Hi folks,
Following up on Karsten's (I think) advice, I went to www.mozilla.org to
check out the bugs filed against mozilla, and there was one regarding
junkbuster. I think the specific error was for something else, but the
advice it gave was to turn off `Enable Keepalive' under Debug ->
Networkin
on Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 03:31:32PM +1100, Damon Muller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Quoth kmself@ix.netcom.com,
> > From the symptoms you're describing and the responses so far, I'd
> > suggest you start posting URLs of sites at which you're observing this
> > behavior. Sounds like it could be a
Quoth kmself@ix.netcom.com,
> From the symptoms you're describing and the responses so far, I'd
> suggest you start posting URLs of sites at which you're observing this
> behavior. Sounds like it could be any of several things.
Just off the top of my head, from my browsing this morning, I got a
on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 05:40:37PM +1100, Damon Muller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> Is anyone else using junkbuster (vanilla potato version) and Mozilla
> (recent/latest nightlies)? I'm using the above combination and
> junkbuster doesn't seem to work very well anymore. I can't see h
([<> On 1 Nov 2000, some witty mortal wrote: <>])
> WRT the javascript thing, it's also a possibility, as mozilla probably
> has support for some tricks that netscape doesnt.
Maybe the ads are in the form of inline frames ? I know that a lot of
banner ads are starting to combine inline frames w
Quoth Brendan Cully,
> hmm, interesting. I've been getting more banners and cookies since I
> started using mozilla, too. I figured it was because evil web
> advertisers had wised up and were using javascript to do all their
> devilish cookie/banner code (I don't think junkbuster attempts to edit
I had to stop using junkbuster a while ago because Mozilla really
didn't like using it. Something about http 1.0 and 1.1, but for a
long time Mozilla just plain didn't work with proxies. I ended up
doing some work arounds to keep the ads from getting too annoying.
Obviously, use the Mozilla cook
On Tuesday, 31 October 2000 at 17:40, Damon Muller wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> What I mean by `not working' is that lots of banner ads are getting
> through that shouldn't. A page (slashdot.org, for example), where
> logging junkbuster at level 1 (shows all objects fetched), and where all
> the ad URLs
Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Likewise I'm getting alerts about cookies even through I've set
> junkbuster to ignore all cookies.
Maybe make sure the user-agent and referer config params are doing
what you want. -chris
There were problems with Mozilla and proxies in the past,
perhaps there's been a regression somewhere. Please
search for/file a bug at mozilla.org
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 07:19:43PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote:
> Quoth Philipp Schulte,
> > > Is anyone else using junkbuster (vanilla potato version)
Quoth Philipp Schulte,
> > Is anyone else using junkbuster (vanilla potato version) and Mozilla
> > (recent/latest nightlies)? I'm using the above combination and
> > junkbuster doesn't seem to work very well anymore. I can't see how it
> > could be possible, but I was wondering if maybe junkbuste
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 05:40:37PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote:
> Is anyone else using junkbuster (vanilla potato version) and Mozilla
> (recent/latest nightlies)? I'm using the above combination and
> junkbuster doesn't seem to work very well anymore. I can't see how it
> could be possible, but I
Hi gang,
Is anyone else using junkbuster (vanilla potato version) and Mozilla
(recent/latest nightlies)? I'm using the above combination and
junkbuster doesn't seem to work very well anymore. I can't see how it
could be possible, but I was wondering if maybe junkbuster didn't work
as well with Moz
13 matches
Mail list logo
