On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 16:00 +0200, Marco Möller wrote:
> So, although it is full freeze time, the former kernel with all its
> already known and tested functionality will not be specially patched,
> but the new kernel is taken although it besides containing the patch
> might also bring changed f
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 04:00:26PM +0200, Marco Möller wrote:
> On 22.07.21 13:49, Tixy wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 12:23 +0200, Marco Möller wrote:
> > > Hello everyone! The Debian development branch "bullseye"(/testing) is in
> > > status "full freeze", if I am correctly informed, and packag
On 22.07.21 13:49, Tixy wrote:
On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 12:23 +0200, Marco Möller wrote:
Hello everyone! The Debian development branch "bullseye"(/testing) is in
status "full freeze", if I am correctly informed, and packages from
/unstable are for quite some time already no more automatically moved
On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 12:23 +0200, Marco Möller wrote:
> Hello everyone! The Debian development branch "bullseye"(/testing) is in
> status "full freeze", if I am correctly informed, and packages from
> /unstable are for quite some time already no more automatically moved
> from /unstable to /tes
Hello everyone! The Debian development branch "bullseye"(/testing) is in
status "full freeze", if I am correctly informed, and packages from
/unstable are for quite some time already no more automatically moved
from /unstable to /testing.
Do you know how Debian handles situations like the curren
Hi,
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:37:05AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Hello Debian Users,
>
> A regression introduced in kernel 2.6.30, where the beeps produced by
> the BIOS on power chord removal are disabled[1] was recently fixed for
> 2.6.33 which AFAIK will *not* be in Squeeze.
...
> provi
On Thu,13.May.10, 16:31:20, Alexey Salmin wrote:
>
> Andrei, you probably should write to debian-kernel mailing list or
> fill a bug against linux-image-2.6 package in Debian BTS (then
> debian-kernel will get a CC AFAIK). If you'll get no response there
> try to raise the discussion at debian-dev
On Thu,13.May.10, 11:19:09, deloptes wrote:
>
> I don't understand. you are compiling the kernel anyway. why not compile the
> latest stable?
I guess it was not very obvious from my first message. My goal is to fix
this issue for Squeeze, not for me, but for other users potentially
affected by
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:19 PM, deloptes wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
>> On Wed,12.May.10, 12:28:57, deloptes wrote:
>>> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, at this point I'm assuming
>>> > that the patch will not apply to 2.6.32, but I have no ideea h
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed,12.May.10, 12:28:57, deloptes wrote:
>> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> >
>> > Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, at this point I'm assuming
>> > that the patch will not apply to 2.6.32, but I have no ideea how
>> > difficult it would be to backport it. Comments?
>
On Wed,12.May.10, 12:28:57, deloptes wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, at this point I'm assuming
> > that the patch will not apply to 2.6.32, but I have no ideea how
> > difficult it would be to backport it. Comments?
>
> if you are not supporting
Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, at this point I'm assuming
> that the patch will not apply to 2.6.32, but I have no ideea how
> difficult it would be to backport it. Comments?
>
if you are not supporting multiple systems that need this patch you can
download
Hello Debian Users,
A regression introduced in kernel 2.6.30, where the beeps produced by
the BIOS on power chord removal are disabled[1] was recently fixed for
2.6.33 which AFAIK will *not* be in Squeeze.
I'm trying to get this issue fixed for Squeeze, but, since I'm aware
that the Debian ker
ontrib non-free source openvz
> deb-src http://debian.systs.org/ lenny main contrib non-free openvz
>
> I have not been able to install the kernel-patch-openvz. Where can I
> find this patch?
The patch is in the standard repos (in Lenny and Sid); I see it in my
standard Sid system.
to install the kernel-patch-openvz. Where can I find
this patch?
Thank you
Aaron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 11:29 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think the kernel number in the subject line is the correct one.
> Anyway, it's the kernel for an AMD 64 cpu with the 32 bit version of
> Etch installed. What I'm looking to do is inst
Hi all,
I think the kernel number in the subject line is the correct one.
Anyway, it's the kernel for an AMD 64 cpu with the 32 bit version of
Etch installed. What I'm looking to do is install the kernel patch with
module-assistant but it tells me there is no kernel source fo
I downloaded patch file kernel-patch-bootsplash_2.6.16-1.tar.gz. But
it contains patches other than 2.6.16-1. From where to get bootsplash
kernel patch for
2.6.16-1?
