Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-07 Thread Mental
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:44:43PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote: > If you have Gnome installed, you can have the Desk Guide applet; and then > you could grab one of the window thumbnails there using the middle button > (both if your mouse emulates), and move it. > At a low resolution that wastes valuable

Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread nate
> I have never tried to use X on anything less than 1024x768, but why > should it be any worse than running MS Windows at the same > resolution? (Purely considered as a graphical display -- ignore the > issue of MS Windows crashing left and right.) everything in X is big. run for an hour or 2 i

Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread mallum
on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:11:29PM +1100, Matt Chipman wrote: > > I have tried both blackbox and window maker and when they load, they > are in 16mill colors and at 800*600 but when i open a program such as > irc or any other type app, the application is huge and sometimes goes > off the screen

Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Aaron Traas wrote: > Windows apps, particularly older ones, were designed to be usable at > 640x480. I believe X started on Solaris, or at least first caught on > there, and I believe the default then was 1152x864, because at 8BPP, it > fit in 1 MB of video

Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread Aaron Traas
Craig Dickson wrote: > > nate wrote: > > > in my 5 years of running X windows my experience is X is > > unusable for the most part with anything below 1024x768. > > 800x600 is just too painful. i would reccomend using a virtual > > desktop of 1024x768 or higher if your using 800x600. see > > the

Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread Andrew Sione Taumoefolau
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:45:59AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: > I have never tried to use X on anything less than 1024x768, but why > should it be any worse than running MS Windows at the same resolution? > (Purely considered as a graphical display -- ignore the issue of MS > Windows crashing left

Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread Johnny Ernst Nielsen
>I seem to run into a problem where the OS installs fine and all the >programs work but the GUI is very large. > >I have tried both blackbox and window maker and when they load, they >are in 16mill colors and at 800*600 but when i open a program such as >irc or any other type app, the applicatio

Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread Oki DZ
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Matt Chipman wrote: > I use Debian for all my servers and have only recently decided to > give it (Debian) a go for my desktop machines as well. Consider to install Gnome too. > irc or any other type app, the application is huge and sometimes goes > off the screen so much s

Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread Craig Dickson
nate wrote: > in my 5 years of running X windows my experience is X is > unusable for the most part with anything below 1024x768. > 800x600 is just too painful. i would reccomend using a virtual > desktop of 1024x768 or higher if your using 800x600. see > the X docs on how to do this, its not too

Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread nate
> I have tried both blackbox and window maker and when they load, > they are in 16mill colors and at 800*600 but when i open a in my 5 years of running X windows my experience is X is unusable for the most part with anything below 1024x768. 800x600 is just too painful. i would reccomend using a

BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread Matt Chipman
I use Debian for all my servers and have only recently decided to give it (Debian) a go for my desktop machines as well. I seem to run into a problem where the OS installs fine and all the programs work but the GUI is very large. I have tried both blackbox and window maker and when they load, t