/usr/share/man/man1/gnome-www-browser.1.gz \
> gnome-www-browser.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/firefox-esr.1.gz
> fi
>
> if [ "$1" = "configure" ] ; then
> rm -rf /usr/lib/firefox-esr/updates
> fi
>
> Good luck.
Yes, I was considering doing that.
On 2025-02-13, Chris Green wrote:
> Max Nikulin wrote:
>> On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> > Now Debian has*two* completely separate
>> > ways to specify a default application for a role.
>>
>> I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
>> particular applicat
On 13/02/2025 09:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 08:56:47 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
- *browser alternatives
- BROWSER environment
- mailcap for text/html
I have realized that I do not have an example of an application that
determines https: scheme handler from mailcap (it is
Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Now Debian has*two* completely separate
> > ways to specify a default application for a role.
>
> I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
> particular applications)
> - *browser alternatives
> - BROWSER
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 08:56:47 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Now Debian has*two* completely separate
> > ways to specify a default application for a role.
>
> I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
> particular applications)
On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Now Debian has*two* completely separate
ways to specify a default application for a role.
I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
particular applications)
- *browser alternatives
- BROWSER environment
- mailcap for text/html
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:34:32 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> urlCommand "sensible-browser '%s'"
hobbit:~$ type -a sensible-browser
sensible-browser is /usr/bin/sensible-browser
sensible-browser is /bin/sensible-browser
hobbit:~$ ls -l /usr/bin/sensible-browser
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1290
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
> Greg (HE12025-02-12):
>> What is going on? You suggested examining the source code.
>
> No, I suggested reading the documentation. Others have suggested other
> avenues that lead to understanding. These are good answers. The
> suggestions to uninstall and ran
Greg (HE12025-02-12):
> What is going on? You suggested examining the source code.
No, I suggested reading the documentation. Others have suggested other
avenues that lead to understanding. These are good answers. The
suggestions to uninstall and randomly fiddle with the order are
polluting the go
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> The only way to achieve a reliable result is to understand what is going
> on. I am flabbergasted that so many people on this list do not start
What is going on? You suggested examining the source code. For the end
user, this might be arduous task at best.
On 2025-02-12, David Wright wrote:
>> > >
>> > Unfortunately, as Greg Wooledge has already pointed out, there is no
>> > universal standard. If there was, this thread would've stopped ages
>> > ago.
>>
>> I am really surprised that this thread is so long. However I am still
>> curious whether xf
Greg (HE12025-02-12):
> Simply reversing the installation order of the two browsers seems the
> most direct and easiest solution.
It might achieve the result. A solution…
What will the OP do if they install another browser to try something and
it becomes the default one? Uninstall them all and r
On Wed 12 Feb 2025 at 22:54:15 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 12/02/2025 22:09, Greg wrote:
> > On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
> > > Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
> > > (XDG) way to configure media types and applications associations.
> > >
> > Unfort
e multiple ways in which a
> browser can be chosen. Some, most notably, circumventing system
> preferences.
The OP installed Vivaldi and then Epiphany, and Epiphany became the
default browser, which wasn't the OP's desire. I simply suggested that
he inverse the procedure as a metho
Chris Green wrote:
> Anssi Saari wrote:
> > Chris Green writes:
> >
> > > Installing epiphany just added it as a choice but left vivaldi as the
> > > configured browser, but still epiphany grabbed everything.
> >
> > Have you considered y
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:36:46 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
Hello Greg,
>What exactly is he after? I was under the impression it was setting the
>default browser to Vivaldi.
Yes, but as has been explained, there are multiple ways in which a
browser can be chosen. Some, most notably, circumventing sys
On 12/02/2025 22:09, Greg wrote:
On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
(XDG) way to configure media types and applications associations.
Unfortunately, as Greg Wooledge has already pointed out, there is no
universal standard.
Greg wrote:
> On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
> >> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
> >
> > At worst, the source code is the documentation.
>
> I think Chris had the right idea. Install Epiphan
On 2025-02-12, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:09:38 - (UTC)
> Greg wrote:
>
> Hello Greg,
>
>>Simply reversing the installation order of the two browsers seems the
>>most direct and easiest solution.=20
>
> Still with, of course, no guarantee of successfully achieving exactly
>
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:09:38 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
Hello Greg,
>Simply reversing the installation order of the two browsers seems the
>most direct and easiest solution.
Still with, of course, no guarantee of successfully achieving exactly
what Chris is after.
--
Regards _ "Valid si
On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 12/02/2025 20:55, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
>>> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
>>
>> At worst, the source code is the documentation.