--
L.V.Gandhi
http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/
linux user No.205042
ersions are permitted to be
> patched? I am happy to attempt the patch, but since I'm not familiar
> with the low-level patch tools I'd rather stay within the make-kpkg
> framework.
>
> THanks much!
> matt
>
>
just to answer my own question; I did this:
dpkg -L
Hi there,
I am trying to patch the current 2.6.11-1-k7 kernel (2.6.11-7) with the
kerenel-patch-suspend2 package. When I run
make-kpkg --added-patches suspend2 --config menuconfig
--append-to-version -suspend2 configure kernel_image modules_image
I get the following error message:
E: no applic
o I'd like to be able to
> get it to run optimally with the CPU.
>
> I can't seem to find any suitable information on how to go from the vanilla kernel
> patch to a debian patch like, for example, the kernel-patch-mppe (which I will also
> be using).
>
> Running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nick Hastings, *,
Nick Hastings wrote on Wed Oct 13, 2004 at 04:50:24PM +0900:
> I tried googling but found nothing applicable. Anyone know anything about
> this?
I have patched my 2.6.8 Kernel with bootsplash (working ^^), and i am
able to provide
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 08:50, Nick Hastings wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>following the most recent Debian weekly news, I decided to try to
> setup bootsplash. I added the appropriate source[1] to my apt sources
> but, it seems the kernel-patch-bootsplash package is a bit out of date
>
Hi all,
I'm a bit lost as to how to proceed here, and the dh-kpatches.html file and man
dh_installkpatches are totally confusing me at this point in time.
I'm trying to find a way to get the Via EPIA kernel patch into a standard Debian patch
form to apply to a custom kernel. I hope
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Nick Hastings wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>following the most recent Debian weekly news, I decided to try to
> setup bootsplash. I added the appropriate source[1] to my apt sources
> but, it seems the kernel-patch-bootsplash package is a bit out of date
>
Hi all,
following the most recent Debian weekly news, I decided to try to
setup bootsplash. I added the appropriate source[1] to my apt sources
but, it seems the kernel-patch-bootsplash package is a bit out of date
since it doesn't appear[2] to supply patches for 2.6.8 kernels.
I
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:57:29 -0400, dmx9595 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On October 12, 2004 03:03 am, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:55:42 -0400, ekco9595 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > > how are you supposed to apply a
On October 12, 2004 03:03 am, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > > how are you supposed to apply a kernel-patch-debian patch i take it you
> > > just untar then goto kern source dirc and
> > > do . ../kernel-patch-debian/all/2.6.8/apply/debian cause th
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:55:42 -0400, ekco9595 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
> how are you supposed to apply a kernel-patch-debian patch i take it you just
> untar then goto kern source dirc and
> do . ../kernel-patch-debian/all/2.6.8/apply/debian cause thats what I did
> th
Hey,
how are you supposed to apply a kernel-patch-debian patch i take it you just
untar then goto kern source dirc and
do . ../kernel-patch-debian/all/2.6.8/apply/debian cause thats what I did
then the screen cleared and it logged me out and im kinda wondering what it
just did? I take it thats
Not certain if it's an on on-disk structure - it is used all over,
but the comments in it would suggest that it is in-memory only
(especially since it contains at least one pointer, which would
make little sense in an on disk struct).
Even in that case, the purpose of the cassert() in the coords_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Just checked - the Andrew Morton -mm4 patch has the offending cassert
> ifdef'd out.
>
> This is why the reiser4 stuff compiles on 64bit platforms in that patch.
Hummm, I wonder if that structure gets written out to disk?
If so, I'm thinking the th
EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: reiser4 kernel patch
It was actually a build problem - a cassert() in coord.c triggers an odd
switch statement error (by design).
Essentially the author is trying to make certain that no new members were
added to the coord_t
kernel sources.
...tom
-Original Message-
From: Tyson Whitehead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 3:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Thomas Evans; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reiser4 kernel patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I was tryi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I was trying out the reiser4 kernel patch and ran in a build-time assert on
> my Alpha machine.
