On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Vegh Karoly wrote:
> Feb 05 18:57:28 Call to tei 69 from onCONNECT (Data)
> Feb 05 18:57:28 Call to tei 69 from onINTERFACE isdn0 called by 9905
> Feb 05 18:57:36 Call to tei 69 from onNormal call clearing (Private
> network serving local user)
> Feb 05 18:57
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, George Karaolides wrote:
> Can't see anything wrong with these, at first glance at least.
Dont search it any more, i found it.
Because of the telephone system was the whole failure.
Luckily we have two systems in the house, and when we tried it through the
other one, it went s
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, George Karaolides wrote:
> Can't see anything wrong with these, at first glance at least.
>
> Send me the output of
>
> ifconfig on both machines.
on the one which should phone:
inet:/etc# ifconfig isdn0
isdn0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FC:FC:0A:01:14:01
inet
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Vegh Karoly wrote:
> Current setup of interface 'isdn0':
>
> EAZ/MSN:9905
Can't see anything wrong with these, at first glance at least.
Send me the output of
ifconfig on both machines.
Best regards,
| George Karaolides 8, Costakis Pantelide
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, George Karaolides wrote:
> Please do:
>
> isdnctrl list
>
> on both computers, and post the output.
the local computer:
inet:/etc# isdnctrl list isdn0
Current setup of interface 'isdn0':
EAZ/MSN:9905
Phone number(s):
Outgoing: 9907
Incoming:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Vegh Karoly wrote:
> also they do see eachother, they connect, but they also sofort do a
> HANGUP, and this is what i dont like...
> what/how shall i fix it?
> TO tell the truth i dont know what should happen, but i await at least
> that a ping goes through... what should be t
Hi, thanks for the help.
> Which one you choose depends on your needs. If you are to network two
> computers which are both under your control, then I suggest you use rawip
> for the folllowing reasons:
>
> - Simpler configuration.
[...]
sounds good. I dont need to allow users dial in, i only
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Vegh Karoly wrote:
> I'd like to set up an ISDN connection, in case the net-connection would be
> unreachable.
> I mean direct, because the two computers are far away from eachother, and
> we really need a fallback connection.
> I would like to be able to
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 18:27, Vegh Karoly wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to set up an ISDN connection, in case the net-connection would be
> unreachable.
> I mean direct, because the two computers are far away from eachother, and
> we really need a fallback connection.
Hi all,
I'd like to set up an ISDN connection, in case the net-connection would be
unreachable.
I mean direct, because the two computers are far away from eachother, and
we really need a fallback connection.
I would like to be able to dial in to the other ISDN computer, but found
only H
It might be that I have not upgrade the isdnutils package in the right way.
However, just wanted to warn you that since there is now a ipppd package which
is separate from the isdnutils package, you better download it before upgrading
the isdnutils package.
Another reason why unstable will live u
Hi,
Can someone help get out of my ISDN potato configuration
problems?
I made the following changes
device.ippp0:
LOCALMSN= 4 last number of the caller
REMOTEMSN= ISP phone number
LEADINGZERO=''
I have entries in chap-secrets et pap-secrets, these
entries were creat
Hi,
Since kernel 2.2.3 I was unable to get my isdn connection with a PCBIT
card (manufactured in Portugal).
My /var/log/syslog file looks like:
---cut here---
Apr 1 22:09:12 cavern kernel: ippp0: dialing 0 ...
Apr 1 22:09:20 cavern kernel: isdn_net: local hangup ippp0
Apr 1 22:09:20
its sleeve. But, if all you want to do is
surf the web, it might be just what you want.
>Question 3. If we use Apache (or other server software), how does it work
>???
If the document wasn't already cached, Apache or Squid would download the
document (oh behalf of one of the other mac
Thanks for the complete and very speedy response Mitch - now I know why I
use and preach Debian !!!
Ivan.
ivan wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Myself and a group of friends wish to connect to WWW by using a permanent
> connection but if we all have 33.6K modems and are all connected then it
> seems that we require at least a 512K connection which is prohibitively
> expensive !
>
> Question 1. Is the calcula
Hello All,
Myself and a group of friends wish to connect to WWW by using a permanent
connection but if we all have 33.6K modems and are all connected then it
seems that we require at least a 512K connection which is prohibitively
expensive !
Question 1. Is the calculation: = div correct ? (ie
17 matches
Mail list logo
