> Install pon
> Then install pppconfig and run that as root
> Then if you are already as user added to dip it will all just work.
> I am still on dialup and about to move onto satellite broadband
> because there is no other broadband option. One of the joys of living
> in the bush.
> Be well,
>
Install pppconfig, run it as root, and follow instructions.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 15:40, Mark Grieveson shared this with us all:
>--} I decided to give up high speed internet, because it's a waste of money
>--} and time. So, now I have dial-up. The last time I had dial-up was
>--} when I used Corel Linux, and I had no problem setting that up. Now,
>--}
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:40:30AM -0400, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> I tried kppp, and did get it to connect, but only when run as root. I
> read kppp's help, and it said a bunch of stuff about "noauth" and
> "dip"; so, my regular user is a member of both dialout and dip, and
> I uncommented "noauth"
I decided to give up high speed internet, because it's a waste of money
and time. So, now I have dial-up. The last time I had dial-up was
when I used Corel Linux, and I had no problem setting that up. Now,
however, I can't seem to get wvdial, or its frontend, gnome-ppp, to
work (aren't things su
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:55:54AM -0500, John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> >John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> >Hello everyone,
> >
> >I have a very annoying problem. I am trying to download some new
> >programs via aptitude and notice that my modem connection keeps >dropping
>John Kerr Anderson wrote:
>Hello everyone,
>
>I have a very annoying problem. I am trying to download some new
>programs via aptitude and notice that my modem connection keeps >dropping
>out after 5 - 10 minutes. The connection keeps dropping esp. if I try
>to check a
John Kerr Anderson wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a very annoying problem. I am trying to download some new
programs via aptitude and notice that my modem connection keeps dropping
out after 5 - 10 minutes. The connection keeps dropping esp. if I try
to check a web-page out while it is
Hello everyone,
I have a very annoying problem. I am trying to download some new
programs via aptitude and notice that my modem connection keeps dropping
out after 5 - 10 minutes. The connection keeps dropping esp. if I try
to check a web-page out while it is downloading in aptitude.
At
Hi all!
I've the same problem...
On the same pc, with windows xp internet is fast (about 80k) but with
the latest debian etch, internet is very very very slow (about 25k)!!
I've installed debian sarge, dist-upgrading to etch and the download
speed is about 80k. But installing the deb linux-image
> Ok. It seems that the internet is extremely fast when I use Mozilla
> and extremely slow when I use Konqueror. I am still unable to telnet
> www.google.com 80 get /.
What machine exactly you have?
If it is pentium I with 64 mb...
KDE is ready to modern box, just
as xp or vista.
Fire up fv
On 6 Nov 2006 13:59:23 -0800
"schmity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. It seems that the internet is extremely fast when I use Mozilla
> and extremely slow when I use Konqueror. I am still unable to telnet
> www.google.com 80 get /.
seems like we are getting somewhere now... if browsing t
If there is any question concerning the router, and if you have a spare
machine with a pair of ethernet cards, download an ISO image of
SmoothWall Express 2.0 (www.smoothwall.org), burn a CD, install
SmoothWall on the spare machine, and see whether the situation improves.
Installation of Smoot
Ok. It seems that the internet is extremely fast when I use Mozilla
and extremely slow when I use Konqueror. I am still unable to telnet
www.google.com 80 get /.
> I've seen your ping results. Better than
> my probes.
> To debug this issue, power down all devi-
> ces. Computers, router, mode
Rodrigo Paes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> PING www.l.google.com (66.249.89.104): 56 data bytes
>> 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=15.3 ms
>> 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=16.6 ms
>> 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=16.7 ms
>> 64 byte
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 06:40:44 +0900
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> PING www.l.google.com (66.249.89.104): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=15.3 ms
> 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=16.6 ms
> 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=
Rodrigo Paes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "schmity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.google.com
>> PING www.l.google.com (216.239.37.104) 56(84) bytes of data.
>> 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=78.5 ms
>> 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=2 tt
Ok I added the following line in my /etc/network/interfaces file
auto eth0
...
...
up ifconfig mtu 1450
after doing a ifdown -a and ifup -a I could verify the mtu by ifconfig
-a.
I tried 1450, 1400, 1300, 1200, .700. None of which seemed to
help.
how do I check on the ipv6 packet?