I compiled stock 2.6.8.1 with the mm4 (Andrew Morton -- includes Reiser 4)
patch set. Didn't have any compile time problems. Don't
Hi all -
I was trying out the reiser4 kernel patch and ran in a build-time assert on
my Alpha machine.
I wasn't sure what package I should attribute the issue to - any suggestions
would be great!
Thanks,
...tom
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:27:44AM -, Antony Gelberg wrote:
>
> I'm trying to install freeswan on a woody box with 2.4.23 from
> backports.org. I apt-got kernel-patch-freeswan, did an export
> PATCH_THE_KERNEL=yes, and a make-kpkg.
Try this:
export PATCH_THE_KERNEL="
On Sun, 2003-12-21 at 19:27, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to install freeswan on a woody box with 2.4.23 from
> backports.org. I apt-got kernel-patch-freeswan, did an export
> PATCH_THE_KERNEL=yes, and a make-kpkg.
>
> But the patch fails, see below
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:27:44 -
"Antony Gelberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to install freeswan on a woody box with 2.4.23 from
> backports.org. I apt-got kernel-patch-freeswan, did an export
> PATCH_THE_KERNEL=yes, and a make
Hi all,
I'm trying to install freeswan on a woody box with 2.4.23 from
backports.org. I apt-got kernel-patch-freeswan, did an export
PATCH_THE_KERNEL=yes, and a make-kpkg.
But the patch fails, see below.
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.23/include -Wall -Wstrict-prot
otypes
Hello Richard!
Sorry, I saw this post of yours too late to include in my previous
message.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 03:30:07PM +, Richard Kimber wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:36:34 +0100
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patches won't be automatically uninstalled, quoting 'man make-kpkg'
Hello Richard!
Hello Kevin (CCed to)!
Regarding instruction from
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:06:08PM +, Richard Kimber wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:36:34 +0100
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So don't forget to run 'make-kpkg clea
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:36:34 +0100
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patches won't be automatically uninstalled, quoting 'man make-kpkg':
> |Please note that the patches are UN-installed from the source when you
> |run the clean target. This cleanup can be prevented by setting the
> |env
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:36:34 +0100
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So don't forget to run 'make-kpkg clean' before attempting a
> recompile, which incidentally is just what '5.6. Making the kernel
> image' from above doc recommends.
Hmmn, well that's what I think I was doing.
However,
Hello Richard!
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:45:13PM +, Richard Kimber wrote:
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
says that after the kernel is built, make-kpkg reverses the patches you
applied, so that each new build starts with an unpatched source tree.
However, whenever I t
I have been experimenting with the low latency and preempt patches.
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
says that after the kernel is built, make-kpkg reverses the patches you
applied, so that each new build starts with an unpatched source tree.
However, whenever I try to re-b
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> y$Now i simply extract the debianlogo and do a patch -p1 in the kernel source.
Thanx ...
1) Now i simply extract the debianlogo and do a patch -p1 in the kernel source.
2) $ PATCH_THE_KERNEL=3DYES fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=3D3:custom.1.0
--con
El miércoles, 10 de septiembre de 2003, a las 07:25, Oliver Fuchs escribe:
> Regrading man make-kpkg and /usr/share/doc/kernel-source-2.2.20/debian.README.gz
> you have to add "patch_the_kernel=YES" in /etc/kernel-pkg.conf
If you don't want to mess with /etc/kernel-pkg.conf, simply run:
$ PATCH_T
Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>install the kernel-source-2.2.20.tar.bz2
>install the kernel-patch-debianlogo
>tar xvfj kernel-source-2.2.20.tar.bz2
>ln -s /usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.20/ /usr/src/linux
>cd /usr/src/l
On Sun, 06 Jul 2003, Christophe Courtois wrote:
Hi all,
late but ... I tried to install the debian package called
kernel-patch-debianlogo and after I searched the archives for a solution to
the install problems I found your email. Thanx!
> - I had a PATCH_KERNEL=YES in my compilation scr
I was trying to patch my kernel 2.4.18(latest) using kernel-package but
it didn't work. According to this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=143198
There should be a new version of grsecurity patch. But I can only get
version 1.9.4-1.