>
> Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the
On 12/02/2025 20:55, Nicolas George wrote:
Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
At worst, the source code is the documentation.
Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
(XDG) way to configure media types and
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
> Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
>> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
>
> At worst, the source code is the documentation.
I think Chris had the right idea. Install Epiphany first, and then
Vivaldi, instead of the o
On 2025-02-12, Chris Green wrote:
>>
>> If you want a Linux way to solve the issue: first, read the
>> documentation of xfce-terminal to see how it decides which web browser
>> to run; then read the documentation of that mechanism to see how to
>> configure it.
>>
> I have looked in the xfce4-te
Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
At worst, the source code is the documentation.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
Nicolas George wrote:
> Chris Green (12025-02-12):
> > I'm just wondering if a way round the issue may be to unistall
> > vivaldi, then install epiphany, then re-install vivaldi. It might be
> > that just doing 'apt reinstall vivaldi' will get me back to whe
> > > very much can install something for one user and not for another in a
> > > browser.
> >
> > How? If I install epiphany using alt then it sets itself as the
> > default browser in just about every location I know about and some
> > that I don't. The
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:18:23AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:06:53 +, Chris Green wrote:
> > The specific thing that bit me when I installed epiphany was clicking
> > on a web link in a terminal (xfce4-terminal) window. Instead of
> > op
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:06:53 +, Chris Green wrote:
> The specific thing that bit me when I installed epiphany was clicking
> on a web link in a terminal (xfce4-terminal) window. Instead of
> opening the link in the already running vivaldi, in another workspace
> (which is the w
On 12/02/2025 17:23, Nicolas George wrote:
If you want a Linux way to solve the issue: first, read the
documentation of xfce-terminal to see how it decides which web browser
to run;
I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented. Perhaps
XFCE has a configuration menu. Most GUI app
one user and not for another in a
> > browser.
>
> How? If I install epiphany using alt then it sets itself as the
> default browser in just about every location I know about and some
> that I don't. These settings apply to all users on the system.
Installing a browser is v
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> Chris Green wrote:
> > debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > songbird wrote:
> > > > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > > ...
> > > > > > It would
Chris Green (12025-02-12):
> I'm just wondering if a way round the issue may be to unistall
> vivaldi, then install epiphany, then re-install vivaldi. It might be
> that just doing 'apt reinstall vivaldi' will get me back to where I
> want to be.
That might be
Anssi Saari wrote:
> Chris Green writes:
>
> > Installing epiphany just added it as a choice but left vivaldi as the
> > configured browser, but still epiphany grabbed everything.
>
> Have you considered you may get better information if you actually
> define this &q
Chris Green writes:
> Installing epiphany just added it as a choice but left vivaldi as the
> configured browser, but still epiphany grabbed everything.
Have you considered you may get better information if you actually
define this "everything"? For me it's the small handfu
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:24:28AM +, Chris Green wrote:
[...]
> Er, but that's the whole problem!!! I installed epiphany (using apt)
> and it **did** force all 'the other users' (including me) to use it.
> You have described the problem in a nutshell! :-)
T
Chris Green wrote:
> debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > Chris Green wrote:
> > > songbird wrote:
> > > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > > It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or
> > &
wrote:
> > > > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > > ...
> > > > > > It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or
> > > > > > another browser) **not** to try and become the default for
> > > > > > everything, rather
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 08:21:02PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > Chris Green wrote:
> > > songbird wrote:
> > > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > > It would be much easier if I could simply te
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> Chris Green wrote:
> > songbird wrote:
> > > Chris Green wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or
> > > > another browser) **not** to try and become the default fo
Chris Green wrote:
> songbird wrote:
> > Chris Green wrote:
> > ...
> > > It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or
> > > another browser) **not** to try and become the default for
> > > everything, rather than having to try a
Chris Green wrote:
> songbird wrote:
>> Chris Green wrote:
>> ...
>> > It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or another
>> > browser) **not** to try and become the default for everything, rather
>> > than having to try and unset all th
songbird wrote:
> Chris Green wrote:
> ...
> > It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or another
> > browser) **not** to try and become the default for everything, rather
> > than having to try and unset all the changes it has made.
>
> Chris
Chris Green wrote:
...
> It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or another
> browser) **not** to try and become the default for everything, rather
> than having to try and unset all the changes it has made.
Chris, for something like testing i would just set up
ano
On 10/02/2025 22:25, Chris Green wrote:
It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or another
browser) **not** to try and become the default for everything, rather
than having to try and unset all the changes it has made.
