"Bob Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>What exactly IS exim?
>IOW: when I setup sendmail, I'm working with bash scripts.
>when I setup an exim conf file - what exactly runs it? perl?
The exim configuration file is written in an Exim-specific language
parsed by nothing but Exim.
Hi,
I see your frustration.
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:26:38PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Dec 5, 8:00 pm, "Sergio Cuéllar Valdés" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > 2007/12/5, Bob Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > What exactly IS exim?
> >
> > > IOW: when I setup sendmail, I'm worki
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Goldberg wrote:
>
> i've spent DAYS trying to get exim to work to no avail.
In that case, don't use Exim. I'm not being sarcastic.
It's not a put-down. Exim isn't as arcane as Sendmail,
but I found it m
Bob Goldberg([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Dec 5, 9:40 pm, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> interesting...
> I did try it w/o enclosing fail in it's own braces...
> but the expansion still shows "fail" when in fact, the lookup was
> successful.
>
> Does a
On Dec 6, 12:50 pm, David Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Bob Goldberg wrote:
>
> > when I setup an exim conf file - what exactly runs it? perl?
>
> Exim reads it in itself. Just like Sendmail reads in sendmail.cf.
>
> Unless you're talking about Debian's Rube-Gol
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 01:22:58PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
> On Dec 5, 9:40 pm, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:26:38PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > ie: the command line [from my router] is:
> > > data = [EMAIL PROTECTED]/etc/exim4/email
On Dec 5, 9:40 pm, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:26:38PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ie: the command line [from my router] is:
> > data = [EMAIL PROTECTED]/etc/exim4/email-accept}
> > {:fail: User unknown }}
>
> > what interpreter can I execut
On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Bob Goldberg wrote:
when I setup an exim conf file - what exactly runs it? perl?
Exim reads it in itself. Just like Sendmail reads in sendmail.cf.
Unless you're talking about Debian's Rube-Goldbergian system for
building an Exim config file from pieces. I never
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:26:38PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At the end of all this research, I STILL find myself trying to
> diagnose why my router isn't working; and it's a pretty darn simple
> router at that. getting useful error messages out of exim debug is
> worthless.
>
> So I thou
On Dec 5, 8:00 pm, "Sergio Cuéllar Valdés" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2007/12/5, Bob Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What exactly IS exim?
>
> > IOW: when I setup sendmail, I'm working with bash scripts.
>
> > when I setup an exim conf file - what exactly runs it? perl?
>
> Hello,
>
> you shoul
2007/12/5, Bob Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i've spent DAYS trying to get exim to work to no avail.
>
> so let me start at the beginning.
>
> What exactly IS exim?
>
> IOW: when I setup sendmail, I'm working with bash scripts.
>
> when I setup an exim conf file - what exactly runs it? perl?
He
i've spent DAYS trying to get exim to work to no avail.
so let me start at the beginning.
What exactly IS exim?
IOW: when I setup sendmail, I'm working with bash scripts.
when I setup an exim conf file - what exactly runs it? perl?
Ok. I may not make much sense...
(NOTE. I am not trying do anything particular, just wondering about
the general idea of rewriting).
When sending mail in the following way:
Host1 --->Host2
and we want it to appear to come from Host3.
Can Host1 rewrite a message header and then send it t
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 09:02:39AM +0930, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Use ssh, or telnet, if you must (although that's just as risky).
>
> I've heard it said that rlogin has security problems, but I don't
> understand why? And surely if there are problems,
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 09:02:39AM +0930, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> I've heard it said that rlogin has security problems, but I don't
> understand why? And surely if there are problems, these would be
> fixable? Isn't Debian supposed to be extra security fix aware?
the r* commands are flawed by
Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Aaarrgh! Not the dreaded r-services! Don't allow them. Shut them
> > off. They are evil, and a great source of amusement to all
> > crackers. Use ssh, or telnet, if you must (although that's just as
>
Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 09:56:11AM +0930, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> >
> > Suppose for example you want to allow exteral rlogins to your
> > computer. I presume you modify the inetd.conf file to include the line:
> >
> > login stream tcp nowait root /usr
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 09:56:11AM +0930, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a little confused about how the external services thing works.
>
> Suppose for example you want to allow exteral rlogins to your
> computer. I presume you modify the inetd.conf file to include the line:
>
> login str
Hi,
I am a little confused about how the external services thing works.
Suppose for example you want to allow exteral rlogins to your
computer. I presume you modify the inetd.conf file to include the line:
login stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/in.rlogind
Now when is this file
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fredrick Schmitt) writes:
> You knew what I meant. What is the most gutless system I could run it on
> (weakest processor)?
It has to be 32-bit or better, so 286 or worse won't work. (This is for
x86, the other ports I don't know about).
386SX/16, 4mb RAM, ~40mb HD.
That's the requirement for any Linux distro.