This is what it says when i t
Vineet Kumar escribio el 14/07/03 20:10:
Debian's kernel-source package does include the debian patches. The
description of kernel-patch-debian-2.4.21 says it should be applied to
"pristine" kernel source, meaning an unpatched tarball from kernel.org.
Now it seems logical. Thanks
* Ismael Valladolid Torres ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030714 11:00]:
> Hi,
>
> The description of the kernel-source-2.4.21 package says "Linux kernel
> source for version 2.4.21 with Debian patches". But, there is another
> package called kernel-patch-debian-2.4.21 whose
Hi,
The description of the kernel-source-2.4.21 package says "Linux kernel
source for version 2.4.21 with Debian patches". But, there is another
package called kernel-patch-debian-2.4.21 whose description says "Debian
patches to Linux 2.4.21". Bizarrely enough, this sec
Op do 10-07-2003, om 19:15 schreef Kevin McKinley:
> On 10 Jul 2003 16:50:52 +0200
> Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > apt-get install tk8.4/unstable (-> i removed it prior to the kernelbuild
> > so i reinstalled it. This could be useful to add to newbie kernel
> >procedure
On 10 Jul 2003 16:50:52 +0200
Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apt-get install tk8.4/unstable (-> i removed it prior to the kernelbuild
> so i reinstalled it. This could be useful to add to newbie kernel
>procedure doc of Kevin McKinley)
What would need to be added to the new
Hello,
I have built some kernels before and now i wanted once to experiment
with a kernel patch.Therefore i choose to try and install the debianlogo
kernel patch. I use unstable and testing.
These are the steps that i did: (i also build the nvidia module)
cd /usr/src
apt-get install kernel
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 12:51:47AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:33:09PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > However, I'll stop here and not say anything more unless there are
> > specific questions; I think I've put forward my point as best I can and
> > your licensing dec
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:33:09PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> However, I'll stop here and not say anything more unless there are
> specific questions; I think I've put forward my point as best I can and
> your licensing decisions are as always yours alone.
I don't think you've put any points for
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:31:03AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:53:40AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Sounds like the GFDL. You might want to have a look at debian-legal
> > archives on this topic; there are unfortunately various concerns about
> > its freeness as fa
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:53:40AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sounds like the GFDL. You might want to have a look at debian-legal
> archives on this topic; there are unfortunately various concerns about
> its freeness as far as Debian's definition of the term is concerned. :-/
http://lists.debia
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:10:00PM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> The XML file I submitted to the LDP is available from
> http://xtrinsic.com/geek/articles/drafts/acpi.xml It will be released
> under the GNU copy left documentation license (the actual name of the
> license escapes me at the momen
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:09:12AM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> I have downloaded the kernel.org source, applied the ACPI patch, then
> downloaded the debian diff.gz and applied it (a few warnings only).
> Then I had to rm -rf debian/ in the kernel source dir, make menuconfig
> and make-kpkg k
On Friday 27 June 2003 13:57, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> I (like many others in the last few days) have a problem with kernel
> 2.4.21. I have downloaded the kernel-source-2.4.21 deb, and want to
> apply the acpi patch from acpi.sf.net to it. So here we go:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/u
On Sunday 29 June 2003 19:55, Kevin McKinley wrote:
>
> It sounds to me like ACPI is already present in the 2.4.21 kernel.
>
> To test this hypothesis, grep the Changelog for "ACPI" and "acpi".
>
At least I did not get ACPI choices on make menuconfig without patching.
joerg
--
Gib GATES keine
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:57:07 +0200
Joerg Johannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> I (like many others in the last few days) have a problem with kernel
> 2.4.21. I have downloaded the kernel-source-2.4.21 deb, and want to
> apply the acpi patch from acpi.sf.net to it. So here we
Your best bet would be to use the vanilla linux-2.4.21.
untar it in /usr/src/linux-2.4.21 and apply your patch.. Keep in mind
that you can use 'kernel-package' to build debs even for the non-debian
kernel sources.
