On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Jack Schneider wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:54:32 -0500
> Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jack Schneider
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think I found a significant glitch.. I appears that mdadm is
>> > confused. I think it happened when I created
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:54:32 -0500
Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jack Schneider
> wrote:
> >
> > I think I found a significant glitch.. I appears that mdadm is
> > confused. I think it happened when I created the /dev/md2 array
> > from the new disks. It looks like the meta
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jack Schneider wrote:
>
> I think I found a significant glitch.. I appears that mdadm is
> confused. I think it happened when I created the /dev/md2 array from
> the new disks. It looks like the metadata 1.2 vs 0.90 configs is the
> culprit...
>
> Here's the
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:31:29 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > It booted to the correct grub menu then to Busy Box. I am thinking
> > it goes to BB because it can't find /var and or /usr on the
> > md1/sda5 LVM partition.
>
> Very likely.
>
> > I checked /proc/mdstat and lo &
Jack Schneider wrote:
> It booted to the correct grub menu then to Busy Box. I am thinking it
> goes to BB because it can't find /var and or /usr on the md1/sda5 LVM
> partition.
Very likely.
> I checked /proc/mdstat and lo & behold there was md1:active
> with correct partitions and md0: active a
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:19:11 -0200
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
> > Both /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab show entries for /dev/md126..
> >
> > What the ... ?
>
> After you modified thei files in the real filesystem, did you update
> the initramfs?
>
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
> Both /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab show entries for /dev/md126..
>
> What the ... ?
After you modified thei files in the real filesystem, did you update the
initramfs?
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all an
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:43:16 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > mdadm --stop /dev/md125
> > > mdadm --assemble /dev/md0
> > > --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
> > >
> > > mdadm --stop /dev/126
> > > mdadm --assemble /dev/md1
> > > --update=
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:43:16 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > mdadm --stop /dev/md125
> > > mdadm --assemble /dev/md0
> > > --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
> > >
> > > mdadm --stop /dev/126
> > > mdadm --assemble /dev/md1
> > > --update=
Jack Schneider wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > mdadm --stop /dev/md125
> > mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
> >
> > mdadm --stop /dev/126
> > mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 --update=super-minor /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5
>
> Bob, a small glitch. mdadm:/dev/sda1 exists
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:50:12 -0600
Jack Schneider wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:29 -0700
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > Jack Schneider wrote:
> > > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > > But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the
> > > > new disk array to the LVM volume group on the above
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:29 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the new
> > > disk array to the LVM volume group on the above array? If so
> > > then you are not done yet. The LVM volume group won
Jack Schneider wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Note that if you add new disk to the lvm root volume group then you
> > also need to rebuild the initrd or your system won't be able to
> > assemble the array at boot time and will fail to boot. (Saying that
> > mostly for people who find this in the a
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:29 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:> will be well..
>
> I have my fingers crossed for you that it will all be okay.
>
> > I have not done the things you have suggested above. I'll wait for
> > your response and then go!!!
>
> Plea
Jack Schneider wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the new disk
> > array to the LVM volume group on the above array? If so then you are
> > not done yet. The LVM volume group won't be able to assemble without
> > the new disk. If you did then
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:19:03 -0600
Jack Schneider wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:42:49 -0700
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > Jack,
> >
> > With your pastebin information and the mdstat information (that last
> > information in your mail and pastebins was critical good stuff) and
> > I found this ol
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:42:49 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack,
>
> With your pastebin information and the mdstat information (that last
> information in your mail and pastebins was critical good stuff) and
> I found this old posting from you too: :-)
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/200
Jack,
With your pastebin information and the mdstat information (that last
information in your mail and pastebins was critical good stuff) and
I found this old posting from you too: :-)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/10/msg00808.html
With all of that I deduce the following:
/dev/
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:57:46 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Jack Schneider wrote:
> > > > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > > > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > > > used or formatted.
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:57:46 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Jack Schneider wrote:
> > > > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > > > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > > > used or formatted.
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:57:46 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Jack Schneider wrote:
> > > > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > > > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > > > used or formatted.
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
> >> > >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
> >> > >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the ke
Jack Schneider wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Jack Schneider wrote:
> > > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > > used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
> > > a live Ubun
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Jack Schneider wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> Jack Schneider wrote:
>> >
>> > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
>> > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
>> > used or form
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
>> > >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
>> > >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
>> > >> will change the mdX designation
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Jack Schneider wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:16:37 -0500
> Tom H wrote:
>> >> >
> [BIG SNIP]
>
>> >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
>> >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
>> >> will change the mdX
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
> > a live U
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:06:11 -0200
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
> > > >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
> > > >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the
> > > >> kernel will change the mdX desig
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
> > >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
> > >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
> > >> will change the mdX designations.
> > >>
> > >> Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your partitions.
Wha
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
> > a live U
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:16:37 -0500
Tom H wrote:
> >> >
[BIG SNIP]
> >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
> >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
> >> will change the mdX designations.
> >>
> >> Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your p
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Jack Schneider wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:43:53 -0500
> Rob Owens wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
>> >
>> > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
>> > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
>>
>> I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
>> until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
>> used or formatted. I configured a new arra
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:06:17 -0600
Jack Schneider wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:43:53 -0500
> Rob Owens wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > > until ~7 days ago) There are 4
Jack Schneider wrote:
> I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from a
> live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end result was the
> n
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:43:53 -0500
Rob Owens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
> >
> > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > used or formatted. I configured a
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
>
> I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from a
> live Ubuntu CD. That's whe
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from a
live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end result was the
names of the arrays were changed
38 matches
Mail list logo