Installing an application may change order of candidates
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:45:06 +, Chris Green wrote:
> > I had x-www-browser set to vivaldi but web links still got opened in
> > epiphany, I tried changing just about every setting I could find for a
> > browser to vivaldi but I still got epiphan
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:45:06 +, Chris Green wrote:
> I had x-www-browser set to vivaldi but web links still got opened in
> epiphany, I tried changing just about every setting I could find for a
> browser to vivaldi but I still got epiphany.
There isn't a single interfac
Anssi Saari wrote:
> Chris Green writes:
>
> > However, when I install epiphany it takes over every single thing that
> > web browsers can do which is very frustrating, I only want to run it
> > explicitly for testing. Is there any way to prevent the install
> >
Chris Green writes:
> However, when I install epiphany it takes over every single thing that
> web browsers can do which is very frustrating, I only want to run it
> explicitly for testing. Is there any way to prevent the install
> changing all the mailcap and mime settings etc.
I use vivaldi as my my web browser and I have it set as the default
application for everything web related. In particular it get's used
to open web links when you use the context menu to open a web link in
a text file.
I want to install another browser (epiphany) as a backup/testing
browser
ding: 7bit
From: Kurt King
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: epiphany-browser: unexpected close while displaying new-password
response
Message-ID: <165462412049.119133.8487592676138933102.reportbug@cm600-gladiator>
X-Mailer: reportbug 7.10.3+deb11u1
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 13:48:40 -04
he Dynamics were
"flattened", but then saw this Thread. Thanks again!
Relevant issue here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/issues/838
+1
>
> Best regards,
> Max
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Saturday, July 27, 2019 7:07 PM, Shahryar Afifi <
>
On 2019-07-27, Shahryar Afifi wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestion but it did not fix the issue
/etc/pulse/daemon.conf or ~/.config/pulse/daemon.conf
flat-volumes = no
$ pulseaudio -k
$ pulseaudio --start
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PulseAudio/Troubleshooting#Per-application_vol
On 2019-07-27, Shahryar Afifi wrote:
> Also, this happens when video ends and another begins.
> Where can I find the log files?
>From November 2016:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844994
Suggested workaround:
setting 'flat-volumes = no' in /etc/pulse/daemon.conf
Recent dup
This should be fixable with "flat-volumes = no" in /etc/pulse/daemon.conf
Relevant issue here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/issues/838
Best regards,
Max
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, July 27, 2019 7:07 PM, Shahryar Afifi
wrote:
> Also, this happens wh
Also, this happens when video ends and another begins.
Where can I find the log files?
Thank you.
bsuter amd64
gnome web 3.32.1.2
Hi All,
OK this got fixed now with tonight update. I can see some gir1.2-webkit2-
4.0, gir1.2-javascriptcoregtk-4.0, libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37, libjavascriptcoregtk-
4.0-18 updated, but I don't feel checking one by one which is the responsible.
Thanks Kent for answering my previous mails and good luck
Hi Kent and All,
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 16:01 -0500, Kent West wrote:
>
>
> > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Abou Al Montacir
wrote:
> > Hi Kent,
> > Thanks for testing. On my side I have:
> > > > > > > > > > >
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Abou Al Montacir
wrote:
> Hi Kent,
>
> Thanks for testing. On my side I have:
>
> # aptitude show epiphany-browser
>
> Package: epiphany-browser
>
> Version: 3.20.3-2
>
> State: installed
>
> Automatically installed: no
&g
Hi Kent,
Thanks for testing. On my side I have:
# aptitude show epiphany-browser
Package: epiphany-browser
Version: 3.20.3-2
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Priority: optional
Section: gnome
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers
Architecture: amd64
Uncompressed Size
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Abou Al Montacir
wrote:
>
> I'm using epiphany browser fro long time and was generally happy despite
> some missing features.
> However since few weeks it become very slowly and almost non usable.
> Browsing sites like http://ddg.gg became so
Dear All,
I'm using epiphany browser fro long time and was generally happy despite some
missing features.
However since few weeks it become very slowly and almost non usable. Browsing
sites like http://ddg.gg became so painful that I start hating it.
Other sites also, like google+, which
On 2/7/15, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>
> For me epiphany 3.14.1 opens up normally under normal user account.
> With root account, I see the following display error.
>
> rajulocal@hogwarts ~/learning % su
> Password:
> root@hogwarts:/home/rajulocal/learning# epiphany
&g
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Ethan Rosenberg
wrote:
> Dear List -
>
> I installed Epiphany with the package manager and receive a segmentation
> fault message if I try to run from the command line. It will not run at all
> from the desktop. The permissions are 777, and it
Hello everybody!
