Bug #400560 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=400560
) has been filed for this failure.
It seems to be associated with some sort of earlier
failure (power failure in one case, ``failed update'' in the
other). I had a failed update earlier, but don't remember
the circumstanc
A. F. Cano wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:53:32PM +, John Halton wrote:
[...]
I have resisted using apg-get as I know the aptitude databases would
then be out of sync.
[...]
You could try the magic bullet "aptitude keep-all" to restore sane
behaviour after using apt-get. See
http
Mmm... I started digging into /etc/apt, didn't see anything obvious
and thus didn't change anything, but the next time I started up aptitude
it worked. Strange...
A.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:53:32PM +, John Halton wrote:
> On 12/28/06, John Halton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> >Uncaught exception:
> >../../../src/generic/problemresolver/problemresolver.h:2216:
> >generic_problem_resolver::generic_problem_resolver(int,
> >int, int, int, unsigned int,
John Halton wrote:
On 12/28/06, John Halton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having problems with updating/installing with aptitude, on a mixed
Etch/Sid system. When running "aptitude update", the output ends with
the following:
Err http://ftp.debian.org sid/main Packages
416 Requested Range Not
On 12/28/06, John Halton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having problems with updating/installing with aptitude, on a mixed
Etch/Sid system. When running "aptitude update", the output ends with
the following:
Err http://ftp.debian.org sid/main Packages
416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable
Then wh
I'm having problems with updating/installing with aptitude, on a mixed
Etch/Sid system. When running "aptitude update", the output ends with
the following:
Err http://ftp.debian.org sid/main Packages
416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable
Then when I try to install/dist-upgrade, I get the following
also sprach Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.23.0204 +0200]:
> Not neccesarily. I have seen apt processing spew weird messages
> WRT broken bzip2 decompression. Apparently something is buggy
> there, but the problem disappears after rerunning update.
Now that you mention it, I did see thi
#include
* martin f krafft [Thu, Jun 22 2006, 02:03:55PM]:
> also sprach Martin Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.22.1846 +0200]:
> > APT::Cache-Limit "141943904";
>
> woho. I don't even set this anymore and:
>
> $ grep -v '^#' /etc/apt/sources.list | wc -l
> 34 /etc/apt/sources.list
>
>
also sprach Martin Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.22.1846 +0200]:
> APT::Cache-Limit "141943904";
woho. I don't even set this anymore and:
$ grep -v '^#' /etc/apt/sources.list | wc -l
34 /etc/apt/sources.list
Anyway, I think your bzip2 problems may be related to a caching
proxy somewher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martin Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.22.1820 +0200]:
>
>>i just did as said page advises, and i still get the same error message.
>
>
> Mh. Have you tried increasing the value to 32k?
i tried out the fol
also sprach Martin Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.22.1820 +0200]:
> i just did as said page advises, and i still get the same error message.
Mh. Have you tried increasing the value to 32k?
I have never hit the 16k limit, even with
stable/testing/unstable/experimental and a bunch of other arc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martin Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.22.1732 +0200]:
>
>>E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
>
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Dynamic+MMap+ran+out+of+room%22&btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky
> (http://ju
also sprach Martin Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.22.1732 +0200]:
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Dynamic+MMap+ran+out+of+room%22&btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky
(http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/)
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
i have a problem with apt-get. upon running apt-get update or apt-get
install, i get some error messages (are attached).
this is happening since yesterday, my apt-get used to work until then
and i dont remember changing anything of note betwee
Hello all,
I recently installed a new computer with the newest copy of the debian
testing on it. I got back in the system to add programs and update others
with apt-get and I continue to get these errors. Is there a way that I
dont know about to get around these? I have also tried to change over
Marcelle Santos wrote:
> hi, I'm trying to change the address used by apt-get.
>
> I changed the adddress in apt-setup, but it doesn't work: apt-get
> continues to search the broken address.
>
> does any one how can I make apt-get aware of the changes?
>
I usually just edit /etc/apt/sources.lst wi
hi, I'm trying to change the address used by apt-get.
I changed the adddress in apt-setup, but it doesn't work: apt-get continues to search the broken address.
does any one how can I make apt-get aware of the changes?
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:26:13AM +1000, Brendon Lloyd Higgins wrote:
> Sebastian Luque wrote (Wednesday 27 July 2005 7:12 am):
> > > I don't know what's going on in the mirror system. I had some weirdness
> > > over the last 3 or 4 days where I wasn't showing any new upgrades.
