On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:59:38PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 08:46:28PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 14 Jan 2025 at 00:53:43 (+), Andy Smith wrote:
> > > Most people do not use a good MUA. The email interfaces of the top three
> > > mailbox provi
Hi David,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 08:46:28PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 14 Jan 2025 at 00:53:43 (+), Andy Smith wrote:
> > Most people do not use a good MUA. The email interfaces of the top three
> > mailbox providers split threads when the subject line changes, a
> > misfeature I was
Bret Busby wrote:
> > This is not a forum. Please do not change the title. It creates a new
> > thread with no context disjoint from thread where the problem was
> > solved..
...
> If a person interested in the thread, from the wording of the Subject field,
> reads the messages in the thread, th
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:55:05 +
> Chris Green wrote:
>
> > Anyway I have it back now. :-)
>
> Glad to hear it.
>
> For the benefit of future readers, please mark the thread as solved.
>
How do I do that via the Gmane/Usenet gateway?
--
Chris Green
·
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:15 AM wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > This is not a forum. Please do not change the title. It creates a new
> > thread with no context disjoint from thread where the problem was
> > solved..
>
> It only creates a
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
[...]
> This is not a forum. Please do not change the title. It creates a new
> thread with no context disjoint from thread where the problem was
> solved..
It only creates a new thread if you have an inferior MUA. Those respecting
On 14/01/2025 07:53, Andy Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:41:17AM +, Alain D D Williams wrote:
It is not just the Subject: but also the In-Reply-To: and References: headers.
A good MUA (mail reader) will use these to deduce what is in reply to what and
have the ability to show an em
On Tue 14 Jan 2025 at 00:53:43 (+), Andy Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:41:17AM +, Alain D D Williams wrote:
> > It is not just the Subject: but also the In-Reply-To: and References:
> > headers.
> > A good MUA (mail reader) will use these to deduce what is in reply to what
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:41:17AM +, Alain D D Williams wrote:
> It is not just the Subject: but also the In-Reply-To: and References: headers.
> A good MUA (mail reader) will use these to deduce what is in reply to what and
> have the ability to show an email 'thread'. I use mutt which d
On Tue 14 Jan 2025 at 07:47:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> On 14/1/25 07:28, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 6:13 PM Charles Curley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:55:05 + Chris Green wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyway I have it back now. :-)
> > >
> > > Glad to hear it.
> > >
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 05:30:19PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> Many list servers serve up their archives with subject line and other
> information but not the body. By modifying the subject appropriately one
> makes it possible for a reader to quickly scan the subject, making
> reading the enti
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:28:55 -0500
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >
> > For the benefit of future readers, please mark the thread as
> > solved.
>
> This is not a forum. Please do not change the title. It creates a new
> thread with no context disjoint from thread where the problem was
> solved..
Th
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 07:47:04 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> Also, the use of prepending, involving the "square brackets",
> generally indicates the name of a mailing list, for example, [GNC]
> for GNUcash.
OK, then how would you do it?
"Re: British English has disappeared: SOLVED"?
> If a person in
On 14/1/25 07:28, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 6:13 PM Charles Curley
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:55:05 +
Chris Green wrote:
Anyway I have it back now. :-)
Glad to hear it.
For the benefit of future readers, please mark the thread as solved.
This is not a forum.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 6:13 PM Charles Curley
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:55:05 +
> Chris Green wrote:
>
> > Anyway I have it back now. :-)
>
> Glad to hear it.
>
> For the benefit of future readers, please mark the thread as solved.
This is not a forum. Please do not change the title
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:55:05 +
Chris Green wrote:
> Anyway I have it back now. :-)
Glad to hear it.
For the benefit of future readers, please mark the thread as solved.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/
16 matches
Mail list logo