I like to use epiphany for web browsing and I was very happy with
announcement of pocket support. I already set up my pocket account in
gnome-online-accounts but I can't see any "save for later" button on
epiphany. Does anyone knows if this works on Debian?
Th
Dear List -
I installed Epiphany with the package manager and receive a segmentation fault message if I try to
run from the command line. It will not run at all from the desktop. The permissions are 777, and it
is owned by me.
ethan@meow:~$ which epiphany
/usr/bin/epiphany
ethan@meow:~$ su
Dear List -
I receive the following message when trying to run Epiphany - "No running instance of xfce4-panel
was found".
However -
root@meow:/home/ethan/Desktop# /usr/bin/xfce4-panel
(xfce4-panel:9580): xfce4-panel-WARNING **: Failed to connect to the D-BUS session bus: Did not
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:34 +, Camaleón wrote:
> P.S. Ralf, I like to see deviations from the main subject but consider in
> tagging your replies as such.
Apologize for not adding OT to the subject.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:24:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:11 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> deficient company
>
> deficient + company = unfortunately a tautology nowadays There's no
> reason for even market economy to be evil. Of course, there's a small
> border between social
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:11 +, Camaleón wrote:
> deficient company
deficient + company = unfortunately a tautology nowadays
There's no reason for even market economy to be evil. Of course, there's
a small border between social market and "vanilla market economy".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:55:46 +0300, Razvan Deaconescu wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>> Wait... the above links seems to point that the newer Epiphany is based
>> in GTK3 and thus cannot work with Adobe Flash Player which is GTK2
>> based so it needs "nspluginwrapper&quo
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:50:10 +0300, Razvan Deaconescu wrote:
>
>> I'm using Debian Wheezy, updated, on AMD64, with Gnome 3.4,
>> flashplugin-nonfree 2.8.3. Flash plugin is working in Iceweasel and
>> Midori but not under Epiphany.
>>
>>
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:50:10 +0300, Razvan Deaconescu wrote:
> I'm using Debian Wheezy, updated, on AMD64, with Gnome 3.4,
> flashplugin-nonfree 2.8.3. Flash plugin is working in Iceweasel and
> Midori but not under Epiphany.
>
> I've followed the steps here[1] but wi
Hi!
I'm using Debian Wheezy, updated, on AMD64, with Gnome 3.4,
flashplugin-nonfree 2.8.3. Flash plugin is working in Iceweasel and
Midori but not under Epiphany.
I've followed the steps here[1] but with no success.
Could you please point me to a solution to this issue?
; My preferred sound device is a Plantronics .Audio 646 DSP usb headset.
> I have also tried plugging in a set of Apple ear buds to the
> traditional sound jacks. I do not get any sound from any source when
> attempting to play videos from VLC, Iceweasel, or Epiphany.
(...)
Your prefe
DSP usb
> > headset. I have also tried plugging in a set of Apple ear buds to the
> > traditional sound jacks. I do not get any sound from any source when
> > attempting to play videos from VLC, Iceweasel, or Epiphany.
> >
> > I am using Debian Squeeze.
>
>
order and Totem Movie Player.
>
> My preferred sound device is a Plantronics .Audio 646 DSP usb
> headset. I have also tried plugging in a set of Apple ear buds to the
> traditional sound jacks. I do not get any sound from any source when
> attempting to play videos from VLC, Icew
ear buds to the traditional sound jacks.
I do not get any sound from any source when attempting to play videos from VLC,
Iceweasel, or Epiphany.
I am using Debian Squeeze.
I searched the debian-user archives and found (at least some of) the commands
I need to get the requisite information
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:34 +0200
Tomas Kral wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> How do I enable the functionality, that already visited URL links in
> Epiphany web browser, are shown in a changed colour?
>
> I was looking for some type of extension because I have installed just
>
Hello List,
How do I enable the functionality, that already visited URL links in
Epiphany web browser, are shown in a changed colour?
I was looking for some type of extension because I have installed just
bare Epiphany package. And visited links do not change the colour so far
for me.
Will any
t;> However, I have noticed some confusing behavior.
>>
>> When I follow HTTP links, e.g.:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yg0tVUnLOAM iceweasel is started. This
>> is fine and exactly what I want.
>>
>> When I follow FILE links, e.g.:
>> file:///usr
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yg0tVUnLOAM
iceweasel is started. This is fine and exactly what I want.
When I follow FILE links, e.g.:
file:///usr/share/doc/libbitstring-ocaml-dev/html/api/Bitstring.html
epiphany is started. I do not understand why epiphany and not iceweasel.
(...)
You can make Icewesel
iceweasel is started. This is fine and exactly what I want.