> > > One or two da
Sebastian Luque wrote (Wednesday 27 July 2005 7:12 am):
> > I don't know what's going on in the mirror system. I had some weirdness
> > over the last 3 or 4 days where I wasn't showing any new upgrades.
> > One or two days I don't think anything of it, when it stretches to 3 or
> > 4 I start to won
Seeker5528 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> The non-us repository is not used any more so this is expected and you
> should remove non-us from your sources.list file.
You're right, I just found this out. I came across
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/06/msg00719.html that cleared
that
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:13:04 -0500
Sebastian Luque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been about a week since I can't solve this problem, despite trying
> several different mirrors. This is what I see:
>
> ,-
> | Get:10 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [197B]
> | Get:11
Hi,
It's been about a week since I can't solve this problem, despite trying
several different mirrors. This is what I see:
,-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-get update
| Ign http://apt.mepis.org unstable Release.gpg
| Ign http://apt.mepis.org unstable Release
| Ign http://apt.mepis.org unstable/main
Jonas Jasas wrote:
Where that pre-removal script is kept? I gues that problem is in permitions, what
other problems
can be with that script?
Preparing to replace finger 0.17-6 (using .../finger_0.17-7_i386.deb) ...
dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute old pre-removal script: Permission denied
dpkg
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:25:34AM -0700, Jonas Jasas wrote:
> Where that pre-removal script is kept? I gues that problem is in permitions, what
> other problems
> can be with that script?
>
> Preparing to replace finger 0.17-6 (using .../finger_0.17-7_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg (subprocess): unable to
I'm sure someone will give a better answer, but I'd use strace to find
out what file it's trying to execute.
I guess somewhere in /var/apt though.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 02:25:34 -0700 (PDT), Jonas Jasas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Where that pre-removal script is kept? I gues that problem is in
Where that pre-removal script is kept? I gues that problem is in permitions, what
other problems
can be with that script?
Preparing to replace finger 0.17-6 (using .../finger_0.17-7_i386.deb) ...
dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute old pre-removal script: Permission denied
dpkg: warning - old pr
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 07:03:23AM -0700, Dirk Ouellette wrote:
I hope I'm not being rude in posting here, but I have a problem with apt
on my RedHat 9 box. When I apt-get update or try to upgrade,my system
gets as far as ;
# apt-get update
E: Could not get lock /var/state/apt/lists/lock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 07:03:23AM -0700, Dirk Ouellette wrote:
> I hope I'm not being rude in posting here, but I have a problem with apt
> on my RedHat 9 box. When I apt-get update or try to upgrade,my system
> gets as far as ;
Well, you might want
I hope I'm not being rude in posting here, but I have a problem with apt
on my RedHat 9 box. When I apt-get update or try to upgrade,my system
gets as far as ;
Fetched 1500kB in 27s (55.4kB/s)
Reading Package Lists... 66%
and then hangs. This came on out of nowhere though possibly when I
upgraded
>You picked the wrong time to be in testing. This is a documented bug,
>read this for more details:
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announc
e->200303/msg6.html
Well, I am glad that it wasn't just me then. Thankyou.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:37:44AM +0100, Jan Johansson wrote:
> What does this mean? All the dependencies _are_ installed. But why wont
> php still install? (Debian/Testin)
php4 is currently broken in testing
Frank
> scooter:~# apt-get install php4
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dep
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:37:44AM +0100, Jan Johansson wrote:
> What does this mean? All the dependencies _are_ installed. But why wont
> php still install? (Debian/Testin)
You picked the wrong time to be in testing. This is a documented bug,
read this for more details:
http://lists.debian.org/de
What does this mean? All the dependencies _are_ installed. But why wont
php still install? (Debian/Testin)
scooter:~# apt-get install php4
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situat
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:11:45PM +, rehm wrote:
> I'm having problems updating my software list for dselect.
> Under the debian documentation, if I got anything wrong, to update my
> dselect list by using iso cd's i made of Woody r3, I would go
>
> -> apt-cdrom add ..which is succesful fo
I'm having problems updating my software list for dselect.
Under the debian documentation, if I got anything wrong, to update my
dselect list by using iso cd's i made of Woody r3, I would go
-> apt-cdrom add ..which is succesful for all 7 that i got.
the etc/apt/sources.lst gets
On 18/10/02 Jacques Kotze did speaketh:
> I am behind the firewall of my University. There exists an archive with
> the full resource of Debian behind the firewall that I would like to get
> access to using apt-get inorder to complete a full package installation
> of my system.