I am currently using vanilla kernel 2.4.21 with the IMQ bandwidth
shaping patch. An
Hello everybody
I (like many others in the last few days) have a problem with kernel
2.4.21. I have downloaded the kernel-source-2.4.21 deb, and want to
apply the acpi patch from acpi.sf.net to it. So here we go:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux$ zcat ../acpi-20030619-2.4.21.diff.gz | patch -p1
Hello,
I'm trying to patch my kernel with kernel-patch-2.4-ipvs but this doesn't
works.
my kernel : kernel-source-2.4.20
others patches : freeswan (loop-jari ?)
command : make-kpkg clean
(export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES;
make-kpkg --revis
I have installed the kernel-patch-freeswan-ext !
In fact, the make-pkgp ask me for setting some building option and I have replied m
for the cryptoapi option (CONFIG_IPSEC_ALG_CRYPTOAPI=m).
I have rebuilt the kernel unseting this option and it works now ;-)
My new chalenge is to understand
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:14:42PM +0100, Francois Chenais wrote:
> I just have install the kernel-patch-freeswan but the building process
> fails because it doesn't find linux/crypto.h.
Hmm... How did you actually apply the patch?
> The warning message says to install cryptoap
Hello,
I just have install the kernel-patch-freeswan but the building process fails because
it doesn't find linux/crypto.h.
The warning message says to install cryptoapi.
I have run apt-get install cryptoapi-core-source but what must I do now with the
/usr/src/cryptoapi-core.tar.gz file
Hello All,
I have just build a buid a new kernel with the patch LPP
and configured my Debian boxe as suggestd in the document file.
Every thing look find, exept the last stage:
the picture stay.
Apparently the command line
`echo 101 /proc/progress '
in the suggested `/etc/init.d/rc' script does
Crap, I forgot to put the --config=config (no ncurses or X)
It took around 8 hours to compile everything.
(P 166 with only 48 Meg of RAM)
I'm going to have to start it over.
Mike
> After copying your config file over, you can:
> % cd /usr/src/linux (or wherever you extract the kernel source
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:54:18PM -0700, np rpr wrote:
>
>
> > Secondly, how do I build this new kernel with the
> > patches for Freeswan?
> > I'm hunting thru the docs as I send the email.
After copying your config file over, you can:
% cd /usr/src/linux (or wherever you extract the kernel
-2.4.18
> Rebooted back into my new stock 2.4 kernel
> apt-get install kernel-patch-freeswan
> apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18
> apt-get install kernel-package
>
> This is where I'm not sure what to do next:
> I understand that I have to use make-kpkg somehow
> to c
Hi,
I interested in setting up ipsec/l2tp on my woody box.
I'm unsure how to patch my kernel. Here's what I've done so far:
Installed woody with kernel 2.2
apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18
Rebooted back into my new stock 2.4 kernel
apt-get install kernel-patch-freeswan
apt-get
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 05:49:49PM -0500, Scott Henson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 16:06, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 14:59:32 -0500, Scott Henson wrote:
> > > The point is I would like to apply the latest -ac patch and get it up and
> > > running, but since 2.4.19 pre
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 16:06, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 14:59:32 -0500, Scott Henson wrote:
> > The point is I would like to apply the latest -ac patch and get it up and
> > running, but since 2.4.19 pre 1 ac1 I have not been able to aplly the
> > patch.
>
> Fetch the -ac
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 14:59:32 -0500, Scott Henson wrote:
> The point is I would like to apply the latest -ac patch and get it up and
> running, but since 2.4.19 pre 1 ac1 I have not been able to aplly the
> patch.
Fetch the -ac2 one. Quoting
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-03-02
I know this isnt debian specific or anything, and I was trying to get on
the kernel mailing list, but I couldnt figure out how to. That is
beside the point though.
The point is I would like to apply the latest -ac patch and get it up
and running, but since 2.4.19 pre 1 ac1 I have not been able t
I am just uploading a new version of my LSM (Linux Security Modules) kernel
patch package.
As many people who are interested in it won't be using unstable I am also
putting it online on http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/kern/ .
Version 2002.02.20-1 adds support for kernel 2.5.5 and (for k
Yes you do. Look in the kernel mailing list archives for this month for
reasons why. =)
---
Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Dmitriy wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was experimenting with preemptive kernelpatch for 2.4.10
Hi everyone,
I was experimenting with preemptive kernelpatch for 2.4.10.