Ken Irv
On 5 Nov 2006 19:48:17 -0800
"schmity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.google.com
> PING www.l.google.com (216.239.37.104) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=78.5 ms
> 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time
On 06/11/06, Zoran Kolic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a cable modem connected to a router that connects to a Windows> XP machine and my Debian linux machine. Internet on the Windows XP> machine is extremely fast and the Debian machine is slower than dial up
> (no joke! night and day differe
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 07:48:17PM -0800, schmity wrote:
> Here is what I get when I do the tests. It takes a long time to ping
> google and yahoo. Telnet didn't work with google or yahoo and it was
> extremely slow also. Don't know about the ipv6 packet or where to
> ...
Maybe check the MTU se
> I have a cable modem connected to a router that connects to a Windows
> XP machine and my Debian linux machine. Internet on the Windows XP
> machine is extremely fast and the Debian machine is slower than dial up
> (no joke! night and day difference!) What is wrong with the Debian
> machine?
I
Here is what I get when I do the tests. It takes a long time to ping
google and yahoo. Telnet didn't work with google or yahoo and it was
extremely slow also. Don't know about the ipv6 packet or where to
look. I'll check into it or if you have more info that you could give
me it would be apprec
On 5 Nov 2006 18:28:32 -0800
"schmity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a cable modem connected to a router that connects to a Windows
> XP machine and my Debian linux machine. Internet on the Windows XP
> machine is extremely fast and the Debian machine is slower than dial up
> (no joke! nigh
I have a cable modem connected to a router that connects to a Windows
XP machine and my Debian linux machine. Internet on the Windows XP
machine is extremely fast and the Debian machine is slower than dial up
(no joke! night and day difference!) What is wrong with the Debian
machine?
--
To UNS
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:04:35AM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I know my modem's connection speed?
> I checked the /var/log/syslog and found some hex number from the
> /usr/bin/chat output. I'm guessing that's related (since it should be
> the handshake between the modems). But I
Hi,
How can I know my modem's connection speed?
I checked the /var/log/syslog and found some hex number from the
/usr/bin/chat output. I'm guessing that's related (since it should be
the handshake between the modems). But I'm not sure if that's true or
how can I figure that out.
I also found tw
I have just completed an 'Upgrade' via apt-get (NOT a 'dist-upgrade').
The only resulting problem I'm aware of is that I can no longer dial out.
The TR (is that actually DTR) and RTS indicators on the modem are
switching on and off - off for about half a second, on for about a
second. If wvdi
I connect to the internet using a good modem & phone line. The
connection is reliable, and fast for a 56k modem.
My problem is this: say I am downloading a file already. Then I want to
check my POP3 server at the same time - it'll work, but it will take an
~extremely~ long time, so long that I wan
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 07:14:00PM +, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 November 2002 3:37 pm, infotechsys wrote:
> >What do most people use to get a dial-up connection
> > working? Will wvdial be a good choice?
> I have tried lots of things, and wvdial was the only one that worked! im sure
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 2:23 am, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> Fix your dang clock already! I'm quite sure this month is November not
> January ;-)
that better?
have messed around with date -s so should be correct now!
sorry if i messed up msg order,
hugh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
Additionally, both Gnome and KDE have pon/poff support in applets
Do you know what the Gnome applet is called? I have the default Gnome
desktop installed by tasksel in Woody 3.0. I looked on on the menu
(Applets > Network) but nothing there invoked pon.
Cheers,
Chris.
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 20:58, John Hasler wrote:
> Mark L. Kahnt writes:
> > That was what I meant by "having access to the modem",...
>
> Members of the dip group do not have access to the modem. For that they
> would need to be members of the dialout group. Members of dip just have
> rights to
Fix your dang clock already! I'm quite sure this month is November not
January ;-)
--
static const char signature[] =
"Copyright (c) 2002 Eric G. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>";
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
Mark L. Kahnt writes:
> That was what I meant by "having access to the modem",...