To install Debian > 1.3, you must have at least 6 (or is it 8) mb of RAM,
but once it's installed, you can take out the extra 2-4mb, and run it just
on 4mb.
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Fredrick Schmitt wrote:
> You knew what I
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 08:47:19PM -0500, Fredrick Schmitt wrote:
> Is the setup text based or graphial? What are the extra features this
> opperating system has over my RH6 box? What system would be the
> cheeziest I could run it on?
there has been a LARGE discussion on it about a week ago.
The S
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 08:32:52AM -0500, Fredrick Schmitt wrote:
> You knew what I meant. What is the most gutless system I could run it on
> (weakest processor)?
I'd guess either a 386SX/16 or an old m68k box. Probably the 386 is the
better option - many old m68k machines are too underspeced t
You knew what I meant. What is the most gutless system I could run it on
(weakest processor)?
Rob Mahurin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 08:47:19PM -0500, Fredrick Schmitt wrote:
> > What system would be the cheeziest I could run it on?
>
> Unfortunately, you cannot run Debian on a block of
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 20:26:35 -0700, NatePuri wrote:
> 4. Menu integration. When ever you install an X app dpkg will update
> your menus in all you window managers. Whether you use KDE, GNOME,
> icewm or fvwm your menus will always reflect the packages you have
> installed. No hand
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 08:47:19PM -0500, Fredrick Schmitt wrote:
> What system would be the cheeziest I could run it on?
Unfortunately, you cannot run Debian on a block of cheese. Work on a
cheese port is in progress, but is not even ready yet for the alpha
release. Until then, you must run Deb
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 08:47:19PM -0500, Fredrick Schmitt wrote:
> Is the setup text based or graphial? What are the extra features this
> opperating system has over my RH6 box? What system would be the
> cheeziest I could run it on?
Oh boy, you have hit a nerve. You will get quite a lot of resp
Text-based.
The extra features are multiple -- the package management is by far the best
I have ever seen in any product. (I haven't tried FreeBSD yet, though.. I
hear it is nice too. :)
The updates are far more often. (Security patches are released within hours
of finding the problems..)
There
Is the setup text based or graphial? What are the extra features this
opperating system has over my RH6 box? What system would be the
cheeziest I could run it on?
here's another working example. in my case, the
Win95 host is not on the same ethernet subnet as my
debian (slink) host, so I use a command like:
smbmount //spunk/E spunk-e -I spunk.spanky.org -U spazwit
(host and user names changed to protect the innocent)
Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
>
> I
I have used the command:
smbmount //HS03/scanagar /mnt -U scanagaratna
to mount a filesystem scanagar on maching HS03 on /mnt on my harddrive.
So I do not understand the problem. HS04 runs NT, and run Debian Linux 2.1
Sebastian Canagaratna
Department of Chemistry
Ohio Northern University
Ada,
Jérôme Zago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "smbclient //servif3/user4if -U jzago" works just fine but I would like to
> mount this share to /mnt/servif3.
>
> "Usage: smbmount-2.1.x service [-p port] [-d debuglevel] [-l log]"
> it seems like smbclient. where does I provide the mount point ?
smbm
What kernel version are you using???
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't figure how to mount SMB shares...
>
> "smbclient //servif3/user4if -U jzago" works just fine but I would like to
> mount this share to /mnt/servif3.
smbclient works with _any_ kernel version (2.0.x, 2.1.x, and
2.2.0prex)
On Sun, Jan 03, 1999 at 05:11:34PM +0100, Jérôme Zago wrote:
> I can't figure how to mount SMB shares...
>
> "smbclient //servif3/user4if -U jzago" works just fine but I would like to
> mount this share to /mnt/servif3.
>
> "Usage: smbmount-2.1.x service [-p port] [-d debuglevel] [-l log]"
> it
I can't figure how to mount SMB shares...
"smbclient //servif3/user4if -U jzago" works just fine but I would like to
mount this share to /mnt/servif3.
"Usage: smbmount-2.1.x service [-p port] [-d debuglevel] [-l log]"
it seems like smbclient. where does I provide the mount point ?
Thanks for y
ee procmail when I do a ps -a).
>
> If I am offline and I send mail, they are save in /var/save/mqueue.
>
> What soft have to send them when I am on-line ? (procmail ?) How does it know
> if it can send
> the messages ? Can I lost the message if I disconnect while this m
e/mqueue.
>
> What soft have to send them when I am on-line ? (procmail ?) How does it know
> if it can send
> the messages ? Can I lost the message if I disconnect while this mysterious
> software is
> sending the messages ?
For me, when messages are on queue and I go online,
soft have to send them when I am on-line ? (procmail ?) How does it know
if it can send
the messages ? Can I lost the message if I disconnect while this mysterious
software is
sending the messages ?
As you can see, I am far away from being a linux guru !!! So, any help would be
appreciated.
(Yo
38 matches
Mail list logo
