* Matthew Daubenspeck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020403 08:14]: > I just got mutt working properly with gpg thanks to the archives. Does mutt > have to include the signature as an attachment, or can it do it in-line in > the message itself?
pgp_create_traditional > > Can it also verify signatures that are not attachments (such like those > sent from windows MUA's) but are included in the message itself as well? check-traditional-pgp, bound to ESC-P by default. See the mutt manual (in /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz) for more info on both. Also note that the old style is marked deprecated for a variety of reasons, including that it only works properly when used with a single us-ascii message part. It won't work for other charsets or for multiple message parts. You can google for more info on that, or search the mutt-users@mutt.org mail archives. good times, Vineet -- Currently seeking opportunities in the SF Bay Area Please see http://www.doorstop.net/resume.shtml
pgpVdfWYpNHcX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