Members of the dip group do not have access to the modem. For that they
would need to be members of the dialout group. Members of dip just have
rights to pppd and the relevant ppp files.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROT
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 19:12, John Hasler wrote:
> Mark L. Kahnt writes:
> > If you have free local calling and unlimited access with your
> > ISP/upstream, diald can be wonderful - essentially on-demand dialup when
> > you are accessing the Internet, and governed disconnection when you are
> > idle
Mark L. Kahnt writes:
> If you have free local calling and unlimited access with your
> ISP/upstream, diald can be wonderful - essentially on-demand dialup when
> you are accessing the Internet, and governed disconnection when you are
> idle for a sysadmin-defined stretch.
You don't need diald for
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 15:16, Chris Lale wrote:
>
>
> infotechsys wrote:
> > Hi, I decided to take Nate's suggest and try to update my system
> > print package from the net. What do most people use to get a dial-up
> > connection working? Will wvdial be a good choice? wayne
> >
> ppp is easily
infotechsys wrote:
> Hi, I decided to take Nate's suggest and try to update my system
> print package from the net. What do most people use to get a dial-up
> connection working? Will wvdial be a good choice? wayne
>
ppp is easily set up using pppconfig, connect with 'pon' and disconnect
with 'po
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 3:37 pm, infotechsys wrote:
>What do most people use to get a dial-up connection
> working? Will wvdial be a good choice?
I have tried lots of things, and wvdial was the only one that worked! im sure
that was just due to malconfiguration on behalf but wvdial was v easy
Hi,
I decided to take Nate's suggest and try to update
my system print package from the net. What do
most people use to get a dial-up connection
working? Will wvdial be a good choice?
wayne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
* Ulf Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> Hi Debianicans.
>
> Thanx to all!
>
> It still doesn't work,
> but the message is a different one now.
> See the very end of this mail.
>
> > > Finally I made it to this distribution.
> >
> > Great.
> >
> Although there is more to do to set up D
Ulf Martin wrote:
Although there is more to do to set up Debian,
You might find that you'd set up the system once in your lifetime; so
the hassles worth knowing your system deeper.
BTW, for the second, third, and so forth installs, you'd always have "cp
-avf" handy... :-) So basically, ther
Hi Debianicans.
Thanx to all!
It still doesn't work,
but the message is a different one now.
See the very end of this mail.
> > Finally I made it to this distribution.
>
> Great.
>
Although there is more to do to set up Debian,
it feels better than the more "commercial" distribs.
>
> Use "ATM
Ulf Martin wrote:
Hi Debians!
Finally I made it to this distribution.
Great.
Now I have a problem connection to the net via modem
under Debian:
The device itself seems to work
(it's actually making a hell of a noise --
how can I stop this),
Use "ATM0" as your modem init string.
but it
Ulf Martin wrote:
>
> Hi Debians!
>
> Finally I made it to this distribution.
>
> Now I have a problem connection to the net via modem
> under Debian:
> The device itself seems to work
> (it's actually making a hell of a noise --
> how can I stop this),
> but it does not hold the connection.
> I
Hi Debians!
Finally I made it to this distribution.
Now I have a problem connection to the net via modem
under Debian:
The device itself seems to work
(it's actually making a hell of a noise --
how can I stop this),
but it does not hold the connection.
I am using a Lucent Winmodem on a Dell Lap
When I type "pon" there is a 'long' wait before I hear the modem
starts dialing. (When I type "poff" however, the connection is
instantaneously cut off). I guess it is not "pon" itself that is the
trouble, but rather the connect-script.
My problem is that I am running a little lan, and we have di
on Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:24:47AM -0700, John Joe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I surf with Netscape 4.0 for Linux and find it much
> slower than IE 5.0 of MS Winodws. I've change MTU to 576 (MTU is an
> argument to pppd) and it didn't help.
>
> I connect by 33.6k internal modem. I use Debian 2.
on Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:24:47AM -0700, John Joe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I surf with Netscape 4.0 for Linux and find it much
> slower than IE 5.0 of MS Winodws. I've change MTU to 576 (MTU is an
> argument to pppd) and it didn't help.
>
> I connect by 33.6k internal modem. I use Debian 2.1
I surf with Netscape 4.0 for Linux and find it much
slower than IE 5.0 of MS Winodws. I've change MTU to
576 (MTU is an argument to pppd) and it didn't help.
I connect by 33.6k internal modem. I use Debian 2.1.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized e
Hello. I have configured my modem and when I connect use to connect I get an
error (in var/log/syslog) about my modem is not 7-bit clean and then it
terminates the connection.