When I follow FILE links, e.g.:
file:///usr/share/doc/libbitstring-ocaml-dev/html/api/Bitstring.html
epiphany is started. I do not understand why epiphany and not iceweasel.
Releavant "alternatives" are set up in the fol
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:04:01 +0100, Andreas Koehler wrote:
> does anybody know what happended with the page-info extension? I cannot
> find it in epiphany-extensions 2.30.2-1 (squeeze).
Hum... yep, it seems missing :-?
Upstream package has indeed that extension bundled:
http://ftp.gno
Hi there,
does anybody know what happended with the page-info extension? I cannot
find it in epiphany-extensions 2.30.2-1 (squeeze).
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:53:34PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> > Hmmm, I've got postgreSQL running on this machine. I have never
> > installed mysql, and in fact don't want it, and yet:
> > ...
> > libaprutil1 depends on libmysqlclient15off (>> 5.0.51a).
>
> This has been
Chris Bannister wrote:
> Hmmm, I've got postgreSQL running on this machine. I have never
> installed mysql, and in fact don't want it, and yet:
> ...
> libaprutil1 depends on libmysqlclient15off (>> 5.0.51a).
This has been fixed for Squeeze circa May 2009.
See:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:36:57PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> > Yes, I care about it. I usually run Debian for headless systems that
> > don't use X or a DE, but when I'm using a GUI on Debian, and need to use
> > a Gnome program, there's much more sense to it requiring and installing
> > the bare m
}
bogofilter-common{a}
dmz-cursor-theme{a}
eog{a}
epiphany-browser{a}
epiphany-browser-data{a}
evince{a}
evince-common{a}
evolution{a}
evolution-common{a}
evolution-plugins{a}
evolution-webcal{a}
file-roller{a}
freepats{a}
gedit{a}
gedit-common{a}
gir1.0-clutter-1.0{a}
gir1.0-freedesktop{a}
gir1.0-glib
On Tue January 18 2011 05:06:52 Camaleón wrote:
> Finally, he decided to give it another role → "gnome-core" as metapackage
> for a GNOME DE that fits into a CD.
>
> Good or bad decision? Dunno, it's "just" a decision and as such can be
> enhanced, revoked, confirmed... as anything in this life :-)
Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I retired at 45, thanks to my business, which was based on my own custom
> software. The first program I released to run on my clients' computers
> was in Java, within 6 months after I learned Java and OOP. In the next 18
> months that version was in use, I had fewer than 5
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:10:30 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:36:57 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Camaleón, I read all your posts, and agree to them all. But I have to
> say I don't agree with you on this one.
No problem. I value most a good argumentation (being positive or
negative)
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:36:57 +, Camaleón wrote:
> (note that everybody can reopen a bug)
Camaleón, I read all your posts, and agree to them all. But I have to say
I don't agree with you on this one.
For *this specific case*, I *do* consider the DD's reply being
"pointlessly abrasive, inap
T o n g wrote:
> That seems to me an absurd reason.
Here is the actual reason, from http://bugs.debian.org/608098#31
| in squeeze, the gnome-session package now
| depends on the basic components that are actually needed for running a
| GNOME session. Since this change was made, I hadn’t known wh
On Mon January 17 2011 10:36:57 Camaleón wrote:
> * gnome-core = GNOME installation designed to fit on one CD
That is a CHANGE to the definition of gnome-core, which affects
many users who have gnome-core installed but not gnome-desktop-
-environment.
Here is the Lenny definition of the pac
On Mon January 17 2011 09:26:17 Hal Vaughan wrote:
> This is an example of why I've been moving away from FOSS. Someone makes a
> good point in a bug report and the programmer/developer/maintainer throws
> it back in his face, which allows the bug to be closed out quickly.
Ill-considered decision
On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:26:17PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>
>> This is an example of why I've been moving away from FOSS. Someone makes
>> a good point in a bug report and the programmer/developer/maintainer
>> throws it back in his face, whic
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:26:17 -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
(I'm going to play here the role of the devil's advocate... oh, well)
> This is an example of why I've been moving away from FOSS. Someone
> makes a good point in a bug report and the
> programmer/developer/maintainer throws it back in his f
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:26:17PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> This is an example of why I've been moving away from FOSS. Someone makes
> a good point in a bug report and the programmer/developer/maintainer
> throws it back in his face, which allows the bug to be closed out quickly.
>
> I think
On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:16 PM, T o n g wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 13:08:36 -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
>
>>>> I'm running Debian Squeeze, and I have only gnome-core installed so
>>>> that I would not have Evolution or Epiphany installed since I do not
>>&g
1 - 100 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