>
> I have conf
Hi,
I am a linux newbie and am attempting my first real Linux installation
from scratch. I have only the first cd of Debian woody dist and have
managed to install a very basic system from this including X.
I am behind the firewall of my University. There exists an archive with
the full resourc
Am 04. Sep, 2001 schwäzte John Galt so:
> Pretty often actually. Have multiple sources, be prepared to comment out
> the ones that don't work right now, and re-update and re-upgrade if the
> situation occurs again. Basically, http.us.debian.org is never the most
> trustworthy under the best of c
Pretty often actually. Have multiple sources, be prepared to comment out
the ones that don't work right now, and re-update and re-upgrade if the
situation occurs again. Basically, http.us.debian.org is never the most
trustworthy under the best of circumstances, and sometimes can be a real
bitch,
"Mike Kuhar" wrote:
>Good evening Fellow Debians,
>
>I went to do an apt-get upgrade, just a few moments ago, after doing an upda
>te
>on unstable. It told me I had 54 packages to upgrade. The problem is that
>only
>half actually downloaded and upgraded from http.us.debian.
Good evening Fellow Debians,
I went to do an apt-get upgrade, just a few moments ago, after doing an update
on unstable. It told me I had 54 packages to upgrade. The problem is that only
half actually downloaded and upgraded from http.us.debian.org. The rest 404'd
on me. What gives? Any one e
@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: apt problems with http.us.debian.org?
"Mike Kuhar" wrote:
>Good evening Fellow Debians,
>
>I went to do an apt-get upgrade, just a few moments ago, after doing an upda
>te
>on unstable. It told me I had 54 packages to upgr
thneed:~# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libc6-dev libstdc++2.10-dev libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
3 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 306 not upgra
Forrest English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Preparing to replace libc6-dev 2.2.2-4 (using
>.../libc6-dev_2.2.3-5_i386.deb) ...
>Unpacking replacement libc6-dev ...
>dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-dev_2.2.3-5_i386.deb
>(--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/rpcgen', which
On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 at 11:32:55 -0700, Forrest English wrote:
> thneed:/usr/bin# apt-get -o DPkg::Options::--force-overwrite -f install
> E: Option DPkg::Options::--force-overwrite: Configuration item
> sepecification must have an =.
>
> did i do somthing stupid? i'm not real familier with what t
On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 at 13:53:07 -0700, Forrest English wrote:
> didn't seem to change anything, same results exactly.
Bleh. If that didn't work, then 'dpkg -i --force-overwrite
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-dev_2.2.3-5_i386.deb' definitely should.
You could edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/netbase.files, b
didn't seem to change anything, same results exactly. is there a way to
disasociate that file with netbase?
thneed:~# apt-get -o DPkg::Options=--force-overwrite -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I get the following error message
>
>home:/home/daniel# apt-get -f install
>Reading Package Lists... Done
>Building Dependency Tree... Done
>Correcting dependencies... failed.
>Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libesd0: Depends: esound-common b
Maybe esound-common is still an old version. You could try a apt-get
update before trying again, because esound-common could have been
updated.
Wouter
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:12:50AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
> I had something similar happen when I did woody->sid dist-upgrade.
>
> Anyway, m
I had something similar happen when I did woody->sid dist-upgrade.
Anyway, make sure that the 2 other 'esound' packages are selected for
installation also. This solved (one of) my problem(s) - hope it works
for you :)
R.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 03:55:39AM +0200, Daniel Mashao wrote:
> I get th
I get the following error message
home:/home/daniel# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... failed.
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
libesd0: Depends: esound-common but it is not installed
E: Error,
on Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:41:24PM -0500, Michelle Murrain ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> The result of a dumb mistake:
>
> I wanted to upgrade a particular package from woody, and in the middle, it
> stopped because it didn't have a newer copy of libc6. I decided at that point
> that I would for
The result of a dumb mistake:
I wanted to upgrade a particular package from woody, and in the middle, it
stopped because it didn't have a newer copy of libc6. I decided at that point
that I would forgo the upgrade. However, somehow, part of it got installed
somehow, and now I can't install anyt
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 01:36:38AM -0500, eric k. wolven wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I recently ran "apt-get update" and "apt-get dist-upgrade" (I have woody).