Any ideas on how to solve this problem?
Thanks,
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
On Sunday 21 January 2001 12:37, Rino Mardo wrote:
> Hi. Since the subject is about 56K modems, I'm just wondering how
> would one measure the online speed (as opposed to the connect speed)?
Have a look at bing.
--
Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.sirinet.net/~budr/zamm.html
All
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:27:45PM + or thereabouts, John Carline wrote:
>
>
>
> I have the same modem, and was told the the following would give me 56K mode
>
> ATZ
> AT&F0 L3 W2
> AT+MS=12,1,300,56000,0,0,33600
>
>
> However, since my phone lines are so crummy I have no idea wether or n
Jarkko Niemi wrote:
> After using my dial-up connecton with speed reporting I wanted to force
> my modem up to it's maximum speed. It works from windows side, so, it's
> just up to configuring it also to Linux. Windows doesn't help, there is
> just one box where to check as "[] use always this spe
To quote Jarkko Niemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# So, I went to look modem's AT manual and edited /etc/chatscripts/
# I added AT+MS= part just before number dialing.
# I don't know do I use wrong AT command, or are parameters wrong,
# anyway it calls, but not connect.
# By commenting that out, everythi
Quoting Jarkko Niemi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> After using my dial-up connecton with speed reporting I wanted to force
> my modem up to it's maximum speed.
I think the quick answer to this is: you can't. The modems at each
end of the line negotiate the speed themselves. All you can do is
decide wheth
Its likely that windows is actually reporting the speed to the UART chip
on the modem and not the actual connect speed (i've it do this to me
before) which would be 57600 for a 56k modem. Trying to force your modem
to a higher speed is probably not a good idea. I see you are .fi so the
US FCC lim
ws doesn't help, there is
>just one box where to check as "[] use always this speed"
I suspect that that little box is just the speed between your PC & the
modem, not the modem connection speed to your ISP (which will vary
according to line quality, for example). I have nev
After using my dial-up connecton with speed reporting I wanted to force
my modem up to it's maximum speed. It works from windows side, so, it's
just up to configuring it also to Linux. Windows doesn't help, there is
just one box where to check as "[] use always this speed", no AT
commands found th
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> commands. This is my modem log under windows:
<...>
> 09-11-2000 02:52:45.70 - Initializing modem.
> 09-11-2000 02:52:45.70 - Send: AT
> 09-11-2000 02:52:45.72 - Recv: AT
> 09-11-2000 02:52:45.72 - Recv: OK
> 09-11-2000 02:52:45.72 - Interpreted respon
[...]
> These are the last lines of my /var/log/syslog:
> Oct 3 04:12:35 colorado pppd[664]: pppd 2.3.11 started by root, uid 0
> Oct 3 04:12:36 colorado chat[665]: abort on (BUSY)
> Oct 3 04:12:36 colorado chat[665]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
> Oct 3 04:12:36 colorado chat[665]: abort on (VOICE)
>
Hi,
I'm sorry the long mail, but I would have no way of describing my problem
without it.
I'm trying to connect to my ISP, using my Lucent Venus Voice Modem, since
august, 2000.
I made these things:
- ISA PnP issues, with pnpdump --> isapnp.conf
- setserial /dev/ttyS1 - the port whas detected as
Sorry, I don't remember, exactly (it was on my old RedHat system, before I
wiped and went to Debian)
something like:
REPORT CONNECT
REPORT CARRIER
then you had to add something to the script that calls chat, so the
reports get written to some file (why I said RTFM, because I don't know).
B
Those are compression modules. Basically, PPP provides a compression
layer, so when easily-compressible data is send over the wire (eg.
text/images), it gets compressed, thus being faster over a modem. The
compression modules get loaded when you establish a connection with
compression enabled.
T
I read here last week about addind the following lines to my
/etc/ppp/peers/provider file:
bsdcomp 15,15
defalte 15,15
vj-max-slots 16
asyncmap 0
mru 576
mtu 576
So I did. But then, after running modconf, I noticed that some new modules
appeared---ones I never specified during set up. They were:
I believe the Modem-HOWTO deals with this as well.
> At 12:41 08.09.99 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> >Hello!
