On Wed, 03 Apr 2002, Vineet Kumar wrote: > * Matthew Daubenspeck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020403 08:14]: > > I just got mutt working properly with gpg thanks to the archives. Does mutt > > have to include the signature as an attachment, or can it do it in-line in > > the message itself? > > pgp_create_traditional
Never use this crap. It will switch to the 'application/pgp' mime type instead of using 'text/plain'. It is the source of a LOT of trouble, and I am told it has been banned from the newest mutt devel releases. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]