noticed that there are 2 different keys for you on the public key
> server. Are you sure you're using the right one to verify the
> signatures?
Yes, there are two keys - old one and new one. Unfortunately, old one was
crea
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 09:22:45AM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> (...)
>
> If this problem started when you imported your private key, then maybe
> that was not done correctly. Is there a step that needs to be taken
> besides simply importing? (I don't know the answer to that).
I think that now,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 04:11:20PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> (...)
>
> You can launch Mutt in debug mode (mutt -d 3), so it logs any message to
> "~/.muttdebug0".
That's the first thing one should think about if something doesn't work
properly, but I forgot about it... Thank you very much, Camale
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:52:54 +0300, Alexander Batischev wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:39:58PM +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Well, what we are testing here (by using another e-mail client) is GPG
>> and your keyring configuration, so you better try with a GUI e-mail
>> client that uses th
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:48:09PM +0300, Alexander Batischev wrote:
> I'm using mutt for about a month already. Almost all problems already solved,
> I
> successfully moved to IMAP. It's time to get GPG signing to work.
>
> As you probably noticed, all my messages are signed. But when I open any
sender's name to GPG's
> verification message, but it didn't solve my problem. I also tried to not set
> this option, with no luck. Does anyone have any advice?
>
> My .muttrc attached.
>
>
> 1. http://codesorcery.net/old/mutt/mutt-gnupg-howto
>
I
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:39:58PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> > Better than before, but mutt still claims "signature can NOT be
> > verified"…
>
> Still? From where are you getting that "not verified" message? From
> Mutt's pager?
Yes, mutt's pager. Message appears at the very bottom of the s
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 00:09:30 +0300, Alexander Batischev wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:59:23PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> Then maybe is that you have to "explicitely" import the key and trust
>> that key. Did you already do that? :-?
>
> Well, okay, I set trust for my key to 5 (absolute) and
Done a little more research: I used lsign (local sign) command and signed
Andrei Popescu's key. Then I set full trust for it. After that, mutt showed me
message like that one showed in previous post: just two lines saying sign is
correct. But mutt still says that sign can not be verified! I definit
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:59:23PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:37:57 +0300, Alexander Batischev wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:21:14PM +, Camale??n wrote:
>
> >> In order to verify a signed message, either you have to previosuly
> >> import the key into your keyri
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:37:57 +0300, Alexander Batischev wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:21:14PM +, Camale??n wrote:
>> In order to verify a signed message, either you have to previosuly
>> import the key into your keyring or you need to setup Mutt to retrieve
>> the key from public server
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:21:14PM +, Camale??n wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:03:22 +0300, Alexander Batischev wrote:
>
> > Some thoughts which just came to my head: can it be because of lack of
> > trusted keys? I did not set anyone's key as trusted, so I don't have web
> > of trust. This s
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:03:22 +0300, Alexander Batischev wrote:
> Some thoughts which just came to my head: can it be because of lack of
> trusted keys? I did not set anyone's key as trusted, so I don't have web
> of trust. This still don't explain (in my opinion, at least) why my own
> signature c
Some thoughts which just came to my head: can it be because of lack of trusted
keys? I did not set anyone's key as trusted, so I don't have web of trust. This
still don't explain (in my opinion, at least) why my own signature can't be
verified.
--
Regards,
Alexander Batischev
1024D/69093C81
F870
I'm using mutt for about a month already. Almost all problems already solved, I
successfully moved to IMAP. It's time to get GPG signing to work.
As you probably noticed, all my messages are signed. But when I open any--even
my own!--message, mutt tells me that PGP signature can NOT be verified. W
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:27:28PM -0500, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
> I am trying to setup Mutt so that it automatically retrieves keys from a
> keyserver is it is not listed in my public key. So far, I have the
> following in my .muttrc:
>
> set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyserver w
I am trying to setup Mutt so that it automatically retrieves keys from a
keyserver is it is not listed in my public key. So far, I have the following in
my .muttrc:
set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyserver wwwkeys.us.pgp.net %r >
/dev/null 2>&1"
Am I missing something? I grabbed a
On Wed, 03 Apr 2002, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * Matthew Daubenspeck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020403 08:14]:
> > I just got mutt working properly with gpg thanks to the archives. Does mutt
> > have to include the signature as an attachment, or can it do it in-line in
> > the message itself?
>
> pgp_crea
At 10:41 AM 4/3/2002, you wrote:
>* Matthew Daubenspeck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020403 08:14]:
>> I just got mutt working properly with gpg thanks to the archives. Does mutt
>> have to include the signature as an attachment, or can it do it in-line in
>> the message itself?
>
>pgp_create_traditional
* Matthew Daubenspeck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020403 08:14]:
> I just got mutt working properly with gpg thanks to the archives. Does mutt
> have to include the signature as an attachment, or can it do it in-line in
> the message itself?
pgp_create_traditional
>
> Can it also verify signatures th
I just got mutt working properly with gpg thanks to the archives. Does mutt
have to include the signature as an attachment, or can it do it in-line in
the message itself?
Can it also verify signatures that are not attachments (such like those
sent from windows MUA's) but are included in the me
both, absolute paths for pgpewrap and the --comment issue exist as
bugreports, so expect fixes sooner or later. for now, yes, just remove
all --comment '' from gpg.rc and change pgpewrap to
/usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:11:07PM +0200, Sven Gaerner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a problem using mutt and gpg since the last update for these packages.
> When I try to encrypt and sign a message I get an error after entering
> my passphrase.
>
> Error message:
> gpg: Mis
Hi,
I got a problem using mutt and gpg since the last update for these packages.
When I try to encrypt and sign a message I get an error after entering
my passphrase.
Error message:
gpg: Missing argument for option "--comment"
Press any key to continue...
I tried using the gpg.rc file
Hi,
If any one has been using premail with mutt and gpg , could you kindly post a
overview of how you did it or any pointer to simple instructions would be great
too ?
sincerely
b thomas
27 matches
Mail list logo