> >
> >I would like to see the modem connection speed after the CONNECT message
> in my
> >logs; I use ppp 2.3.5-2 on a slink box.
>
> Depends which m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Opening "/var/log/connection_speeds"...
> chat: Sep 09 16:23:04 CONNECT 50666/ARQ/V90/LAPM/V42BIS
> Closing "/var/log/connection_speeds".
> Opening "/var/log/connection_speeds"...
> chat: Sep 09 10:55:38 CONNECT 50666/A
*- On 9 Sep, Enrico Zini wrote about "Re: Modem connection speed"
>
> (and, BTW, another thing I would like to know is why doesn't it CONNECT
> 56000 :( )
>
Here is a little article describing all the reasons. Actually you are
lucky to get 50666.
http://www.comput
On 8 Sep 1999, John Hasler wrote:
> > This is my chatscript (I added ECHO and REPORT to the original pppconfig
> > generated script, but nothing changed):
> > connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/chatscripts/mclink2"
>
> Change that to connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -r report_file -f
> /etc/chatscript
Enrico Zini writes:
> This is my chatscript (I added ECHO and REPORT to the original pppconfig
> generated script, but nothing changed):
> connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/chatscripts/mclink2"
Change that to connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -r report_file -f
/etc/chatscripts/mclink2"
where 'report_
On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> >I would like to see the modem connection speed after the CONNECT message
> in my
> >logs; I use ppp 2.3.5-2 on a slink box.
> Depends which modem do you use. Look at your modems manual to see how to
> enable
> connection speed
At 12:41 08.09.99 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I would like to see the modem connection speed after the CONNECT message
in my
>logs; I use ppp 2.3.5-2 on a slink box.
Depends which modem do you use. Look at your modems manual to see how to
enable
connection speed reporting.
Hasso
Hello!
I would like to see the modem connection speed after the CONNECT message in my
logs; I use ppp 2.3.5-2 on a slink box.
* This is my chatscript (I added ECHO and REPORT to the original pppconfig
generated script, but nothing changed):
ABORT BUSY
ABORT "NO CARRIER"
ABORT VOICE
Daniel Kahraman writes:
> I can hear the dialing of my modem, but there is also a continuous
> buzzing sound as soon as the modem is activated and while the dialing is
> taking place.
Does it sound like dialtone? If so, the line is not going off-hook, either
because of a hardware problem or becau
hello all:
I can hear the dialing of my modem, but there is also a continuous
buzzing sound as soon as the modem is activated and while the dialing is
taking place.
No connection is established.
my modem init. string is ATZ
modem dial command is ATDT
could these be the problem?
You can try the pppload utility. I am sorry, I don't remeber where I found it.
I think it does exist as a deb package
Franck
>I finally worked out how to pon to specific providers using
> pon
>
>How do I find out what my connection speed is?
Well, for *starters*, you need to make sure that your modem is reporting the
DCE speed (the speed it's talking to the other modem at) and not the DTE
speed (the speed it's talking
Hi,
I finally worked out how to pon to specific providers using
pon
How do I find out what my connection speed is?
I had deleted /var/log/ppp.log earlier assuming that it will be recreated by
what ever program but that didn't happen. Will creating a blank file do the
trick.
Sincerely,
Colin Telmer writes:
> What I ultimately would like to do is to be able to do rlogins through
> this ppp connection but have all other network connections still using my
> ethernet connection. I guess I don't completely understand what you mean
> by "Put a script in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d to add a route
Colin Telmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I ultimately would like to do is to be able to do rlogins through
> this ppp connection but have all other network connections still using my
> ethernet connection. I guess I don't completely understand what you mean
> by "Put a script in /etc/ppp/ip
On 24 Nov 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You don't want to divert net traffic to the ppp connection. You just want
> to make it the route to your office. Put a script in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d to
> add a route to your office network via the ppp interface and another in
> /etc/ppp/ip-down.d to delete
Colin Telmer writes:
> I connect to the internet via an ethernet connection by default but now
> also need to occasionally use a ppp connection to make a secure
> connection to my office. Can I divert net traffic to the ppp connection
> on occasion without disturbing my ppp connection?
You don't w
Hi, I connect to the internet via an ethernet connection by default but
now also need to occasionally use a ppp connection to make a secure
connection to my office. Can I divert net traffic to the ppp connection on
occasion without disturbing my ppp connection? Cheers.