>
> I get this message:
>
> "/usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared library: libdb.so.3 : cannot open
See debian weekly news:
"Be careful. If
Hi!
I recently ran "apt-get update" and "apt-get dist-upgrade" (I have woody).
I get this message:
"/usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared library: libdb.so.3 : cannot open
shared object file: no such file or library
E: Write error - write (32 Broken pipe)
E: Failure running script: /usr/sb
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Neilen Marais wrote:
> trick. But what then is the function of the apt.conf file? What am I
> missing out on? I like fiddling in conf files
You fiddled it wrong.. That config file is not ment for general use, it
does 'weird' things.
Jason
Hello
On 17-Jan-2000 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Neilen Marais wrote:
>
>> If I choose the apt method in dselect, and do an update, I get the
>> following problem after the package files have been downloaded:
>
> 'rm /etc/apt/apt.conf'
>
> Jason
>
I moved the apt.conf f
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Neilen Marais wrote:
> If I choose the apt method in dselect, and do an update, I get the
> following problem after the package files have been downloaded:
'rm /etc/apt/apt.conf'
Jason
Hi All
I can't seem to get my dselect and apt-get to play niceley.
If I choose the apt method in dselect, and do an update, I get the
following problem after the package files have been downloaded:
Get:1 ftp://ftp.cdrom.com potato/main Packages [847kB]
Get:2 ftp://ftp.cdrom.com potato/main Rele
Whenever I use apt-get install or use apt method in dselect,
I get the following error after the files are downloaded:
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
/bin/sh: dpkg-preconfig: command not found
E: Sub-process dpkg-preconfig --apt --priority=low --frontend=dialog
returned an error code (127)
E: Fail
On Sat, 5 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have main and contrib on CD, and I have non-free in a separate
> partition on one of my hard drives (I wasn't able to find CD's for
> this). This was not a problem under the last version, as I could tell
> dselect that I was mounting from a directo
I am having a bit of trouble getting some packages installed from the slink
distribution.
I have main and contrib on CD, and I have non-free in a separate partition on
one of my hard drives (I wasn't able to find CD's for this). This was not a
problem under the last version, as I could tell ds
On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Robert Kerr wrote:
> I think the problem may lie in my sources.list. does anyone have an
> example one that I could look at? I would like to access the frozen us
> sections, and the non-us section.
You need another package installed to do the ftp transfers (see the apt
guid
I don't believe www.debian.org is a site containing Debian packages. The
apt package includes a sources.list which contains both us and non-us
sites which will work.
I have attached a copy.
There are others, such as llug.sep.bnl.gov (hopefully README.mirrors will
list them some day).
Bob
On Th
Hi all,
when I run dselect using apt as the method, I go to update and I get these
errors.
Get http://www.debian.org frozen/contrib Packages
Error http://www.debian.org frozen/contrib Packages
404 Not Found
Get http://www.debian.org frozen/main Packages
Error h
Bob Nielsen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Steve Mayer wrote:
>
> > Chris,
> >
> > I ran into this same problem after updating to the lastest
> > libc6_2.0.7r-2. The dependency in the latest apt is looking for
> > something >= 2.0.7pre1-0. I guess that it doesn't see 2.0.7r-2 as being
> > "g
On Fri, Jun 26, 1998 at 08:36:09AM -0700, Steve Mayer wrote:
> I ran into this same problem after updating to the lastest
> libc6_2.0.7r-2. The dependency in the latest apt is looking for
> something >= 2.0.7pre1-0. I guess that it doesn't see 2.0.7r-2 as being
> "greaterthan or equal to".
>
>
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Steve Mayer wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I ran into this same problem after updating to the lastest
> libc6_2.0.7r-2. The dependency in the latest apt is looking for
> something >= 2.0.7pre1-0. I guess that it doesn't see 2.0.7r-2 as being
> "greaterthan or equal to".
>
> Somet
Chris,
I ran into this same problem after updating to the lastest
libc6_2.0.7r-2. The dependency in the latest apt is looking for
something >= 2.0.7pre1-0. I guess that it doesn't see 2.0.7r-2 as being
"greaterthan or equal to".
Something was posted on this list a few days ago about this be
Hello again,
I'm having a problem with apt. I've just done an upgrade of my hamm
system with a few updated packages, and now everytime I run apt, it wants
to remove its own package. The following is a sample session with apt:
mort:~# apt-get update
Get ftp://ftp.questnet.net.au stable/binary-
71 matches
Mail list logo