There are actually two patches:
patch-rml-2.4.10-preempt-kernel-1
patch-rml-2.4.10-preempt-ptrace-and-jobs-fix-2
If anyone else is using/trying it,
I applied both of them, but do I really need to apply the ptrace and jobs
f
Long-ish report with a few questions, please bear with me...
I was upgrading a sid machine I use as a vpn gateway from kernel 2.2.17 to
2.4.9. Poptop stopped working with pptp-linux from the machine that's the
other end of the pptp tunnel (sid, kernel 2.2.17).
Now it's a very convoluted story whi
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 02:39:00PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 06:34:08PM +0800, Liu Tao wrote:
> >> Does someone know how to get the kernel patch
> >> for compiling kernel 2.4 with g
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 06:34:08PM +0800, Liu Tao wrote:
>> Does someone know how to get the kernel patch
>> for compiling kernel 2.4 with gcc3.0?
>
> Er, until gcc 3.0 is more proven, why would you want to do this?
To se
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 06:34:08PM +0800, Liu Tao wrote:
> Does someone know how to get the kernel patch
> for compiling kernel 2.4 with gcc3.0?
Er, until gcc 3.0 is more proven, why would you want to do this?
--
Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better
Micromu
Does someone know how to get the kernel patch
for compiling kernel 2.4 with gcc3.0?
Thanks
Liu Tao
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This URL has links for vpn kernel patches.
http://www.impsec.org/linux/masquerade/ip_masq_vpn.html
--
Andrew
> 2.3.99pre-n has USB already in it. Also, the bunch that are producing
>
Of course, I meant the reiserfs patch. Sorry for mixing things up. :)
> ReiserFS are alledgedly working hard to produce a patch suitable for
> inclusion in 2.3.x. They have one available, but last I noticed it
> was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Kristian Rink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anybody have an idea what to do to get both USB *and*
> rfs in the same kernel? Is there an USB patch for 2.3.99?
2.3.99pre-n has USB already in it. Also, the bunch that are producing
ReiserFS a
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
> Once upon a time, I heard Rob say
>
> > Hmm.. I have one for 2.2.14, one of the reasons I don't just
> > go up to .15 ... also a reiserfs patch..
> >
> I have been using 2.2.14 reiser patch on 2.2.15 since pre10, for about 2-3
> months now, the pat
Once upon a time, I heard Rob say
> Hmm.. I have one for 2.2.14, one of the reasons I don't just
> go up to .15 ... also a reiserfs patch..
>
I have been using 2.2.14 reiser patch on 2.2.15 since pre10, for about 2-3
months now, the patch applied cleanly and I haven't found a problem yet.
--
Cha
Hmm.. I have one for 2.2.14, one of the reasons I don't just
go up to .15 ... also a reiserfs patch..
Let me know if you are interested and I'll dig up a link or
just attach it..
Rob
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 09:59:37AM +0200, Gijs van der Brugge wrote:
> list,
>
> this question isn't exactly o
list,
this question isn't exactly one specifically Debian, but since I use
Debian, i figured why not :)
Running a dual boot system with win98, I prefer to use Debian yet there's
one problem; every now and then I transfer files fom distance computers
to my own one using cd-rw discs. Now I've fou
Hi dear gurus
I would like to use the supermount features on cdrom
& floppy disks. But I don't know how to apply the patch file
to kernel. (currently running slink 2.0.36)
Can somebody tell me please ?
Thanks in advance.
Alan
Hi,
after patching my kernel (2.3.29) with cat patch-2.3.30 | patch -p0 I get
warnings when I run
make dep clean modules modules_install bzImage bzlilo
echo "SECTIONS { .data : { input_len = .; LONG(input_data_end - input_data)
input_data = .; *(.data) input_data_end = .; }}" > $tmppiggy.lnk;
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 09:56:11AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how or where to find information about applying a kernel
> patch. Can someone point me in the right direction? I have the kernel
> sources, and the appropriate kernel patch deb, but do I apply t
Oh, never mind. I'm a moron. I looked at found out why at
http://sunsite.auc.dk/linux-newbie/kernel_upgrade.htm.
i'm a moron 8-(
>I'm not sure how or where to find information about applying a kernel patch.
Can someone point me in the right direction? I have the kerne
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