--
Colin Telmer, Ottawa, Ont
On Sat, Nov 21, 1998 at 09:56:03PM +0100, l chinsky wrote:
> how can i install internet via a modem under linux?
What do you mean? Do you want to install Debian over modem, or you
have already a working Debian system and you want to hook it up to the
net via modem? If the latter, we need to know
At 04:14 PM 10/30/98 -0500, Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
>
>> Just recently there was a posting here that said they got better
>> connection speed in Win95 than in Linux. A couple of days ago I heard
>> another Linux say the same thing. And so far, on a hamm
Hi all,
After running into this same problem, and asking on this list for
answers, I think I may be able to give others some help now.
First, what speed are you connecting at? As reported in another post or
two, it is easy to make your system save the modem connect speed in its
own file. Mine sav
On Sat, Oct 31, 1998 at 08:23:47PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michele writes:
> > It seems that there isn't a place (manpages, howtos, readmes) where these
> > speeds are listed :(, and even worse, my posting about this problem via
> > the debian bug tracking system had no replies
>
> What
Michele Bini writes:
> Also please remember to edit your /etc/rc.boot/0setserial
> file to have spd_vhi (or spd_hi) in the STD_FLAGS:
> STD_FLAGS="session_lockout spd_vhi"
Please don't. pppd will work just fine at 115200 without this.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing
On Sun, Nov 01, 1998 at 02:01:55AM +0100, Michele Bini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 1998 at 05:23:31AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> > another Linux say the same thing. And so far, on a hamm box, I can only
> > get 19200 out of my 28800 pc card modem. Is this typical of Linux, or is
> > it just an imp
Michele writes:
> It seems that there isn't a place (manpages, howtos, readmes) where these
> speeds are listed :(, and even worse, my posting about this problem via
> the debian bug tracking system had no replies
What package did you file the bug against? You should at least have gotten
an autom
On Thu, Oct 29, 1998 at 05:23:31AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> Just recently there was a posting here that said they got better
> connection speed in Win95 than in Linux. A couple of days ago I heard
sorry, what posting do you refer to?
> another Linux say the same thing. And so far, on a hamm
Raymond A. Ingles writes:
> I think serial ports in Linux default to pretty conservative values. Try
> setting the rate to at least 38400. I'll bet that this is the main source
> of the problem.
pppconfig sets the rate to 115200. 38400 isn't fast enough to keep up with
a modem running 28800.
> M
On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> Just recently there was a posting here that said they got better
> connection speed in Win95 than in Linux. A couple of days ago I heard
> another Linux say the same thing. And so far, on a hamm box, I can only
> get 19200 out of my 28800 pc card modem.
Windows is doing something extra with modems. I upgraded from a
motorola 28.8 to a hayes 56k v.90 (externals). Now I would expect
that any two external modems would look about the same to the
computer. Infact I had to do NOTHING to get linux to dial out and
connect to my ISP with the new modem.
On 28 Oct 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Michael" == Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> If you are using chat, pass it the '-v' option.
>
> I am passing the -v option to chat, and indeed, I am also
> using W2S95=47 (I have a rockwell chip modem). plog does
On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Kent West wrote:
> Just recently there was a posting here that said they got better
> connection speed in Win95 than in Linux. A couple of days ago I heard
> another Linux say the same thing. And so far, on a hamm box, I can only
> get 19200 out of my 28800 pc card modem. Is t
Just recently there was a posting here that said they got better
connection speed in Win95 than in Linux. A couple of days ago I heard
another Linux say the same thing. And so far, on a hamm box, I can only
get 19200 out of my 28800 pc card modem. Is this typical of Linux, or is
it just an improper
Hi,
>>"Michael" == Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> If you are using chat, pass it the '-v' option.
I am passing the -v option to chat, and indeed, I am also
using W2S95=47 (I have a rockwell chip modem). plog does not have
that, but /var/log/ppp.log does indeed hav
Hamish Moffatt writes:
> Not really the same thing; you really need ATZ then ATW2 as a separate
> command. Or do ATW2 and write the options to NVRAM with &W.
You're right: 'ATZ OK ATW2' for belt & suspenders. But most modems don't
need the ATZ at all.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasle
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
